Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What is Most Important: Social Factors, Health Selection, and Adolescent Educational Achievement

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the relative importance of social factors and health measures in predicting educational achievement in early and late adolescence using population-based administrative data. The sample was made up of 41,943 children born in Manitoba, Canada between 1982 and 1989 and remaining in the province until age 18. Multilevel modeling nests each individual (level 1) within a family (level 2) residing within a neighborhood (level 3). Most important in predicting adolescent achievement were a broad socioeconomic status index (and a narrower measure of household income), being on social assistance, mother’s age at first birth, gender, residential mobility, the presence of ADHD/Conduct disorders, and measures of family functioning (child taken into care or offered protection services and family structure history). Family size, birth order, and newborn characteristics (birthweight, APGAR, gestational age) were statistically significant but of little importance in explaining the outcomes. Both examining regression coefficients and systematically omitting variables showed social factors (often emphasized by epidemiologists) to have markedly greater effects than the combination of health measures (often stressed by economists) in predicting achievement. However, mental health in childhood is identified as among the important predictors. Record linkage across population datasets from health, education, and family services ministries allowed: tracking health and educational attainment at different times in a child’s life, following a large number of cases across childhood, considerable sensitivity testing, controlling for unmeasured family and neighborhood effects, generating an extensive list of predictors, estimating effect sizes, and comparing Manitoba results with those of well-known American studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The data and methods are described in more detail in the Extended Appendix to Currie et al. (2010). Material updated to reflect the additional years of information used in this paper is available on request from the corresponding author.

  2. Linear modeling was carried out using PROC MIXED in Unix SAS Version 9. The REML (Restricted Maximum Likelihood) method was used to estimate variance–covariance parameters.

  3. Other statistics on model fit produced very similar results. These data, as well as the relevant intercepts and intraclass correlation coefficients, are available from the corresponding author.

  4. A Ramsey RESET (regression) test for misspecification (which deals with both omitted variables and incorrect functional form) was significant at the .01 level for the large Manitoba sample (Grade 12 index) but showed only minimal improvement in fit (from .325 to .329) (Ramsey, 1969). Such a finding of bias is quite common (Clarke 2005) and ours seems relatively small. Similar tests were not available for the American and UK studies.

  5. “Systems’ conditions include “respiratory, alimentary, heart, haematological, urogenital, central nervous system, epilepsy.” “These condition are too rare in the NCDS cohort to analyze their impacts separately for each chronic illness.” Case et al. (2005), p. 368.

  6. Manitoba analyses have eliminated intellectually disabled children; ‘mental retardation’ and ‘psychoses’ are among the codes used. As noted in the working paper (http://www.wws.prineton.edu/chw/research/papers.php), such children are included in the UK analysis. In addition, the UK children (in 1958) were likely to be less healthy than their more recent Canadian comparison group.

References

  • Adam, E. K., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2002). Home sweet home(s): Parental separations, residential moves, and adjustment problems in low-income adolescent girls. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 792–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annett, R. D., Aylward, E. H., Lapidus, J., Bender, B. G., & DuHamel, T. (2000). Neurocognitive functioning in children with mild and moderate asthma in the childhood asthma management program. The childhood asthma management program (CAMP) research group. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 105(4), 717–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, K., Fuller, E., Shepherd, P., Strachan, D. P., & Power, C. (2008). Loss and representativeness in a biomedical survey at age 45 years, 1958 British birth cohort. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(3), 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, L. J., Silver, E. J., & Stein, R. E. (2006). Cumulative social disadvantage and child health. Pediatrics, 117(4), 1321–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, L. F. (2009). Social epidemiology: Social determinants of health in the United States: Are we losing ground? Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research: It’s just regression. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, A., Jantti, M., & Solon, G. (2005) Influences of nature and nurture on earnings variation: A report on a study of various sibling types in Sweden. In S. Bowles, H. Gintis, & M. Osborne Groves (Eds.), Unequal chances: Family background and economic success (pp. 145–164). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Bonnie, R. J., Fulco, C. E., & Liverman, C. T. (Eds.). (1999). Reducing the burden of injury. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (2005). Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook, E., Rosman, D. L., & Holman, C. D. (2008). Public resource through data linkage: Measuring research outputs from the Western Australia data linkage system. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 32(1), 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, A., Fertig, A., & Paxson, C. (2005). The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. Journal of Health Economics, 24(2), 365–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. A. (2005). The phantom menace: Omitted variable bias in econometric research. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 22, 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D., Pfeiffer, K. M., & Velez, M. (2007). Explaining sibling differences in achievement and behavioral outcomes: The importance of within- and between-family factors. Social Science Research, 36(3), 1087–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. (2009). Healthy, wealthy, and wise: Socioeconomic status, poor health in childhood, and human capital development. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 87–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., Stabile, M., Manivong, P., & Roos, L. L. (2010). Child health and young adult outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 45(3), 517–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, M., Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Williamson, D. F., Dube, S. R., Brown, D. W., et al. (2005). Childhood residential mobility and multiple health risks during adolescence and adulthood: The hidden role of adverse childhood experiences. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(12), 1104–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G., Dowsett, C., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Hustonb, A., Klebanov, P., et al. (2006). School readiness and later achievement. Northwestern University working paper.

  • Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2010). Multiple risk exposure as a potential explanatory mechanism for the socioeconomic status-health gradient. Annals the New York Academy of Sciences, 1186, 174–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fomby, P., & Cherlin, A. (2007). Family instability and child well-being. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furstenberg, F. F., Cook, T. D., Eccles, J., Elder, G. H., Jr., & Sameroff, A. (1999). Managing to make it: Urban families and adolescent success. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. F., & Epel, D. (2009). Ecological developmental biology; integrating epigenetics, medicine, and evolution (pp. 245–286). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginther, D., & Pollak, R. A. (2004). Family structure and children’s educational outcomes: Blended families, stylized facts, and descriptive regressions. Demography, 41(4), 671–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glied, S. (2001). The value of reductions in child injury mortality in the U.S. In D. Cutler & E. Berndt (Eds.), Medical care output and productivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golobardes, B., Lynch, J. W., & Smith, G. D. (2008). Is the association between childhood socioeconomic circumstances and cause-specific mortality established? Update of a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 387–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutstadt, L. B., Gillette, J. W., Mrazek, D. A., Fukuhara, J. T., LaBrecque, J. F., & Strunk, R. C. (1989). Determinants of school performance in children with chronic asthma. American Journal of Diseases in Children, 143(4), 471–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, S. A., & Fosse, N. E. (2008). Health and the educational attainment of adolescents: Evidence from the NLSY97. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49(2), 178–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hango, D. W. (2006). The long-term effect of childhood residential mobility on educational attainment. The Sociological Quarterly, 47(4), 631–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1994). Succeeding generations: On the effects of investments in children. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzman, C., & Power, C. (2003). Health and human development: Understandings from life-course research. Developmental Neuropsychology, 24(2–3), 719–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzman, C., & Williams, R. (2009). Making early childhood count. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(1), 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotz, V. J., McElroy, S. W., & Sanders, S. G. (1996). The costs and consequences of teenage childbearing for mothers and government. Chicago Policy Review, 1, 55–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., Schoeni, R. F., Kaplan, G. A., & Pollack, H. (2008). The health effects of social and economic policy: The promise and challenge for research and policy. In R. F. Schoeni, J. S. House, G. A. Kaplan, & H. Pollack (Eds.), Making Americans healthier: Social and economic policy as health policy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. I. (2009). Understanding links between adolescent health and educational attainment. Demography, 46(4), 671–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, J. O. (2010). Child well-being and intergenerational inequality. Child Indicators Research, 3, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jutte, D. P., Brownell, M., Roos, N. P., Schippers, C., Boyce, W. T., & Syme, S. L. (2010a). Rethinking what is important: Biologic versus social predictors of childhood health and educational outcomes. Epidemiology, 21(3), 314–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jutte, D. P., Roos, L. L., & Brownell, M. (2011). Administrative record linkage as a tool for public health research. Annual Review of Public Health, 32, 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jutte, D. P., Roos, N. P., Brownell, M., Briggs, G., MacWilliam, L., & Roos, L. L. (2010b). The ripples of adolescent motherhood: Social, educational and medical outcomes for children of teen and prior teen moms. Academic Pediatrics, 10(5), 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E. (1994). Lords of the fly. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, N., Zierler, S., Hogan, J. W., Waterman, P., Chen, J., Lemieux, K., et al. (2003). Geocoding and measurement of neighborhood socioeconomic position: A U.S. perspective. In I. Kawachi & L. F. Berkman (Eds.), Neighborhoods and health (pp. 147–178). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, M., Leslie, W. D., Dastani, Z., Goltzman, D., & Richards, J. B. (2010). An efficient paradigm for genetic epidemiology cohort creation. PLoS One, 5(11), e14045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahey, B. B., & D’Onofrio, B. M. (2010). All in the family: Comparing siblings to test casual hypotheses regarding environmental influences on behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(5), 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. A., Pollack, H., & Comfort, M. E. (2001). Academic and behavioral outcomes among the children of young mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2005). A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, X., Ma, L., & Bradley, K. D. (2008). Using multilevel modeling to investigate school effects. In A. A. O’Connell & D. B. McCoach (Eds.), Multilevel modeling of educational data (pp. 59–110). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor, O., Matthews, S., & Power, C. (2003). Health selection: The role of inter- and intra-generational mobility on social inequalities in health. Social Science and Medicine, 57(11), 2217–2227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmot, M. (1999). Introduction. In M. Marmot & R. G. Wilkinson (Eds.), Social determinants of health (pp. 1–16). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Martens, P. J., Derksen, S., & Gupta, S. (2004). Predictors of hospital readmission of Manitoba newborns within six weeks postbirth discharge: A population-based study. Pediatrics, 114(3), 708–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, P. J., Frohlich, N., Carriere, K. C., Derksen, S., & Brownell, M. (2002). Embedding child health within a framework of regional health: Population health status and sociodemographic indicators. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 93(2 Suppl), S15–S20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, S. E. (1997). Introduction. In What money can’t buy: Family income and children’s life chances (pp. 1–15). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Mayer, S. E. (2002). The influence of parental income on children’s outcomes. Wellington, New Zealand: Knowledge Management Group, Ministry of Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumder, B. (2005). The apple falls even closer to the tree than we thought: New and revised estimates of the intergenerational inheritance of earnings. In S. Bowles, H. Gintis, & M. Osborne Groves (Eds.), Unequal chances: Family background and economic success (pp. 80–99). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazumder, B. (2008). Sibling similarities and economic inequality in the US. Journal of Population Economics, 21(3), 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S., & Sandefur, G. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. (2005). Remarks on the analysis of causal relationships in population research. Demography, 42(1), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (Eds.). (1977). Data analysis and regression.A second course in statistics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustard, C. A., Derksen, S., Berthelot, J. M., & Wolfson, M. C. (1999). Assessing ecologic proxies for household income: A comparison of household and neighborhood-level income measures in the study of population health status. Health and Place, 5(2), 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustard, C. A., & Roos, N. P. (1994). The relationship of prenatal care and pregnancy complications to birthweight in Winnipeg, Canada. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1450–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreopoulos, P. (2008). Neighbourhood effects in Canada: A critique. Canadian Public Policy, 34(2), 237–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreopoulos, P., & Salvanes, K. G. (2009). How large are returns to schooling? Hint: Money isn’t everything. NBER working paper No. 15339.

  • Oreopoulos, P., Stabile, M., Walld, R., & Roos, L. L. (2008). Short, medium, and long term consequences of poor infant health: An analysis using siblings and twins. Journal of Human Resources, 43(1), 88–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., & Early, D. (2001). Turnover in kindergarten classroom membership in a national sample. Early Education and Development, 12(2), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powe, N. R., Weiner, J., Starfield, B., Stuart, M. E., Baker, A., & Steinwachs, D. (1998). Systemwide performance in a Medicaid program: Profiling the care of patients with chronic illness. Medical Care, 34(8), 798–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raferty, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 31(2), 350–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W. (2008). Many small groups. In J. de Leeuw & E. Meijer (Eds.), Handbook of multilevel analysis (pp. 207–236). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, G. T., Croen, L. A., & Habel, L. A. (2009). Mothers of children diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Health conditions and medical care utilization in periods before and after birth of the child. Medical Care, 47(1), 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. J., MacWilliam, L., Verhulst, L., Roos, N. P., & Aitkinson, M. (2001). Performance of the ACG case-mix system in two Canadian provinces. Medical Care, 39(1), 86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. J., Roos, N. P., MacWilliam, L., Frohlich, N., & Black, C. (2002). Assessing population health care needs using a claims based ACG morbidity measure: A validation exercise in the Province of Manitoba. Health Services Research, 37(5), 1345–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, L. L., Brownell, M., Lix, L., Roos, N. P., Walld, R., & MacWilliam, L. (2008). From health research to social research: Privacy, methods, approaches. Social Science and Medicine, 66(1), 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, L. L., Menec, V., & Currie, R. J. (2004). Policy analysis in an information-rich environment. Social Science and Medicine, 58(11), 2231–2341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, L. L., & Nicol, J. P. (1999). A research registry: Uses, development, and accuracy. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(1), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, N. P., Roos, L. L., Brownell, M., & Fuller, E. L. (2010). Enhancing policy makers’ understanding of disparities: Relevant data from an information-rich environment. Milbank Quarterly, 88(3), 382–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, L. L., Soodeen, R., Bond, R., & Burchill, C. (2003). Working more productively: Tools for administrative data. Health Services Research, 38(5), 1339–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, N., & Pebley, A. R. (2010). Family and neighborhood sources of socioeconomic inequality in children’s achievement. Demography, 47(3), 777–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). Education, occupation and earnings. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, M., & Gousseau, C. (1999). Using the POPULIS framework for interprovincial comparisons of expenditures on health care. Medical Care, 37(6 Suppl), JS83–JS100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberg, J. L., Maes, H., & Eaves, L. J. (2010). Genetic and environmental influences on the transmission of parental depression to children’s depression and conduct disturbance: An extended Children of Twins study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(6), 734–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, L. A., Peterson, L., Lannon, C. M., Murphy, S. B., Goodman, C., Ren, Z., et al. (2010). Special challenges in comparative effectiveness research on children’s and adolescents’ health. Health Affairs, 29(10), 1849–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P. (2007). The impact of socioeconomic status on health over the life course. Journal of Human Resources, 42(4), 739–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. P. (2009). The impact of childhood health on adult labor market outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 478–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2010). Measuring up: Canadian results of the OECD PISA study “The performance of Canada’s youth in reading, mathematics, and science: 2009 first results for Canadians aged 15” (81-590-X2010001), Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

  • Strohschein, L., Roos, N. P., & Brownell, M. (2009). Family structure histories and high school completion: Evidence from a population based registry. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 34(1), 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, S. L. (2008). Reducing racial and social-class inequalities in health: The need for a new approach. Health Affairs (Millwood), 27(2), 456–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Johns Hopkins University. (2010). The Johns Hopkins ACG case-mix system (version 8 release notes) [computer software]. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health and Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Innocenti report card 7, Florence, IT: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Indoor Environments Division Office of Air and Radiation. (2006). Asthma Facts. Rep. No. EPA 402-F-04-019.

  • Weiner, J., Dobson, A., Maxwell, S., Coleman, K., Starfield, B., & Anderson, G. (1996). Risk-adjusted Medicare capitation rates using ambulatory and inpatient diagnoses. Health Care Financing Review, 17(3), 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J., Starfield, B., & Lieberman, R. N. (1992). Johns Hopkins ambulatory care groups (ACGs): A case mix system for UR, QA, and capitation adjustment. HMO Practice, 6(1), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J., Starfield, B., Steinwachs, D., & Mumford, L. (1991). Development and application of a population-oriented measure of Ambulatory care case-mix. Medical Care, 29(5), 452–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., McClellan, M. B., & Rivlin, A. M. (2010). Beyond the affordable care act: Achieving real improvements in Americans’ health. Health Affairs, 29(8), 1481–1488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D. (1986). Social class segregation and its relationship to pupils’ examination results in Scotland. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 224–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D. (2004). Variation in literacy skills among Canadian provinces: Findings from the OECD PISA. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to many individuals for making this research possible: Heather Hunter, John Van Walleghem, Richard Perrault, Carol Crerar, Jean Britton, Ken Clark, Irene Huggins, Allyson Matczuk and Shirley McLellan from Manitoba Education, Louis Barre and Deborah Malazdrewicz from Manitoba Health, Jan Forster, Harvey Stevens (now retired), Linda Burnside, Charlene Paquin, Joy Cramer, Kathy Reid, Margaret Ferniuk, Elin Ibrahim, Tracy Lewis and Kim Hucko from Manitoba Family Services and Consumer Affairs. This research has been funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Manitoba Health Project Number 2007/2008—20C), the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, the Lupina Foundation, and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. The results and conclusions presented are those of the authors. No official endorsement by the ministries involved is intended or should be inferred. The authors thank Shannon Lussier and Theresa Daniuk for manuscript preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leslie L. Roos.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Intellectual Disability

We removed children who ever had a diagnosis of mental retardation from the sample. We looked for children in the Ministry of Education data with a “special needs” flag, identified by the variables ‘MH’ = ‘Multiple Handicaps’, ‘AUT’ = ‘Autism’, or ‘ASD’ = ‘Autism Spectrum Disorder’. Hospital and physician visit data for at least one of the following diagnoses at some time during the child’s childhood years (up to age 14) were also considered (ICD-9-CM codes): ‘317—Mild Mental Retardation (MR)’, ‘318—Other MR’ ‘319—Unspecified MR’, ‘299—Psychoses’, ‘758—Downs and related’, ‘759—Fragile X, Prader-W’, and ‘760—FAS’. With hospital coding moving to ICD-10 (in April 2004), additional codes (from the hospital data) were used to flag mental retardation: ‘F70—Mild mental retardation’, ‘F71—Moderate mental retardation’, ‘F72— Severe mental retardation’, ‘F73—Profound mental retardation’, ‘F74’, ‘F75’, ‘F76’,’F77’, ‘F78—Other mental retardation’, and ‘F79—Unspecified mental retardation’.

Appendix 2: Neighborhood of Residence

Our main analyses assigned neighborhood of residence to children in each family on the basis of the oldest sibling’s residence at age 17. Residential changes were bracketed by reassigning family neighborhood and income based on residence (1986 census enumeration area) at the time of the youngest sibling’s birth. Neighborhood environments were generally persistent, but 26.5% of the families did change neighborhood between the time of the oldest sibling’s turning 17 and the time of the youngest sibling’s birth. Household income for the relevant census area (rather than SEFI) had to be used for further comparison. SEFI was not available for 1986 while 1986 Winnipeg census enumeration areas (N = 757) were larger than the dissemination areas (N = 1,183) used subsequently by Statistics Canada. These size differences probably contributed to the differing level 3 variances in the null model: 0.17 in the ‘oldest child at age 17’ model versus 0.12 in the ‘youngest child at birth’ model. A considerable pattern of available variance was explained by mean neighborhood household income in the full model (87.7% ‘for oldest child’ versus 88.4% ‘for youngest child’).

Appendix 3: Index Validation

Validation was approached in two ways. First of all, the score on the index of Grade 9 achievement can be compared with the Grade 12 achievement scores (Winnipeg sample) (Table 6). Correlations among indices ranged from .694 to .746 (Winnipeg sample) (Table 7). The Grade 9 index scores correspond reasonably closely to the average scores on the Grade 12 measure. These achievement scores can be further assessed in terms of a student’s probability of high school graduation within 5 years (Roos et al. 2008).

Table 6 Validation checks for grade 9 index using different grade 12 measures Winnipeg sample 1984–1988 birth cohorts
Table 7 Overall correlations of education indices, 1984–1989 Winnipeg siblings sample

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roos, L.L., Hiebert, B., Manivong, P. et al. What is Most Important: Social Factors, Health Selection, and Adolescent Educational Achievement. Soc Indic Res 110, 385–414 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9936-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9936-0

Keywords

Navigation