Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology 4/2019

13.02.2019 | Urology - Original Paper

More lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed lymph node-positive penile cancer

verfasst von: Weipu Mao, Xin Huang, Minghao Kong, Jie Fan, Jiang Geng

Erschienen in: International Urology and Nephrology | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

For patients with lymph node-positive (LN+) penile cancer, the optimal extent of lymph node dissection (LND) is currently not established. We aimed to reveal the potential association between survival and the number of LND in patients with newly diagnosed LN + penile cancer.

Methods

Patients with LN + penile cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were identified using the SEER database. The relationships between the number of removed lymph nodes and overall survival (OS), all-cause mortality (ACM), cancer-specific mortality (CSM), and 5-year mortality were tested. Kaplan–Meier curves as well as univariate and multivariable cox regression were used to further analyze disparities in mortality and survival.

Results

Among 599 eligible patients with LN + penile cancer, 527 (88.0%) received surgery and 72 (12.0%) did not. Compared with those who had not received surgery, patients receiving surgery had longer overall survival (28.31 ± 30.84 versus 16.69 ± 21.68 months) and longer median survival (15.00 versus 8.00 months) times. Univariate analyses demonstrated the number of LND to be an independent factor. Multivariable Cox regression analyses suggested that the ≥ 8 removed lymph nodes predicted a lower ACM rate (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48, 95% CI 0.38–0.61, p < 0.001), penile CSM rate (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.30–0.57, p < 0.001), and lower 5-year mortality (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.47–0.71, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In patients with newly diagnosed LN + penile cancer, more LND during lymphadenectomy was associated with an improvement in ACM, CSM rate, and 5-year mortality. Therefore, patients with preoperatively LN + penile cancer should undergo LND to have more lymph nodes removed.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Curado M (2002) Cancer incidence in five continents (Volume VIII). IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon 155:1–781 Curado M (2002) Cancer incidence in five continents (Volume VIII). IARC Scientific Publications, Lyon 155:1–781
7.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Horenblas S (2001) Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU Int 88(5):473–483CrossRefPubMed Horenblas S (2001) Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU Int 88(5):473–483CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Compton CC, Byrd DR, Garciaaguilar J, Kurtzman SH, Olawaiye A (2012) AJCC cancer staging atlas. Springer, BerlinCrossRef Compton CC, Byrd DR, Garciaaguilar J, Kurtzman SH, Olawaiye A (2012) AJCC cancer staging atlas. Springer, BerlinCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Winters BR, Kearns JT, Holt SK, Mossanen M, Lin DW, Wright JL. Is there a benefit to adjuvant radiation in stage III penile cancer after lymph node dissection? Findings from the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol. 2017;36(3) Winters BR, Kearns JT, Holt SK, Mossanen M, Lin DW, Wright JL. Is there a benefit to adjuvant radiation in stage III penile cancer after lymph node dissection? Findings from the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol. 2017;36(3)
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Herr HW, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Donat SM, Reuter VE, Bajorin DF (2002) Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 167(3):1295–1298CrossRefPubMed Herr HW, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Donat SM, Reuter VE, Bajorin DF (2002) Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 167(3):1295–1298CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Leissner J, Hohenfellner R, Thuroff JW, Wolf HK (2000) Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; significance for staging and prognosis. BJU Int 85(7):817–823CrossRefPubMed Leissner J, Hohenfellner R, Thuroff JW, Wolf HK (2000) Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; significance for staging and prognosis. BJU Int 85(7):817–823CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Herr HW (2003) Extent of surgery and pathology evaluation has an impact on bladder cancer outcomes after radical cystectomy. Urology 61(1):105–108CrossRefPubMed Herr HW (2003) Extent of surgery and pathology evaluation has an impact on bladder cancer outcomes after radical cystectomy. Urology 61(1):105–108CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulsen AL, Horn T, Steven K (1998) Radical cystectomy: extending the limits of pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival for patients with bladder cancer confined to the bladder wall. The J Urol 160(6 Pt 1):2015–2019; discussion 20PubMed Poulsen AL, Horn T, Steven K (1998) Radical cystectomy: extending the limits of pelvic lymph node dissection improves survival for patients with bladder cancer confined to the bladder wall. The J Urol 160(6 Pt 1):2015–2019; discussion 20PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
More lymph node dissection improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed lymph node-positive penile cancer
verfasst von
Weipu Mao
Xin Huang
Minghao Kong
Jie Fan
Jiang Geng
Publikationsdatum
13.02.2019
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Urology and Nephrology / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02084-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

International Urology and Nephrology 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.