Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Quality of Life Research
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 8/2014

01.10.2014

Comparison between the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-3L in patients with hepatitis B

verfasst von: Y. X. Jia, F. Q. Cui, L. Li, D. L. Zhang, G. M Zhang, F. Z. Wang, X. H. Gong, H. Zheng, Z. H. Wu, N. Miao, X. J. Sun, L. Zhang, J. J. Lv, F. Yang

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of the study was to compare psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L (5L) and the EQ-5D-3L (3L) health outcomes assessment instruments in patients with hepatitis B in China.

Methods

Patients, including hepatitis B virus carriers and those with active or inactive chronic hepatitis B, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma, answered a questionnaire composed of 5L, socio-demographic information, 3L, and the visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. After 1 week, a retest was conducted for inpatients. We compared acceptability, face validity, redistribution properties, convergent validity, known-group validity, discriminatory power, ceiling effect, test–retest reliability, and responsiveness of 5L and 3L.

Results

A total of 369 outpatients and 276 inpatients were recruited for the first interview. Of the inpatients, 183 were used in the retest. Most patients preferred 5L–3L. The 3L–5L response pairs had an inconsistency rate of 2.4 %. Correlation with the VAS was greater with 5L than with 3L. Age, education, and comorbidity were associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). 5L discriminated more infectious conditions than 3L. In all dimensions, the Shannon’s index from 5L was larger while in three dimensions the Shannon’s evenness index from 5L was slightly larger. The ceiling effect was reduced in 5L. In patients with stable health states, no significant difference was detected in the weighted kappa between 5L and 3L, but intraclass correlation coefficient of 5L was higher than that of 3L. In patients with improved health states, HRQoL was seen as increased in both 5L and 3L, without significant difference.

Conclusions

The EQ-5D-5L was more suitable than the EQ-5D-3L in the patients with hepatitis B in China.
Literatur
1.
2.
3.
Brazier, J., Deverill, M., & Green, C. (1999). A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 4(3), 174–184.PubMed
4.
Revicki, D. A., & Lenderking, W. R. (2012). Methods and issues associated with the use of quality-adjusted life-years. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 12(1), 105–114.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zhang, F., Fu, S. Y., Wang, M., & Du, J. (2009). Correlation empirical research on the quality of life of Chinese patients with acute ischemic stoke measured by EQ-5D. China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics, 6, 5–12.
6.
Wu, Y. Q., Liu, K., Tang, X., Cao, Y., Wang, J. W., Li, N., et al. (2012). Empirical research of measuring elderly health utility in the outskirts of Beijing by using European quality of life 5-Dimensions. Journal of Peking University (Health Science), 44(3), 397–402.
7.
Zhou, L., Jin, H., Deng, Z. H., Cheng, X. W., Li, Z., Hu, S. X., et al. (2012). Measuring quality of life of hospitalized patients with severe acute respiratory infection by EQ-5D instrument: An exploratory study. Practical Preventive Medicine, 19(5), 644–647.
8.
Luo, Y. J., Fang, Y., & Ding, X. S. (2009). Quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes measured by EQ-5D and its influential factors analysis. China Journal of Pharmaceutical Economics, 2, 12–18.
9.
He, M. M., & Wu, M. (2009). Using EQ-5D to preliminarily analyze the relation between living mode and health condition in a district in Beijing. Chinese Journal of Gerontology, 29(4), 478–481.
10.
Wang, H. M., Patrick, D. L., Edwards, T. C., Skalicky, A. M., Zeng, H. Y., & Gu, W. W. (2012). Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China. Quality of Life Research, 21(1), 155–160.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Kopec, J. A., & Willison, K. D. (2003). A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(4), 317–325.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Brazier, J., Deverill, M., & Green, C. (1999). A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 4(3), 174–184.PubMed
13.
Kopec, J., & Willison, K. (2003). A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(4), 317–325.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Scalone, L., Ciampichini, R., Fagiuoli, S., Gardini, I., Fusco, F., Gaeta, L., et al. (2012). Comparing the performance of the standard EQ-5D 3L with the new version EQ-5D 5L in patients with chronic hepatic diseases. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1707–1716.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Kim, S. H., Kim, H. J., Lee, S. I., et al. (2012). Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea. Quality of Life Research, 21(6), 1065–1073.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Janssen, M. F., Birnie, E., Haagsma, J. A., & Bonsel, G. J. (2008). Comparing the standard EQ-5D three-level system with a five-level version. Value in Health, 11(2), 275–284.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Pickard, A. S., De Leon, M. C., Kohlmann, T., Cella, D., & Rosenbloom, S. (2007). Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients. Medical Care, 45(3), 259–263.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Kim, T. H., Jo, M. W., Lee, S. I., Kim, S. H., & Chung, S. M. (2012). Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in the general population of South Korea. Quality of Life Research, 22(8), 2245–2253.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Tsuchiya, A., Ikeda, S., Ikegami, N., Nishimura, S., Sakai, I., Fukuda, T., et al. (2002). Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: The case of Japan. Health Economics, 11(4), 341–353.PubMedCrossRef
20.
van Hout, B., Janssen, M. F., Feng, Y. S., Kohlmann, T., Busschbach, J., Golicki, D., et al. (2012). Interim scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L value sets. Value in Health, 15(5), 708–715.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Janssen, M. F., Pickard, A. S., Golicki, D., Gudex, C., Niewada, M., Scalone, L., et al. (2013). Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: A multi-country study. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1717–1727.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
Cohen, J. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2000). Quality of Life-Assessment, Analysis, Interpretation. Chichester: Wiley.
24.
Sun, S., Chen, J., Johannesson, M., Kind, P., Xu, L., Zhang, Y., et al. (2011). Population health status in China: EQ-5D results, by age, sex and socio-economic status, from the National Health Services Survey 2008. Quality of Life Research, 20(3), 309–320.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
Wang, H., Kindig, D. A., & Mullahy, J. (2005). Variation in Chinese population health related quality of life: Results from a EuroQol study in Beijing, China. Quality of Life Research, 14(1), 119–132.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.CrossRef
27.
Janssen, M. F., Birnie, E., & Bonsel, G. J. (2007). Evaluation the discriminatory power of EQ-5D, HUI2, and HUI3 in a US general population survey using Shannon’s indices. Quality of Life Research, 16(5), 895–904.PubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Pickard, A. S., Kohlmann, T., Janssen, M. F., Bonsel, G., Rosenbloom, S., & Cella, D. (2007). Evaluating equivalency between response systems: Application of the Rasch model to a 3-level and 5-level EQ-5D. Medical Care, 45(9), 812–819.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison between the EQ-5D-5L and the EQ-5D-3L in patients with hepatitis B
verfasst von
Y. X. Jia
F. Q. Cui
L. Li
D. L. Zhang
G. M Zhang
F. Z. Wang
X. H. Gong
H. Zheng
Z. H. Wu
N. Miao
X. J. Sun
L. Zhang
J. J. Lv
F. Yang
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0670-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

Quality of Life Research 8/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Book Review

Cappelleri JC, Zou KH, Bushmakin AG, Alvir JMJ, Alemayehu D, Symonds T: Patient-reported outcomes, measurement, implementation and interpretation

OriginalPaper

Factorial structural analysis of the Spanish version of WHOQOL-BREF: an exploratory structural equation model study

OriginalPaper

Using WOMAC Index scores and personal characteristics to estimate Assessment of Quality of Life utility scores in people with hip and knee joint disease

OriginalPaper

Health impact of sport and exercise in emerging adult men: a prospective study

OriginalPaper

Exploring psychometric properties of the SF-6D, a preference-based health-related quality of life measure, in the context of spinal cord injury

Brief Communication

Patient education, upper-limb symptom perception, and quality of life among Japanese breast cancer survivors