Skip to main content
Erschienen in: La radiologia medica 11/2021

01.11.2021 | Breast Radiology

Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer

verfasst von: Rossano Girometti, Anna Linda, Paola Conte, Michele Lorenzon, Isabella De Serio, Katerina Jerman, Viviana Londero, Chiara Zuiani

Erschienen in: La radiologia medica | Ausgabe 11/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare preoperative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CEM) versus digital mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis (DM + DBT) in detecting breast cancer (BC) and assessing its size.

Material and methods

We retrospectively included 78 patients with histological diagnosis of BC who underwent preoperative DM, DBT, and CEM over one year. Four readers, blinded to pathology and clinical information, independently evaluated DM + DBT versus CEM to detect BC and measure its size. Readers' experience ranged 3–10 years. We calculated the per-lesion cancer detection rate (CDR) and the complement of positive predictive value (1-PPV) of both methods, stratifying analysis on the total of lesions, index lesions, and additional lesions. The agreement in assessing cancer size versus pathology was assessed with Bland–Altman analysis.

Results

100 invasive BCs (78 index lesions and 22 additional lesions) were analyzed. Compared to DM + DBT, CEM showed higher overall CDR in less experienced readers (range 0.85–0.90 vs. 0.95–0.96), and higher CDR for additional lesions, regardless of the reader (range 0.54–0.68 vs. 0.77–0.86). CEM increased the detection of additional disease in dense breasts in all readers and non-dense breasts in less experienced readers only. The 1-PPV of CEM (range 0.10–0.18) was comparable to that of DM + DBT (range 0.09–0.19). At Bland–Altman analysis, DM + DBT and CEM showed comparable mean differences and limits of agreement in respect of pathologic cancer size.

Conclusion

Preoperative CEM improved the detection of additional cancer lesions compared to DM + DBT, particularly in dense breasts. CEM and DM + DBT achieved comparable performance in cancer size assessment.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 27:5640–5649CrossRef Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 27:5640–5649CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brennan ME, McKessar M, Snook K et al (2017) Impact of selective use of breast MRI on surgical decision-making in women with newly diagnosed operable breast cancer. Breast 32:135–143CrossRef Brennan ME, McKessar M, Snook K et al (2017) Impact of selective use of breast MRI on surgical decision-making in women with newly diagnosed operable breast cancer. Breast 32:135–143CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Clauser P, Mann R, Athanasiou A et al (2018) A survey by the European society of breast imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 28:1909–1918CrossRef Clauser P, Mann R, Athanasiou A et al (2018) A survey by the European society of breast imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 28:1909–1918CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316CrossRef Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L (2019) Breast MRI: state-of-the art. Radiology 292:520–536CrossRef Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L (2019) Breast MRI: state-of-the art. Radiology 292:520–536CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fontaine M, Tourasse C, Pages E et al (2019) Local tumor staging of breast cancer: digital mammography versus digital mammography plus tomosynthesis. Radiology 291:594–603CrossRef Fontaine M, Tourasse C, Pages E et al (2019) Local tumor staging of breast cancer: digital mammography versus digital mammography plus tomosynthesis. Radiology 291:594–603CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim WH, Chang JM, Moon HG et al (2016) Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers. Eur Radiol 26:1556–1564CrossRef Kim WH, Chang JM, Moon HG et al (2016) Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers. Eur Radiol 26:1556–1564CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783CrossRef Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhimani C, Matta D, Roth RG et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: technique, indications, and clinical applications. Acad Radiol 24:84–88CrossRef Bhimani C, Matta D, Roth RG et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: technique, indications, and clinical applications. Acad Radiol 24:84–88CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghaderi KF, Phillips J, Perry H et al (2019) Contrast-enhanced mammography: current applications and future directions. Radiographics 39:1907–1920CrossRef Ghaderi KF, Phillips J, Perry H et al (2019) Contrast-enhanced mammography: current applications and future directions. Radiographics 39:1907–1920CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee-Felker SA, Tekchandani L, Thomas M et al (2019) Newly diagnosed breast cancer: comparison of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and breast MR imaging in the evaluation of extent of disease. Radiology 285:389–400CrossRef Lee-Felker SA, Tekchandani L, Thomas M et al (2019) Newly diagnosed breast cancer: comparison of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and breast MR imaging in the evaluation of extent of disease. Radiology 285:389–400CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fallenberg EM, Schmitzberger FF, Amer H et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI-clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation. Eur Radiol 27:2752–2764CrossRef Fallenberg EM, Schmitzberger FF, Amer H et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI-clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation. Eur Radiol 27:2752–2764CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Helal MH, Mansour SM, Zaglol M et al (2017) Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know? Br J Radiol 90:20160717CrossRef Helal MH, Mansour SM, Zaglol M et al (2017) Staging of breast cancer and the advanced applications of digital mammogram: what the physician needs to know? Br J Radiol 90:20160717CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Perry H, Phillips J, Dialani V et al (2019) Contrast-enhanced mammography: a systematic guide to interpretation and reporting. Am J Roentgenol 212:222–231CrossRef Perry H, Phillips J, Dialani V et al (2019) Contrast-enhanced mammography: a systematic guide to interpretation and reporting. Am J Roentgenol 212:222–231CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290CrossRef Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Li L, Roth R, Germaine P et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:113–123CrossRef Li L, Roth R, Germaine P et al (2017) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:113–123CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS et al (2013) Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266:743–751CrossRef Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS et al (2013) Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology 266:743–751CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bicchierai G, Tonelli P, Piacenti A et al (2020) Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: large-scale single-center experience. Breast J 26:1276–1283CrossRef Bicchierai G, Tonelli P, Piacenti A et al (2020) Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: large-scale single-center experience. Breast J 26:1276–1283CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Suter MB, Pesapane F, Agazzi GM et al (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 53:8–17CrossRef Suter MB, Pesapane F, Agazzi GM et al (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 53:8–17CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumkin JH, Berg WA, Carter GJ et al (2019) Diagnostic performance of MRI, molecular breast imaging, and contrast-enhanced mammography in women with newly diagnosed. Breast Cancer Radiol 293:531–540 Sumkin JH, Berg WA, Carter GJ et al (2019) Diagnostic performance of MRI, molecular breast imaging, and contrast-enhanced mammography in women with newly diagnosed. Breast Cancer Radiol 293:531–540
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tardivel AM, Balleyguier C, Dunant A et al (2016) Added value of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in postscreening assessment. Breast J 22:520–528CrossRef Tardivel AM, Balleyguier C, Dunant A et al (2016) Added value of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in postscreening assessment. Breast J 22:520–528CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanardo M, Cozzi A, Trimboli RM et al (2019) Technique, protocols and adverse reactions for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): a systematic review. Insights Imaging 10:76CrossRef Zanardo M, Cozzi A, Trimboli RM et al (2019) Technique, protocols and adverse reactions for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM): a systematic review. Insights Imaging 10:76CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer
verfasst von
Rossano Girometti
Anna Linda
Paola Conte
Michele Lorenzon
Isabella De Serio
Katerina Jerman
Viviana Londero
Chiara Zuiani
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2021
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
La radiologia medica / Ausgabe 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0033-8362
Elektronische ISSN: 1826-6983
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01400-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2021

La radiologia medica 11/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.