Tumor grade estımatıon of clear cell and papıllary renal cell carcınomas usıng contrast-enhanced MDCT and FSE T2 weıghted MR ımagıng: radıology-pathology correlatıon

Discrimination of low grade (grade 1–2) renal tumors from high grade (grade 3–4) ones carries crucial importance in terms of the management of these patients and also in the decision-making of appropriate treatment strategies. Our aim was to investigate whether contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and T2 weighted fast spin echo (FSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could play a specific role in the discrimination of low grade versus high grade tumors in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) patients.

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 66 RCC patients based on histopathologic findings who had underwent either partial or total nephrectomies. Our cohort consisted of 52 ccRCC and 14 pRCC patients, of whom 50 were male (%76) and 16 were female (%24). Among the 52 ccRCC patients, 18 had both cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, 15 had only cortico-medullary phase CT and 19 had only MRI examination. In the pRCC group, 8 patients had both cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced CT and MRI, 3 had only cortico-medullary phase CT and 3 had only MRI. We both calculated mean tumor attenuation values on cortico-medullary phase MDCT images as HU (hounsfield unit) and also tumor mean signal intensity values on FSE T2 weighted MR images, using both region of interest and whole lesion measurements including normal renal cortex. The obtained values were compared with the grading results of the ccRCC and pRCC tumors according to the WHO/International Society of Urological Pathology grading system.

A significant positive correlation was found between the mean attenuation values of both tumor subtypes on cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced CT and their grades (p < 0.001). High grade tumors exhibited higher mean attenuation values (74.3 ± 22.3 HU) than the low grade tumors (55.2 ± 23.7 HU) in both subtypes. However, a statistically significant correlation was not found between the mean signal intensity values of the two tumor subtypes on FSE T2 weighted MR images and their grades (p > 0.05). Low grade tumors had a mean signal intensity value of 408.9 ± 44.6, while high grade tumors showed a value of 382.1 ± 44.2. The analysis of the ccRCC group patients, yielded a statistically significant correlation between the mean signal intensity values on T2 weighted images and tumor grading (p < 0.001). Low grade (grade 1–2) ccRCC patients exhibited higher mean signal intensity values (475.7 ± 51.3), as compared to those of high grade (grade 3–4) (418.5 ± 45.7) tumors. On the other hand, analysis of the pRCC group patients revealed that there was a significant correlation between the mean attenuation values of tumors on cortico-medullary phase contrast-enhanced CT and their grades (p < 0.001). High grade papillary subtype tumors (54.2 ± 25.2) showed higher mean attenuation values than the low grade (35.5 ± 18.8) ones.

Contrast-enhanced MDCT and T2 weighted FSE MRI can play a considerable role in the discrimination of low grade versus high grade tumors of both subtype RCC patients. Thus, these non-invasive evaluation techniques may have positive impact on the determination of the management and treatment strategies of these patients.