Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2014

01.12.2014 | Review

A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

verfasst von: Thomas W. Concannon, Ph.D, Melissa Fuster, PhD, Tully Saunders, BS, Kamal Patel, M.P.H., M.B.A., John B. Wong, M.D, Laurel K. Leslie, M.D, M.P.H, Joseph Lau, M.D

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 12/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a review of the peer-reviewed literature since 2003 to catalogue reported methods of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We worked with stakeholders before, during and after the review was conducted to: define the primary and key research questions; conduct the literature search; screen titles, abstracts and articles; abstract data from the articles; and analyze the data. The literature search yielded 2,062 abstracts. The review was conducted on 70 articles that reported on stakeholder engagement in individual research projects or programs.

FINDINGS

Reports of stakeholder engagement are highly variable in content and quality. We found frequent engagement with patients, modestly frequent engagement with clinicians, and infrequent engagement with stakeholders in other key decision-making groups across the healthcare system. Stakeholder engagement was more common in earlier (prioritization) than in later (implementation and dissemination) stages of research. The roles and activities of stakeholders were highly variable across research and program reports.

RECOMMENDATIONS

To improve on the quality and content of reporting, we developed a 7-Item Stakeholder Engagement Reporting Questionnaire. We recommend three directions for future research: 1) descriptive research on stakeholder-engagement in research; 2) evaluative research on the impact of stakeholder engagement on the relevance, transparency and adoption of research; and 3) development and validation of tools that can be used to support stakeholder engagement in future work.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Institute of Medicine. Initial Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Washington: National Academies Press; 2009.
2.
Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2009.
3.
Sox HC, Greenfield S. Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the institute of medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:203–205.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
McClellan M, Benner J, Garber AM, Meltzer DO, Tunis SR, Pearson S. Comparative Effectiveness Research: Will it bend the Health Care Cost Curve and Improve Quality? The Brookings Institute: Washington; 2009.
6.
Roehr B. More stakeholder engagement is needed to improve quality of research, say US experts. BMJ. 2010;341:c4193.CrossRef
7.
Conway PH, Clancy C. Charting a path from comparative effectiveness funding to improved patient-centered health care. JAMA. 2010;303:985–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, McElwee N, Guise JM, Santa J, Conway PH, Daudelin D, Morrato EH, Leslie LK. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:985–991.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;424:1758–72.CrossRef
11.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA group preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
13.
Amico KL, Wieland ML, Weis JA, Sullivan SM, Nigon JA, Sia IG. Capacity building through focus group training in community-based participatory research. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011;24:638.
14.
Ammerman A, Corbie-Smith G, St George DM, Washington C, Weathers B, Jackson-Christian B. Research expectations among African American church leaders in the PRAISE! project: a randomized trial guided by community-based participatory research. Am J Publ Health. 2003;93:1720–1727.CrossRef
15.
Amtmann D, Cook KF, Johnson KL, Cella D. The PROMIS initiative: involvement of rehabilitation stakeholders in development and examples of applications in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:S12–19.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Angstman KB, Bender RO, Bruce SM. Patient advisory groups in practice improvement: sample case presentation with a discussion of best practices. J Amb Care Mgmt. 2009;32:328–332.CrossRef
17.
Austin SA, Claiborne N. Faith wellness collaboration: a community-based approach to address type II diabetes disparities in an African-American community. Soc Work Health Care. 2011;50:360–375.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Boutain DM. Collective knowledge sharing as a social justice strategy: the difference it made in a service project about preterm birth disparity. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2009;32:E68–80.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Boyer BB, Mohatt GV, Pasker RL, Drew EM, McGlone KK. Sharing results from complex disease genetics studies: a community based participatory research approach. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2007;66:19–30.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Breslin M, Mullan RJ, Montori VM. The design of a decision aid about diabetes medications for use during the consultation with patients with type 2 diabetes. Pat Educ Couns. 2008;73:465–472.CrossRef
21.
Buckler AJ, Bresolin L, Dunnick NR, Sullivan DC. A collaborative enterprise for multi-stakeholder participation in the advancement of quantitative imaging. Radiology. 2011;258:906–914.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Chang DI, Burton A, O’Brien J, Hurley RE. Honesty as good policy: evaluating Maryland’s medicaid managed care program. Milbank. 2003;81:389–414.CrossRef
23.
Chung B, Corbett CE, Boulet B, et al. Talking wellness: a description of a community-academic partnered project to engage an African-American community around depression through the use of poetry, film, and photography. Ethn Dis. 2006;16:S67–78.PubMed
24.
Chung B, Jones L, Dixon EL, Miranda J, Wells K. Using a community partnered participatory research approach to implement a randomized controlled trial: planning community partners in care. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010;21:780–795.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
Cooley WC, McAllister JW, Sherrieb K, Clark RE. The Medical Home Index: development and validation of a new practice-level measure of implementation of the Medical Home model. Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3:173–180.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Corona R, Gonzalez T, Cohen R, Edwards C, Edmonds T. Richmond Latino needs assessment: a community-university partnership to identify health concerns and service needs for Latino youth. J Commun Health. 2009;34:195–201.CrossRef
27.
Crowe JL, Keifer MC, Salazar MK. Striving to provide opportunities for farm worker community participation in research. J Agric Saf Health. 2008;14:205–219.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Curran GM, Pyne J, Fortney JC, et al. Development and implementation of collaborative care for depression in HIV clinics. AIDS Care. 2011;23:1626–1636.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Davis RM, Hitch AD, Nichols M, Rizvi A, Salaam M, Mayer-Davis EJ. A collaborative approach to the recruitment and retention of minority patients with diabetes in rural community health centers. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30:63–70.PubMedCrossRef
30.
31.
Fredericks JE, Bunting RF Jr. Implementation of a patient-friendly medication schedule to improve patient safety within a healthcare system. J Healthc Risk Mgmt. 2010;29:22–27.CrossRef
32.
Freysteinson WM. The ethical community consultation model as preparation for nursing research: a case study. Nurs Ethics. 2010;17:749–758.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Gallagher LP, Truglio-Londrigan M, Levin R. Partnership for healthy living: an action research project. Nurs Res. 2009;16:7–29.CrossRef
34.
Garretson M, Walline V, Heisler J, Townsend J. New medical school engages rural communities to conduct regional health assessment. Fam Med. 2010;42:693–701.PubMed
35.
Goins RT, Garroutte EM, Fox SL, Dee Geiger S, Manson SM. Theory and practice in participatory research: lessons from the native elder care study. Gerontology. 2011;51:285–294.CrossRef
36.
Hitchcock K, Appelt K. Sustainable collaboration for community outreach: lessons from the Spanish Access to Literature/Uso Directo (SALUD) project. J Med Libr Assoc. 2008;96:58–60.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
37.
James S, Arniella G, Bickell NA, et al. Community ACTION boards: an innovative model for effective community-academic research partnerships. Prog Commun Health Part. 2011;5:399–404.
38.
Kaplan SA, Calman NS, Golub M, Ruddock C, Billings J. The role of faith-based institutions in addressing health disparities: a case study of an initiative in the southwest Bronx. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006;17:9–19.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Kaplan SA, Ruddock C, Golub M, et al. Stirring up the mud: using a community-based participatory approach to address health disparities through a faith-based initiative. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20:1111–1123.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
40.
Kataoka SH, Fuentes S, O’Donoghue VP, et al. A community participatory research partnership: the development of a faith-based intervention for children exposed to violence. Ethnic Dis. 2006;16:S89–97.
41.
Katz JR, Martinez T, Paul R. Community-based participatory research and American Indian/Alaska Native nurse practitioners: a partnership to promote adolescent health. J Amer Acad Nurs Pract. 2011;23:298–304.CrossRef
42.
Kelly PJ, Lesser J, Cheng AL, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of an interpersonal violence prevention program with a Mexican American community. Fam Commun Health. 2010;33:207–215.CrossRef
43.
Kim S, Flaskerud JH, Koniak-Griffin D, Dixon EL. Using community-partnered participatory research to address health disparities in a Latino community. J Prof Nurs. 2005;21:199–209.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Kogan JN, Bauer MS, Dennehy EB, et al. Increasing minority research participation through collaboration with community outpatient clinics: the STEP-BD community partners experience. Clin Trials. 2009;6:344–354.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Laditka JN, Beard RL, Bryant LL, et al. Promoting cognitive health: a formative research collaboration of the healthy aging research network. Gerontology. 2009;49:S12–17.CrossRef
46.
Leape LL, Rogers G, Hanna D, et al. Developing and implementing new safe practices: voluntary adoption through statewide collaboratives. Q Saf Health Care. 2006;15:289–295.CrossRef
47.
Legaspi A, Orr E. Disseminating research on community health and well-being: a collaboration between Alaska Native villages and the academe. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2007;14:24.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Lopez ED, Lichtenstein R, Lewis A, et al. Drawing from Freirian empowerment methods to develop and use innovative learning maps: increasing enrollment of uninsured children on Detroit’s eastside. Health Prom Pract. 2007;8:181–191.CrossRef
49.
McAllister CL, Green BL, Terry MA, Herman V, Mulvey L. Parents, practitioners, and researchers: community-based participatory research with early head start. Am J Pub Health. 2003;93:1672–1679.CrossRef
50.
McGhan WF, Al M, Doshi JA, Kamae I, Marx SE, Rindress D. The ISPOR good practices for quality improvement of cost-effectiveness research task force report. Value Health. 2009;12:1086–1099.PubMedCrossRef
51.
McKeithen T, Robertson S, Speight M. Developing clinical competencies to assess learning needs and outcomes: the experience of the CS2day initiative. J Cont Educ Health Prof. 2011;31:S21–27.CrossRef
52.
Meredith LS, Branstrom RB, Azocar F, Fikes R, Ettner SL. A collaborative approach to identifying effective incentives for mental health clinicians to improve depression care in a large managed behavioral healthcare organization. Adm Pol Ment Health. 2011;38:193–202.CrossRef
53.
Noe TD, Manson SM, Croy C, McGough H, Henderson JA, Buchwald DS. The influence of community-based participatory research principles on the likelihood of participation in health research in American Indian communities. Ethnic Dis. 2007;17:S6–14.
54.
Peterson TH, Dolan T, Hanft S. Partnering with youth organizers to prevent violence: an analysis of relationships, power, and change. Prog Commun Health Part. 2010;4:235–242.CrossRef
55.
Pfefferle SG, Cooper B, Layton D, Rohrbach S. Early collaboration for adaptation: addressing depression in low-income new mothers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20:539–544.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Pickard AS, Lee TA, Solem CT, Joo MJ, Schumock GT, Krishnan JA. Prioritizing comparative-effectiveness research topics via stakeholder involvement: an application in COPD. Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;90:888–892.CrossRef
57.
Raja S, Ball M, Booth J, Haberstro P, Veith K. Leveraging neighborhood-scale change for policy and program reform in Buffalo. N Y Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:S352–360.CrossRef
58.
Ray J, White M, Cannon P, Bowen C, O’Rourke K. Implementing the Florida KidCare open enrollment communications campaign: a framework for mobilizing community partners to reduce the number of uninsured children. Int Q Comm Health Educ. 2006;26:365–377.CrossRef
59.
Redwood D, Lanier A, Kemberling M, Klejka J, Sylvester I, Lundgren K. Community-based participatory research in a large cohort study of chronic diseases among Alaska native adults. Prog Commun Health Part. 2010;4:325–330.
60.
Redwood Y, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Yoshihama M, Wang CC, Kreuter M. Social, economic, and political processes that create built environment inequities: perspectives from urban African Americans in Atlanta. Fam Commun Health. 2010;33:53–67.CrossRef
61.
Rhodes SD, Hergenrather KC, Montano J, et al. Using community-based participatory research to develop an intervention to reduce HIV and STD infections among Latino men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2006;18:375–389.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Rhodes SD, Hergenrather KC, Vissman AT, et al. Boys must be men, and men must have sex with women: a qualitative CBPR study to explore sexual risk among African American, Latino, and White gay men and MSM. Am J Men’s Health. Mar 2011;5:140–151.
63.
Sanchez RJ, Mardekian J, Cziraky MJ, Mullins CD. Developing a collaborative study protocol for combining payer-specific data and clinical trials for CER. J Man Care Pharm. 2011;17:S34–37.
64.
Savage CL, Xu Y, Lee R, Rose BL, Kappesser M, Anthony JS. A case study in the use of community-based participatory research in public health nursing. Publ Health Nurs. 2006;23:472–478.CrossRef
65.
Schensul JJ, Robison J, Reyes C, Radda K, Gaztambide S, Disch W. Building interdisciplinary/intersectoral research partnerships for community-based mental health research with older minority adults. Am J Commun Psychol. 2006;38:79–93.CrossRef
66.
Shah ND, Mullan RJ, Breslin M, Yawn BP, Ting HH, Montori VM. Translating comparative effectiveness into practice: the case of diabetes medications. Med Care. 2010;48:S153–158.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Spatz ES, Phipps MS, Wang OJ, et al. Expanding the safety net of specialty care for the uninsured: a case study. Health Serv Res. 2012;47:344–362.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
68.
Spoth R, Redmond C, Clair S, Shin C, Greenberg M, Feinberg M. Preventing substance misuse through community-university partnerships: randomized controlled trial outcomes 4(1/2) years past baseline. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:440–447.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
69.
Steinman KJ, Wright V, Cooksey E, Myers LJ, Price-Spratlen T, Ryles R. Collaborative research in a faith-based setting: Columbus congregations for healthy youth. Publ Health Rep. 2005;120:213–216.
70.
Stewart AL, Napoles-Springer AM, Gregorich SE, Santoyo-Olsson J. Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1235–1256.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
71.
Stewart MK, Colley D, Huff A, et al. Participatory development and implementation of a community research workshop: experiences from a community-based participatory research partnership. Prog Commun Health Part. 2009;3:165–178.CrossRef
72.
Stiffman AR, Freedenthal S, Brown E, Ostmann E, Hibbeler P. Field research with underserved minorities: the ideal and the real. J Urban Health. 2005;82:56–66.CrossRef
73.
Stockdale SE, Mendel P, Jones L, Arroyo W, Gilmore J. Assessing organizational readiness and change in community intervention research: framework for participatory evaluation. Ethnic Dis. 2006;16:S136–145.
74.
Sullivan M, Bhuyan R, Senturia K, Shiu-Thornton S, Ciske S. Participatory action research in practice: a case study in addressing domestic violence in nine cultural communities. J Interpers Violence. 2005;20:977–995.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Tanjasiri S, Tran J, Palmer P, et al. Developing a community-based collaboration to reduce cancer health disparities among Pacific Islanders in California. Pac Health Dialogues. 2007;14:119.
76.
Tanjasiri SP, Tran JH, Palmer PH, Valente TW. Network analysis of an organizational collaboration for Pacific Islander cancer control. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;18:184–196.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Taylor-Piliae RE, Froelicher ES. Methods to optimize recruitment and retention to an exercise study in Chinese immigrants. Nurs Res. 2007;56:132–136.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Weiner J, Aguirre A, Ravenell K, et al. Designing an illustrated patient satisfaction instrument for low-literacy populations. Am J Man Care. 2004;10:853–860.
79.
Wennerstrom A, Vannoy SD 3rd, Allen CE. Community-based participatory development of a community health worker mental health outreach role to extend collaborative care in post-Katrina New Orleans. Ethnic Dis. 2011;21(S1):45–51.
80.
Wong C, Mouanoutoua V, Chen MJ. Engaging community in the quality of hypertension care project with Hmong Americans. J Cult Divers. 2008;15:30–36.PubMed
81.
Wong FY, Crisostomo VA, Bao D, et al. Development and implementation of a collaborative, multistakeholder research and practice model on HIV prevention targeting Asian/Pacific Islander men in the United States who have sex with men. Am J Pub Health. 2011;101:623–631.CrossRef
82.
Zoellner J, Connell CL, Santell R, et al. Fit for life steps: results of a community walking intervention in the rural Mississippi delta. Prog Commun Health Part. 2007;1:49–60.CrossRef
83.
84.
Lieu TA, Au D, Krishnan JA, Moss M, Selker H, Harabin A, Taggart V, Connors A. Comparative effectiveness research in lung diseases and sleep disorders: recommendations from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 2011;184:848–856.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
85.
86.
Hartung DMGJ, Fagnan LJ, Davis MM, Stange KC. The role of practice-based research networks in comparative effectiveness research. J Comp Eff Res. 2012;1:45–55.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
87.
88.
Woolf SH. The 2009 breast cancer screening recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2010;303:162–3.PubMedCrossRef
89.
90.
91.
Morrato EH, Concannon TW, Meissner P, Shah ND, Turner BJ. Dissemination and implementation of comparative effectiveness evidence: key informant interviews with clinical and translational science award institutions. J Comp Eff Res. 2013;2:185–194.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
92.
Burke JG, Jones J, Yonas M, Guizzetti L, Virata MC, Costlow M, Morton SC, Elizabeth M. PCOR, CER, and CBPR: alphabet soup or complementary fields of health research? Clin Trans Sci. 2013;6:493–496.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
verfasst von
Thomas W. Concannon, Ph.D
Melissa Fuster, PhD
Tully Saunders, BS
Kamal Patel, M.P.H., M.B.A.
John B. Wong, M.D
Laurel K. Leslie, M.D, M.P.H
Joseph Lau, M.D
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-2878-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2014

Journal of General Internal Medicine 12/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

Peer Review: The Year in Review

Clinical Practice: Exercises in Clinical Reasoning

Split Decision

Original Research

Older Women’s Experience with a Benign Breast Biopsy—A Mixed Methods Study

Original Research

Language Concordance, Interpersonal Care, and Diabetes Self-Care in Rural Latino Patients

Capsule Commentary

Capsule Commentary on Hess et al. A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial of the Functional Assessment Screening Tablet to Engage Patients at the Point of Care

Clinical Image

Mass Effect from Hepatomegaly in Polycystic Kidney Disease

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Metformin rückt in den Hintergrund

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Thrombophiliescreening – Wenn, dann richtig und nur bei therapeutischer Konsequenz

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Nachrichten

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!
weitere anzeigen

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise