Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reliability and Validity of the World Health Organization Quality of Life: Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) in a Homeless Substance Dependent Veteran Population

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the high number of homeless, there is a critical need for rapid and accurate assessment of quality of life to assess program outcomes. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-100 has demonstrated promise in accurately assessing quality-of-life in this population. However, its length may make large scale use impractical for working with a homeless population. The World Health Organization Quality of Life—Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF), though providing a shorter instrument and being, theoretically, more manageable has not been evaluated for use with homeless individuals. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-BREF in 389 homeless veterans. Adequate internal consistency for all domains was found and validity for each domain was supported using the Personality Assessment Inventory. The WHOQOL-BREF provides a reliable, valid, and brief assessment of quality-of-life. Due to the length of the instrument and the domains covered, it could have great utility in the assessment of homeless populations with multiple problem domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonomi, A. E., & Patrick, D. L. (1997). User’s manual and interpretation guide for the United States version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instruments. Seattle: US WHOQOL Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chachamovich, E., Fleck, M., Laidlaw, K., & Power, M. (2008). Impact of major depression and subsyndromal symptoms on quality of life and attitudes toward aging in an international sample of older adults. The Gerontologist, 48, 593–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Rea, E. A., & LePage, J. P. (2008). Reliability and validity of the world health organization quality of life—100 (WHOQOL-100) in a homeless substance dependent veteran population. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45, 619–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Group, W. H. O. Q. O. L. (1993). Study protocol of the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research, 2, 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., Chung, S. Y., Park, S., Park, J. H., Byun, S., Hwang, M., et al. (2008). Enhancing effect of HT008-1 on cognitive function and quality of life in cognitively declined healthy adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 90, 517–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Young, D., Xiao, S., Zhou, X., & Zhou, L. (2004). Psychometric properties of the WHO Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-100) in patients with chronic diseases and their caregivers in China. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 82, 493–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masskulpan, P., Riewthong, K., Dajpratham, P., & Kuptniratsaikul, V. (2008). Anxiety and depressive symptoms after stroke in 9 rehabilitation centers. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 91, 1595–1602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masthoff, E. D., Trompenaars, F. J., & Van Heck, G. L. (2005). Validation of the WHO Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-100) in a population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients. European Psychiatry, 20, 465–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1996). An interpretive guide to the personality assessment inventory (PAI). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nejatisafa, A. A., Mortaz-Hedjri, S., Malakoutian, T., Arbabi, M., Hakemi, M. S., Haghighi, A. N., et al. (2008). Quality of life and life events of living unrelated kidney donors in Iran: A multicenter study. Transplantation, 86, 937–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, S., Quinn, K., Sharan, P., Naresh, B., Ha, Y., & Power, M. (2005). Cross-linguistic equivalence of WHOQOL-100: A study from North India. Quality of Life Research, 14, 891–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research, 13, 299–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynia, K., Middel, B., van Dijk, J. P., De Keyser, J. H., & Reijneveld, S. A. (2008). The impact of disabilities on quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis, 14, 972–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, L., Leung, K. F., Liu, F. B., Chen, J., & Chan, K. (2008). Responsiveness of the Chinese quality of life instrument in patients with congestive heart failure. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 14, 173–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded through a VA VISN 17 Start-Up Grant and VA RR&D MERIT #D6192-R

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James P. LePage.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia-Rea, E.A., LePage, J.P. Reliability and Validity of the World Health Organization Quality of Life: Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) in a Homeless Substance Dependent Veteran Population. Soc Indic Res 99, 333–340 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9583-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9583-x

Keywords

Navigation