Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2009

01.08.2009 | Editorial

Should Guidelines Incorporate Evidence on Patient Preferences?

verfasst von: Craig A. Umscheid, MD, MSCE

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 8/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Patient preferences are critically important to clinical decision making and patient care. Few clinicians practicing modern day medicine would argue otherwise. This is the case despite the fact that shared decision making can often be difficult for us to accomplish in our everyday practices.15 Traditional models for incorporating patient preferences into clinical decisions have described the intersection of patient values with clinical evidence and resource considerations at the point-of-decision (Figure 1).6 More recently, there have been calls to move beyond the mere integration of patient preferences at the point-of-decision to the more systematic integration of patient preference data into guidelines themselves.7,8
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Barry MJ. Involving patients in medical decisions: how can physicians do better? JAMA. 1999;282(24):2356–7.PubMedCrossRef Barry MJ. Involving patients in medical decisions: how can physicians do better? JAMA. 1999;282(24):2356–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282(24):2313–20.PubMedCrossRef Braddock CH 3rd, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282(24):2313–20.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up—and there’s no going back. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1999;319(7212):719–20. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up—and there’s no going back. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1999;319(7212):719–20.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implement Sci. 2006;1:16.PubMedCrossRef Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Implement Sci. 2006;1:16.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanson JL. Shared decision making: have we missed the obvious? Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(13):1368–70.PubMedCrossRef Hanson JL. Shared decision making: have we missed the obvious? Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(13):1368–70.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Muir Gray JA. Evidence-based healthcare. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2001. 11. Muir Gray JA. Evidence-based healthcare. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2001. 11.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300(4):436–8.PubMedCrossRef Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300(4):436–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA. 2009;301(8):868–9.PubMedCrossRef Shaneyfelt TM, Centor RM. Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA. 2009;301(8):868–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2003;12(1):18–23. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2003;12(1):18–23.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281(20):1900–5.PubMedCrossRef Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281(20):1900–5.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45.PubMedCrossRef McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(26):2635–45.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman RD, Zou GY, Vandervoort MK, Wong CJ, Nelson SA, Feagan BG. A simplified approach to the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Hypertension. 2009;53(4):646–53.PubMedCrossRef Feldman RD, Zou GY, Vandervoort MK, Wong CJ, Nelson SA, Feagan BG. A simplified approach to the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Hypertension. 2009;53(4):646–53.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shekelle P, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Woolf SH. When should clinical guidelines be updated? BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2001;323(7305):155–7.CrossRef Shekelle P, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM, Woolf SH. When should clinical guidelines be updated? BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2001;323(7305):155–7.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–6.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–6.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1049–51.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1049–51.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Strech D, Tilburt J. Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(6):521–4.PubMedCrossRef Strech D, Tilburt J. Value judgments in the analysis and synthesis of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(6):521–4.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Metadaten
Titel
Should Guidelines Incorporate Evidence on Patient Preferences?
verfasst von
Craig A. Umscheid, MD, MSCE
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1055-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2009

Journal of General Internal Medicine 8/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Reflection

REFLECTION

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.