Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2012

01.06.2012 | Original Research

Blood Pressure Monitoring Technique Impacts Hypertension Treatment

verfasst von: Gretchen M. Ray, Pharm.D, James J. Nawarskas, Pharm.D, Joe R. Anderson, Pharm.D

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2005 the American Heart Association (AHA) released updated recommendations for blood pressure (BP) monitoring in order to ensure accurate BP measurements.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if current methods of BP assessment in an ambulatory clinic result in significantly different BP measurements than those obtained by following the AHA recommendations and if these BP differences impact treatment decisions.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Randomized prospective analysis.

SETTING

University of New Mexico Hospital Adult Internal Medicine clinic.

PATIENTS

Forty adults with hypertension

METHODS

Patient BPs were measured using both the traditional triage method and the AHA-recommended method in cross-over fashion in random order. Two complete medical profile summaries were then constructed for each patient: one for each BP measurement obtained by each technique. These profiles were then reviewed by a panel of providers who provided hypothetical hypertension treatment recommendations.

RESULTS

Individual BP results varied greatly between the two methods. SBP readings differed by ≥5 mmHg in either direction for 68% of patients while 78% of patient’s DBP readings differed by ≥2 mmHg in either direction. Overall, 93% of patients had a BP difference of either ≥5 mmHg systolic or ≥2 mmHg diastolic. Five patients were determined to be at goal with the triage method, but were higher than their goal BP with the AHA method Significant differences were also seen in treatment recommendations for a given patient based on the differences seen between the two obtained BP readings. The number of patients with treatment variations between their two profiles ranged from 13% to 23% depending on the reviewing provider (p < 0.01 for all providers).

CONCLUSION

Inaccurate BP assessment is common and may impact hypertension treatment decisions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52.PubMedCrossRef Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–52.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics- 2006 update. A report from the American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113:e85–151.PubMedCrossRef Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics- 2006 update. A report from the American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113:e85–151.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Manning DM, Kuchirka C, Kaminski J. Miscuffing: inappropriate blood pressure cuff application. Circulation. 1983;68:763–66.PubMedCrossRef Manning DM, Kuchirka C, Kaminski J. Miscuffing: inappropriate blood pressure cuff application. Circulation. 1983;68:763–66.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fonseca-Reyes S, Garcia de Alba-Garcia J, Parra-Carrillo JZ, Paczka-Zapata JA. Effect of standard cuff on blood pressure readings in patients with obese arms. How frequent are arms of a large circumference. Blood Press Monit. 2003;8:101–106.PubMedCrossRef Fonseca-Reyes S, Garcia de Alba-Garcia J, Parra-Carrillo JZ, Paczka-Zapata JA. Effect of standard cuff on blood pressure readings in patients with obese arms. How frequent are arms of a large circumference. Blood Press Monit. 2003;8:101–106.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans. A statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association council on high blood pressure research. Circulation. 2005;111:697–716.PubMedCrossRef Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans. A statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association council on high blood pressure research. Circulation. 2005;111:697–716.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Webster J, Newnham D, Petrie JC, Lovell HG. Influence of arm position on measurement of blood pressure. Br Med J. 1984;288:1574–75.CrossRef Webster J, Newnham D, Petrie JC, Lovell HG. Influence of arm position on measurement of blood pressure. Br Med J. 1984;288:1574–75.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Mourad A, Carney S, Gillies A, Jones B, Nanra R, Trevillian P. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension? J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:389–95.PubMedCrossRef Mourad A, Carney S, Gillies A, Jones B, Nanra R, Trevillian P. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension? J Hum Hypertens. 2003;17:389–95.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lane D, Beevers M, Barnes N, et al. Inter-arm differences in blood pressure: when are they clinically significant? J Hypertens. 2002;20:1089–95.PubMedCrossRef Lane D, Beevers M, Barnes N, et al. Inter-arm differences in blood pressure: when are they clinically significant? J Hypertens. 2002;20:1089–95.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinar R, Sabuncu N, Oksay A. Effects of crossed leg on blood pressure. Blood Press. 2004;13:252–54.PubMedCrossRef Pinar R, Sabuncu N, Oksay A. Effects of crossed leg on blood pressure. Blood Press. 2004;13:252–54.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiolero A, Gervasoni JP, Rwebogora A, Balampama M, Paccaud F, Bovet P. Difference in blood pressure readings with mercury and automated devices: impact on hypertension prevalence estimates in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:427–33.PubMedCrossRef Chiolero A, Gervasoni JP, Rwebogora A, Balampama M, Paccaud F, Bovet P. Difference in blood pressure readings with mercury and automated devices: impact on hypertension prevalence estimates in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21:427–33.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell NRC, Culleton BW, McKay DW. Misclassification of blood pressure by usual measurements in ambulatory physician practices. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:1522–27.PubMedCrossRef Campbell NRC, Culleton BW, McKay DW. Misclassification of blood pressure by usual measurements in ambulatory physician practices. Am J Hypertens. 2005;18:1522–27.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JW, Bosworth HB, Voils CI, et al. Brief report: How well do clinic-based blood pressure measurements agree with the mercury standard? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:647–49.PubMedCrossRef Kim JW, Bosworth HB, Voils CI, et al. Brief report: How well do clinic-based blood pressure measurements agree with the mercury standard? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:647–49.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Verdecchia P, Staessen JA, Angeli F, et al. Usual versus tight control of SBP in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): an open-label randomized trial. Lancet. 2009;374:525–33.PubMedCrossRef Verdecchia P, Staessen JA, Angeli F, et al. Usual versus tight control of SBP in non-diabetic patients with hypertension (Cardio-Sis): an open-label randomized trial. Lancet. 2009;374:525–33.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelton PK, He J, Appel LJ, et al. Primary prevention of hypertension clinical and public health advisory from the national high blood pressure education program. JAMA. 2002;288:1882–88.PubMedCrossRef Whelton PK, He J, Appel LJ, et al. Primary prevention of hypertension clinical and public health advisory from the national high blood pressure education program. JAMA. 2002;288:1882–88.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cook NR, Cohen J, Herbert PR, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:701–9.PubMedCrossRef Cook NR, Cohen J, Herbert PR, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:701–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner MJ, Baker AB, Kam PC. Effects of systematic errors in blood pressure measurements on the diagnosis of hypertension. Blood Press Monit. 2004;9:249–53.PubMedCrossRef Turner MJ, Baker AB, Kam PC. Effects of systematic errors in blood pressure measurements on the diagnosis of hypertension. Blood Press Monit. 2004;9:249–53.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Blood Pressure Monitoring Technique Impacts Hypertension Treatment
verfasst von
Gretchen M. Ray, Pharm.D
James J. Nawarskas, Pharm.D
Joe R. Anderson, Pharm.D
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1937-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.