Skip to main content
Log in

Do pregnant women accurately report sleep time? A comparison between self-reported and objective measures of sleep duration in pregnancy among a sample of urban mothers

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Sleep and Breathing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Survey questions are commonly used to assess sleep duration because of their low cost and convenience. Responses to these questions correlate moderately with objectively measured sleep duration in nonpregnant individuals, but little is known about the validity of self-reported sleep measures in pregnancy. The aim of the present study was to determine the extent to which self-reported gestational sleep duration assessed by questionnaire predicted objectively measured gestational sleep duration via actigraphy.

Methods

We analyzed data from 80 mothers enrolled in an ancillary study of Project BABIES, a prospective cohort study of urban, pregnant women. Sleep measurements were collected in midpregnancy and included 7 days of wrist actigraphy, a sleep log, and survey questions about sleep time adapted from the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

Results

Mean measured gestational sleep duration derived from actigraphy was 6.87 h [standard deviation (SD) 0.87], and questionnaire-assessed nocturnal sleep time averaged 7.29 h (SD 1.84). While the difference between measures did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07 for paired samples t test), over half (62 %) of participants reported a habitual average nightly sleep time that differed more than 1 h from their average actigraphically measured sleep duration (39 % overestimated by more than an hour; 23 % underestimated by more than an hour). There was no correlation between measures (r = 0.007; 95 % confidence interval −0.21, 0.23).

Conclusion

Questionnaire-derived reports of usual sleep hours do not reflect objectively measured sleep time in urban, pregnant women. Actigraphy is preferable to accurately assess gestational sleep duration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Knutson KL (2010) Sleep duration and cardiometabolic risk: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 24:731–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel SR, Ayas NT, Malhotra MR, White DP, Schernhammer ES, Speizer FE, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB (2004) A prospective study of sleep duration and mortality risk in women. Sleep 27:440–444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Facco FL, Grobman WA, Kramer J, Ho KH, Zee PC (2010) Self-reported short sleep duration and frequent snoring in pregnancy: impact on glucose metabolism. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203:142.e1–5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Reutrakul S, Zaidi N, Wroblewski K, Kay HH, Ismail M, Ehrmann DA, Van Cauter E (2011) Sleep disturbances and their relationship to glucose tolerance in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 34:2454–2457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Qiu C, Enquobahrie D, Frederick IO, Abetew D, Williams MA (2010) Glucose intolerance and gestational diabetes risk in relation to sleep duration and snoring during pregnancy: a pilot study. BMC Womens Health 14:17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams MA, Miller RS, Qiu C, Cripe SM, Gelaye B, Enquobahrie D (2010) Associations of early pregnancy sleep duration with trimester-specific blood pressures and hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Sleep 33:1363–1371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Micheli K, Komninos I, Bagkeris E, Roumeliotaki T, Koutis A, Kogevinas M, Chatzi L (2011) Sleep patterns in late pregnancy and risk of preterm birth and fetal growth restriction. Epidemiology 22:738–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee KA, Gay CL (2004) Sleep in late pregnancy predicts length of labor and type of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:2041–2046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abeysena C, Jayawardana P (2011) Sleep deprivation, physical activity and low income are risk factors for inadequate weight gain during pregnancy: a cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 37:734–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zafarghandi N, Hadavand S, Davati A, Mohseni SM, Kimiaiimoghadam F, Torkestani F (2012) The effects of sleep quality and duration in late pregnancy on labor and fetal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:535–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ulman TF, Von Holle A, Torgersen L, Stoltenberg C, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Bulik CM (2012) Sleep disturbances and binge eating disorder symptoms during and after pregnancy. Sleep 35:1403–1411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pien GW, Schwab RJ (2004) Sleep disorders during pregnancy. Sleep 27:1405–1417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sivertsen B, Omvik S, Havik OE, Pallesen S, Bjorvatn B, Nielsen GH, Straume S, Nordhus IH (2006) A comparison of actigraphy and polysomnography in older adults treated for chronic primary insomnia. Sleep 29:1353–1358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ancoli-Israel S, Cole R, Alessi C, Chambers M, Moorcroft W, Pollak CP (2003) The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep 26:342–392

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jean-Louis G, von Gizycki H, Zizi F, Spielman A, Hauri P, Taub H (1997) The actigraph data analysis software: I. A novel approach to scoring and interpreting sleep–wake activity. Percept Mot Ski 85:207–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. O'Brien LM, Bullough AS, Shelgikar AV, Chames MC, Armitage R, Chervin RD (2012) Validation of Watch-PAT-200 against polysomnography during pregnancy. J Clin Sleep Med 8:287–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Borodulin K, Evenson KR, Monda K, Wen F, Herring AH, Dole N (2010) Physical activity and sleep among pregnant women. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 24:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams MA, Aurora SK, Frederick IO, Qiu C, Gelaye B, Cripe SM (2010) Sleep duration, vital exhaustion and perceived stress among pregnant migraineurs and non-migraineurs. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 10:72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dørheim SK, Bjorvatn B, Eberhard-Gran M (2012) Insomnia and depressive symptoms in late pregnancy: a population-based study. Behav Sleep Med 10:152–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 28:193–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lauderdale DS, Knutson KL, Yan LL, Liu K, Rathouz PJ (2008) Self-reported and measured sleep duration: how similar are they? Epidemiology 19:838–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee KA, Zaffke ME, McEnany G (2000) Parity and sleep patterns during and after pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 95:14–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bourjeily G, Raker C, Chalhoub M, Miller M (2012) Excessive daytime sleepiness in late pregnancy may not always be normal: results from a cross-sectional study. Sleep and Breathing PMID: 22872283. doi:10.1007/s11325-012-0753-8

  24. Means MK, Edinger JD, Glenn DM, Fins AI (2003) Accuracy of sleep perceptions among insomnia sufferers and normal sleepers. Sleep Med 4:285–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Herring SJ, Nelson DB, Davey A, Klotz AA, Dibble LV, Oken E, Foster GD (2012) Determinants of excessive gestational weight gain in urban, low-income women. Women's Health Issues 22:e439–e446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Krouwer JS (2008) Why Bland–Altman plots should use X, not (Y + X)/2 when X is a reference method. Stat Med 27:778–780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Den Berg JF, Van Rooij FJ, Vos H, Tulen JH, Hofman A, Miedema HM, Neven AK, Tiemeier H (2008) Disagreement between subjective and actigraphic measures of sleep duration in a population-based study of elderly persons. J Sleep Res 17:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Okifuji A, Hare BD (2011) Nightly analyses of subjective and objective (actigraphy) measures of sleep in fibromyalgia syndrome: what accounts for the discrepancy? Clin J Pain 27:289–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bei B, Milgrom J, Ericksen J, Trinder J (2010) Subjective perception of sleep, but not its objective quality, is associated with immediate postpartum mood disturbances in healthy women. Sleep 33:531–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsai SY, Lin JW, Kuo LT, Thomas KA (2012) Daily sleep and fatigue characteristics in nulliparous women during the third trimester of pregnancy. Sleep 35:257–262

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilson DL, Fung A, Walker SP, Barnes M (2012) Subjective reports versus objective measurement of sleep latency and sleep duration in pregnancy. Behavioral Sleep Medicine PMID: 23205562. doi:10.1080/15402002.2012.670674

  32. de Souza L, Benedito-Silva AA, Pires ML, Poyares D, Tufik S, Calil HM (2003) Further validation of actigraphy for sleep studies. Sleep 26:81–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the US National Institutes of Health (R01 HD038856) and Temple University Department of Medicine. Dr. Herring was additionally supported by grant K23 HL106231 from the US National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon J. Herring.

Additional information

The study was conducted in Philadelphia at Temple University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herring, S.J., Foster, G.D., Pien, G.W. et al. Do pregnant women accurately report sleep time? A comparison between self-reported and objective measures of sleep duration in pregnancy among a sample of urban mothers. Sleep Breath 17, 1323–1327 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-013-0835-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-013-0835-2

Keywords

Navigation