Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology 7/2015

01.07.2015 | Urology - Original Paper

Right versus left retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy

verfasst von: Toshiaki Kashiwadate, Kazuaki Tokodai, Noritoshi Amada, Izumi Haga, Tetsuro Takayama, Atsushi Nakamura, Takuya Jimbo, Yasuyuki Hara, Naoki kawagishi, Noriaki Ohuchi

Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the safety and efficacy of right-side and left-side retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN) using our hybrid technique.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data obtained from 151 consecutive patients who underwent RDN between May 2005 and July 2013. Right and left nephrectomies were performed in 87 and 64 patients, respectively. We compared these two groups with respect to donors’ intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, and recipients’ outcomes.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding donor blood loss, warm ischemia time, donor postoperative creatinine levels, donor postoperative length of hospital stay, recipient creatinine levels at 1 year after transplantation, and 1-year graft survival rate after transplantation. The time required for graft extraction and overall operative time were significantly shorter in the right RDN group than in the left RDN group (152 vs. 168 min, P = 0.016; 175 vs. 195 min, P = 0.0059). Only one case in the right nephrectomy group required open conversion because of uncontrollable bleeding from the inferior vena cava.

Conclusion

Although larger sample sizes would be required to evaluate postoperative complication rate, these results indicate that both the right and left RDN could be performed with similar donor and recipient outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60(9):1047–1049PubMed Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60(9):1047–1049PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Derweesh IH, Goldfarb DA, Abreu SC, Goel M, Flechner SM, Modlin C, Zhou LM, Streem SB, Novick AC, Gill IS (2005) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 65(5):862–866. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.051 PubMedCrossRef Derweesh IH, Goldfarb DA, Abreu SC, Goel M, Flechner SM, Modlin C, Zhou LM, Streem SB, Novick AC, Gill IS (2005) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy has equivalent early and late renal function outcomes compared with open donor nephrectomy. Urology 65(5):862–866. doi:10.​1016/​j.​urology.​2004.​11.​051 PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Harper JD, Breda A, Leppert JT, Veale JL, Gritsch HA, Schulam PG (2010) Experience with 750 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies—is it time to use a standardized classification of complications? J Urol 183(5):1941–1946. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.021 PubMedCrossRef Harper JD, Breda A, Leppert JT, Veale JL, Gritsch HA, Schulam PG (2010) Experience with 750 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies—is it time to use a standardized classification of complications? J Urol 183(5):1941–1946. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2010.​01.​021 PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chin EH, Hazzan D, Herron DM, Gaetano JN, Ames SA, Bromberg JS, Edye M (2007) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity, and delayed complications with 500 cases. Surg Endosc 21(4):521–526. doi:10.1007/s00464-006-9021-y PubMedCrossRef Chin EH, Hazzan D, Herron DM, Gaetano JN, Ames SA, Bromberg JS, Edye M (2007) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity, and delayed complications with 500 cases. Surg Endosc 21(4):521–526. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-006-9021-y PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV (2003) Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transpl 3(10):1295–1301CrossRef Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV (2003) Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transpl 3(10):1295–1301CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandal AK, Cohen C, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR, Ratner LE (2001) Should the indications for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindication to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 71(5):660–664PubMedCrossRef Mandal AK, Cohen C, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR, Ratner LE (2001) Should the indications for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindication to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 71(5):660–664PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohei N, Kazuya O, Hirai T, Miyauchi Y, Iida S, Shirakawa H, Shimizu T, Ishida H, Tanabe K (2010) Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: experience of 425 cases at a single center. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 24(11):1783–1787. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0493 CrossRef Kohei N, Kazuya O, Hirai T, Miyauchi Y, Iida S, Shirakawa H, Shimizu T, Ishida H, Tanabe K (2010) Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: experience of 425 cases at a single center. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 24(11):1783–1787. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2009.​0493 CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Omoto K, Nozaki T, Inui M, Shimizu T, Hirai T, Sawada Y, Ishida H, Tanabe K (2013) Impact of right-sided nephrectomy on long-term outcomes in retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy at single center. J Transpl 2013:546373. doi:10.1155/2013/546373 Omoto K, Nozaki T, Inui M, Shimizu T, Hirai T, Sawada Y, Ishida H, Tanabe K (2013) Impact of right-sided nephrectomy on long-term outcomes in retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy at single center. J Transpl 2013:546373. doi:10.​1155/​2013/​546373
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yashi M, Yagisawa T, Ishikawa N, Nukui A, Fujiwara T, Sakuma Y (2007) Retroperitoneoscopic hand-assisted live-donor nephrectomy according to the basic principle of transplantation in donor kidney selection. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 21(6):589–594. doi:10.1089/end.2006.0326 CrossRef Yashi M, Yagisawa T, Ishikawa N, Nukui A, Fujiwara T, Sakuma Y (2007) Retroperitoneoscopic hand-assisted live-donor nephrectomy according to the basic principle of transplantation in donor kidney selection. J Endourol/Endourol Soc 21(6):589–594. doi:10.​1089/​end.​2006.​0326 CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Wolff T, Forster T, Lenggenhager C, Dickenmann M, Eugster T, Gurke L, Steiger J, Gasser TC, Sulser T, Bachmann A (2007) Reluctance over right-sided retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: justified or not? Transpl Proc 39(5):1381–1385. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.02.069 CrossRef Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Wolff T, Forster T, Lenggenhager C, Dickenmann M, Eugster T, Gurke L, Steiger J, Gasser TC, Sulser T, Bachmann A (2007) Reluctance over right-sided retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: justified or not? Transpl Proc 39(5):1381–1385. doi:10.​1016/​j.​transproceed.​2007.​02.​069 CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tokodai K, Amada N, Kikuchi H, Haga I, Takayama T, Nakamura A (2013) Posttransplant increase of body mass index is associated with new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation. Tohoku J Exp Med 229(3):227–232PubMedCrossRef Tokodai K, Amada N, Kikuchi H, Haga I, Takayama T, Nakamura A (2013) Posttransplant increase of body mass index is associated with new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation. Tohoku J Exp Med 229(3):227–232PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Right versus left retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy
verfasst von
Toshiaki Kashiwadate
Kazuaki Tokodai
Noritoshi Amada
Izumi Haga
Tetsuro Takayama
Atsushi Nakamura
Takuya Jimbo
Yasuyuki Hara
Naoki kawagishi
Noriaki Ohuchi
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Urology and Nephrology / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1014-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

International Urology and Nephrology 7/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.