Skip to main content
Log in

An augmented reality simulator for ultrasound guided needle placement training

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Details are presented of a low cost augmented-reality system for the simulation of ultrasound guided needle insertion procedures (tissue biopsy, abscess drainage, nephrostomy etc.) for interventional radiology education and training. The system comprises physical elements; a mannequin, a mock ultrasound probe and a needle, and software elements; generating virtual ultrasound anatomy and allowing data collection. These two elements are linked by a pair of magnetic 3D position sensors. Virtual anatomic images are generated based on anatomic data derived from full body CT scans of live humans. Details of the novel aspects of this system are presented including; image generation, registration and calibration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alterovitz R, Pouliot J, Taschereau R, Hsu I, Goldberg K (2003) Simulating needle insertion and radioactive seed implantation for prostate brachytherapy. Proc Med Meets Virtual Reality 12:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  2. Besl P, McKay N (1992) A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dawson S (2006) Procedural simulation: a primer. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DeBonet J (1997) Multiresolution sampling procedure for analysis and synthesis of texture images. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH), pp 361–368

  5. Efros A, Freeman W (2001) Image quilting for texture synthesis and transfer. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH), pp 341–346

  6. Fischler M, Bolles R (1981) Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Graph Image Process 24(6):381–395

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gould D, Reekers J, Kessel D, Chalmers N, Sapoval M, Patel A, Becker G, Lee M, Stockx L (2006a) Simulation devices in interventional radiology: caveat emptor. Cardiovascular Intervent Radiol 29:4–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gould D, Kessel D, Healey A, Johnson S, Lewandowski W (2006b) Simulators in catheter-based interventional radiology: training or computer games. Clin Radiol 61:556–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heeger D, Bergen J (1995) Pyramid-based texture analysis/synthesis. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH), pp 229–238

  10. Magee D, Bulpitt A, Berry E (2001) Combining 3D deformable models and level set methods for the segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurisms. Proc Br Mach Vis Conf 1:333–341

    Google Scholar 

  11. Magee D, Kessel D (2005) A computer based simulator for ultrasound guided needle insertion procedures. IEE Conf Vis Inf Eng 1:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peachey D (1985) Solid texturing of complex objects. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH), pp 279–286

  13. Perlin K (1985) An image synthesizer. In: Proceedings of international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH), pp 287–296

  14. Pieper S, Weidenbach M, Berlage T (1997) Registration of 3D ultrasound images to surface models of the heart. In: Proceedings of the interface to real & virtual worlds, pp 211–213

  15. Reznek M, Harter P, Krummel T (2002) Virtual reality and simulation: training the future emergency physician. Acad Emerg Med 9:78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2002) Face-, expert and referent validity of the Xitact LS500 Laparoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 16:1764–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 Laparoscopy simulator. Surg Endosc 17:803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sethian JA (1999) Level set methods and fast marching methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Seymour N, Gallagher A, Roman S et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tafra L (2001) The learning curve and sentinel node biopsy. Am J Surg 182:347–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Y, Chui C, Lim H, Cai Y, Mak K (1998) Real-time interactive simulator for percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures. Comput Aided Surg 3:211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Weidenbach M, Wild F, Scheer K, Muth G, Kreutter S, Grunst G, Berlage T, Schneider P (2005) Computer-based training in two-dimensional echocardiography using an echocardiography simulator. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:362–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Magee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magee, D., Zhu, Y., Ratnalingam, R. et al. An augmented reality simulator for ultrasound guided needle placement training. Med Bio Eng Comput 45, 957–967 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0231-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0231-9

Keywords

Navigation