Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2013

01.01.2013 | Original Research

Improving the Informed Consent Process for Research Subjects with Low Literacy: A Systematic Review

verfasst von: Leonardo Tamariz, MD, MPH, Ana Palacio, MD, MPH, Mauricio Robert, Erin N. Marcus, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Inadequate health literacy may impair research subjects’ ability to participate adequately in the informed consent (IC) process. Our aim is to evaluate the evidence supporting interventions, to improve comprehension of the IC process in low literacy subjects.

METHODS

We performed a MEDLINE database search (1966 to November 2011) supplemented by manual searches of bibliographies of key relevant articles. We selected all studies in which a modification of the IC was tested to improve comprehension in low literacy populations. Study design, quality criteria, population, interventions and outcomes for each trial were extracted. The main outcome evaluated was comprehension, measured using a written test or verbal comprehension.

RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 281 studies, of which only six met our eligibility criteria. The six studies included 1620 research participants. The studies predominantly included populations that were older (median age 61, range 48–64), ethnic minority, and with literacy level of 8th grade or below. Only one study had a randomized design. The specific intervention differed in each study. Two of the studies included the teach-back method or teach to goal method and achieved the highest level of comprehension. Two studies changed the readability level of the IC and resulted in the lowest comprehension among study subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence supporting interventions to improve the informed consent process in low literacy populations is extremely limited. Among the interventions evaluated, having a study team member spend more time talking one-on-one to study participants was the most effective strategy for improving informed consent understanding; however, this finding is based on the results of a single study.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugarman J. Missing the informed in consent. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(2):319–20.PubMed Sugarman J. Missing the informed in consent. Anesth Analg. 2003;96(2):319–20.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard JM, DeMets D. How informed is informed consent? the BHAT experience. Control Clin Trials. 1981;2(4):287–303.PubMedCrossRef Howard JM, DeMets D. How informed is informed consent? the BHAT experience. Control Clin Trials. 1981;2(4):287–303.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Riecken HW, Ravich R. Informed consent to biomedical research in veterans administration hospitals. JAMA. 1982;248(3):344–8.PubMedCrossRef Riecken HW, Ravich R. Informed consent to biomedical research in veterans administration hospitals. JAMA. 1982;248(3):344–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugarman J, Paasche-Orlow M. Confirming comprehension of informed consent as a protection of human subjects. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(8):898–9.PubMedCrossRef Sugarman J, Paasche-Orlow M. Confirming comprehension of informed consent as a protection of human subjects. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(8):898–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2001;358(9295):1772–7.PubMedCrossRef Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2001;358(9295):1772–7.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcus EN. The silent epidemic–the health effects of illiteracy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):339–41.PubMedCrossRef Marcus EN. The silent epidemic–the health effects of illiteracy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(4):339–41.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dewalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone MP. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(12):1228–39.PubMedCrossRef Dewalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone MP. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(12):1228–39.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Paasche-Orlow MK, Wolf MS. The causal pathways linking health literacy to health outcomes. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(Suppl 1):S19–26.PubMedCrossRef Paasche-Orlow MK, Wolf MS. The causal pathways linking health literacy to health outcomes. Am J Health Behav. 2007;31(Suppl 1):S19–26.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Peel J, Baker DW. Health literacy and knowledge of chronic disease. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51(3):267–75.PubMedCrossRef Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Peel J, Baker DW. Health literacy and knowledge of chronic disease. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51(3):267–75.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf MS, Gazmararian JA, Baker DW. Health literacy and health risk behaviors among older adults. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(1):19–24.PubMedCrossRef Wolf MS, Gazmararian JA, Baker DW. Health literacy and health risk behaviors among older adults. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(1):19–24.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackson RD, Eckert GJ. Health literacy in an adult dental research population: a pilot study. J Public Health Dent. 2008;68(4):196–200.PubMedCrossRef Jackson RD, Eckert GJ. Health literacy in an adult dental research population: a pilot study. J Public Health Dent. 2008;68(4):196–200.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Flory J, Emanuel E. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2004;292(13):1593–601.PubMedCrossRef Flory J, Emanuel E. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. JAMA. 2004;292(13):1593–601.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Raich PC, Plomer KD, Coyne CA. Literacy, comprehension, and informed consent in clinical research. Cancer Invest. 2001;19(4):437–45.PubMedCrossRef Raich PC, Plomer KD, Coyne CA. Literacy, comprehension, and informed consent in clinical research. Cancer Invest. 2001;19(4):437–45.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999;282(11):1054–60.PubMedCrossRef Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999;282(11):1054–60.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bickmore TW, Pfeifer LM, Paasche-Orlow MK. Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75(3):315–20.PubMedCrossRef Bickmore TW, Pfeifer LM, Paasche-Orlow MK. Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;75(3):315–20.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong SA, Ong YY, Subramaniam M, Abdin E, Marx CE, Campbell AV. An assessment of the understanding and motivations of patients with schizophrenia about participating in a clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(5):446–50.PubMedCrossRef Chong SA, Ong YY, Subramaniam M, Abdin E, Marx CE, Campbell AV. An assessment of the understanding and motivations of patients with schizophrenia about participating in a clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(5):446–50.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kripalani S, Bengtzen R, Henderson LE, Jacobson TA. Clinical research in low-literacy populations: using teach-back to assess comprehension of informed consent and privacy information. IRB. 2008;30(2):13–9.PubMed Kripalani S, Bengtzen R, Henderson LE, Jacobson TA. Clinical research in low-literacy populations: using teach-back to assess comprehension of informed consent and privacy information. IRB. 2008;30(2):13–9.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sudore RL, Landefeld CS, Williams BA, Barnes DE, Lindquist K, Schillinger D. Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(8):867–73.PubMedCrossRef Sudore RL, Landefeld CS, Williams BA, Barnes DE, Lindquist K, Schillinger D. Use of a modified informed consent process among vulnerable patients: a descriptive study. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(8):867–73.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Young DR, Hooker DT, Freeberg FE. Informed consent documents: increasing comprehension by reducing reading level. IRB. 1990;12(3):1–5.PubMedCrossRef Young DR, Hooker DT, Freeberg FE. Informed consent documents: increasing comprehension by reducing reading level. IRB. 1990;12(3):1–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Davis TC, Holcombe RF, Berkel HJ, Pramanik S, Divers SG. Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(9):668–74.PubMedCrossRef Davis TC, Holcombe RF, Berkel HJ, Pramanik S, Divers SG. Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(9):668–74.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):721–6.PubMedCrossRef Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):721–6.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Daugherty CK, Banik DM, Janish L, Ratain MJ. Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients. IRB. 2000;22(3):6–14.PubMedCrossRef Daugherty CK, Banik DM, Janish L, Ratain MJ. Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients. IRB. 2000;22(3):6–14.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Improving the Informed Consent Process for Research Subjects with Low Literacy: A Systematic Review
verfasst von
Leonardo Tamariz, MD, MPH
Ana Palacio, MD, MPH
Mauricio Robert
Erin N. Marcus, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2133-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.