Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2020

18.04.2020 | Review Article

Association of Graft-to-Recipient Weight Ratio with the Prognosis Following Liver Transplantation: a Meta-analysis

verfasst von: Yanhu Feng, Zhijian Han, Xiang Wang, Hao Chen, Yumin Li

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Studies indicate that low graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) affect graft survival in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. However, the potential role of GRWR in the prognosis of patients following living donor liver transplantation according to patient characteristics remains controversial. This study aimed to update the role of GRWR in patients following living donor liver transplantation.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for studies comparing low GRWR (< 0.8%) with normal GRWR (≥ 0.8%) in the prognosis following living donor liver transplantation from inception to March 2019. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year summary survival rates, small-for-size syndrome (SFSS), perioperative mortality, biliary complications, postoperative bleeding, and acute rejection were calculated using the random-effects model.

Results

Eighteen studies comprising 4001 patients were included. Patients with low GRWR were associated with lower 1-year and 3-year survival rates compared to patients with normal GRWR, while no significant difference was found in the association of 5-year survival rate with low and normal GRWRs. Moreover, the risk of SFSS significantly increased in patients with low GRWR. Finally, no significant differences were observed in the association of low and normal GRWRs with the risk of perioperative mortality, biliary complications, postoperative bleeding, and acute rejection.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicated that low GRWR was associated with poor prognosis for patients following living donor liver transplantation, especially in terms of 1- and 3-year survival rates and SFSS.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Broelsch CE, Emond JC, Whitington PF, Thistlethwaite JR, Baker AL, Lichtor JL. Application of reduced-size liver transplants as split grafts, auxiliary orthotopic grafts, and living related segmental transplants. Ann Surg 1990;212:368-375; discussion 375-367.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Broelsch CE, Emond JC, Whitington PF, Thistlethwaite JR, Baker AL, Lichtor JL. Application of reduced-size liver transplants as split grafts, auxiliary orthotopic grafts, and living related segmental transplants. Ann Surg 1990;212:368-375; discussion 375-367.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Wei WI, Lo RJ, Lai CL, Chan JK, Ng IO, Fung A, Wong J. Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using extended right lobe grafts. Ann Surg 1997;226:261-269; discussion 269-270. Lo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Wei WI, Lo RJ, Lai CL, Chan JK, Ng IO, Fung A, Wong J. Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using extended right lobe grafts. Ann Surg 1997;226:261-269; discussion 269-270.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Humar A, Ganesh S, Jorgensen D, Tevar A, Ganoza A, Molinari M, Hughes C. Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplant (LDLT versus DDLT) at a single center: time to change our paradigm for liver transplant. Annals Surg 2019; 270:444-451.CrossRef Humar A, Ganesh S, Jorgensen D, Tevar A, Ganoza A, Molinari M, Hughes C. Adult living donor versus deceased donor liver transplant (LDLT versus DDLT) at a single center: time to change our paradigm for liver transplant. Annals Surg 2019; 270:444-451.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, Egawa H, Fujita S, Hayashi M, Tanaka K. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation 1999;67:321-327.PubMedCrossRef Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, Egawa H, Fujita S, Hayashi M, Tanaka K. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation 1999;67:321-327.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahm F, Georgiev P, Clavien PA. Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transplant 2005;5:2605-2610.PubMedCrossRef Dahm F, Georgiev P, Clavien PA. Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transplant 2005;5:2605-2610.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hill MJ, Hughes M, Jie T, Cohen M, Lake J, Payne WD, Humar A. Graft weight/recipient weight ratio: how well does it predict outcome after partial liver transplants? Liver Transpl 2009;15:1056-1062.PubMedCrossRef Hill MJ, Hughes M, Jie T, Cohen M, Lake J, Payne WD, Humar A. Graft weight/recipient weight ratio: how well does it predict outcome after partial liver transplants? Liver Transpl 2009;15:1056-1062.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishizaki T, Ikegami T, Hiroshige S, Hashimoto K, Uchiyama H, Yoshizumi T, Kishikawa K, Shimada M, Sugimachi K. Small graft for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2001;233:575-580.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nishizaki T, Ikegami T, Hiroshige S, Hashimoto K, Uchiyama H, Yoshizumi T, Kishikawa K, Shimada M, Sugimachi K. Small graft for living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2001;233:575-580.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yagi S, Uemoto S. Small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2012;11:570-576.PubMedCrossRef Yagi S, Uemoto S. Small-for-size syndrome in living donor liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2012;11:570-576.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Umeda Y, Yagi T, Sadamori H, Matsukawa H, Matsuda H, Shinoura S, Mizuno K, Yoshida R, Iwamoto T, Satoh D, Tanaka N. Effects of prophylactic splenic artery modulation on portal overperfusion and liver regeneration in small-for-size graft. Transplantation 2008;86:673-680.PubMedCrossRef Umeda Y, Yagi T, Sadamori H, Matsukawa H, Matsuda H, Shinoura S, Mizuno K, Yoshida R, Iwamoto T, Satoh D, Tanaka N. Effects of prophylactic splenic artery modulation on portal overperfusion and liver regeneration in small-for-size graft. Transplantation 2008;86:673-680.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogura Y, Hori T, El Moghazy WM, Yoshizawa A, Oike F, Mori A, Kaido T, Takada Y, Uemoto S. Portal pressure <15 mm Hg is a key for successful adult living donor liver transplantation utilizing smaller grafts than before. Liver Transpl 2010;16:718-728.PubMedCrossRef Ogura Y, Hori T, El Moghazy WM, Yoshizawa A, Oike F, Mori A, Kaido T, Takada Y, Uemoto S. Portal pressure <15 mm Hg is a key for successful adult living donor liver transplantation utilizing smaller grafts than before. Liver Transpl 2010;16:718-728.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Troisi R, Ricciardi S, Smeets P, Petrovic M, Van Maele G, Colle I, Van Vlierberghe H, de Hemptinne B. Effects of hemi-portocaval shunts for inflow modulation on the outcome of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005;5:1397-1404.PubMedCrossRef Troisi R, Ricciardi S, Smeets P, Petrovic M, Van Maele G, Colle I, Van Vlierberghe H, de Hemptinne B. Effects of hemi-portocaval shunts for inflow modulation on the outcome of small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005;5:1397-1404.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller CM, Durand F, Heimbach JK, Kim-Schluger L, Lee SG, Lerut J, Lo CM, Quintini C, Pomfret EA. The international liver transplant society guideline on living liver donation. Transplantation 2016;100: 1238-1243.PubMedCrossRef Miller CM, Durand F, Heimbach JK, Kim-Schluger L, Lee SG, Lerut J, Lo CM, Quintini C, Pomfret EA. The international liver transplant society guideline on living liver donation. Transplantation 2016;100: 1238-1243.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller CM, Quintini C, Dhawan A, Durand F, Heimbach JK, Kim-Schluger HL, Kyrana E, Lee SG, Lerut J, Lo CM, Pomfret EA. The international liver transplantation society living donor liver transplant recipient guideline. Transplantation 2017;101:938–944PubMedCrossRef Miller CM, Quintini C, Dhawan A, Durand F, Heimbach JK, Kim-Schluger HL, Kyrana E, Lee SG, Lerut J, Lo CM, Pomfret EA. The international liver transplantation society living donor liver transplant recipient guideline. Transplantation 2017;101:938–944PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakade VA and Mathur SK. Donor Safety in Live-Related Liver Transplantation. Indian J Surg 2012;74: 118–126.PubMedCrossRef Wakade VA and Mathur SK. Donor Safety in Live-Related Liver Transplantation. Indian J Surg 2012;74: 118–126.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Uemura T, Wada S, Kaido T, Mori A, Ogura Y, Yagi S, Fujimoto Y, Ogawa K, Hata K, Yoshizawa A, Okajima H, Uemoto S. How far can we lower graft-to-recipient weight ratio for living donor liver transplantation under modulation of portal venous pressure? Surgery 2016;159: 1623-30.PubMedCrossRef Uemura T, Wada S, Kaido T, Mori A, Ogura Y, Yagi S, Fujimoto Y, Ogawa K, Hata K, Yoshizawa A, Okajima H, Uemoto S. How far can we lower graft-to-recipient weight ratio for living donor liver transplantation under modulation of portal venous pressure? Surgery 2016;159: 1623-30.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal S, Selvakumar N, Rajasekhar K, Dey R, Verma S, Gupta S. Minimum absolute graft weight of 650 g predicts a good outcome in living donor liver transplant despite a graft recipient body weight ratio of less than 0.8. Clinical transplantation. 2019;33:e13705.PubMedCrossRef Agarwal S, Selvakumar N, Rajasekhar K, Dey R, Verma S, Gupta S. Minimum absolute graft weight of 650 g predicts a good outcome in living donor liver transplant despite a graft recipient body weight ratio of less than 0.8. Clinical transplantation. 2019;33:e13705.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188.PubMedCrossRef DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making 2005;25:646-654.PubMedCrossRef Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making 2005;25:646-654.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D. Analyzing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins J, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 501 Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008; chap 9. Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D. Analyzing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins J, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 501 Oxford: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008; chap 9.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Tobias A. Assessing the influence of a single study in meta-analysis. Stata Tech Bull 1999;47:15–17. Tobias A. Assessing the influence of a single study in meta-analysis. Stata Tech Bull 1999;47:15–17.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088-1101.PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994;50:1088-1101.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HH, Joh JW, Lee KW, Kim SJ, Lee DS, Park JH, Choi SH, Heo JS, Hyon WS, Kwak MS, Lee SK. Small-for-size graft in adult living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2004;36:2274-2276.PubMedCrossRef Lee HH, Joh JW, Lee KW, Kim SJ, Lee DS, Park JH, Choi SH, Heo JS, Hyon WS, Kwak MS, Lee SK. Small-for-size graft in adult living-donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc 2004;36:2274-2276.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Selzner M, Kashfi A, Cattral MS, Selzner N, Greig PD, Lilly L, McGilvray ID, Therapondos G, Adcock LE, Ghanekar A, Levy GA, Renner EL, Grant DR. A graft to body weight ratio less than 0.8 does not exclude adult-to-adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2009;15:1776-1782.PubMedCrossRef Selzner M, Kashfi A, Cattral MS, Selzner N, Greig PD, Lilly L, McGilvray ID, Therapondos G, Adcock LE, Ghanekar A, Levy GA, Renner EL, Grant DR. A graft to body weight ratio less than 0.8 does not exclude adult-to-adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2009;15:1776-1782.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon JI, Kwon CH, Joh JW, Jung GO, Choi GS, Park JB, Kim JM, Shin M, Kim SJ, Lee SK. Safety of small-for-size grafts in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe. Liver Transpl 2010;16:864-869.PubMedCrossRef Moon JI, Kwon CH, Joh JW, Jung GO, Choi GS, Park JB, Kim JM, Shin M, Kim SJ, Lee SK. Safety of small-for-size grafts in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the right lobe. Liver Transpl 2010;16:864-869.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Gyoten K, Mizuno S, Tanemura A. Impact of the regulation of portal venous pressure on the small-for-size graft in adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transpl 2010;10:101-102. Gyoten K, Mizuno S, Tanemura A. Impact of the regulation of portal venous pressure on the small-for-size graft in adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transpl 2010;10:101-102.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaido T, Mori A, Ogura Y, Hata K, Yoshizawa A, Iida T, Yagi S, Uemoto S. Lower limit of the graft-to-recipient weight ratio can be safely reduced to 0.6% in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in combination with portal pressure control. Transplant Proc 2011;43:2391-2393.PubMedCrossRef Kaido T, Mori A, Ogura Y, Hata K, Yoshizawa A, Iida T, Yagi S, Uemoto S. Lower limit of the graft-to-recipient weight ratio can be safely reduced to 0.6% in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in combination with portal pressure control. Transplant Proc 2011;43:2391-2393.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lei JY, Yan LN, Li B, Wen TF, Wang WT, Xu MQ, Yang JY. Graft size alone should not affect donors selection and be used to predict the prognosis of recipients after living donor liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59:224-227.PubMed Lei JY, Yan LN, Li B, Wen TF, Wang WT, Xu MQ, Yang JY. Graft size alone should not affect donors selection and be used to predict the prognosis of recipients after living donor liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59:224-227.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishizaki Y, Kawasaki S, Sugo H, Yoshimoto J, Fujiwara N, Imamura H. Left lobe adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: Should portal inflow modulation be added? Liver Transpl 2012;18:305-314.PubMedCrossRef Ishizaki Y, Kawasaki S, Sugo H, Yoshimoto J, Fujiwara N, Imamura H. Left lobe adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: Should portal inflow modulation be added? Liver Transpl 2012;18:305-314.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SD, Kim SH, Kim YK, Lee SA, Park SJ. Graft-to-recipient weight ratio lower to 0.7% is safe without portal pressure modulation in right-lobe living donor liver transplantation with favorable conditions. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2014;13:18-24.PubMedCrossRef Lee SD, Kim SH, Kim YK, Lee SA, Park SJ. Graft-to-recipient weight ratio lower to 0.7% is safe without portal pressure modulation in right-lobe living donor liver transplantation with favorable conditions. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2014;13:18-24.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasavada B, Chen CL, Zakaria M. Using low graft/recipient’s body weight ratio graft with portal flow modulation an effective way to prevent small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplant: a retrospective analysis. Exp Clin Transplant 2014;12:437-442.PubMed Vasavada B, Chen CL, Zakaria M. Using low graft/recipient’s body weight ratio graft with portal flow modulation an effective way to prevent small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplant: a retrospective analysis. Exp Clin Transplant 2014;12:437-442.PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen PX, Yan LN, Wang WT. Outcome of patients undergoing right lobe living donor liver transplantation with small-for-size grafts. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:282-289.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chen PX, Yan LN, Wang WT. Outcome of patients undergoing right lobe living donor liver transplantation with small-for-size grafts. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:282-289.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Z, Zhong X, Zhou J, Xiang J, Li Z, Zhang M, Wu J, Jiang W, Zheng S. Smaller grafts do not imply early recurrence in recipients transplanted for hepatocellular carcinoma: A Chinese experience. Sci Rep 2016;6:26487.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hu Z, Zhong X, Zhou J, Xiang J, Li Z, Zhang M, Wu J, Jiang W, Zheng S. Smaller grafts do not imply early recurrence in recipients transplanted for hepatocellular carcinoma: A Chinese experience. Sci Rep 2016;6:26487.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Klair T, Przybyszewski E, Samstein B. Outcomes of small-for-size grafts in adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2016;16:71-72. Klair T, Przybyszewski E, Samstein B. Outcomes of small-for-size grafts in adult living donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2016;16:71-72.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuyama T, Iida T, Masuda K. Clinical outcome of adult living donor liver transplantation using small for size grafts. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017;24:A372. Matsuyama T, Iida T, Masuda K. Clinical outcome of adult living donor liver transplantation using small for size grafts. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2017;24:A372.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Sethi P, Thillai M, Thankamonyamma BS, Mallick S, Gopalakrishnan U, Balakrishnan D, Menon RN, Surendran S, Dhar P, Othiyil Vayoth S. Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Small-for-Size Grafts: Does Size Really Matter? J Clin Exp Hepatol 2018;8:125-131.PubMedCrossRef Sethi P, Thillai M, Thankamonyamma BS, Mallick S, Gopalakrishnan U, Balakrishnan D, Menon RN, Surendran S, Dhar P, Othiyil Vayoth S. Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Small-for-Size Grafts: Does Size Really Matter? J Clin Exp Hepatol 2018;8:125-131.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee EC, Kim SH, Shim JR, Park SJ. Small-for-size grafts increase recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation beyond milan criteria. Liver Transpl 2018;24:35-43.PubMedCrossRef Lee EC, Kim SH, Shim JR, Park SJ. Small-for-size grafts increase recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation beyond milan criteria. Liver Transpl 2018;24:35-43.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Goja S, Kumar Yadav S, Singh Soin A. Readdressing the Middle Hepatic Vein in Right Lobe Liver Donation: Triangle of Safety. Liver Transpl 2018;24:1363-1376.PubMedCrossRef Goja S, Kumar Yadav S, Singh Soin A. Readdressing the Middle Hepatic Vein in Right Lobe Liver Donation: Triangle of Safety. Liver Transpl 2018;24:1363-1376.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Iesari S, Inostroza Nunez ME, Rico Juri JM, Ciccarelli O, Bonaccorsi-Riani E, Coubeau L, Laterre PF, Goffette P, De Reyck C, Lengele B, Gianello P, Lerut J. Adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation: The experience of the Universite catholique de Louvain. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2019;18:132-142.PubMedCrossRef Iesari S, Inostroza Nunez ME, Rico Juri JM, Ciccarelli O, Bonaccorsi-Riani E, Coubeau L, Laterre PF, Goffette P, De Reyck C, Lengele B, Gianello P, Lerut J. Adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation: The experience of the Universite catholique de Louvain. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2019;18:132-142.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Duvall S, Tweedie R. A nonparametric “trim and fill” method for assessing publication bias in meta-analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 2000;95:89–98. Duvall S, Tweedie R. A nonparametric “trim and fill” method for assessing publication bias in meta-analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 2000;95:89–98.
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell R, Pandanaboyana S, Upasani V, Prasad R. Impact of graft-to-recipient weight ratio on small-for-size syndrome following living donor liver transplantation. ANZ J Surg 2018;88:415-420.PubMedCrossRef Bell R, Pandanaboyana S, Upasani V, Prasad R. Impact of graft-to-recipient weight ratio on small-for-size syndrome following living donor liver transplantation. ANZ J Surg 2018;88:415-420.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Yan Y, Zheng DF, Pu JL, Wu ZJ. Outcomes of adult patients adopting small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2019. Yan Y, Zheng DF, Pu JL, Wu ZJ. Outcomes of adult patients adopting small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2019.
Metadaten
Titel
Association of Graft-to-Recipient Weight Ratio with the Prognosis Following Liver Transplantation: a Meta-analysis
verfasst von
Yanhu Feng
Zhijian Han
Xiang Wang
Hao Chen
Yumin Li
Publikationsdatum
18.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04598-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2020

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.