Skip to main content
Log in

Substance use among adolescent students with consideration of budget constraints

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper estimates the demand for cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana with consideration of the other goods that might exist in a teenager’s utility function. Youth tend to have small incomes and limited wants, with the result that many students spend the bulk of their income on only a few items such as fast food, clothing, and entertainment. In this paper, we examine the influence of changes in the prices of goods commonly bought by teenagers on the demand for cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. We estimate own and cross price effects using the prices of the illicit substances and other consumer products including gasoline, clothing, entertainment, and fast food. Income effects are also estimated and show that teens with higher incomes and allowances are more likely to use substances. The implications of higher excise taxes on different products are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An alternative estimation strategy might be to use an Almost Ideal Demand System (AIDS). The estimation of AIDS requires data on expenditures for all goods in the system. While we have measures of prices for many products, quantity data is only available for cigarettes, alcohol and marijuana.

  2. Dropouts are much more likely to live with no parents (32% of dropouts live with no parents as opposed to 10% for teens in school), and have much higher average earned incomes.

  3. Models were tested with the per capita number of employees and results do not change. The absolute number of employees is used as a proxy for presence of large breweries within the state.

  4. Linear probability models are used for the participation equations with the standard errors adjusted according to White (1980).

  5. Eighty-nine percent of the sample remains in the same county, and 95% remain within the same state during the sample period.

  6. ACCRA also provides gasoline prices, however, these prices pertain only to recognized national brands and exclude regional discount brands which may be an important source for gas sales to young drivers. Also, given the frequent variations in gas prices, we prefer the monthly Department of Energy price to the ACCRA quarterly price. Results with the ACCRA price are similar, with some exceptions, and are available upon request.

References

  • ACCRA. (Various years). Inter-city cost of living index. Louisville, KY: ACCRA.

  • Bailey, A. W. (1992). Teenagers’ employment, earnings and spending. Journal of Home Economics, 84(2), 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bask, M., & Melkersson, M. (2004). Rationally addicted to drinking and smoking? Applied Economics, 36(4), 373–381. doi:10.1080/00036840410001674295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., Rice, C., & Harvey, R. (1985). Adolescents’ reported saving, giving, and spending as a function of sources of income. In E. C. Hirschman & M. B. Holbrook (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 12, pp. 42–46). Holbrook, Provo: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. Report on the Youth Labor Force. (June, 2000). http://www.bls.gov/opub/rylf/rylfhome.htm. Accessed 6 Oct 2005.

  • Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (August 8, 2003). Characteristics of minimum wage workers: 2002. http://www.bls.gov/cps/minwage2002.htm. Accessed April 2006.

  • Busch, S. H., Jofre-Bonet, M., Falba, T. A., & Sindelar, J. L. (2004). Burning a hole in the budget: Tobacco spending and its crowd-out of other goods. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 3(4), 263–272. doi:10.2165/00148365-200403040-00009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L., & Williams, J. (2001). Cannabis, alcohol and cigarettes: Substitutes or complements? The Economic Record, 77(236), 19–34. doi:10.1111/1475-4932.00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawley, J. H., Tauras, J., & Markowitz, S. (2004). Lighting up and slimming down: The effects of body weight and cigarette prices on adolescent smoking initiation. Journal of Health Economics, 23(2), 293–311. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2003.12.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaloupka, F. J., & Warner, K. E. (2000). The Economics of smoking. In A. J. Cuyler & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), The handbook of health economics (pp. 1539–1627). North-Holland, New York: Elsevier Science B.V.

  • Chaloupka, F. J., & Laixuthai, A. (1997). Do youths substitute alcohol and marijuana? Some econometric evidence. Eastern Economic Journal, 23(3), 253–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaloupka, F. J., Pacula, R. L., Farrelly, M. C., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (1999). Do higher cigarette prices encourage youth to use marijuana? [Working Paper] (p. 6939). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers.

  • Coinstar. First coinstar teens talk poll reveals adolescents spend at least $264 each month. http://www.coinstar.com/US/PressReleases/453946?OpenDocument. Accessed 6 October 2005.

  • Cook, P. J., & Moore, M. J. (2000). Alcohol. In A. J. Cuyler & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), The handbook of health economics (pp. 1630–1673). North-Holland, New York: Elsevier Science B.V.

  • Decker, S. L., & Schwartz, A. E. (2000). Cigarettes and alcohol: Substitutes or complements? (p. 7535). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, NBER Working Papers.

  • Dee, T. S. (1999). The complementarity of teen smoking and drinking. Journal of Health Economics, 18(6), 769–793. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(99)00018-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiNardo, J., & Lemieux, T. (2001). Alcohol, marijuana, and American youth: The unintended consequences of government regulation. Journal of Health Economics, 20(6), 991–1010. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00102-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsett, R., & Marsh, A. (1998). The health trap: poverty, smoking, and lone parenthood. London: Policies Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doss, V. S., Marlowe, J., & Godwin, D. D. (1995). Middle-school children’s sources and uses of money. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 29(1), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly, M. C., Bray, J. W., Zarkin, G. A., & Wendling, B. W. (2001). The joint demand for cigarettes and marijuana: Evidence from the national household surveys on drug abuse. Journal of Health Economics, 20(1), 51–68. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(00)00067-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glied, S. (2002). Youth tobacco control: Reconciling theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Health Economics, 21(1), 117–135. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00118-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, R. K., & Morey, M. J. (1995). The interdependence of cigarette and liquor demand. Southern Economic Journal, 62(2), 451–459. doi:10.2307/1060696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M., Chaloupka, F. J., Saffer, H., & Laixuthai, A. (1994). Effects of alcohol price policy on youth: A summary of economic research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4(2), 347–364. doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0402_9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J., Sen, A., & Stabile, M. (2003). Estimating price elasticities when there is smuggling: The sensitivity of smoking to price in Canada. Journal of Health Economics, 22(5), 821–842. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00058-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. S., & Lino, M. (2000). Teenagers: Employment and contributions to family spending. Monthly Labor Review, 123, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J., & Dinardo, J. (1996). Econometric methods (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2005a). Decline in teen smoking appears to be nearing its end. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan News and Information Services [On-line]. www.monitoringthefuture.org. Accessed 2 Dec 2006.

  • Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2005b). Teen drug use down but progress halts among youngest teens. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan News and Information Services [On-line]. www.monitoringthefuture.org. Accessed 2 Dec 2006.

  • Jones, A. M. (1989). A systems approach to the demand for alcohol, tobacco. Bulletin of Economic Research, 41(2), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzman, B., Markowitz, S., & McGeary, K. A. (2007). An empirical investigation of the social market for cigarettes. Health Economics, 16(10), 1025–1039. doi:10.1002/hec.1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, D. S. (1996). New estimates of the optimal tax on alcohol. Economic Inquiry, 34(2), 296–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (1998). Teen green. American Demographics, 20(2), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeal, J. U. (1990). Children as customers. American Demographics, 12(9), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, C. B. (1998). Factors influencing adolescents’ income and expenditures. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 19(2), 131–150. doi:10.1023/A:1022948623549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacula, R. L. (1998). Does increasing the beer tax reduce marijuana consumption? Journal of Health Economics, 17(5), 557–585. doi:10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00039-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picone, G. A., Sloan, F., & Trogdon, J. G. (2004). The effect of the tobacco settlement and smoking bans on alcohol consumption. Health Economics, 13(10), 1063–1080. doi:10.1002/hec.930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Propper, C. (2005). Why economics is good for your health. 2004 Royal economic society public lecture. Health Economics, 14, 987–997. doi:10.1002/hec.1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2003). The effect of cigarette prices on youth smoking. Health Economics, 12(3), 217–230. doi:10.1002/hec.709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siahpush, M., & Carlin, J. B. (2006). Financial stress, smoking cessation and relapse: Results from a prospective study of an Australian national sample. Addiction (Abingdon England), 101(1), 121–127. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01292.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thies, C. F., & Register, C. A. (1993). Decriminalization of marijuana and the demand for alcohol, marijuana and cocaine. Social Science Journal, 30(4), 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnaar, M., & van Praag, B. (1997). How Dutch teenagers spend their money. De Economist, 145, 367–397. doi:10.1023/A:1003020630497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. A. (1980). Heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838. doi:10.2307/1912934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., Pacula, R. L., Chaloupka, F. J., & Wechsler, H. (2004). Alcohol and marijuana use among college students: Economic complements or substitutes? Health Economics, 13(9), 825–843. doi:10.1002/hec.859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., & Harris, M. N. (2004). Demand for marijuana, alcohol and tobacco: Participation, levels of consumption and cross-equation correlations. The Economic Record, 80(251), 394–410. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.2004.00197.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, P. (1995). Talking to teens. American Demographics, 17(11), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Markowitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markowitz, S., Tauras, J. Substance use among adolescent students with consideration of budget constraints. Rev Econ Household 7, 423–446 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-009-9049-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-009-9049-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation