Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2016

06.10.2016 | Original Article

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Status and Extent of Lymphadenectomy in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Confined To and Extending Beyond the Pancreas

verfasst von: Claudius Conrad, Onur C. Kutlu, Arvind Dasari, Jennifer A Chan, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, David B. Adams, Michael Kim, Jason B. Fleming, Matthew H. G. Katz, Jeffrey E. Lee

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The impact of lymph node (LN) status and lymphadenectomy (LA) on survival in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of tumor extension and grade on nodal metastasis and survival.

Methods

Surgical pNET patients were queried in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1998–2012, N = 981). Factors associated with LN status were analyzed by logistic regression and by Cox analyses.

Results

For T1–T2 tumors, N status was associated only with tumor size. N status (p = 0.001), grade (p < 0.001), age (p = 0.001), and sex (p = 0.007) predicted overall survival (OS). For T3–T4, grade (p < 0.001), sex (p = 0.004), size (p = 0.013), and age (p = 0.007) but not N status (p = 0.789) predicted OS. For T1–T2, disease-specific survival (DSS; p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.008) were longer for N0 vs N1, while N0 vs NX had similar OS (p = 0.59) and DSS (p = 0.80). While a difference was seen in DSS for NX vs N1 (p = 0.04), no significant difference in OS was seen (p = 0.08). For T3–T4, N status did not affect DSS (p = 0.365) or OS (p = 0.454). For all T groups and any N status, extended LA (≥10 nodes resected) was not associated with OS.

Conclusion

While in T1–T2 pNET N1 status is a predictor of negative OS, similar outcome between NX and N0 supports limited LN resection in selected patients. Extended LA is unlikely to be helpful in T3–T4.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Sadot et al., Observation versus Resection for Small Asymptomatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Matched Case-Control Study. Ann Surg Oncol, (Nov 23, 2015). E. Sadot et al., Observation versus Resection for Small Asymptomatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Matched Case-Control Study. Ann Surg Oncol, (Nov 23, 2015).
3.
Zurück zum Zitat A. Frilling et al., Neuroendocrine tumor disease: an evolving landscape. Endocr Relat Cancer 19, R163 (2012).CrossRefPubMed A. Frilling et al., Neuroendocrine tumor disease: an evolving landscape. Endocr Relat Cancer 19, R163 (2012).CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat I. M. Modlin et al., Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol 9, 61 (2008).CrossRefPubMed I. M. Modlin et al., Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Lancet Oncol 9, 61 (2008).CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat T. C. Chua, T. X. Yang, A. J. Gill, J. S. Samra, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Enucleation Versus Standardized Resection for Small Pancreatic Lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 592 (2016).CrossRefPubMed T. C. Chua, T. X. Yang, A. J. Gill, J. S. Samra, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Enucleation Versus Standardized Resection for Small Pancreatic Lesions. Ann Surg Oncol 23, 592 (2016).CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat E. Lermite et al., Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 37, 230 (2013).CrossRefPubMed E. Lermite et al., Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 37, 230 (2013).CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat J. Wong et al., Predictors of lymph node metastases and impact on survival in resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience. Am J Surg 208, 775 (2014).CrossRefPubMed J. Wong et al., Predictors of lymph node metastases and impact on survival in resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience. Am J Surg 208, 775 (2014).CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat S. M. Brunner et al., Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: a retrospective single-center analysis using the ENETS TNM-classification and immunohistochemical markers for risk stratification. BMC Surg 15, 49 (2015).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral S. M. Brunner et al., Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: a retrospective single-center analysis using the ENETS TNM-classification and immunohistochemical markers for risk stratification. BMC Surg 15, 49 (2015).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Y. M. Hashim et al., Regional lymphadenectomy is indicated in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Ann Surg 259, 197 (2014).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Y. M. Hashim et al., Regional lymphadenectomy is indicated in the surgical treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Ann Surg 259, 197 (2014).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat J. R. Strosberg et al., Prognostic validity of a novel American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 29, 3044 (2011).CrossRef J. R. Strosberg et al., Prognostic validity of a novel American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Classification for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 29, 3044 (2011).CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat A. B. Haynes et al., Implications of incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors: short-term and long-term patient outcomes. Arch Surg 146, 534 (2011).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral A. B. Haynes et al., Implications of incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors: short-term and long-term patient outcomes. Arch Surg 146, 534 (2011).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat K. Y. Bilimoria et al., Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg 247, 490 (2008).CrossRefPubMed K. Y. Bilimoria et al., Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg 247, 490 (2008).CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat J. R. Parekh et al., Lymph node sampling rates and predictors of nodal metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor resections: the UCSF experience with 149 patients. Pancreas 41, 840 (2012).CrossRefPubMed J. R. Parekh et al., Lymph node sampling rates and predictors of nodal metastasis in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor resections: the UCSF experience with 149 patients. Pancreas 41, 840 (2012).CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat M. Falconi et al., Parenchyma-preserving resections for small nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 1621 (2010).CrossRefPubMed M. Falconi et al., Parenchyma-preserving resections for small nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 17, 1621 (2010).CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat E. J. Kuo, R. R. Salem, Population-level analysis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors 2 cm or less in size. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 2815 (2013).CrossRefPubMed E. J. Kuo, R. R. Salem, Population-level analysis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors 2 cm or less in size. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 2815 (2013).CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat G. Kloppel, Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer 18 Suppl 1, S1 (Oct. 2011). G. Kloppel, Classification and pathology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr Relat Cancer 18 Suppl 1, S1 (Oct. 2011).
19.
Zurück zum Zitat J. E. Tepper et al., Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 19, 157 (2001).PubMed J. E. Tepper et al., Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 19, 157 (2001).PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat C. M. Huang et al., Prognostic impact of dissected lymph node count on patients with node-negative gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 15, 3926 (2009).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral C. M. Huang et al., Prognostic impact of dissected lymph node count on patients with node-negative gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 15, 3926 (2009).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat J. Franko, W. Feng, L. Yip, E. Genovese, A. J. Moser, Non-functional neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas: incidence, tumor biology, and outcomes in 2,158 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 541 (2010).CrossRefPubMed J. Franko, W. Feng, L. Yip, E. Genovese, A. J. Moser, Non-functional neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas: incidence, tumor biology, and outcomes in 2,158 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 541 (2010).CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Q. D. Chu et al., Predictive factors associated with long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 9, 855 (2002).CrossRefPubMed Q. D. Chu et al., Predictive factors associated with long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol 9, 855 (2002).CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat H. Ito et al., Surgery and staging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a 14-year experience. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 891 (2010).CrossRefPubMed H. Ito et al., Surgery and staging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a 14-year experience. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 891 (2010).CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat R. Kumar et al., Role of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET-CT in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur Radiol 21, 2408 (2011).CrossRefPubMed R. Kumar et al., Role of (68)Ga-DOTATOC PET-CT in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Eur Radiol 21, 2408 (2011).CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Status and Extent of Lymphadenectomy in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Confined To and Extending Beyond the Pancreas
verfasst von
Claudius Conrad
Onur C. Kutlu
Arvind Dasari
Jennifer A Chan
Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
David B. Adams
Michael Kim
Jason B. Fleming
Matthew H. G. Katz
Jeffrey E. Lee
Publikationsdatum
06.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3243-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.