nach oben

Molecular Imaging and Biology

Erschienen in:

12.07.2018 | Review Article

The Complexity and Fractal Geometry of Nuclear Medicine Images

verfasst von: Fabio Grizzi, Angelo Castello, Dorina Qehajaj, Carlo Russo, Egesta Lopci

Erschienen in: Molecular Imaging and Biology | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Irregularity in shape and behavior is the main feature of every anatomical system, including human organs, tissues, cells, and sub-cellular entities. It has been shown that this property cannot be quantified by means of the classical Euclidean geometry, which is only able to describe regular geometrical objects. In contrast, fractal geometry has been widely applied in several scientific fields. This rapid growth has also produced substantial insights in the biomedical imaging. Consequently, particular attention has been given to the identification of pathognomonic patterns of “shape” in anatomical entities and their changes from natural to pathological states. Despite the advantages of fractal mathematics and several studies demonstrating its applicability to oncological research, many researchers and clinicians remain unaware of its potential. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the complexity and fractal geometry of nuclear medicine images.

Kane EA, Higham TE (2015) Complex systems are more than the sum of their parts: using integration to understand performance, biomechanics, and diversity. Integr Comp Biol 55:146–165CrossRef

Grizzi F, Chiriva-Internati M (2005) The complexity of anatomical systems. Theor Biol Med Model 19:2–26

Simon AH (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 106:467–482

Di Ieva A, Grizzi F, Jelinek H et al (2014) Fractals in the neurosciences, part I: general principles and basic neurosciences. Neuroscientist 20:403–417CrossRef

Noble D (2008) Claude Bernard, the first systems biologist, and the future of physiology. Exp Physiol 93:16–26CrossRef

Sargut G, McGrath RG (2011) Learning to live with complexity. Harv Bus Rev 89(68–76):136

Losa GA (2009) The fractal geometry of life. Riv Biol 102:29–59PubMed

Losa GA (2002) Fractal morphometry of cell complexity. Riv Biol 95:239–258PubMed

Bianciardi G (2015) Differential diagnosis. Shape and function, fractal tools in the pathology lab. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci 19:437–464PubMed

10.

Losa GA, Nonnenmacher TF (1996) Self-similarity and fractal irregularity in pathologic tissues. Mod Pathol 9:174–182PubMed

11.

Lennon FE, Cianci GC, Cipriani NA, Hensing TA, Zhang HJ, Chen CT, Murgu SD, Vokes EE, Vannier MW, Salgia R (2015) Lung cancer—a fractal viewpoint. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12:664–675CrossRef

12.

Di Ieva A, Esteban FJ, Grizzi F et al (2015) Fractals in the neurosciences, part II: clinical applications and future perspectives. Neuroscientist 21:30–43CrossRef

13.

Im K, Lee JM, Yoon U, Shin YW, Hong SB, Kim IY, Kwon JS, Kim SI (2006) Fractal dimension in human cortical surface: multiple regression analysis with cortical thickness, sulcal depth, and folding area. Hum Brain Mapp 27:994–1003CrossRef

14.

Gadde SG, Anegondi N, Bhanushali D et al (2016) Quantification of vessel density in retinal optical coherence tomography angiography images using local fractal dimension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:246–252CrossRef

15.

Noujaim SF, Berenfeld O, Kalifa J, Cerrone M, Nanthakumar K, Atienza F, Moreno J, Mironov S, Jalife J (2007) Universal scaling law of electrical turbulence in the mammalian heart. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20985–20989CrossRef

16.

Goldberger AL (1991) Is the normal heartbeat chaotic or homeostatic? News Physiol Sci 6:87–91PubMed

17.

Mandelbrot B (1967) How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science 156(3775):636–638CrossRef

18.

Bancaud A, Lavelle C, Huet S, Ellenberg J (2012) A fractal model for nuclear organization: current evidence and biological implications. Nucleic Acids Res 40:8783–8792CrossRef

19.

Glenny RW, Robertson HT, Yamashiro S, Bassingthwaighte JB (1991) Applications of fractal analysis to physiology. J Appl Physiol 70:2351–2367CrossRef

20.

Liebovitch LS, Todorov AT (1996) Using fractals and nonlinear dynamics to determine the physical properties of ion channel proteins. Crit Rev Neurobiol 10:169–187CrossRef

21.

West BJ (2010) Fractal physiology and the fractional calculus: a perspective. Front Physiol 14:1–12

22.

Cross SS (1997) Fractals in pathology. J Pathol 182:1–8CrossRef

23.

Smith TG Jr, Lange GD, Marks WB (1996) Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology—dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals. J Neurosci Methods 69:123–136CrossRef

24.

Grizzi F, Russo C, Colombo P et al (2005) Quantitative evaluation and modeling of two-dimensional neovascular network complexity: the surface fractal dimension. BMC Cancer 8:5–14

25.

Havlin S, Buldyrev SV, Goldberger AL, Mantegna RN, Ossadnik SM, Peng CK, Simons M, Stanley HE (1995) Fractals in biology and medicine. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 6:171–201CrossRef

26.

Grizzi F, Colombo P, Taverna G, Chiriva-Internati M, Cobos E, Graziotti P, Muzzio PC, Dioguardi N (2007) Geometry of human vascular system: is it an obstacle for quantifying antiangiogenic therapies? Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 15:134–139CrossRef

27.

Captur G, Karperien AL, Li C et al (2015) Fractal frontiers in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: towards clinical implementation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7:17–80

28.

Lorthois S, Cassot F (2010) Fractal analysis of vascular networks: insights from morphogenesis. J Theor Biol 262:614–633CrossRef

29.

Moal F, Chappard D, Wang J et al (2002) Fractal dimension can distinguish models and pharmacologic changes in liver fibrosis in rats. Hepatology 36:840–849CrossRef

30.

Rajkovic K, Bacic G, Ristanovic D, Milosevic NT (2014) Mathematical model of neuronal morphology: prenatal development of the human dentate nucleus. Biomed Res Int 2014:812351CrossRef

31.

Ristanovic D, Stefanovic BD, Puskas N (2014) Fractal analysis of dendrite morphology using modified box-counting method. Neurosci Res 84:64–67CrossRef

32.

Ristanovic D, Stefanovic BD, Puskas N (2014) Fractal analysis of dendrite morphology of rotated neuronal pictures: the modified box counting method. Theor Biol Forum 107:109–121PubMed

33.

Tambasco M, Magliocco AM (2008) Relationship between tumor grade and computed architectural complexity in breast cancer specimens. Hum Pathol 39:740–746CrossRef

34.

Liebovitch LS, Toth TI (1990) Fractal activity in cell membrane ion channels. Ann N Y Acad Sci 591:375–391CrossRef

35.

Dioguardi N, Grizzi F, Fiamengo B, Russo C (2008) Metrically measuring liver biopsy: a chronic hepatitis B and C computer-aided morphologic description. World J Gastroenterol 14:7335–7344CrossRef

36.

Grizzi F, Russo C, Franceschini B, di Rocco M, Torri V, Morenghi E, Fassati LR, Dioguardi N (2006) Sampling variability of computer-aided fractal-corrected measures of liver fibrosis in needle biopsy specimens. World J Gastroenterol 12:7660–7665CrossRef

37.

Dioguardi N, Grizzi F, Franceschini B, Bossi P, Russo C (2006) Liver fibrosis and tissue architectural change measurement using fractal-rectified metrics and Hurst’s exponent. World J Gastroenterol 12:2187–2194CrossRef

38.

Dioguardi N, Franceschini B, Aletti G, Russo C, Grizzi F (2003) Fractal dimension rectified meter for quantification of liver fibrosis and other irregular microscopic objects. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 25:312–320PubMed

39.

Dioguardi N, Grizzi F, Bossi P, Roncalli M (1999) Fractal and spectral dimension analysis of liver fibrosis in needle biopsy specimens. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 21:262–266PubMed

40.

Sedivy R (1996) Fractal tumours: their real and virtual images. Wien Klin Wochenschr 108:547–551PubMed

41.

Kikuchi A, Kozuma S, Yasugi T, Taketani Y (2004) Fractal analysis of surface growth patterns in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Obstet Investig 58:61–67CrossRef

42.

Lee LH, Tambasco M, Otsuka S, Wright A, Klimowicz A, Petrillo S, Morris D, Magliocco A, Bebb DG (2014) Digital differentiation of non-small cell carcinomas of the lung by the fractal dimension of their epithelial architecture. Micron 67:125–131CrossRef

43.

Vasiljevic J, Reljin B, Sopta J, Mijucic V, Tulic G, Reljin I (2012) Application of multifractal analysis on microscopic images in the classification of metastatic bone disease. Biomed Microdevices 14:541–548CrossRef

44.

Di Ieva A, Grizzi F, Tschabitscher M et al (2010) Correlation of microvascular fractal dimension with positron emission tomography [¹¹C]-methionine uptake in glioblastoma multiforme: preliminary findings. Microvasc Res 80:267–273CrossRef

45.

Metze K (2013) Fractal dimension of chromatin: potential molecular diagnostic applications for cancer prognosis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 13:719–735CrossRef

46.

Fudenberg G, Getz G, Meyerson M, Mirny LA (2011) High order chromatin architecture shapes the landscape of chromosomal alterations in cancer. Nat Biotechnol 29:1109–1113CrossRef

47.

Misteli T (2010) Higher-order genome organization in human disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2(8):a000794CrossRef

48.

Irinopoulou T, Rigaut JP, Benson MC (1993) Toward objective prognostic grading of prostatic carcinoma using image analysis. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 15:341–344PubMed

49.

Streba CT, Pirici D, Vere CC, Mogoantă L, Comănescu V, Rogoveanu I (2011) Fractal analysis differentiation of nuclear and vascular patterns in hepatocellular carcinomas and hepatic metastasis. Romanian J Morphol Embryol 52:845–854

50.

Strauss LG, Conti PS (1991) The applications of PET in clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 32:623–648PubMed

51.

Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Müeller SP, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, Fisher RI, Trotman J, Hoekstra OS, Hicks RJ, O'Doherty MJ, Hustinx R, Biggi A, Cheson BD (2014) Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. J Clin Oncol 32:3048–3058CrossRef

52.

Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A (2015) PET-based molecular imaging in personalized oncology: potential of the assessment of therapeutic outcome. Future Oncol 11:1083–1091CrossRef

53.

Mijnhout GS, Hoekstra OS, van Tulder MW, Teule GJJ, Devill WLJM (2001) Systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in melanoma patients. Cancer 91:1530–1542CrossRef

54.

Kessler LG, Barnhart HX, Buckler AJ, Choudhury KR, Kondratovich MV, Toledano A, Guimaraes AR, Filice R, Zhang Z, Sullivan DC, QIBA Terminology Working Group (2015) The emerging science of quantitative imaging biomarkers terminology and definitions for scientific studies and regulatory submissions. Stat Methods Med Res 24:9–26CrossRef

55.

Michallek F, Dewey M (2014) Fractal analysis in radiological and nuclear medicine perfusion imaging: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 24:60–69CrossRef

56.

Miwa K, Inubushi M, Wagatsuma K, Nagao M, Murata T, Koyama M, Koizumi M, Sasaki M (2014) FDG uptake heterogeneity evaluated by fractal analysis improves the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol 83:715–719CrossRef

57.

Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Georgoulias V, Eisenhut M, Herth F, Koukouraki S, Mäcke HR, Haberkorn U, Strauss LG (2006) Quantitative assessment of SSTR2 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET and comparison with ¹⁸F-FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:823–830CrossRef

58.

Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Burger C (2001) Quantitative PET studies in pretreated melanoma patients: a comparison of 6-[¹⁸F]fluoro-L-dopa with 18F-FDG and ¹⁵O-water using compartment and noncompartment analysis. J Nucl Med 42:248–256PubMed

59.

Breki CM, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hassel J, Theoharis T, Sachpekidis C, Pan L, Provata A (2016) Fractal and multifractal analysis of PET/CT images of metastatic melanoma before and after treatment with ipilimumab. EJNMMI Res 6:61CrossRef

60.

Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Schwarzbach M, Burger C, Heichel T, Willeke F, Mechtersheimer G, Lehnert T (2001) Dynamic PET ¹⁸F-FDG studies in patients with primary and recurrent soft-tissue sarcomas: impact on diagnosis and correlation with grading. J Nucl Med 42:713–720PubMed

61.

Okazumi S, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Schwarzbach MH, Strauss LG (2009) Quantitative, dynamic ¹⁸F-FDG-PET for the evaluation of soft tissue sarcomas: relation to differential diagnosis, tumor grading and prediction of prognosis. Hell J Nucl Med 12:223–228PubMed

62.

Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Burger C, Rühl A, Irngartinger G, Stremmel W, Rudi J (2004) Prognostic aspects of ¹⁸F-FDG PET kinetics in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma receiving FOLFOX chemotherapy. J Nucl Med 45:1480–1487PubMed

63.

Koukouraki S, Strauss LG, Georgoulias V, Eisenhut M, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A (2006) Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC and [¹⁸F]FDG in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours scheduled for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:1115–1122CrossRef

64.

Sachpekidis C, Kopka K, Eder M et al (2016) ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 dynamic PET/CT imaging in primary prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med 41:e473–e479CrossRef

65.

Sachpekidis C, Baumer P, Kopka K et al (2018) ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:904–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3936-0 CrossRefPubMed

66.

Sachpekidis C, Hillengass J, Goldschmidt H, Wagner B, Haberkorn U, Kopka K, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A (2017) Treatment response evaluation with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT in multiple myeloma patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 44:50–62CrossRef

67.

Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hoffmann M, Bergner R, Uppenkamp M, Haberkorn U, Strauss LG (2009) Prediction of progression-free survival in patients with multiple myeloma following anthracycline-based chemotherapy based on dynamic FDG-PET. Clin Nucl Med 34:576–584CrossRef

68.

Ben Bouallegue F, Tabaa YA, Kafrouni M et al (2017) Association between textural and morphological tumor indices on baseline PET-CT and early metabolic response on interim PET-CT in bulky malignant lymphomas. Med Phys 44:4608–4619CrossRef

69.

Tochigi T, Shuto K, Kono T, Ohira G, Tohma T, Gunji H, Hayano K, Narushima K, Fujishiro T, Hanaoka T, Akutsu Y, Okazumi S, Matsubara H (2017) Heterogeneity of glucose metabolism in esophageal cancer measured by fractal analysis of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography image: correlation between metabolic heterogeneity and survival. Dig Surg 34:186–191CrossRef

70.

Lopci E, Grizzi F, Russo C, Toschi L, Grassi I, Cicoria G, Lodi F, Mattioli S, Fanti S (2017) Early and delayed evaluation of solid tumours with ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM PET/CT: a pilot study on semiquantitative and computer-aided fractal geometry analysis. Nucl Med Commun 38:340–346CrossRef

71.

Kuikka JT, Tiihonen J, Karhu J et al (1997) Fractal analysis of striatal dopamine re-uptake sites. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 24:1085–1090

72.

Kuikka JT, Hartikainen P (2000) Heterogeneity of cerebral blood flow: a fractal approach. Nuklearmedizin 39:37–42CrossRef

73.

Lee JS, Lee DS, Park KS, Chung JK, Lee MC (2004) Changes in the heterogeneity of cerebral glucose metabolism with healthy aging: quantitative assessment by fractal analysis. J Neuroimaging 14:350–356CrossRef

74.

Venegas JG, Galletti GG (2000) Low-pass filtering, a new method of fractal analysis: application to PET images of pulmonary blood flow. J Appl Physiol 88:1365–1373CrossRef

75.

Kalliokoski KK, Kuusela TA, Nuutila P, Tolvanen T, Oikonen V, Teräs M, Takala TES, Knuuti J (2001) Perfusion heterogeneity in human skeletal muscle: fractal analysis of PET data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 28:450–456CrossRef

76.

Kalliokoski KK, Kuusela TA, Laaksonen MS, Knuuti J, Nuutila P (2003) Muscle fractal vascular branching pattern and microvascular perfusion heterogeneity in endurance-trained and untrained men. J Physiol 546:529–535CrossRef

Titel: The Complexity and Fractal Geometry of Nuclear Medicine Images
verfasst von: Fabio Grizzi
Angelo Castello
Dorina Qehajaj
Carlo Russo
Egesta Lopci
Publikationsdatum: 12.07.2018
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Molecular Imaging and Biology / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1536-1632
Elektronische ISSN: 1860-2002
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-018-1236-5

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

The Complexity and Fractal Geometry of Nuclear Medicine Images

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Characterization of [11C]PXT012253 as a PET Radioligand for mGlu4 Allosteric Modulators in Nonhuman Primates

Pre-therapy Somatostatin Receptor-Based Heterogeneity Predicts Overall Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients Undergoing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy

[68Ga]PSMA PET/CT Improves Initial Staging and Management Plan of Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Site-Specific Labeling of F-18 Proteins Using a Supplemented Cell-Free Protein Synthesis System and O-2-[18F]Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine: [18F]FET-HER2 Affibody Molecule

Inconsistent Detection of Sites of Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma with PSMA-Targeted [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT

Physiological Whole-Brain Distribution of [18F]FDOPA Uptake Index in Relation to Age and Gender: Results from a Voxel-Based Semi-quantitative Analysis

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Update Radiologie