Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Practical limits on muscle synergy identification by non-negative matrix factorization in systems with mechanical constraints

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistical decomposition, including non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), is a convenient tool for identifying patterns of structured variability within behavioral motor programs, but it is unclear how the resolved factors relate to actual neural structures. Factors can be extracted from a uniformly sampled, low-dimension command space. In practical application, the command space is limited, either to those activations that perform some task(s) successfully or to activations induced in response to specific perturbations. NMF was applied to muscle activation patterns synthesized from low dimensional, synergy-like control modules mimicking simple task performance or feedback activation from proprioceptive signals. In the task-constrained paradigm, the accuracy of control module recovery was highly dependent on the sampled volume of control space, such that sampling even 50 % of control space produced a substantial degradation in factor accuracy. In the feedback paradigm, NMF was not capable of extracting more than four control modules, even in a mechanical model with seven internal degrees of freedom. Reduced access to the low-dimensional control space imposed by physical constraints may result in substantial distortion of an existing low dimensional controller, such that neither the dimensionality nor the composition of the recovered/extracted factors match the original controller.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berniker M, Jarc A, Bizzi E, Tresch MC (2009) Simplified and effective motor control based on muscle synergies to exploit musculoskeletal dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:7601–7606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosco G, Poppele RE (1993) Broad directional tuning in spinal projections to the cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 70:863–866

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bunderson NE, Burkholder TJ, Ting LH (2008) Reduction of neuromuscular redundancy for postural force generation using an intrinsic stability criterion. J Biomech 41:1537–1544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunderson NE, McKay JL, Ting LH, Burkholder TJ (2010) Directional constraint of endpoint force emerges from hindlimb anatomy. J Exp Biol 213:2131–2141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burkholder TJ, Nichols TR (2004) Three-dimensional model of the feline hindlimb. J Morphol 261:118–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark DJ, Ting LH, Zajac FE, Neptune RR, Kautz SA (2010) Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. J Neurophysiol 103:844–857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. d’Avella A, Bizzi E (2005) Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3076–3081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. d’Avella A, Saltiel P, Bizzi E (2003) Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. Nat Neurosci 6:300–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Donoho D, Stodden V (2003) When does non-negative matrix factorization give a correct decomposition into parts? Adv Neur In 16:1141–1148

    Google Scholar 

  10. Giszter SF, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E (1993) Convergent force fields organized in the frog’s spinal cord. J Neurosci 13:467–491

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Houk JC, Rymer WZ, Crago PE (1981) Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. J Neurophysiol 46:143–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoyer PO (2004) Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. J Mach Learn Res 5:1457–1469

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kutch JJ, Valero-Cuevas FJ (2012) Challenges and new approaches to proving the existence of muscle synergies of neural origin. PLOS Comput Biol 8(5):e1002434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee DD, Seung HS (2001) Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 13(13):556–562

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee DD, Seung HS (1999) Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401:788–791

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lemay MA, Galagan JE, Hogan N, Bizzi E (2001) Modulation and vectorial summation of the spinalized frog’s hindlimb end-point force produced by intraspinal electrical stimulation of the cord. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 9:12–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lemay MA, Grill WM (2004) Modularity of motor output evoked by intraspinal microstimulation in cats. J Neurophysiol 91:502–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saltiel P, Wyler-Duda K, D’Avella A, Tresch MC, Bizzi E (2001) Muscle synergies encoded within the spinal cord: evidence from focal intraspinal NMDA iontophoresis in the frog. J Neurophysiol 85:605–619

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sloane NJA, Hardin RH, Smith WW (2000) Tables of spherical codes. In: http://wwwresearchattcom/~njas/packings/. Accessed 22 Mar 2012

  20. Ting LH, Macpherson JM (2005) A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. J Neurophysiol 93:609–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ting LH, McKay JL (2007) Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17:622–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Todorov E (2004) Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7:907–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tresch MC, Cheung VC, d’Avella A (2006) Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. J Neurophysiol 95:2199–2212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tresch MC, Saltiel P, Bizzi E (1999) The construction of movement by the spinal cord. Nat Neurosci 2:162–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Valero-Cuevas FJ, Venkadesan M, Todorov E (2009) Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control. J Neurophysiol 102:59–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. van Antwerp KW, Burkholder TJ, Ting LH (2007) Inter-joint coupling effects on muscle contributions to endpoint force and acceleration in a musculoskeletal model of the cat hindlimb. J Biomech 40:3570–3579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (HD046922, HD032571). The NIH had no role in the design, performance or interpretation of the study, nor in the decision to publish.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas J. Burkholder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burkholder, T.J., van Antwerp, K.W. Practical limits on muscle synergy identification by non-negative matrix factorization in systems with mechanical constraints. Med Biol Eng Comput 51, 187–196 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0983-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-012-0983-8

Keywords

Navigation