Abstract
Purpose
The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of collateral findings detected in computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in a multi-center registry.
Materials and methods
We performed a retrospective review of 4303 patients (2719 males, mean age 60.3 ± 10.2 years) undergoing 64-slice CTCA for suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) at various academic institutions between 01/2006 and 09/2010. Collateral findings were recorded and scored as: non-significant (no signs of relevant pathology, not necessary to be reported), significant (clear signs of pathology, mandatory to be reported), or major (remarkable pathology, mandatory to be reported and further investigated).
Results
We detected 6886 non-cardiac findings (1.6 non cardiac finding per patient). Considering all centers, only 865/4303 (20.1 %) patients were completely without any additional finding. Overall, 2095 (30.4 %) non-significant, 4486 (65.2 %) significant, and 305 (4.4 %) major findings were detected. Among major findings, primary lung cancer was reported in 21 cases. In every center, most prevalent significant findings were mediastinal lymph nodes >1 cm. In 256 patients, collateral findings were clinically more relevant than coexisting CAD and justified the symptoms of patients.
Conclusions
The prevalence of significant and major collateral findings in CTCA is high. Radiologists should carefully evaluate the entire scan volume in each patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS et al (2008) 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 94:1386–1393. doi:10.1136/hrt.2008.145292
Francone M, Napoli A, Carbone I et al (2007) Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns. Radiol Med. 112:31–46. doi:10.1007/s11547-007-0118-8
Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Hunink MG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography by using different generations of multisection scanners: single-center experience. Radiology 246:384–393. doi:10.1148/radiol.2462070113
Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Palumbo A et al (2009) Computed tomography coronary angiography vs. stress ECG in patients with stable angina. Radiol Med. 114:513–523. doi:10.1007/s11547-009-0388-4
Malagò R, Pezzato A, Barbiani C et al (2012) Role of coronary angiography MDCT in the clinical setting: changes in diagnostic workup in the real world. Radiol Med. 117:939–952. doi:10.1007/s11547-012-0842-6
La Grutta L, La Grutta S, Galia M et al (2014) Acceptance of noninvasive computed tomography coronary angiography: for a patient-friendly medicine. Radiol Med. 119:128–134. doi:10.1007/s11547-013-0319-2
Di Cesare E, Gennarelli A, Di Sibio A et al (2014) Assessment of dose exposure and image quality in coronary angiography performed by 640-slice CT: a comparison between adaptive iterative and filtered back-projection algorithm by propensity analysis. Radiol Med. 119:642–649. doi:10.1007/s11547-014-0382-3
Di Cesare E, Carbone I, Carriero A (2012) Clinical indications for cardiac computed tomography. From the Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM). Radiol Med. 117:901–938. doi:10.1007/s11547-012-0814-x
Maffei E, Martini C, De Crescenzo S et al (2010) Low dose CT of the heart: a quantum leap into a new era of cardiovascular imaging. Radiol Med. 115:1179–1207. doi:10.1007/s11547-010-0566-4
La Grutta L, Runza G, Gentile G et al (2011) Prognostic outcome of routine clinical noninvasive multidetector-row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 2-year follow-up study. Radiol Med. 116:521–531. doi:10.1007/s11547-011-0655-z
Hunold P, Schmermund A, Seibel RM, Gronemeyer DH, Erbel R (2001) Prevalence and clinical significance of accidental findings in electron-beam tomographic scans for coronary artery calcification. Eur Heart J 22:1748–1758. doi:10.1053/euhj.2000.2586
Cademartiri F, Malago R, Belgrano M et al (2007) Spectrum of collateral findings in multislice CT coronary angiography. Radiol Med. 112:937–948. doi:10.1007/s11547-007-0194-9
Law YM, Huang J, Chen K, Cheah FK, Chua T (2008) Prevalence of significant extracoronary findings on multislice CT coronary angiography examinations and coronary artery calcium scoring examinations. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 52:49–56. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01911.x
Onuma Y, Tanabe K, Nakazawa G et al (2006) Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:402–406. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.071
Machaalany J, Yam Y, Ruddy TD et al (2009) Potential clinical and economic consequences of noncardiac incidental findings on cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1533–1541. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.026
Horton KM, Post WS, Blumenthal RS, Fishman EK (2002) Prevalence of significant noncardiac findings on electron-beam computed tomography coronary artery calcium screening examinations. Circulation 106:532–534. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000027136.56615.DE
Runza G, La Grutta L, Alaimo V et al (2007) Comprehensive cardiovascular ECG-gated MDCT as a standard diagnostic tool in patients with acute chest pain. Eur J Radiol 64:41–47. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.06.020
Flor N, Di Leo G, Squarza SA et al (2013) Malignant incidental extracardiac findings on cardiac CT: systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:555–564. doi:10.2214/AJR
Earls JP (2011) The pros and cons of searching for extracardiac findings at cardiac CT: studies should be reconstructed in the maximum field of view and adequately reviewed to detect pathologic findings. Radiology 261:342–346. doi:10.1148/radiol.11111099
White CS (2011) The pros and cons of searching for extracardiac findings at cardiac CT: use of a restricted field of view is acceptable. Radiology 261:338–341. doi:10.1148/radiol.11111131
Conflict of interest
None of the Authors have potential conflict of interests or financial disclosures concerning the material of this study.
Ethical standards
This article contains a retrospective study; for this type of study formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
La Grutta, L., Malagò, R., Maffei, E. et al. Collateral non cardiac findings in clinical routine CT coronary angiography: results from a multi-center registry. Radiol med 120, 1122–1129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0551-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-015-0551-z