Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Urban–Rural Variation in Satisfaction with Life: Demographic, Health, and Geographic Predictors in Halifax, Canada

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines how satisfaction with life (SWL) varies in four zones of the urban–rural continuum, for 1,971 residents of the county-sized municipality of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. It also examines whether the predictors of SWL themselves vary by rural–urban. Data are from the STAR project, which is an innovative GPS-assisted time diary survey. ‘Global’ SWL varies significantly by urban–rural zones, being highest in the inner city (IC), and lowest in the outer commuter belt (OCB). Self-rated health is a significant bivariate correlate, as are age, whether married, household size, and household income (all of which vary significantly by U-R zones). Several geographic variables co-vary significantly with SWL, particularly community belonging (strong in IC, weak in OCB), unsafe after dark (worst in IC, best in OCB), and commuting time (least in IC, most in OCB). A regional multivariate model yielded significant predictors related to physical health, mental health, and community geography, but excluded socio-demographic variables. Separate models for each urban–rural zone showed that SWL is more predictable at the zonal level than for the region as a whole, and the predictors vary considerably by zone. Physical health is an important predictor in the inner city and suburbs, unsafe after dark is significant only in the suburbs, and travel-related variables are very important in the inner commuter belt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, F. M., & McKennell, A. C. (1980). Measures of self-reported well-being: their affective, cognitive, and other components. Social Indicators Research, 8, 127–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being (Review of Economics and Statistics). New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Auh, S., & Cook, C. C. (2009). Quality of community life among rural residents: an integrated model. Social Indicators Research, 94(3), 377–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagley, M., & Mokhtarian, P. (1999). The role of lifestyle and attitudinal characteristics in residential neighborhood choice. In A. Ceder (Ed.), Proceedings, 14 th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (pp. 735–758). New York, NY: Elsevier.

  • Beesley, K. B. (1997). Metro-nonmetro comparisons of satisfaction in the rural–urban fringe Southern Ontario. Great Lakes Geographer, 4(1), 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, K. B. (Ed.). (2010). The rural–urban fringe in Canada: conflict and controversy. Brandon: Rural Development Institute, Brandon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, K. B., & Bowles, R. T. (1991). Change in the countryside: the turnaround, the community, and the quality of life. Rural Sociologist, 11(4), 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, K. B., & Russwurm, L. H. (1989). Social indicators and quality of life research: toward synthesis. Environments, 20(1), 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, C. J., Cummins, R. A., & Lo, S. K. (2000). The quality of rural and metropolitan life. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52(2), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, G. C., Berger, M. C., & Hoehn, J. P. (1988). New estimates of quality of life in urban areas. The American Economic Review, 78(1), 89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramston, P., Bruggerman, K., & Pretty, G. (2002). Community perspectives and subjective quality of life. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 49(4), 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. M., Eisenhauer, B. W., & Krannich, R. S. (2004). Dimensions of community attachment and their relationship to well-being in the amenity-rich rural West. Rural Sociology, 69(3), 405–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brereton, F., Bullock, C., Clinch, J. P., & Scott, M. (2011). Rural change and individual well-being: the case of Ireland and rural quality of life. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(2), 203–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brereton, F., Clinch, J. P., & Ferreira, S. (2008). Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 386–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruegmann, R. (2005). Sprawl: a compact history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bukenya, J. O., Gebremedhin, T. G., & Schaeffer, P. V. (2003). Analysis of rural quality of life and health: a spatial approach. Economic Development Quarterly, 17(3), 280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanera, J. M., & Higgins, P. (2011). Quality of life in urban-classified and rural-classified English local authority areas. Environment & Planning A, 43(3), 683–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S. L. (2009). Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transport Reviews, 29(3), 359–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, K. (1988). On the structure of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 20(6), 581–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. K., McChesney, R., Munroe, D., & Irwin, E. (2009). Spatial characteristics of exurban settlement pattern in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning, 90, 178–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1993). The Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale: Adult. (ComQol-A4) (4th ed.). Melbourne: School of Psychology, Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1995). On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 35(2), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: an attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38(3), 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Weale, M. (1992). On measuring the quality-of-life. World Development, 20(1), 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davern, M. T., & Chen, X. (2010). Piloting the geographic information system (GIS) methodology as an analytic tool for subjective wellbeing research. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 5(2), 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Neve, J.-E., Christakis, N. A., Fowler, J. H., & Frey, B. S. (2010). Genes, economics, and happiness. http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/crawpaper/2010-24.htm.

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being—The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felce, D. (1997). Defining and applying the concept of quality of life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41, 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: state and prospects. Review of Social Economy, 62(2), 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugl-Meyer, A. R., Melin, R., & Fugl-Meyer, K. S. (2002). Life satisfaction in 18-to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34(5), 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furuseth, O., & Lapping, M. (1999). Contested Countryside: the Rural–urban Fringe in North America. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, M. E. B. (1998). Determinants of the quality of life of rural families. The Journal of Rural Health, 14(2), 146–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, D. S., & Jungmin, L. (2007). Stressed out on four continents: time crunch or yuppie kvetch? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 374–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helburn, N. (1982). Geography and the quality of life. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72(4), 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: the case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61(2), 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Jian, G., & Casey, M. F. (2009). The impact of third places on community quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(4), 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. J., & Leven, C. L. (1997). Quality of life in central cities and suburbs. The Annals of Regional Science, 31(4), 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R. F. (1983). The extent and form of exurban sprawl. Growth & Change, 14(1), 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., & Weng, Q. (2007). Measuring the quality of life in city of Indianapolis by integration of remote sensing and census data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(2), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, E., Hartig, T., Garvill, J., & Garling, T. (1992). Residential-location preferences across the life span. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(2), 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K. M., & Auld, C. J. (2002). The role of leisure in determining quality of life: issues of content and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 57(1), 43–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1979). Life changes, illness and personal life satisfaction in a rural population. Social Science & Medicine, 13A(2), 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., Zumbo, B. D., & Hubley, A. (2000). Health and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 51(3), 245–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N., Kim, S., & Schofield-Tomschin, S. (1998). The effects of activity and aging on rural community living and consuming. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 32(2), 343–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward, H. (2002). Peri-urban residential development in the Halifax region 1960–2000: magnets, constraints, and planning policies. Canadian Geographer, 46(1), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward, H. (2010). ‘Exurban’ housing development in the Halifax commuter belt: processes, patterns, and policies. In K. Beesley (Ed.), The Rural-urban Fringe in Canada: Conflict and Controversy (pp. 363–374). Brandon: Rural Development Institute, Brandon University.

  • Millward, H., & Spinney, J. (2011). Time use, travel behavior, and the rural-urban continuum: results from the Halifax STAR project. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(1), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mookherjee, H. N. (1992). Perceptions of well-being by metropolitan and non-metropolitan populations in the United States. Journal of Social Psychology, 132(4), 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. St. Paul: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppong, J. R., Ironside, R. G., & Kennedy, L. W. (1988). Perceived quality of life in a center-periphery framework. Social Indicators Research, 20(6), 605–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, R. (1966). The rural–urban continuum. Sociologia Ruralis, 6, 299–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmore, E., & Luikart, C. (1972). Health and Social factors related to life satisfaction. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 13(1), 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piantadosi, S., Byar, D. P., & Green, S. B. (1988). The ecological fallacy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 127(5), 893–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prezza, M., & Constantini, S. (1998). Sense of community and life satisfaction: investigation in three different territorial contexts. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prutkin, J., & Feinstein, A. (2002). Quality-of-life measurements: origin and pathogenesis. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 75, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, R. (1968). Defining the rural–urban fringe. Social Forces, 47(2).

  • Raphael, D., Renwick, R., Brown, I., & Rootman, I. (1996). Quality of life indicators and health: current status and emerging conceptions. Social Indicators Research, 39(1), 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, L., Filson, G. C., Paine, C., Pfeiffer, W. C., & Taylor, J. R. (2000). Non-farm rural Ontario residents’ perceived quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 50(2), 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. H., Halstead, J. M., Gardner, K. H., & Carlson, C. H. (2011). Examining walkability and social capital as indicators of quality of life at the municipal and neighborhood scales. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(2), 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, A., Ghanghro, A., Johnson, E., & Kidwai, A. (2010). Does money matter? Determining the happiness of Canadians (p. 134). Ottawa: Centre for the Study of Living Standards, Research. Report No. 2010–09.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shucksmith, M., Cameron, S., Merridew, T., & Pichler, F. (2009). Urban–rural differences in quality of life across the European Union. Regional Studies, 43(10), 1275–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, M. J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., Easterlin, R. A., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The quality-of-life (QOL) research movement: past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 76(3), 343–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. M. (1973). The geography of social wellbeing in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, J. (2005). Making sense of multivariate data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinney, J., & Millward, H. (2010). Weather impacts on leisure activities in Halifax, Nova Scotia. International Journal of Biometeorology, 55, 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stathi, A., Fox, K. R., & McKenna, J. (2002). Physical activity and dimensions of subjective well-being in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 10(1), 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2006). General Social Survey—Cycle 19: time use (2005) user’s guide to the public use microdata file. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimpson, R. (1982). The Australian city: a welfare geography. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, J. B., Kelleher, C. C., Hope, A., Barry, M., Gabhainn, S. N., & Sixsmith, J. (2004). Influence of sociodemographic and neighbourhood factors on self rated health and quality of life in rural communities: findings from the agriproject in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58(11), 904–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodori, G. (2001). Examining the effects of community satisfaction and attachment on individual well-being. Rural Sociology, 66(4), 618–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, I., & Hungerford, L. (2010). Enhancing rural well-being through ‘experiencing’ rural community as place. In K. B. Beesley (Ed.), The rural–urban fringe in Canada: conflict and controversy (pp. 269–290). Brandon: Rural Development Institute, Brandon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vemuri, A. W., & Costanza, R. (2006). The role of human, social, built, and natural capital in explaining life satisfaction at the country level: toward a National Well-Being Index (NWI). Ecological Economics, 58(1), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., & Li, J. (2007). Latent lifestyle preferences and household location decisions. Journal of Geographical Systems, 9(1), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrwein, G. (1942). The rural–urban fringe. Economic Geography, 18, 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL. (1998). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Social Science & Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills-Herrera, E., Islam, G., & Hamilton, M. (2009). Subjective well-being in cities: a multidimensional concept of individual, social and cultural variables. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(2), 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this research was received from the Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (PSO – Project-2008-4669).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS, Canada, B3H 3C3

    Hugh Millward & Jamie Spinney

Authors
  1. Hugh Millward
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jamie Spinney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugh Millward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Millward, H., Spinney, J. Urban–Rural Variation in Satisfaction with Life: Demographic, Health, and Geographic Predictors in Halifax, Canada. Applied Research Quality Life 8, 279–297 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-012-9194-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-012-9194-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation