Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2014

01.04.2014 | Original Article

How to Treat an Appendiceal Inflammatory Mass: Operatively or Nonoperatively?

verfasst von: J. D. Deelder, M. C. Richir, T. Schoorl, W. H. Schreurs

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

While there is consensus on how to treat acute appendicitis, the most suitable treatment for an appendiceal inflammatory mass is still debated. This study compares the outcomes of operative and nonoperative management.

Material and Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 119 patients (2007–2011) with an appendiceal inflammatory mass, 85 of whom were treated nonoperatively and 34 operatively. Of the nonoperative patients, 69 did not receive interventional treatment and 16 underwent percutaneous drainage of an accompanying abscess; the data for these patients were analyzed separately.

Results

Of the noninterventional managed patients, 49 (71.0 %) experienced at least one recurrence and 37 (53.6 %) ultimately needed an acute surgical or radiological intervention. Of the 16 patients who underwent percutaneous drainage, 7 (43.8 %) experienced at least one recurrence and 6 (37.5 %) underwent an acute surgical or (second) percutaneous intervention. None of the operated patients had a recurrence and the incidence of complications was 17.6 %. The incidence of underlying malignant tumor in our study population was 5.9 %. In 35 patients, the definitive diagnosis remained unclear because the patients did not undergo surgery or follow-up colonoscopy after nonoperative treatment. The rate of extensive (ileocecal + hemicolonic) resection in all operated patients was 30.8 %.

Conclusion

We conclude that the high rate of recurrence and intervention in the nonoperative group and the high proportion of these patients who did not receive adequate follow-up despite the relatively high rate (5.9 %) of bowel malignancy support the operative management of an appendiceal inflammatory mass. Noninterventional management or a percutaneous intervention should be reserved as a bridge to surgery for patients with a large accompanying abscess or as treatment for patients with significant comorbidity. If nonoperative treatment is chosen, follow-up colonoscopy is mandatory to exclude malignancy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, and Tekkis PP. A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery. 2010, Jun;147(6):818–29. Simillis C, Symeonides P, Shorthouse AJ, and Tekkis PP. A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon). Surgery. 2010, Jun;147(6):818–29.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ochsner AJ. Handbook of Appendicitis. Chicago: G.P. Engelhard & Company; 1902. Ochsner AJ. Handbook of Appendicitis. Chicago: G.P. Engelhard & Company; 1902.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey H. The Ochsner-Sherren (delayed) treatment of acute appendicitis: indications and technique. Br Med J. 1930, Jan 25;1(3603):140–3. Bailey H. The Ochsner-Sherren (delayed) treatment of acute appendicitis: indications and technique. Br Med J. 1930, Jan 25;1(3603):140–3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM, Lewis RJ, Vargas H, Arnell T, and Stamos MJ. Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis without periappendiceal mass. Am J Surg. 2000, Mar;179(3):177–81. Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM, Lewis RJ, Vargas H, Arnell T, and Stamos MJ. Nonoperative management of perforated appendicitis without periappendiceal mass. Am J Surg. 2000, Mar;179(3):177–81.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Willemsen PJ, Hoorntje LE, Eddes EH, and Ploeg RJ. The need for interval appendectomy after resolution of an appendiceal mass questioned. Dig Surg. 2002;19(3):216–20; discussion 221.PubMedCrossRef Willemsen PJ, Hoorntje LE, Eddes EH, and Ploeg RJ. The need for interval appendectomy after resolution of an appendiceal mass questioned. Dig Surg. 2002;19(3):216–20; discussion 221.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar S, and Jain S. Treatment of appendiceal mass: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2004;23(5):165–7.PubMed Kumar S, and Jain S. Treatment of appendiceal mass: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2004;23(5):165–7.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekin A, Kurtoğlu HC, Can I, and Oztan S. Routine interval appendectomy is unnecessary after conservative treatment of appendiceal mass. Colorectal Dis. 2008, Jun;10(5):465–8. Tekin A, Kurtoğlu HC, Can I, and Oztan S. Routine interval appendectomy is unnecessary after conservative treatment of appendiceal mass. Colorectal Dis. 2008, Jun;10(5):465–8.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat You KS, Kim DH, Yun HY, Jang LC, Choi JW, Song YJ, and Ryu DH. The value of a laparoscopic interval appendectomy for treatment of a periappendiceal abscess: experience of a single medical center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012, Apr;22(2):127–30. You KS, Kim DH, Yun HY, Jang LC, Choi JW, Song YJ, and Ryu DH. The value of a laparoscopic interval appendectomy for treatment of a periappendiceal abscess: experience of a single medical center. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012, Apr;22(2):127–30.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunnigaiper ND, Raj P, Ganeshram P, and Venkatesan V. Does Ochsner-Sherren regimen still hold true in the management of appendicular mass? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010, Jan;16(1):43–6. Cunnigaiper ND, Raj P, Ganeshram P, and Venkatesan V. Does Ochsner-Sherren regimen still hold true in the management of appendicular mass? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010, Jan;16(1):43–6.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bahram MA. Evaluation of early surgical management of complicated appendicitis by appendicular mass. Int J Surg. 2011;9(1):101–3.PubMedCrossRef Bahram MA. Evaluation of early surgical management of complicated appendicitis by appendicular mass. Int J Surg. 2011;9(1):101–3.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shindholimath VV, Thinakaran K, Rao TN, and Veerappa YV. Laparoscopic management of appendicular mass. J Minim Access Surg. 2011, Apr;7(2):136–40.[cited 2012, Jul 4] Shindholimath VV, Thinakaran K, Rao TN, and Veerappa YV. Laparoscopic management of appendicular mass. J Minim Access Surg. 2011, Apr;7(2):136–40.[cited 2012, Jul 4]
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaya B, Sana B, Eriş C, and Kutaniş R. Immediate appendectomy for appendiceal mass. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012, Jan;18(1):71–4. Kaya B, Sana B, Eriş C, and Kutaniş R. Immediate appendectomy for appendiceal mass. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012, Jan;18(1):71–4.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM, Lewis RJ, Arnell T, Vargas H, and Stamos MJ. Initial nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscess. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001, Jul;44(7):936–41. Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani VM, Lewis RJ, Arnell T, Vargas H, and Stamos MJ. Initial nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscess. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001, Jul;44(7):936–41.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Senapathi PS, Bhattacharya D, and Ammori BJ. Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass. Surg Endosc. 2002, Dec;16(12):1783–5. Senapathi PS, Bhattacharya D, and Ammori BJ. Early laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicular mass. Surg Endosc. 2002, Dec;16(12):1783–5.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gibeily GJ, Ross MN, Manning DB, Wherry DC, and Kao TC. Late-presenting appendicitis: a laparoscopic approach to a complicated problem. Surg Endosc. 2003, May;17(5):725–9. Gibeily GJ, Ross MN, Manning DB, Wherry DC, and Kao TC. Late-presenting appendicitis: a laparoscopic approach to a complicated problem. Surg Endosc. 2003, May;17(5):725–9.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Arshad M, Aziz LA, Qasim M, and Talpur KA. Early appendicectomy in appendicular mass--a Liaquat University Hospital experience. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008; 20(1):70–2. Arshad M, Aziz LA, Qasim M, and Talpur KA. Early appendicectomy in appendicular mass--a Liaquat University Hospital experience. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008; 20(1):70–2.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Aranda-Narváez JM, González-Sánchez AJ, Marín-Camero N, Montiel-Casado C, López-Ruiz P, Sánchez-Pérez B, et al. Conservative approach versus urgent appendectomy in surgical management of acute appendicitis with abscess or phlegmon. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2010, Nov;102(11):648–52. Aranda-Narváez JM, González-Sánchez AJ, Marín-Camero N, Montiel-Casado C, López-Ruiz P, Sánchez-Pérez B, et al. Conservative approach versus urgent appendectomy in surgical management of acute appendicitis with abscess or phlegmon. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2010, Nov;102(11):648–52.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersson RE, and Petzold MG. Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2007, Nov;246(5):741–8. Andersson RE, and Petzold MG. Nonsurgical treatment of appendiceal abscess or phlegmon: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2007, Nov;246(5):741–8.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakker OJ, Go PM, Puylaert JB, Kazemier G, Heij HA, and Werkgroup en klankbordgroup "Richtlijn acute appendicitis". [Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154A303. Bakker OJ, Go PM, Puylaert JB, Kazemier G, Heij HA, and Werkgroup en klankbordgroup "Richtlijn acute appendicitis". [Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154A303.
Metadaten
Titel
How to Treat an Appendiceal Inflammatory Mass: Operatively or Nonoperatively?
verfasst von
J. D. Deelder
M. C. Richir
T. Schoorl
W. H. Schreurs
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2460-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 4/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.