Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2007

01.04.2007

Treatment of Gastric Adenocarcinoma May Differ Among Hospital Types in the United States, a Report from the National Cancer Data Base

verfasst von: Kaye M. Reid-Lombardo, Greer Gay, Lina Patel-Parekh, Jaffer A. Ajani, John H. Donohue, Gastric Patient Care Evaluation Group from the Commission on Cancer

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The concept that complex surgical procedures should be performed at high-volume centers to improve surgical morbidity and mortality is becoming widely accepted. We wanted to determine if there were differences in the treatment of patients with gastric cancer between community cancer centers and teaching hospitals in the United States. Data from the 2001 Gastric Cancer Patient Care Evaluation Study of the National Cancer Data Base comprising 6,047 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma treated at 691 hospitals were assessed. The mean number of patients treated was larger at teaching hospitals (14/year) when compared to community centers (5–9/year) (p < 0.05). The utilization of laparoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography were significantly more common at teaching centers (p < 0.01). Pathologic assessment of greater than 15 nodes was documented in 31% of specimen at community hospitals and 38% at teaching hospitals (p < 0.01). Adjusted for cancer stage, chemotherapy and radiation therapy were utilized with equal frequency at all types of treatment centers. The 30-day postoperative mortality was lowest at teaching hospitals (5.5%) and highest at community hospitals (9.9%) (p < 0.01). These data support previous publications demonstrating that patients with diseases requiring specialized treatment have lower operative mortality when treated at high-volume centers.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2006. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2006.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hundahl SA, Phillips JL, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on poor survival of U.S. gastric carcinoma patients treated with gastrectomy: Fifth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, proximal disease, and the “different disease” hypothesis. Cancer 2000;88:921–932.PubMedCrossRef Hundahl SA, Phillips JL, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on poor survival of U.S. gastric carcinoma patients treated with gastrectomy: Fifth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, proximal disease, and the “different disease” hypothesis. Cancer 2000;88:921–932.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura Y, Yoshimi I. Comparison of cancer mortality (stomach cancer) in five countries: France, Italy, Japan, UK and USA from the WHO mortality database (1960–2000). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005;35:103–105.PubMedCrossRef Imamura Y, Yoshimi I. Comparison of cancer mortality (stomach cancer) in five countries: France, Italy, Japan, UK and USA from the WHO mortality database (1960–2000). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2005;35:103–105.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Testa T, Nahum MA, Spinelli E, Carbone E, Flocchini GP, Motta G. The “Will Rogers effect” on stage grading. Ann Ital Chir 1999;70:829–830.PubMed Testa T, Nahum MA, Spinelli E, Carbone E, Flocchini GP, Motta G. The “Will Rogers effect” on stage grading. Ann Ital Chir 1999;70:829–830.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Warshaw Al, Finlayson SRG, Grove MR, Tosteson ANA. Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodectomy. Surgery 1999;126:78–83.CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Warshaw Al, Finlayson SRG, Grove MR, Tosteson ANA. Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodectomy. Surgery 1999;126:78–83.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:81–88.CrossRef Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2001;345:81–88.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000;284:3028–3035.PubMedCrossRef Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000;284:3028–3035.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128–1137.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128–1137.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomura E, Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Oshima A. Population-based study of relationship between hospital surgical volume and 5-year-survival of stomach cancer patients in Osaka, Japan. Cancer Sci 2003;94:998–1002.PubMedCrossRef Nomura E, Tsukuma H, Ajiki W, Oshima A. Population-based study of relationship between hospital surgical volume and 5-year-survival of stomach cancer patients in Osaka, Japan. Cancer Sci 2003;94:998–1002.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Standards for cancer registries. In Hultstrom D, ed. Required Status Table, vol. II, version 10, Chap. IX. Springfield, IL: NAACCR, 2002, pp 107–118. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Standards for cancer registries. In Hultstrom D, ed. Required Status Table, vol. II, version 10, Chap. IX. Springfield, IL: NAACCR, 2002, pp 107–118.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Commission on Cancer. Standards of the Commission on Cancer, vol. II: Registry Operations and Data Standards. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons, 1998. Commission on Cancer. Standards of the Commission on Cancer, vol. II: Registry Operations and Data Standards. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons, 1998.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaffer JP. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annu Rev Psychol 1995;46:561–584.CrossRef Shaffer JP. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annu Rev Psychol 1995;46:561–584.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat The Research Group for Population-based Cancer Registration in Japan. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 1999: Estimates based on data from 11 population-based cancer registries. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004;34:352–356.CrossRef The Research Group for Population-based Cancer Registration in Japan. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 1999: Estimates based on data from 11 population-based cancer registries. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2004;34:352–356.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wanebo HJ, Kennedy BJ, Winchester DP, Fremgen A, Stewart AK. Gastric carcinoma: Does lymph node dissection alter survival? J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:616–624.PubMed Wanebo HJ, Kennedy BJ, Winchester DP, Fremgen A, Stewart AK. Gastric carcinoma: Does lymph node dissection alter survival? J Am Coll Surg 1996;183:616–624.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, Sasako M, Welvaart K, Plukker JT, van Elk P, Obertop H, Gouma DJ, Taat CW, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 1995;345:745–748.PubMedCrossRef Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, Sasako M, Welvaart K, Plukker JT, van Elk P, Obertop H, Gouma DJ, Taat CW, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet 1995;345:745–748.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, Craven J, Bancewicz J, Joypaul V, Cook P. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: Preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet 1996;347:995–999.PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, Fayers P, Fielding J, Craven J, Bancewicz J, Joypaul V, Cook P. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: Preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group. Lancet 1996;347:995–999.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujii M, Sasaki J, Nakajima T. State of the art in the treatment of gastric cancer: From the 71st Japanese Gastric Cancer Congress. Gastric Cancer 1999;2:151–157.PubMedCrossRef Fujii M, Sasaki J, Nakajima T. State of the art in the treatment of gastric cancer: From the 71st Japanese Gastric Cancer Congress. Gastric Cancer 1999;2:151–157.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sano T, Katai H, Sasako M, Maruyama K. One thousand consecutive gastrectomies without operative mortality. Br J Surg 2002;89:123.PubMed Sano T, Katai H, Sasako M, Maruyama K. One thousand consecutive gastrectomies without operative mortality. Br J Surg 2002;89:123.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kodera Y, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Sano T, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Gastric Cancer Surgery Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Identification of risk factors for the development of complications following extended and superextended lymphadenectomies for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:1103–1109.PubMedCrossRef Kodera Y, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, Sano T, Nashimoto A, Kurita A, Gastric Cancer Surgery Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Identification of risk factors for the development of complications following extended and superextended lymphadenectomies for gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2005;92:1103–1109.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wainess RM, Dimick JB, Upchurch GR Jr, Cowan JA, Mulholland MW. Epidemiology of surgically treated gastric cancer in the United States, 1988–2000. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:879–883.PubMedCrossRef Wainess RM, Dimick JB, Upchurch GR Jr, Cowan JA, Mulholland MW. Epidemiology of surgically treated gastric cancer in the United States, 1988–2000. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:879–883.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128–1137.PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128–1137.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarhult J. The importance of volume for outcome in cancer surgery—an overview. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996;22:205–210.PubMedCrossRef Jarhult J. The importance of volume for outcome in cancer surgery—an overview. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996;22:205–210.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bottcher K, Siewert JR, Roder JD, Busch R, Hermanek P, Meyer HJ. Risk of surgical therapy of stomach cancer in Germany. Results of the German 1992 Stomach Cancer Study. German Stomach Cancer Study Group (‘92). Chirurg 1994;65:298–306.PubMed Bottcher K, Siewert JR, Roder JD, Busch R, Hermanek P, Meyer HJ. Risk of surgical therapy of stomach cancer in Germany. Results of the German 1992 Stomach Cancer Study. German Stomach Cancer Study Group (‘92). Chirurg 1994;65:298–306.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Damhuis RA, Meurs CJ, Dijkhuis CM, Stassen LP, Wiggers T. Hospital volume and post-operative mortality after resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002;28:401–405.PubMedCrossRef Damhuis RA, Meurs CJ, Dijkhuis CM, Stassen LP, Wiggers T. Hospital volume and post-operative mortality after resection for gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2002;28:401–405.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Karpeh MS, Leon L, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: Is location more important than number? An analysis of 1,038 patients. Ann Surg 2000;232:362–371.PubMedCrossRef Karpeh MS, Leon L, Klimstra D, Brennan MF. Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: Is location more important than number? An analysis of 1,038 patients. Ann Surg 2000;232:362–371.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7114–7124.PubMedCrossRef Smith DD, Schwarz RR, Schwarz RE. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:7114–7124.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Treatment of Gastric Adenocarcinoma May Differ Among Hospital Types in the United States, a Report from the National Cancer Data Base
verfasst von
Kaye M. Reid-Lombardo
Greer Gay
Lina Patel-Parekh
Jaffer A. Ajani
John H. Donohue
Gastric Patient Care Evaluation Group from the Commission on Cancer
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2007
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-006-0040-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2007

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.