Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 4/2010

01.05.2010

Development of the WHOQOL disabilities module

verfasst von: M. J. Power, A. M. Green, The WHOQOL-Dis Group

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 4/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This paper describes the development of an add-on module for the World Health Organization WHOQOL measures of quality of life for use with adults with physical or intellectual disabilities. The add-on module, known as the WHOQOL-DIS, was derived following standard WHOQOL methodology and is designed to assess people with disabilities.

Results

In the pilot phase of the study, 12 centres from around the world carried out focus groups with people with physical disabilities, people with intellectual disabilities, with their carers, and with relevant professionals in order to identify gaps in the coverage of the WHOQOL-BREF that were relevant for their quality of life. Items generated from the focus groups were then tested in a pilot study with 1,400 respondents from 15 different centres worldwide, with items being tested and reduced using both classical and modern psychometric methods. A field trial study was then carried out with almost 3,800 respondents, again with the use of both classical and modern psychometric methods.

Conclusions

The outcome of the two rounds of data collection and analysis is a 12-item module that can be used in conjunction with the WHOQOL-BREF or the WHOQOL-100 for assessment of quality of life in physically or intellectually disabled people. Further modifications are also proposed for the use of the WHOQOL-BREF with adults with intellectual disabilities, including simplification of wording of some of the items, the use of a three-point response scale, and the inclusion of smiley faces.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat The WHOQOL Group. (1998). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 1569–1585.CrossRef The WHOQOL Group. (1998). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 1569–1585.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Power, M. J., Quinn, K., Schmidt, S., & The WHOQOL-OLD Group. (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Quality of Life Research, 14, 2197–2214.CrossRefPubMed Power, M. J., Quinn, K., Schmidt, S., & The WHOQOL-OLD Group. (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Quality of Life Research, 14, 2197–2214.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (1994). Moving out: Relocation from hospital to community. London: HMSO. Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (1994). Moving out: Relocation from hospital to community. London: HMSO.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schalock, R. L., & Keith, K. D. (1994). Quality of life questionnaire. Worthington, OH: IDS Publishing Corporation. Schalock, R. L., & Keith, K. D. (1994). Quality of life questionnaire. Worthington, OH: IDS Publishing Corporation.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing quality of life. In R. I. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for people with disabilities: Models, research and practice, 2nd edn. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes. Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing quality of life. In R. I. Brown (Ed.), Quality of life for people with disabilities: Models, research and practice, 2nd edn. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat The WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–555.CrossRef The WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–555.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Power, M. J., Bullinger, M., Harper, A., & The WHOQOL Group. (1999). The world health organization WHOQOL-100: Tests of the universality of quality of life in fifteen different cultural groups world-wide. Health Psychology, 18, 495–505.CrossRefPubMed Power, M. J., Bullinger, M., Harper, A., & The WHOQOL Group. (1999). The world health organization WHOQOL-100: Tests of the universality of quality of life in fifteen different cultural groups world-wide. Health Psychology, 18, 495–505.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat The WHOQOL-DIS Group. Focus Group paper [in prep]. The WHOQOL-DIS Group. Focus Group paper [in prep].
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hays, R. D., Hayashi, T., Carson, S., & Ware, J. E. (1988). User’s guide for the multitrait analysis program (MAP). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation (N-2786-RC). Hays, R. D., Hayashi, T., Carson, S., & Ware, J. E. (1988). User’s guide for the multitrait analysis program (MAP). Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation (N-2786-RC).
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrich, D. (2005). RUMM2020: Rasch unidimensional measurement models. Perth: RUMM Laboratory. Andrich, D. (2005). RUMM2020: Rasch unidimensional measurement models. Perth: RUMM Laboratory.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (2002). EQS 6 for windows user’s guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc. Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (2002). EQS 6 for windows user’s guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modelling as a unitary framework for binary and likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense. Zumbo, B. D. (1999). A handbook on the theory and methods of differential item functioning (DIF): Logistic regression modelling as a unitary framework for binary and likert-type (ordinal) item scores. Ottawa, ON: Directorate of Human Resources Research and Evaluation, Department of National Defense.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HITTM). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913–933.CrossRefPubMed Bjorner, J. B., Kosinski, M., & Ware, J. E. (2003). Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HITTM). Quality of Life Research, 12, 913–933.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chachamovich, E., Fleck, M. P., Trentini, C., & Power, M. J. (2008). Brazilian WHOQOL-OLD module version: Rasch analysis of a new instrument. Revista de Saude Publica, 42, 308–316.PubMed Chachamovich, E., Fleck, M. P., Trentini, C., & Power, M. J. (2008). Brazilian WHOQOL-OLD module version: Rasch analysis of a new instrument. Revista de Saude Publica, 42, 308–316.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization. (2001). The World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS II). Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2001). The World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS II). Geneva: World Health Organization.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bullinger, M., Power, M. J., Aronson, N. K., Cella, D. F., & Anderson, R. T. (1996). Creating and evaluating cross-cultural instruments. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd edn. Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott-Raven. Bullinger, M., Power, M. J., Aronson, N. K., Cella, D. F., & Anderson, R. T. (1996). Creating and evaluating cross-cultural instruments. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, 2nd edn. Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott-Raven.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueda, S., & Okawa, Y. (2003). The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: What is it and what is it for? Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 596–601.CrossRefPubMed Ueda, S., & Okawa, Y. (2003). The subjective dimension of functioning and disability: What is it and what is it for? Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 596–601.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 977–988.CrossRefPubMed Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 977–988.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Grundy, E., & Glaser, K. (2000). Socio-demographic differences in the onset and progression of disability in early old age: a longitudinal study. Age and Ageing;, 29, 149–157.CrossRefPubMed Grundy, E., & Glaser, K. (2000). Socio-demographic differences in the onset and progression of disability in early old age: a longitudinal study. Age and Ageing;, 29, 149–157.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Perrig-Chiello, P., Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Stähelin, H. B., & Perrig, W. J. (2009). Personality and health in middle age as predictors for well-being and health in old age. European Journal of Ageing, 6(1), 27–37. Perrig-Chiello, P., Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Stähelin, H. B., & Perrig, W. J. (2009). Personality and health in middle age as predictors for well-being and health in old age. European Journal of Ageing, 6(1), 27–37.
Metadaten
Titel
Development of the WHOQOL disabilities module
verfasst von
M. J. Power
A. M. Green
The WHOQOL-Dis Group
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2010
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 4/2010
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-010-9616-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2010

Quality of Life Research 4/2010 Zur Ausgabe