Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2015

01.06.2015 | Original Research

Rates and Correlates of Potentially Inappropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration

verfasst von: Adam A. Powell, PhD, MBA, Sameer D. Saini, MD, MS, Matthew K. Breitenstein, PhD, MS, Siamak Noorbaloochi, PhD, Andrea Cutting, MA, Deborah A. Fisher, MD, MHS, Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH, Krysten Halek, MA, Melissa R. Partin, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate use of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening procedures can inflate healthcare costs and increase medical risk. Little is known about the prevalence or causes of inappropriate CRC screening.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate CRC screening, and its association with patient and facility characteristics in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) .

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of all VHA patients aged 50 years and older who completed a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or a screening colonoscopy between 1 October 2009 and 31 December 2011 (n = 1,083,965).

MAIN MEASURES

Measures included: proportion of patients whose test was classified as potentially inappropriate; associations between potentially inappropriate screening and patient demographic and health characteristics, facility complexity, CRC screening rates, dependence on FOBT, and CRC clinical reminder attributes.

KEY RESULTS

Of 901,292 FOBT cases, 26.1 % were potentially inappropriate (13.9 % not due, 7.8 % limited life expectancy, 11.0 % receiving FOBT when colonoscopy was indicated). Of 134,335 screening colonoscopies, 14.2 % were potentially inappropriate (10.4 % not due, 4.4 % limited life expectancy). Each additional 10 years of patient age was associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing potentially inappropriate screening (ORs = 1.60 to 1.83 depending on screening mode). Compared to facilities scoring in the bottom third on a measure of reliance on FOBT (versus screening colonoscopy), facilities scoring in the top third were less likely to conduct potentially inappropriate FOBTs (OR = 0.,78) but more likely to conduct potentially inappropriate colonoscopies (OR = 2.20). Potentially inappropriate colonoscopies were less likely to be conducted at facilities where primary care providers were assigned partial responsibility (OR = 0.74) or full responsibility (OR = 0.73) for completing the CRC clinical reminder.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial number of VHA CRC screening tests are potentially inappropriate. Establishing processes that enforce appropriate screening intervals, triage patients with limited life expectancies, and discourage the use of FOBTs when a colonoscopy is indicated may reduce inappropriate testing.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–117.CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, Desantis C, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(2):104–117.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):132–141.CrossRefPubMed Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(2):132–141.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB, Thompson TD, Seeff LC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Colorectal cancer screening - United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surveill Summ. 2011;60:42–46. Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB, Thompson TD, Seeff LC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Colorectal cancer screening - United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surveill Summ. 2011;60:42–46.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat US Preventive Services. Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–637.CrossRef US Preventive Services. Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–637.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: A decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):659–669.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Wilschut J, van Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: A decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):659–669.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Conell-Price J, O'Brien S, Walter LC. Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark. BMJ. 2013;346:e8441.CrossRefPubMed Lee SJ, Boscardin WJ, Stijacic-Cenzer I, Conell-Price J, O'Brien S, Walter LC. Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: Meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark. BMJ. 2013;346:e8441.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: A targeted, updated systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):638–658.CrossRefPubMed Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: A targeted, updated systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):638–658.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: Magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20(4):659–671.CrossRefPubMed Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: Magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20(4):659–671.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher DA, Judd L, Sanford NS. Inappropriate colorectal cancer screening: Findings and implications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(11):2526–2530.CrossRefPubMed Fisher DA, Judd L, Sanford NS. Inappropriate colorectal cancer screening: Findings and implications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(11):2526–2530.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed FMD, Murthy UKMD. Inappropriate and improper use of fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening in the VA medical system. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(6):1401.CrossRefPubMed Ahmed FMD, Murthy UKMD. Inappropriate and improper use of fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening in the VA medical system. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(6):1401.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo Y, Riall TS, Goodwin JS. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: Variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):542–550.CrossRefPubMed Sheffield KM, Han Y, Kuo Y, Riall TS, Goodwin JS. Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: Variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(7):542–550.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, Riall TS, Kuo YF. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1335–1343.CrossRefPubMed Goodwin JS, Singh A, Reddy N, Riall TS, Kuo YF. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1335–1343.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Partin MR, Powell AA, Bangerter A, et al. Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(12):1618–1625.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Partin MR, Powell AA, Bangerter A, et al. Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(12):1618–1625.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–619.CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–619.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Iversen LH, Norgaard M, Jacobsen J, Laurberg S, Sorensen HT. The impact of comorbidity on survival of Danish colorectal cancer patients from 1995 to 2006: A population-based cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):71–78.CrossRefPubMed Iversen LH, Norgaard M, Jacobsen J, Laurberg S, Sorensen HT. The impact of comorbidity on survival of Danish colorectal cancer patients from 1995 to 2006: A population-based cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(1):71–78.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho H, Klabunde CN, Yabroff KR, et al. Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy: A new tool to inform recommendations for optimal screening strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(10):667–676.CrossRefPubMed Cho H, Klabunde CN, Yabroff KR, et al. Comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy: A new tool to inform recommendations for optimal screening strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(10):667–676.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, Konety BR. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006;296(19):2336–2342.CrossRefPubMed Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K, Konety BR. PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA. 2006;296(19):2336–2342.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Walter LC, Lindquist K, Nugent S, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(7):465–473.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Walter LC, Lindquist K, Nugent S, et al. Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(7):465–473.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ioannou GN, Chapko MK, Dominitz JA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(9):2082–2091.CrossRefPubMed Ioannou GN, Chapko MK, Dominitz JA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(9):2082–2091.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(2):389–394.CrossRefPubMed Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, Vernon SW. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(2):389–394.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Partin M, Noorbaloochi S, Grill J, et al. The interrelationships between and contributions of background, cognitive, and environmental factors to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Cancer Causes and Control. 2010;21(9):1357–1368.CrossRefPubMed Partin M, Noorbaloochi S, Grill J, et al. The interrelationships between and contributions of background, cognitive, and environmental factors to colorectal cancer screening adherence. Cancer Causes and Control. 2010;21(9):1357–1368.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Stefos T, LaVallee N, Holden F. Fairness in prospective payment: A clustering approach. Health Serv Res. 1992;27(2):239.PubMedCentralPubMed Stefos T, LaVallee N, Holden F. Fairness in prospective payment: A clustering approach. Health Serv Res. 1992;27(2):239.PubMedCentralPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher DA, Jeffreys A, Coffman CJ, Fasanella K. Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1232–1235.CrossRefPubMed Fisher DA, Jeffreys A, Coffman CJ, Fasanella K. Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1232–1235.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Etzioni DA, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, et al. Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: The importance of follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(7):1002–1010.CrossRefPubMed Etzioni DA, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV, et al. Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: The importance of follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(7):1002–1010.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Burnand B, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, Froehlich F, Vader JP, Gonvers JJ. Use, appropriateness, and diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopy: An international observational study (EPAGE). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(7):1018–1026.CrossRefPubMed Burnand B, Harris JK, Wietlisbach V, Froehlich F, Vader JP, Gonvers JJ. Use, appropriateness, and diagnostic yield of screening colonoscopy: An international observational study (EPAGE). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63(7):1018–1026.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron TH, Kimery BD, Sorbi D, Gorkis LC, Leighton JA, Fleischer DE. Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: Guidelines in an open endoscopy practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(2):178–182.CrossRefPubMed Baron TH, Kimery BD, Sorbi D, Gorkis LC, Leighton JA, Fleischer DE. Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: Guidelines in an open endoscopy practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(2):178–182.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahajan RJ, Barthel JS, Marshall JB. Appropriateness of referrals for open-access endoscopy: How do physicians in different medical specialties do? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(18):2065–2069.CrossRefPubMed Mahajan RJ, Barthel JS, Marshall JB. Appropriateness of referrals for open-access endoscopy: How do physicians in different medical specialties do? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(18):2065–2069.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(44):881–888. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use—United States, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(44):881–888.
Metadaten
Titel
Rates and Correlates of Potentially Inappropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration
verfasst von
Adam A. Powell, PhD, MBA
Sameer D. Saini, MD, MS
Matthew K. Breitenstein, PhD, MS
Siamak Noorbaloochi, PhD
Andrea Cutting, MA
Deborah A. Fisher, MD, MHS
Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH
Krysten Halek, MA
Melissa R. Partin, PhD
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3163-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.