Skip to main content
Erschienen in: HAND 3/2014

01.09.2014

Long-term outcomes following single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release

verfasst von: K. R. Means Jr., N. H. Dubin, K. M. Patel, J. D. Pletka

Erschienen in: HAND | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is limited published information about long-term outcomes and recurrence rates following single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

Methods

We reviewed symptom and function outcomes from a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release at a minimum of 8 years follow-up. Out of 207 patients in the original database, we were able to confirm correct current contact information for 106 patients. Of these, 91 patients with 115 single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel releases agreed to participate. All of these patients were eligible for this long-term follow-up study based on documented preoperative and 6-month postoperative Levine-Katz questionnaire scores. Patients then completed a current update of the Levine-Katz questionnaires to assess function and symptom outcomes at latest follow-up.

Results

The average 6-month postoperative scores were significantly lower compared with the average preoperative scores and were maintained at long-term follow-up. There were no significant differences in average change in scores at long-term follow-up compared to 6-months postoperative.

Conclusions

Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release is an effective surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Low recurrence rates and maintenance of low symptom and function scores can be expected at 8 to 10 years following this technique.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Atroshi I, Hofer M, Larsson GU, et al. Open compared with 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34:266–72. Atroshi I, Hofer M, Larsson GU, et al. Open compared with 2-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a 5-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2009;34:266–72.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Borisch N, Haussmann P. Neurophysiological recovery after open carpal tunnel decompression: comparison of simple decompression and decompression with epineurotomy. J Hand Surg (Br). 2003;28:450–4.CrossRef Borisch N, Haussmann P. Neurophysiological recovery after open carpal tunnel decompression: comparison of simple decompression and decompression with epineurotomy. J Hand Surg (Br). 2003;28:450–4.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chow JC, Hantes ME . Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: thirteen years' experience with the Chow technique. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002; 27: 1011–18. Chow JC, Hantes ME . Endoscopic carpal tunnel release: thirteen years' experience with the Chow technique. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2002; 27: 1011–18.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Concannon MJ, Brownfield ML, Puckett CL. The incidence of recurrence after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1662–5.PubMedCrossRef Concannon MJ, Brownfield ML, Puckett CL. The incidence of recurrence after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:1662–5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat De Smith L, Fabry G. Transection of the motor branch of the ulnar nerve as a complication of two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a case report. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;20:18–9. De Smith L, Fabry G. Transection of the motor branch of the ulnar nerve as a complication of two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a case report. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;20:18–9.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferdinand RD, MacLean JG. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective, randomised, blinded assessment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2002;84:375–9.CrossRef Ferdinand RD, MacLean JG. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release in bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective, randomised, blinded assessment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2002;84:375–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Filippi R, Reisch R, El-Shki D, et al. Uniportal endoscopic surgery of carpal tunnel syndrome: technique and clinical results. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;45:78–83.PubMedCrossRef Filippi R, Reisch R, El-Shki D, et al. Uniportal endoscopic surgery of carpal tunnel syndrome: technique and clinical results. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;45:78–83.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hankins CL, Brown MG, Lopez RA, Lee AK, Dang J, Harper RD . A 12-year experience using the Brown two-portal endoscopic procedure of transverse carpal ligament release in 14,722 patients: defining a new paradigm in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1911–21. Hankins CL, Brown MG, Lopez RA, Lee AK, Dang J, Harper RD . A 12-year experience using the Brown two-portal endoscopic procedure of transverse carpal ligament release in 14,722 patients: defining a new paradigm in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1911–21.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Jugovac I, Burgic N, Micovic V, et al. Carpal tunnel release by limited palmar incision vs traditional open technique: randomized controlled trial. Croat Med J. 2002;43:33–6.PubMed Jugovac I, Burgic N, Micovic V, et al. Carpal tunnel release by limited palmar incision vs traditional open technique: randomized controlled trial. Croat Med J. 2002;43:33–6.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Keiner D, Gaab MR, Schroeder HW, et al. Long-term follow-up of dual-portal endoscopic release of the transverse ligament in carpal tunnel syndrome: an analysis of 94 cases. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:131–7.PubMedCrossRef Keiner D, Gaab MR, Schroeder HW, et al. Long-term follow-up of dual-portal endoscopic release of the transverse ligament in carpal tunnel syndrome: an analysis of 94 cases. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:131–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kharwadkar N, Naique S, Molitor PJ. Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg (Br). 2005;30:92–5.CrossRef Kharwadkar N, Naique S, Molitor PJ. Prospective randomized trial comparing absorbable and non-absorbable sutures in open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg (Br). 2005;30:92–5.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulick MI, Gordillo G, Javidi T, Kilgore ES, Jr., Newmeyer WL, III. Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1986;11:59–66. Kulick MI, Gordillo G, Javidi T, Kilgore ES, Jr., Newmeyer WL, III. Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1986;11:59–66.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Langloh ND, Linscheid RL. Recurrent and unrelieved carpal-tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;83:41–47. Langloh ND, Linscheid RL. Recurrent and unrelieved carpal-tunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;83:41–47.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorgelly PK, Dias JJ, Bradley MJ, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome, the search for a cost-effective surgical intervention: a randomised controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87:36–40.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lorgelly PK, Dias JJ, Bradley MJ, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome, the search for a cost-effective surgical intervention: a randomised controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87:36–40.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Roth JH, et al. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized trial. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003;28:475–80.CrossRef MacDermid JC, Richards RS, Roth JH, et al. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized trial. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2003;28:475–80.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Dua A, et al. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a short-term comparative study. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41:57–61.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Malhotra R, Kiran EK, Dua A, et al. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a short-term comparative study. Indian J Orthop. 2007;41:57–61.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mintalucci DJ, Leinberry Jr CF. Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43:431–7.PubMedCrossRef Mintalucci DJ, Leinberry Jr CF. Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43:431–7.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Quaglietta P, Corriero G. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release surgery: retrospective study of 390 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;92:41–5.PubMedCrossRef Quaglietta P, Corriero G. Endoscopic carpal tunnel release surgery: retrospective study of 390 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;92:41–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Saw NL, Jones S, Shepstone L, et al. Early outcome and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized prospective trial. J Hand Surg (Br). 2003;28:444–9.CrossRef Saw NL, Jones S, Shepstone L, et al. Early outcome and cost-effectiveness of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release: a randomized prospective trial. J Hand Surg (Br). 2003;28:444–9.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Subasi M, Ay S, Tuzuner T. Transection of the ulnar nerve as a complication of two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Isr Med Assoc J. 2004;6:443–4.PubMed Subasi M, Ay S, Tuzuner T. Transection of the ulnar nerve as a complication of two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Isr Med Assoc J. 2004;6:443–4.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Trumble TE, Diao E, Abrams RA, et al. Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1107–15.PubMed Trumble TE, Diao E, Abrams RA, et al. Single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release compared with open release: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1107–15.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasiliadis HS, Xenakis TA, Mitsionis G, et al. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:26–33.PubMedCrossRef Vasiliadis HS, Xenakis TA, Mitsionis G, et al. Endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel release. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:26–33.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber RA, DeSalvo DJ, Rude MJ . Five-year follow-up of carpal tunnel release in patients over age 65. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2010;35:207–11. Weber RA, DeSalvo DJ, Rude MJ . Five-year follow-up of carpal tunnel release in patients over age 65. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2010;35:207–11.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Wheatley MJ, Kaul MP. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome following endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;39:469–71.PubMedCrossRef Wheatley MJ, Kaul MP. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome following endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a preliminary report. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;39:469–71.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong KC, Hung LK, Ho PC, et al. Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomised study of endoscopic versus limited-open methods. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2003;85:863–8. Wong KC, Hung LK, Ho PC, et al. Carpal tunnel release. A prospective, randomised study of endoscopic versus limited-open methods. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2003;85:863–8.
Metadaten
Titel
Long-term outcomes following single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release
verfasst von
K. R. Means Jr.
N. H. Dubin
K. M. Patel
J. D. Pletka
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
HAND / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1558-9447
Elektronische ISSN: 1558-9455
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9614-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

HAND 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.