Abstract
Research findings of sex-symmetry in the perpetration of intimate partner assaults have sparked vigorous debate about the appropriate definition and measurement of intimate violence. A neglected but central issue in this debate is the conceptualization and measurement of gender. This article first examines the often unstated theoretical perspective on gender that underlies the research on sex-symmetry in intimate partner violence. This perspective treats gender as an individual characteristic of persons. Next, I describe challenges to the individualist model of gender from two emerging theoretical perspectives—interactionist and structuralist gender theories. The article concludes with suggestions for research on intimate partner violence that are informed by these new gender theories.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alway, J. (1995). The trouble with gender: Tales of a still missing feminist revolution in sociological theory. Sociological Theory, 13(3), 209–228.
Anderson, K. L. (1997). Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 655–669.
Anderson, K. L. (2002). Perpetrator or victim?: Relationships between intimate partner violence and well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 851–863.
Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001). Gendering violence: Masculinity and power in men’s accounts of domestic violence. Gender and Society, 15, 358–380.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680.
Babcock, J. C., Miller, S. A., & Siard, C. (2003). Toward a typology of abusive women: Differences between partner-only and generally violent women in the use of violence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 153–162.
Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L. E. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey August 1995 (NCJ-154348 Special Report). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bernard, J. L., Bernard, S. L., & Bernard, M. L. (1985). Courtship violence and sex-typing. Family Relations, 34, 573–576.
Brush, L. D. (1993). Violent acts and injurious outcomes in married couples: Methodological issues in the National Survey of Families and Households. In P. B. Bart & E. G. Moran (Eds.), Violence against women: The bloody footprints (pp. 240–251). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1988). Gender identity, self-esteem, and physical and sexual abuse in dating relationships. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(3), 272–285.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Buzawa, E., & Hotaling, G. (2000). The police response to domestic violence calls for assistance in three Massachusetts towns: Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Currie, D. H. (1998). Violent men or violent women: Whose definition counts? In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 97–111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dasgupta, S. D. (2002). A framework for understanding women’s use of nonlethal violence in intimate heterosexual relationships. Violence Against Women, 8, 1364–1389.
Davis, K. E., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Research on stalking: What do we know and where do we go? Violence and Victims, 15, 473–487.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1990). A social-psychological model of gender. In D. L. Rhode (Ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference (pp. 89–99). London: Yale University Press.
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1998). Violent men and violent contexts. In R. E. Dobash & R. P. Dobash (Eds.), Rethinking violence against women (pp. 141–168). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71–91.
Dutton, D. G. (1994). Patriarchy and wife assault: The ecological fallacy. Violence and Victims, 9, 167–182.
Dutton, D. G., & Golant, S. K. (1995). The batterer: A psychological profile. New York: Basic Books.
Fagot, B., Hagan, R., Leinbach, M. B., & Kronsberg, S. (1985). Differential reactions to assertive and communicative acts of toddler boys and girls. Child Development, 56, 1499–1505.
Felson, R. B. (2002). Violence and gender reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Fine, M., Weis, L., Addelston, J., & Marusza, J. (1997). (In)secure times: Constructing White working-class masculinities in the late 20th century. Gender and Society, 11, 52–68.
Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.
Frieze, I. H. (2000). Violence in close relationships—Development of a Research area: Comment on Archer (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 126, 681–684.
Frieze, I. H., Hymer, S., & Greenberg, M. S. (1987). Describing the crime victim: Psychological reactions to victimization. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 299–315.
Goffman, E. (1977). The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society, 4, 301–331.
Greenwood, G. L., Relf, M. V., Huang, B., Pollack, L. M., Canchola, J. A., & Catania, J. A. (2002). Battering victimization among a probability-based sample of men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 92(12), 1964–1969.
Hearn, J. (1998). The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence against women. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Avon.
Jacobsen, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., Babcock, J., & Holzworth-Munroe, A. (1994). Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 982–988.
Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–295.
Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948–963.
Kalmuss, D. S., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Wife’s marital dependency and wife abuse. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 369–382). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Kaukinen, C. (2004). Status compatibility, physical violence, and emotional abuse in intimate relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 452–471.
Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving abusive partners. London: Sage.
Kurz, D. (1993). Physical assaults by husbands: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 88–103). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kurz, D. (1995). For richer, for poorer: Mothers confront divorce. New York: Routledge.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Neidig, P., & Thorn, G. (1995). Violent marriages: Gender differences in levels of current violence and past abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 159–176.
McCaughey, M. (1997). Real knockouts: The physical feminism of women’s self-defense. New York: New York University Press.
Merrill, G. S. (1998). Understanding domestic violence among gay and bisexual men. In R. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 129–141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Messerschmidt, J. (1993). Masculinities and crime: A critique and reconceptualization of theory. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
Messner, M. A. (1998). The limits of the “male sex role”: An analysis of men’s liberation and men’s rights movements’ discourse. Gender and Society, 12, 255–276.
Miller, S. L., & Simpson, S. S. (1991). Courtship violence and social control: Does gender matter? Law and Society Review, 25, 335–365.
Ptacek, J. (1988). Why do men batter their wives? In K. Yllo & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 133–157). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Renzetti, C. M. (1998). Violence and abuse in lesbian relationships: Theoretical and empirical issues. In R. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence (pp. 117–127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Risman, B. (1998). Gender vertigo: American families in transition. London: Yale University Press.
Salari, S. M., & Baldwin, B. (2002). Verbal, physical, and injurious aggression among intimate couples over time. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 523–550.
Stacey, J., & Thorne, B. (1985). The missing feminist revolution in sociology. Social Problems, 32(4), 301–316.
Stark, E., & Flitcraft, A. (1996). Women at risk: Domestic violence and women’s health. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Steinmetz, S. K. (1977–78). The battered husband syndrome. Victimology, 2, 499–509.
Stets, J. E., & Straus. M. A. (1990). Gender differences in reporting marital violence and its medical and psychological consequences. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 151–165). NJ: Transaction.
Straus, M. A. (1992). The conflict tactics scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 49–73). NJ: Transaction.
Straus, M. A. (1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence(pp. 67–87). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Stuart, G. L., Moore, T. M., Ramsey, S. E., & Kahler, C. W. (2004). Hazardous drinking and relationship perpetration and victimization in women arrested for domestic violence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65, 46–57.
Sugerman, D. B., & Frankel, S. L. (1996). Patriarchal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 13–40.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Totten, M. (2003). Girlfriend abuse as a form of masculinity construction among violent, marginal male youth. Men and Masculinities, 6, 70–92.
Walker, L. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.
Williams, C. L. (1991). Case studies and the sociology of gender. In J. R. Feagin, A. M. Orum, & G. Sjoberg (Eds.), The case for the case study (pp. 224–243). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Worcester, N. (2002). Women’s use of force: Complexities and challenges of taking the issue seriously. Violence Against Women, 8, 1390–1415.
Yllo, K. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. Gelles & D. L. Loseke (Eds), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47–62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, K.L. Theorizing Gender in Intimate Partner Violence Research. Sex Roles 52, 853–865 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4204-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-4204-x