Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2013

01.03.2013 | Original Article

A Randomised Comparative Study Evaluating Learning Curves of Novices in a Basic Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Task

verfasst von: Mikael Sodergren, Colleen McGregor, Hugo A. Farne, Jiguo Cao, Zhijun Lv, Sanjay Purkayastha, Thanos Athanasiou, Ara Darzi, Paraskevas Paraskeva

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

There is currently no objective quantification of the temporal changes in performance associated with a novice surgeon learning single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) operative tasks. Analysing learning curves allows us to objectively quantify performance. The aim was to evaluate if the rate of learning and ultimate proficiency level reached in SILS when using straight or articulating instruments is different to conventional laparoscopy and if training in laparoscopy influences learning or proficiency for SILS.

Design and Setting

Thirty-six surgically naive medical students were randomised to complete the validated peg transfer task over 50 repetitions using a conventional laparoscopic set-up, SILS set-up with straight instruments or articulated instruments or SILS set-up after having reached proficiency using a conventional laparoscopy.

Results

There was a significant increased overall proficiency between the group trained in conventional laparoscopy and all other groups (p < 0.01), with no difference between the other groups. There was no difference in the rate of learning between the groups. There was no difference in the ultimate proficiency level (p = 0.671) or rate of learning (p = 0.63) when using straight or articulating instruments. There was no difference in ultimate proficiency level (p = 0.59) or learning rate (p = 0.219) seen in the SILS group that had prior training on the task with a conventional laparoscopic set-up.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that the proficiency reached using a conventional laparoscopic set-up cannot be matched using a SILS configuration for the novice surgeon and that the choice of straight or articulated instruments as well as previous laparoscopic training does not confer an advantage in this basic task.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Pefanis D, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparison with 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2010;145:1187–1191PubMedCrossRef Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Pefanis D, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparison with 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2010;145:1187–1191PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chow AG, Purkayastha S, Zacharakis E, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy. Arch Surg 2011;146:183–186PubMedCrossRef Chow AG, Purkayastha S, Zacharakis E, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy. Arch Surg 2011;146:183–186PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 2000;191:272–283PubMedCrossRef Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV, et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? J Am Coll Surg 2000;191:272–283PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, et al. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 2004;135:21–27PubMedCrossRef Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, et al. Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 2004;135:21–27PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Islam A, Castellvi AO, Tesfay ST, et al. Early surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons learning center study. Surg Endosc 2011;25(8):2597–603PubMedCrossRef Islam A, Castellvi AO, Tesfay ST, et al. Early surgeon impressions and technical difficulty associated with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: a Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons learning center study. Surg Endosc 2011;25(8):2597–603PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rieder E, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, et al. A triangulating operating platform enhances bimanual performance and reduces surgical workload in single-incision laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:378–384PubMedCrossRef Rieder E, Martinec DV, Cassera MA, et al. A triangulating operating platform enhances bimanual performance and reduces surgical workload in single-incision laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212:378–384PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Montero PN, Acker CE, Heniford BT, Stefanidis D. Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Is Associated with Poorer Performance and Increased Surgeon Workload Compared with Standard Laparoscopy. Am Surg 2011;77:73–77PubMed Montero PN, Acker CE, Heniford BT, Stefanidis D. Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Is Associated with Poorer Performance and Increased Surgeon Workload Compared with Standard Laparoscopy. Am Surg 2011;77:73–77PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos BF, Enter D, Soper NJ, Hungness ES. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 2011;25:483–490PubMedCrossRef Santos BF, Enter D, Soper NJ, Hungness ES. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 2011;25:483–490PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Froghi F, Sodergren MH, Darzi A, Paraskeva P. Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in general surgery: a review of current practice. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2010;20:191–204PubMedCrossRef Froghi F, Sodergren MH, Darzi A, Paraskeva P. Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in general surgery: a review of current practice. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2010;20:191–204PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 2011;201:369–373PubMedCrossRef Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Report of preliminary data. Am J Surg 2011;201:369–373PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kravetz AJ, Iddings D, Basson MD, Kia MA. The learning curve with single-port cholecystectomy. JSLS 2009;13:332–336PubMed Kravetz AJ, Iddings D, Basson MD, Kia MA. The learning curve with single-port cholecystectomy. JSLS 2009;13:332–336PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman LS, Cao J, Andalib A, Fraser S, Fried GM. A method to characterize the learning curve for performance of a fundamental laparoscopic simulator task: defining “learning plateau” and “learning rate”. Surgery 2009;146:381–386PubMedCrossRef Feldman LS, Cao J, Andalib A, Fraser S, Fried GM. A method to characterize the learning curve for performance of a fundamental laparoscopic simulator task: defining “learning plateau” and “learning rate”. Surgery 2009;146:381–386PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fraser SA, Feldman LS, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1572–1578PubMedCrossRef Fraser SA, Feldman LS, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. Characterizing the learning curve for a basic laparoscopic drill. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1572–1578PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Madan AK, Harper JL, Frantzides CT, Tichansky DS. Nonsurgical skills do not predict baseline scores in inanimate box or virtual-reality trainers. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1686–1689PubMedCrossRef Madan AK, Harper JL, Frantzides CT, Tichansky DS. Nonsurgical skills do not predict baseline scores in inanimate box or virtual-reality trainers. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1686–1689PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Randomised Comparative Study Evaluating Learning Curves of Novices in a Basic Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Task
verfasst von
Mikael Sodergren
Colleen McGregor
Hugo A. Farne
Jiguo Cao
Zhijun Lv
Sanjay Purkayastha
Thanos Athanasiou
Ara Darzi
Paraskevas Paraskeva
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-2113-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.