Abstract
Since many teachers and students recognize other kinds of knowledge (faith) based on other ways of knowing, consideration of these realities is appropriate for the science education community. Understanding the multitude of ways that clergy view relationships between science and faith (i.e. alternative ways of knowing) would assist in understanding various ways that people address complex issues arising from ideas about science and faith. We administered a questionnaire composed of multiple-choice and short answer items to 63 United Methodist ministers. Findings included (1) that formal, organized faith contexts (e.g. church services) serve as informal science education opportunities, (2) participants demonstrated considerable diversity regarding the types of relationships developed between science and faith, and (3) participants recognized a need exists for better understandings of science and its relationship to faith for them, their colleagues, and their congregations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achinstein P (2001) The book of evidence. Oxford University Press, New York
Akerson VL, Morrison JA, McDuffie AR (2006) One course is not enough: preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach 43(2):194–213
Ammerman NT (2003) Christian fundamentalism in the US. In: ter Harr G, Busuttil JJ (eds) The freedom to do god’s will: religious fundamentalism and social change. Routledge, New York
Anderson RD (2007) Teaching the theory of evolution in social, intellectual, and pedagogical context. Sci Educ 91(4):664–677
Bamberger Y, Tal T (2006) Learning in a personal context: levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Sci Educ 91(1):75–95
Banks JA (2006) Cultural diversity and education: foundations, curriculum, and teaching. Pearson, Boston
Barbour IG (2000) When science meets religion: enemies, strangers, or partners? Harper Collins, San Francisco
Barr D, Kalmenoff M (1961) How and why wonder book of primitive man. Grosset & Dunlap, New York
Bogdan RC, Biklen SN (1998) Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Allyn and Bacon, Boston
Boyer L, Roth WM (2006) Learning and teaching as emergent features of informal settings: an ethnographic study in an environmental action group. Sci Educ 90(6):1028–1049
Bube RH (1995) Putting it all together: seven patterns for relating science and the christian faith. University Press of America, Lanham, NY
Carlson RF (2000) Science and christianity: four views. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL
Colburn A, Henriques L (2006) Clergy views on evolution, creationism, science, and religion. J Res Sci Teach 43(4):419–442
Colburn A, Henriques L, Clough M (2002) Science, creationism, and religion: responses from the clergy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA
Creswell JW (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, California
Dagher ZR, BouJaoude S (1997) Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: the case of biological evolution. J Res Sci Teach 34:429–445
Drees W (1996) Religion, science, and naturalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
Driver R, Leach J, Millar R, Scott P (1996) Young people’s images of science. Open University Press, Bristol, PA
Dutch SI (2002) Religion as belief versus religion as fact. J Geosci Educ 50(2):137–144
Falk JH (2001) Free-choice science education: how we learn science outside of school. Teachers College Press, New York
Gall M, Borg W, Gall J (1996) Educational research: an introduction. Longman Publishers, White Plains, NY
Gilbert A (2006) “How can a scientist believe in God?” Investigating issues of diversity and religion in an early elementary science methods classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The Association of Science Teacher Educators, Portland, OR
Goldberg S (1999) Seduced by science: how American religion has lost its way. New York University Press, New York
Good R, Shymansky J (2001) Nature-of-science literacy in benchmarks and standards: post-modern/relativist or modern/realist? In: Bevilacqua F, Giannetto E, Matthews MR (eds) Science education and culture: the contribution of history and philosophy of science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Gould SJ (1997) Nonoverlapping magisterial. Nat Hist 106:16–22
Haught JF (1995) Science and religion: from conflict to conversation. Paulist Press, Mahwah, NJ
Hofstein A, Rosenfeld S (1996) Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Stud Sci Educ 28:87–112
Jackson DF (2002) An ordinal, three-dimensional model for the interaction of evolution and religion and its application to earth and life science teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA
Khishfe R, Lederman N (2006) Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: integrated versus nonintegrated. J Res Sci Teach 43(4):395–418
Kourany JA (1998) Scientific knowledge: basic issues in the philosophy of science. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA
Kuhn D, Amsel E, O'Loughlin M (1988) The development of scientific thinking skills. Academic Press, London
Lederman NG (1992) Students and teachers conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. J Res Sci Teach 29(4):331–359
Lindner EW (2006) The yearbook of American and Canadian churches. Abingdon Press, Nashville, TN
McComas W (1998a) The principal elements of the nature of science. In: McComas WF (ed) The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
McComas W (1998b) The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
McGrath AE (1999) Science and religion: an introduction. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA
McMillan JH, Schumacher S (2006) Research in education: evidence-based inquiry. Pearson, Boston
National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
National Research Council (2000) Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Nord WA (1999) Science, religion, and education. Phi Delta Kappan 91:28–33
Phillips DC (2004) Two decades after: after the wake: postpositivistic educational thought. Sci & Educ 13:67–84
Ratzsch D (2000) Science and its limits: the natural sciences in christian perspective. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL
Skehan JW, Nelson CE (2000) The creation controversy and the science classroom. NSTA Press, Arlington, VA
Watts EG (1998) We are united methodists. Abingdon Press, Nashville, TN
Wise DU (2001) Creationism’s propaganda assault on deep time and evolution. J Geosci Educ 49(1):30–35
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A
Appendix A
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dickerson, D.L., Dawkins, K.R. & Penick, J.E. Clergy’s Views of the Relationship between Science and Religious Faith and the Implications for Science Education. Sci & Educ 17, 359–386 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9099-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9099-1