Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2016

29.02.2016 | Original Article

Should Oral Contrast Be Omitted in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis?

verfasst von: Lily Saadat, Irene Helenowski, David Mahvi, Anne-Marie Boller

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies. Our study evaluated patients given the diagnosis of appendicitis and reviewed their workup and clinical outcomes. We specifically focused on the use of oral contrast followed by appendectomy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients given an ICD-9 code for appendicitis at Northwestern Memorial Hospital between January 2000 and September 2010. Complication rates, time to the operating room, and length of hospital stay were compared between patients who received a CT scan and those who did not during the hospitalization for appendicitis.

Results

Average time from Emergency Department to the operating room was found to be statistically longer for patients who underwent a CT scan (10 h: 3, 1548) versus those who did not (6 h: 2, 262) (p < 0.0001). There were 19 patients who had the complication of pneumonia and 4 patients who were diagnosed with acute respiratory distress syndrome postoperatively. Patients who underwent a CT scan and received oral contrast had a statistically higher number of both complications (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

The use of oral contrast is not necessary for an accurate diagnosis of appendicitis and may be associated with higher complication rates, longer hospital stays, and poor outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993–2008. J. Surg. Res. Jun 15 2012;175(2):185–190. Buckius MT, McGrath B, Monk J, Grim R, Bell T, Ahuja V. Changing epidemiology of acute appendicitis in the United States: study period 1993–2008. J. Surg. Res. Jun 15 2012;175(2):185–190.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg ER, Mehta SD, Mitchell P, Soto J, Oyama L, Ulrich A. Length of stay by route of contrast administration for diagnosis of appendicitis by computed-tomography scan. Acad. Emerg. Med. Oct 2006;13(10):1040–1045. Berg ER, Mehta SD, Mitchell P, Soto J, Oyama L, Ulrich A. Length of stay by route of contrast administration for diagnosis of appendicitis by computed-tomography scan. Acad. Emerg. Med. Oct 2006;13(10):1040–1045.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guss DA, Richards C. Comparison of men and women presenting to an ED with acute appendicitis. Am. J. Emerg. Med. Jul 2000;18(4):372–375. Guss DA, Richards C. Comparison of men and women presenting to an ED with acute appendicitis. Am. J. Emerg. Med. Jul 2000;18(4):372–375.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Horattas MC, Guyton DP, Wu D. A reappraisal of appendicitis in the elderly. Am. J. Surg. Sep 1990;160(3):291–293. Horattas MC, Guyton DP, Wu D. A reappraisal of appendicitis in the elderly. Am. J. Surg. Sep 1990;160(3):291–293.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pittman-Waller VA, Myers JG, Stewart RM, et al. Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 consecutive appendectomies. Am. Surg. Jun 2000;66(6):548–554. Pittman-Waller VA, Myers JG, Stewart RM, et al. Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 consecutive appendectomies. Am. Surg. Jun 2000;66(6):548–554.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Titte SN, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW. Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. Am. J. Emerg. Med. Nov 1996;14(7):620–622. Von Titte SN, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW. Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. Am. J. Emerg. Med. Nov 1996;14(7):620–622.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Papandria D, Goldstein SD, Rhee D, et al. Risk of perforation increases with delay in recognition and surgery for acute appendicitis. J. Surg. Res. Oct 2013;184(2):723–729. Papandria D, Goldstein SD, Rhee D, et al. Risk of perforation increases with delay in recognition and surgery for acute appendicitis. J. Surg. Res. Oct 2013;184(2):723–729.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 2002;178(6):1319–1325. Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 2002;178(6):1319–1325.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson DW, Causey MW, Porta CR, et al. Examining the relevance of the physician’s clinical assessment and the reliance on computed tomography in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Am. J. Surg. Apr 2013;205(4):452–456. Nelson DW, Causey MW, Porta CR, et al. Examining the relevance of the physician’s clinical assessment and the reliance on computed tomography in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Am. J. Surg. Apr 2013;205(4):452–456.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaligram A, Pallati P, Simorov A, Meyer A, Oleynikov D. Do you need a computed tomographic scan to evaluate suspected appendicitis in young men: an administrative database review. Am. J. Surg. Dec 2012;204(6):1025–1030; discussion 1030. Shaligram A, Pallati P, Simorov A, Meyer A, Oleynikov D. Do you need a computed tomographic scan to evaluate suspected appendicitis in young men: an administrative database review. Am. J. Surg. Dec 2012;204(6):1025–1030; discussion 1030.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Collaborative S, Cuschieri J, Florence M, et al. Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann. Surg. Oct 2008;248(4):557–563. Collaborative S, Cuschieri J, Florence M, et al. Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann. Surg. Oct 2008;248(4):557–563.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB, et al. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology. Feb 2010;254(2):460–468. Coursey CA, Nelson RC, Patel MB, et al. Making the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: do more preoperative CT scans mean fewer negative appendectomies? A 10-year study. Radiology. Feb 2010;254(2):460–468.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. Apr 26 2012;366(17):1596–1605. Kim K, Kim YH, Kim SY, et al. Low-dose abdominal CT for evaluating suspected appendicitis. N Engl J Med. Apr 26 2012;366(17):1596–1605.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Raman SS, Osuagwu FC, Kadell B, Cryer H, Sayre J, Lu DS. Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. N Engl J Med. Feb 28 2008;358(9):972–973. Raman SS, Osuagwu FC, Kadell B, Cryer H, Sayre J, Lu DS. Effect of CT on false positive diagnosis of appendicitis and perforation. N Engl J Med. Feb 28 2008;358(9):972–973.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, Venus LG, Novelline RA. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann. Surg. Mar 1999;229(3):344–349. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Rattner DW, Venus LG, Novelline RA. Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. Ann. Surg. Mar 1999;229(3):344–349.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Peck J, Peck A, Peck C, Peck J. The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am. J. Surg. Aug 2000;180(2):133–136. Peck J, Peck A, Peck C, Peck J. The clinical role of noncontrast helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Am. J. Surg. Aug 2000;180(2):133–136.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M, et al. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology. Sep 2001;220(3):683–690. Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M, et al. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology. Sep 2001;220(3):683–690.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR. A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am. J. Surg. Sep 2005;190(3):474–478. Anderson BA, Salem L, Flum DR. A systematic review of whether oral contrast is necessary for the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis in adults. Am. J. Surg. Sep 2005;190(3):474–478.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Drake FT, Alfonso R, Bhargava P, et al. Enteral Contrast in the Computed Tomography Diagnosis of Appendicitis: Comparative Effectiveness in a Prospective Surgical Cohort. Ann. Surg. Oct 10 2013. Drake FT, Alfonso R, Bhargava P, et al. Enteral Contrast in the Computed Tomography Diagnosis of Appendicitis: Comparative Effectiveness in a Prospective Surgical Cohort. Ann. Surg. Oct 10 2013.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Glauser J, Siff J, Emerman C. Emergency Department Experience With Nonoral Contrast Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Patients for Appendicitis. Journal of patient safety. Sep 27 2013. Glauser J, Siff J, Emerman C. Emergency Department Experience With Nonoral Contrast Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Patients for Appendicitis. Journal of patient safety. Sep 27 2013.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kepner AM, Bacasnot JV, Stahlman BA. Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients. Am. J. Emerg. Med. Nov 2012;30(9):1765–1773. Kepner AM, Bacasnot JV, Stahlman BA. Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients. Am. J. Emerg. Med. Nov 2012;30(9):1765–1773.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Laituri CA, Fraser JD, Aguayo P, et al. The lack of efficacy for oral contrast in the diagnosis of appendicitis by computed tomography. J. Surg. Res. Sep 2011;170(1):100–103. Laituri CA, Fraser JD, Aguayo P, et al. The lack of efficacy for oral contrast in the diagnosis of appendicitis by computed tomography. J. Surg. Res. Sep 2011;170(1):100–103.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Latifi A, Labruto F, Kaiser S, Ullberg U, Sundin A, Torkzad MR. Does enteral contrast increase the accuracy of appendicitis diagnosis? Radiol. Technol. Mar-Apr 2011;82(4):294–299. Latifi A, Labruto F, Kaiser S, Ullberg U, Sundin A, Torkzad MR. Does enteral contrast increase the accuracy of appendicitis diagnosis? Radiol. Technol. Mar-Apr 2011;82(4):294–299.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hlibczuk V, Dattaro JA, Jin Z, Falzon L, Brown MD. Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast computed tomography for appendicitis in adults: a systematic review. Ann. Emerg. Med. Jan 2010;55(1):51–59 e51. Hlibczuk V, Dattaro JA, Jin Z, Falzon L, Brown MD. Diagnostic accuracy of noncontrast computed tomography for appendicitis in adults: a systematic review. Ann. Emerg. Med. Jan 2010;55(1):51–59 e51.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ. Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emergency radiology. Mar 2006;12(3):99–102. Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ. Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emergency radiology. Mar 2006;12(3):99–102.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Drake FT, Alfonso R, Bhargava P, et al. Enteral contrast in the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis: comparative effectiveness in a prospective surgical cohort. Ann. Surg. Aug 2014;260(2):311–316. Drake FT, Alfonso R, Bhargava P, et al. Enteral contrast in the computed tomography diagnosis of appendicitis: comparative effectiveness in a prospective surgical cohort. Ann. Surg. Aug 2014;260(2):311–316.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Malone AJ, Jr., Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 1993;160(4):763–766. Malone AJ, Jr., Wolf CR, Malmed AS, Melliere BF. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 1993;160(4):763–766.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahmoud M, McAuliffe J, Kim HY, et al. Oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography in children: the effects on gastric fluid volume. Anesth. Analg. Nov 2010;111(5):1252–1258. Mahmoud M, McAuliffe J, Kim HY, et al. Oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography in children: the effects on gastric fluid volume. Anesth. Analg. Nov 2010;111(5):1252–1258.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Morcos SK. Review article: Effects of radiographic contrast media on the lung. Br. J. Radiol. May 2003;76(905):290–295. Morcos SK. Review article: Effects of radiographic contrast media on the lung. Br. J. Radiol. May 2003;76(905):290–295.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Trulzsch DV, Penmetsa A, Karim A, Evans DA. Gastrografin-induced aspiration pneumonia: a lethal complication of computed tomography. South. Med. J. Dec 1992;85(12):1255–1256. Trulzsch DV, Penmetsa A, Karim A, Evans DA. Gastrografin-induced aspiration pneumonia: a lethal complication of computed tomography. South. Med. J. Dec 1992;85(12):1255–1256.
Metadaten
Titel
Should Oral Contrast Be Omitted in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis?
verfasst von
Lily Saadat
Irene Helenowski
David Mahvi
Anne-Marie Boller
Publikationsdatum
29.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3110-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.