Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2018

25.04.2018 | Original Research

Comparing Quality of Care in Veterans Affairs and Non-Veterans Affairs Settings

verfasst von: Rebecca Anhang Price, PhD, Elizabeth M. Sloss, PhD, Matthew Cefalu, PhD, Carrie M. Farmer, PhD, Peter S. Hussey, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Congress, veterans’ groups, and the press have expressed concerns that access to care and quality of care in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) settings are inferior to access and quality in non-VA settings.

Objective

To assess quality of outpatient and inpatient care in VA at the national level and facility level and to compare performance between VA and non-VA settings using recent performance measure data.

Main Measures

We assessed Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs), 30-day risk-standardized mortality and readmission measures, and ORYX measures for inpatient safety and effectiveness; Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS®) measures for outpatient effectiveness; and Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Hospital Survey (HCAHPS) and Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) survey measures for inpatient patient-centeredness. For inpatient care, we used propensity score matching to identify a subset of non-VA hospitals that were comparable to VA hospitals.

Key Results

VA hospitals performed on average the same as or significantly better than non-VA hospitals on all six measures of inpatient safety, all three inpatient mortality measures, and 12 inpatient effectiveness measures, but significantly worse than non-VA hospitals on three readmission measures and two effectiveness measures. The performance of VA facilities was significantly better than commercial HMOs and Medicaid HMOs for all 16 outpatient effectiveness measures and for Medicare HMOs, it was significantly better for 14 measures and did not differ for two measures. High variation across VA facilities in the performance of some quality measures was observed, although variation was even greater among non-VA facilities.

Conclusions

The VA system performed similarly or better than the non-VA system on most of the nationally recognized measures of inpatient and outpatient care quality, but high variation across VA facilities indicates a need for targeted quality improvement.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Asch S, Glassman P, Matula S, Trivedi A, Miake-Lye I, Shekelle PG. Comparison of Quality of Care in VA and Non-VA Settings: a Systematic Review. VA-ESP Project #05–226; 2010. Asch S, Glassman P, Matula S, Trivedi A, Miake-Lye I, Shekelle PG. Comparison of Quality of Care in VA and Non-VA Settings: a Systematic Review. VA-ESP Project #05–226; 2010.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(22):2218–2227.CrossRef Jha AK, Perlin JB, Kizer KW, Dudley RA. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(22):2218–2227.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg-Chicago. 2002;137(1):20–27.CrossRef Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg-Chicago. 2002;137(1):20–27.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Matula SR, Trivedi AN, Miake-Lye I, Glassman PA, Shekelle P, Asch S. Comparisons of quality of surgical care between the US Department of Veterans Affairs and the private sector. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(6):823–832.CrossRef Matula SR, Trivedi AN, Miake-Lye I, Glassman PA, Shekelle P, Asch S. Comparisons of quality of surgical care between the US Department of Veterans Affairs and the private sector. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(6):823–832.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Trivedi AN, Matula S, Miake-Lye I, Glassman PA, Shekelle P, Asch S. Systematic review: comparison of the quality of medical care in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs settings. Med Care. 2011;49(1):76–88.CrossRef Trivedi AN, Matula S, Miake-Lye I, Glassman PA, Shekelle P, Asch S. Systematic review: comparison of the quality of medical care in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs settings. Med Care. 2011;49(1):76–88.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Hanlon C, Huang C, Sloss E, et al. Comparing VA and non-VA quality of care: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2016. O’Hanlon C, Huang C, Sloss E, et al. Comparing VA and non-VA quality of care: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2016.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Blay E Jr, Delancey JE, Hewitt DB, Chung JW, Bilimoria KY. Initial public reporting of quality at Veterans Affairs vs non-Veterans Affairs hospitals. JAMA Int Med. 2017;177(6):882–3.CrossRef Blay E Jr, Delancey JE, Hewitt DB, Chung JW, Bilimoria KY. Initial public reporting of quality at Veterans Affairs vs non-Veterans Affairs hospitals. JAMA Int Med. 2017;177(6):882–3.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat National Committee for Quality Assurance. The State of Health Care Quality 2014. 2014. Available at: www.ncqa.org. Accessed February 21, 2018. National Committee for Quality Assurance. The State of Health Care Quality 2014. 2014. Available at: www.​ncqa.​org. Accessed February 21, 2018.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehrman WG, Elliott MN, Goldstein E, Beckett MK, Klein DJ, Giordano LA. Characteristics of hospitals demonstrating superior performance in patient experience and clinical process measures of care. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67(1):38–55.CrossRef Lehrman WG, Elliott MN, Goldstein E, Beckett MK, Klein DJ, Giordano LA. Characteristics of hospitals demonstrating superior performance in patient experience and clinical process measures of care. Med Care Res Rev. 2010;67(1):38–55.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Nuti SV, Qin L, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Association of admission to Veterans Affairs hospitals vs non-Veterans Affairs hospitals with mortality and readmission rates among older men hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. JAMA. 2016;315(6):582–592.CrossRef Nuti SV, Qin L, Rumsfeld JS, et al. Association of admission to Veterans Affairs hospitals vs non-Veterans Affairs hospitals with mortality and readmission rates among older men hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia. JAMA. 2016;315(6):582–592.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang PC, Ralston M, Arrigotti M F, Qureshi L, Graham J. Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc: JAMIA. 2007;14(1), 10–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2198 CrossRefPubMed Tang PC, Ralston M, Arrigotti M F, Qureshi L, Graham J. Comparison of methodologies for calculating quality measures based on administrative data versus clinical data from an electronic health record system: implications for performance measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc: JAMIA. 2007;14(1), 10–15. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1197/​jamia.​M2198 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker DW, Chassin MR. Holding providers accountable for health care outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:418–423.CrossRef Baker DW, Chassin MR. Holding providers accountable for health care outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:418–423.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparing Quality of Care in Veterans Affairs and Non-Veterans Affairs Settings
verfasst von
Rebecca Anhang Price, PhD
Elizabeth M. Sloss, PhD
Matthew Cefalu, PhD
Carrie M. Farmer, PhD
Peter S. Hussey, PhD
Publikationsdatum
25.04.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4433-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 10/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.