Skip to main content
Log in

Breast is Best…But Not Everywhere: Ambivalent Sexism and Attitudes Toward Private and Public Breastfeeding

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although breastfeeding is encouraged by the medical community, many women do not breastfeed because of perceived social sanctions. This experiment examines the level of positive evaluations, negative affect, and normalcy accorded a woman who is breastfeeding. 106 undergraduates and 80 older adults from the Midwestern U.S. were shown photos of a woman breastfeeding in public or private. It was hypothesized that the breastfeeding mother would be seen more positively when breastfeeding in private than in public, and that this response would be moderated by participants’ familiarity with breastfeeding, gender, and levels of benevolent and hostile sexism. Results supported these predictions. Three explanations for the negative view of public breastfeeding are discussed: familiarity, sexist attitudes, and hypersexualization of the breast.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2001). Breastfeeding in Australia, 2001. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. Document number 4810.0.55.001. Retrieved December 10, 2007 from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4810.0.55.001Main+Features12001?OpenDocument.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldock-Apps, T. (2006). Parenting in pictures. Community Practitioner, 79, 140–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. E., Leggett, J. C., & Durham, T. W. (1993). Breastfeeders versus bottlefeeders: differences in femininity perceptions. Maternal-Child Nursing Journal, 21, 15–19.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, A. (2005). Maternal sexuality and breastfeeding. Sex Education, 5, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yam, N. B., & Darby, L. (1997). Fathers and breastfeeding: a review of the literature. Journal of Human Lactation, 13, 45–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Behrmann, B. (2005). The breastfeeding café. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: a critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. R., Goldenberg, J. L., Arndt, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2007). Mother’s milk: an existential perspective on negative reactions to breast-feeding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 110–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, M. J., & Parrott, R. L. (1996). Prenatal care from the woman’s perspective: A thematic analysis of the newspaper media. In R. L. Parrott & C. M. Condit (Eds.), Evaluating women’s health messages (pp. 222–233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1971 [cl952]). The second sex. Translated and edited by H. M. Parshley. New York: Knopf.

  • Department of Health (England). (2002). Infant feeding 2000: A summary report. UK: Crown. Retrieved December 10, 2007 from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4008114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (England). (2004). Good practice and innovation in breastfeeding. UK: Crown. Retrieved December 10, 2007 from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4097202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettwyler, K. A. (1995). Beauty and the breast: The cultural context of breast-feeding in the United States. In P. Stuart-Macadam & K. A. Dettwyler (Eds.), Breastfeeding: Biocultural perspectives (pp. 167–215). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckett, L. (1992). Maternal employment and breastfeeding. NAACOG’s Clinical Issues in Perinatal and Women’s Health Nursing, 3, 701–712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, R. (1980). Tempest in a tea house: American attitudes toward breast-feeding. Kent, OH: Kent Popular.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., Hamm, N. R., & White, K. B. (2003). Perceptions of the woman who breastfeeds: the role of erotophobia, sexism, and attitudinal variables. Sex Roles, 49, 379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, T. E., Wentzel, E. R., & Lorion, J. (2001). Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 677–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freed, G. L., Fraley, J. K., & Schanler, R. J. (1992). Attitudes of expectant fathers regarding breast-feeding. Pediatrics, 90, 224–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freed, G. L., Fraley, J. K., & Schanler, R. J. (1993). Accuracy of expectant mothers’ predictions of fathers’ attitudes regarding breast-feeding. The Journal of Family Practice, 37, 148–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A., Weinberg, H., & Pines, A. M. (1998). Sexuality and motherhood: mutually exclusive in perception of women. Sex Roles, 38, 781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, L. M., Morton, J., Lawrence, R. A., Naylor, A. J., O'Hare, D., Schanler, R. J., et al. (2005). Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 115, 496–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, M., Connor, S., McClenahan, C., Mallett, J., Stewart-Knox, B., & Wright, M. (2007). Measuring young people’s attitudes to breastfeeding using the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Public Health, 29, 17–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2002). Ambivalent responses. American Psychologist, 57, 444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., Diebold, J., Balley-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, C., Lampron, A., Marcil, I., & Ross, L. (2003). Attitudes and subjective norms of male and female adolescents toward breastfeeding. Journal of Human Lactation, 19, 402–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., Stewart-Knox, B., & Wright, M. (2003). Feeding preferences and attitudes to breastfeeding and its promotion among teenagers in Northern Ireland. Journal of Human Lactation, 19, 57–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D., & Isbell, L. M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: men’s and women’s reactions to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, N., & Zimmerman, D. R. (2000). Low-income mothers’ views on breastfeeding. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 1457–1473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haiek, L. N., Gauthier, D. L., Brosseau, D., & Rocheleau, L. (2007). Understanding breastfeeding behavior: rates and shifts in patterns in Quebec. Journal of Human Lactation, 23, 24–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, A., Li, R., Benton-Davis, S., & Grummer-Strawn, L. (2005). Regional variation in public opinion about breastfeeding in the United States. Journal of Human Lactation, 21, 284–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, B. L. (2003). Mother’s milk: Breastfeeding controversies in American culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. G. (2006). Babies were born to be breastfed. Presentation on Breastfeeding Campaign. Office on Women’s Health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved October 16, 2006 from http://www.4woman.gov/breastfeeding/campaign_results.pdf.

  • Heagney, M. (2007, March 1). Breast-milk fee angers mom. The Columbus Dispatch, p. 1A.

  • Henderson, L., Kitzinger, J., & Green, J. (2000). Representing infant feeding: content analysis of British media portrayals of bottle feeding and breast feeding. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research ed.), 321, 1196–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. D. (2000). Update on breastfeeding: Healthy People 2010 objectives. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 25, 248–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., Fielding, K. S., Johnson, D., Masser, B., Russell, E., & Svensson, A. (2006). Demographic category membership and leadership in small groups: a social identity analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, D. C., Dobson, B., & Association, A. D. (2005). Position of the American Dietetic Association: promoting and supporting breastfeeding. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105, 810–818.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston-Robledo, I., Wares, S., Fricker, J., & Pasek, L. (2007). Indecent exposure: self-objectification and young women’s attitudes toward breastfeeding. Sex Roles, 56, 429–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, N., Song, Y., & Im, E. (2005). Korean university students’ knowledge and attitudes toward breastfeeding: a questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 42, 863–870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, L. A., Gielen, A. C., Diener-West, M., & Paige, D. M. (1995). The effect of a woman’s significant other on her breastfeeding decision. Journal of Human Lactation, 11, 103–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., Hsia, J., Fridinger, F., Hussain, A., Benton-Davis, S., & Grummer-Strawn, L. (2004). Public beliefs about breastfeeding policies in various settings. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 104, 1162–1168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., Darling, N., Maurice, E., Barker, L., & Grummer-Strawn, L. M. (2005). Breastfeeding rates in the United States by characteristics of the child, mother, or family: the 2002 National immunization survey. Pediatrics, 115, 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, R. W., Rock, V. J., & Grummer-Strawn, L. (2007). Changes in public attitudes toward breastfeeding in the United States, 1999–2003. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107, 122–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Libbus, M. K., & Kolostov, L. S. (1994). Perceptions of breastfeeding and infant feeding choice in a group of low-income mid-Missouri women. Journal of Human Lactation, 10, 17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mannien, J., van den Brandhof, W. E., McIntyre, E., & Hiller, J. E. (2002). Breastfeeding articles in the Australian press: 1996–1999. Breastfeeding Review, 10(1), 5–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, L., & Morrow, M. H. (1994). Infant feeding practices: understanding the decision-making process. Family Medicine, 26, 319–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, V. L. (2005). Are your breasts bound by law? Mothering, 12(12), 62–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrone, S., Vogeltanz-Holm, N., & Holm, J. (2008). Attitudes, knowledge, and intentions related to breastfeeding among university undergraduate women and men. Journal of Human Lactation, 24, 186–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J., Godfrey, M., & Renfrew, M. (2007). Being a ‘good mother’: managing breastfeeding and merging identities. Social Science & Medicine, 65, 2147–2159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., Ventura, S. J., Menacker, F., & Kirmeyer, S. (2006). Births: Final data for 2004. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics Reports, 55(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: the consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51, 609–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, E., Turnbull, D., & Hiller, J. E. (1999). Breastfeeding in public places. Journal of Human Lactation, 15, 131–135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, E., Hiller, J. E., & Turnbull, D. (2001a). Attitudes towards infant feeding among adults in a low socioeconomic community: what social support is there for breastfeeding? Breastfeeding Review, 9(1), 13–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, E., Hiller, J. E., & Turnbull, D. (2001b). Community attitudes to infant feeding. Breastfeeding Review, 9(3), 27–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2004). Personal attitudes or structural factors? A contextual analysis of breastfeeding duration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 388–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (1992). “Euch, those are for your husband!” Examination of cultural values and assumptions associated with breast-feeding. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative health research (pp. 50–60). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M., & Harrison, M. J. (1992). Social coercion for weaning. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative health research (pp. 363–375). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSNBC (2006a, July 27) Eyeful of breast-feeding mom sparks outrage. Retrieved October 19, 2006 from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14065706/.

  • MSNBC (2006b, November 16) Woman kicked off plane for breast-feeding baby. Retrieved November 17, 2006 from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15720339/.

  • National Health and Medical Research Council. (2003). The dietary guidelines for children and adolescents in Australia incorporating the infant feeding guidelines for health workers. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okon, M. (2004). Health promotion: partners’ perceptions of breastfeeding. British Journal of Midwifery, 12, 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G. (1988). The politics of breastfeeding. London: Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, B., Sheeshka, J., & Valaitis, R. (2000). A content analysis of infant feeding messages in a Canadian women’s magazine: 1945–1995. Journal of Nutrition Education, 32(4), 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese, A. R. (2000). Breastfeeding in public. New Beginnings, 17(6), 196–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, V. K., & Plichta, S. B. (1998). The role of social support in breastfeeding promotion: a literature review. Journal of Human Lactation, 14, 41–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, L. A., & Rempel, J. K. (2004). Partner influence on health behavior decision-making: increasing breastfeeding duration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 92–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. (1980). The psychological categorization of food and non-foods: a preliminary taxonomy of food rejections. Appetite, 1, 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheeshka, J., Potter, B., Norrie, E., Valaitis, R., Adams, G., & Kuczynski, L. (2001). Women’s experiences breastfeeding in public places. Journal of Human Lactation, 17, 31–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000a). Healthy People 2010: Understanding and improving health (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved November 1, 2006, from http://www.healthypeople.gov/Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Women’s Health. (2000b). HHS blueprint for action on breastfeeding. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accountability Office. (2006). Breastfeeding: Some strategies used to market infant formula may discourage breastfeeding (GAO 06-282). United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees.

  • Van Esterik, P. (1989). Beyond the breast-bottle controversy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viki, G. T., Massey, K., & Masser, B. (2005). When chivalry backfires: benevolent sexism and attitudes toward Myra Hindley. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10(1), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2006). Breasts are for men: media, masculinity ideologies, and men’s beliefs about women’s bodies. Sex Roles, 55, 703–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S. (2007, April 21). Civil-rights ruling: mom at club had right to breast-feed, fitness center faulted in discrimination case. The Columbus Dispatch, p. A1.

  • World Health Organization. (2003). Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: a gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Thanks to Dr. Thomas Nelson and Dr. Laura Bennett-Murphy for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Acker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acker, M. Breast is Best…But Not Everywhere: Ambivalent Sexism and Attitudes Toward Private and Public Breastfeeding. Sex Roles 61, 476–490 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9655-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9655-z

Keywords

Navigation