Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2008

01.11.2008 | Original Article

Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients

verfasst von: Kristy S. Deep, MD, MA, Charles H. Griffith, MD, MSPH, John F. Wilson, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 11/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence-based recommendations for communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment, resident physicians’ actual practice may vary. Few prior studies have examined these conversations qualitatively to uncover why ineffective communication styles may persist.

OBJECTIVE

To explore how discussions about life-sustaining treatment occur and examine the factors that influence physicians’ communicative practices in hopes of providing novel insight into how these processes can be improved.

PARTICIPANTS AND APPROACH

We conducted and recorded 56 qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants from 28 matched dyads of a resident physician and a hospitalized patient or their surrogate decision maker with whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was discussed. Transcripts were analyzed and coded using the constant comparative method to develop themes.

MAIN RESULTS

Resident physicians introduced decisions about resuscitation in a scripted, depersonalized and procedure-focused manner. Decision makers exhibited a poor understanding of the decision they were being asked to make and resident physicians often disagreed with the decision. Residents did not advocate for a particular course of action; however, the discussions of resuscitation were framed in ways that may have implicitly influenced decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents’ communication practices may stem from their attempt to balance an informed choice model of decision making with their interest in providing appropriate care for the patient. Physicians’ beliefs about mandatory autonomy may be an impediment to improving communication about patients’ choices for life-sustaining treatment. Redefining the role of the physician will be necessary if a shared decision making model is to be adopted.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith AK, Ries AP, Zhang B, Tulsky JA, Prigerson HG, Block SD. Resident approaches to advance care planning on the day of hospital admission. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1597–1602.PubMedCrossRef Smith AK, Ries AP, Zhang B, Tulsky JA, Prigerson HG, Block SD. Resident approaches to advance care planning on the day of hospital admission. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1597–1602.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Tulsky JA, Chesney MA, Lo B. How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:436–442.PubMedCrossRef Tulsky JA, Chesney MA, Lo B. How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:436–442.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer GS, Tulsky JA, Rose MR, Siminoff LA, Arnold RM. Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:447–54.PubMedCrossRef Fischer GS, Tulsky JA, Rose MR, Siminoff LA, Arnold RM. Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:447–54.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, Wenger N, Reding D, Kussin PS, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Weeks JC, Phillips RS. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colon cancer. SUPPORT investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1998;105:222–229.PubMedCrossRef Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, Wenger N, Reding D, Kussin PS, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Weeks JC, Phillips RS. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colon cancer. SUPPORT investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1998;105:222–229.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein EM, Alper BS, Quill TE. The patient-physician relationship. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA. 2004;291:2359–2366.PubMedCrossRef Epstein EM, Alper BS, Quill TE. The patient-physician relationship. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA. 2004;291:2359–2366.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson DG, Tobin DR. The patient-physician relationship. End-of-life conversations. JAMA. 2000;284:1573–1578.PubMedCrossRef Larson DG, Tobin DR. The patient-physician relationship. End-of-life conversations. JAMA. 2000;284:1573–1578.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tulsky JA. Interventions to enhance communication among patients, providers and families. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(Supplement):95–102.CrossRef Tulsky JA. Interventions to enhance communication among patients, providers and families. J Palliat Med. 2005;8(Supplement):95–102.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–661.PubMedCrossRef Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–661.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:2221–2226.PubMedCrossRef Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267:2221–2226.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Quill TE, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:763–769.PubMed Quill TE, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:763–769.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yedidia MJ, Gillespie CC, Kacher E, et al. Effect of communications training on medical student performance. JAMA. 2003;290:1210–1212.CrossRef Yedidia MJ, Gillespie CC, Kacher E, et al. Effect of communications training on medical student performance. JAMA. 2003;290:1210–1212.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitney SN. A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:275–280.PubMedCrossRef Whitney SN. A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:275–280.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat White DB, Braddock CH III, Bereknyei S, Curtis JR. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:461–467.PubMedCrossRef White DB, Braddock CH III, Bereknyei S, Curtis JR. Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:461–467.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Towle A, Godolphin W, Grams G, Lamarre A. Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect. 2006;9:321–332.PubMedCrossRef Towle A, Godolphin W, Grams G, Lamarre A. Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expect. 2006;9:321–332.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, et al. Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21:347–354.PubMedCrossRef Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, et al. Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract. 2004;21:347–354.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider C. The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Physicians and Medical Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Schneider C. The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Physicians and Medical Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenbaum JR, Bradley EH, Holmboe ES, Farrell MH, Krumholz HM. Sources of ethical conflict in medical housestaff training: A qualitative study. Am J Med. 2004;116:402–407.PubMedCrossRef Rosenbaum JR, Bradley EH, Holmboe ES, Farrell MH, Krumholz HM. Sources of ethical conflict in medical housestaff training: A qualitative study. Am J Med. 2004;116:402–407.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wirtz V, Cribb A, Barber N. Patient-doctor decision making about treatment within the consultation—A critical analysis of the models. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:116–124.PubMedCrossRef Wirtz V, Cribb A, Barber N. Patient-doctor decision making about treatment within the consultation—A critical analysis of the models. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:116–124.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips DC, et al. “Chapter 5: Activity Status and Cognitive Function” in SUPPORT: Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments: Study Design. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43S:33–37.CrossRef Phillips DC, et al. “Chapter 5: Activity Status and Cognitive Function” in SUPPORT: Study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments: Study Design. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43S:33–37.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiner JS, Roth J. Avoiding iatrogenic harm to patient and family while discussing goals of care near the end of life. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:451–463.PubMedCrossRef Weiner JS, Roth J. Avoiding iatrogenic harm to patient and family while discussing goals of care near the end of life. J Palliat Med. 2006;9:451–463.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Heyland DK, Tranmer J, O’Callaghan CJ, Gafni A. The seriously ill hospitalized patient: Preferred role in end-of-life decision making? J Crit Care. 2003;18:3–10.PubMedCrossRef Heyland DK, Tranmer J, O’Callaghan CJ, Gafni A. The seriously ill hospitalized patient: Preferred role in end-of-life decision making? J Crit Care. 2003;18:3–10.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Entwhistle VA, Watt IS. Patient involvement in treatment decision making: The case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Educ Counsel. 2006;63:268–278.CrossRef Entwhistle VA, Watt IS. Patient involvement in treatment decision making: The case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Educ Counsel. 2006;63:268–278.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Abbott KH, Tulsky JA. Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:283–289.PubMedCrossRef Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Abbott KH, Tulsky JA. Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:283–289.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal/withholding of life sustaining support. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:197–201.PubMedCrossRef Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal/withholding of life sustaining support. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:197–201.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Disagreements that arise when making decisions about withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 1):101. Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Disagreements that arise when making decisions about withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 1):101.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Deep KS, Griffith CH, Wilson JF. Discussing preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: What do resident physicians and their hospitalized patients think was decided? Patient Educ and Couns 2008; Mar 10 [Epub ahead of print] Deep KS, Griffith CH, Wilson JF. Discussing preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: What do resident physicians and their hospitalized patients think was decided? Patient Educ and Couns 2008; Mar 10 [Epub ahead of print]
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Percy ME, Llewellyn-Thomas H. Assessing preferences about the DNR order: does it depend on how you ask? Med Decis Making. 1995;15:209–216.PubMedCrossRef Percy ME, Llewellyn-Thomas H. Assessing preferences about the DNR order: does it depend on how you ask? Med Decis Making. 1995;15:209–216.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim S, Goldstein D, Hasher L, Zacks RT. Framing effects in younger and older adults. J Gerontol. 2005;60B:215–218. Kim S, Goldstein D, Hasher L, Zacks RT. Framing effects in younger and older adults. J Gerontol. 2005;60B:215–218.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Duffy SA, Jackson FC, Schim SM, Ronis DL, Fowler KE. Racial/ethnic preferences, sex preferences, and perceived discrimination related to end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:150–7.PubMedCrossRef Duffy SA, Jackson FC, Schim SM, Ronis DL, Fowler KE. Racial/ethnic preferences, sex preferences, and perceived discrimination related to end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54:150–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Blackhall LJ Frank G, Murphy ST, Michel V, Palmer JM, Azen SP. Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technology. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(12):1779–89, Jun.CrossRef Blackhall LJ Frank G, Murphy ST, Michel V, Palmer JM, Azen SP. Ethnicity and attitudes towards life sustaining technology. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(12):1779–89, Jun.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander SC, Keitz SA, Sloane R, Tulsky JA. A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents’ communication with patients at the end of life. Acad Med. 2006;81:1008–1012.PubMedCrossRef Alexander SC, Keitz SA, Sloane R, Tulsky JA. A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents’ communication with patients at the end of life. Acad Med. 2006;81:1008–1012.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Kagawa-Singer M. End-of-life decision making: A qualitative study of elderly individuals. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:620–625.PubMedCrossRef Rosenfeld KE, Wenger NS, Kagawa-Singer M. End-of-life decision making: A qualitative study of elderly individuals. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:620–625.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Communication and Decision Making About Life-Sustaining Treatment: Examining the Experiences of Resident Physicians and Seriously-Ill Hospitalized Patients
verfasst von
Kristy S. Deep, MD, MA
Charles H. Griffith, MD, MSPH
John F. Wilson, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 11/2008
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0779-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2008

Journal of General Internal Medicine 11/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.