Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019

05.10.2018 | Original Research

Screening for Adverse Drug Events: a Randomized Trial of Automated Calls Coupled with Phone-Based Pharmacist Counseling

verfasst von: Gordon D. Schiff, MD, Elissa Klinger, SM, Alejandra Salazar, PharmD, Jeffrey Medoff, BA, Mary G. Amato, PharmD, E. John Orav, PhD, Shimon Shaykevich, MS, Enrique V. Seoane, PharmD, Lake Walsh, BA, Theresa E. Fuller, BA, BS, Patricia C. Dykes, RN, PhD, MA, David W. Bates, MD, MSc, Jennifer S. Haas, MD, MSPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Medication adverse events are important and common yet are often not identified by clinicians. We evaluated an automated telephone surveillance system coupled with transfer to a live pharmacist to screen potentially drug-related symptoms after newly starting medications for four common primary care conditions: hypertension, diabetes, depression, and insomnia.

Methods

Cluster randomized trial with automated calls to eligible patients at 1 and 4 months after starting target drugs from intervention primary care clinics compared to propensity-matched patients from control clinics. Primary and secondary outcomes were physician documentation of any adverse effects associated with newly prescribed target medication, and whether the medication was discontinued and, if yes, whether the reason for stopping was an adverse effect.

Results

Of 4876 eligible intervention clinic patients who were contacted using automated calls, 776 (15.1%) responded and participated in the automated call. Based on positive symptom responses or request to speak to a pharmacist, 320 patients were transferred to the pharmacist and discussed 1021 potentially drug-related symptoms. Of these, 188 (18.5%) were assessed as probably and 479 (47.1%) as possibly related to the medication. Compared to a propensity-matched cohort of control clinic patients, intervention patients were significantly more likely to have adverse effects documented in the medical record by a physician (277 vs. 164 adverse effects, p < 0.0001, and 177 vs. 122 patients discontinued with documented adverse effects, p < 0.0001).

Discussion

Systematic automated telephone outreach monitoring coupled with real-time phone referral to a pharmacist identified a substantial number of previously unidentified potentially drug-related symptoms, many of which were validated as probably or possibly related to the drug by the pharmacist or their physicians. Multiple challenges were encountered using the interactive voice response (IVR) automated calling system, suggesting that other approaches may need to be considered and evaluated.

Trial Registration

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Haas JS, Chan AT, Giovannucci EL. Trends in prescription drug use among adults in the united states from 1999-2012. JAMA 2015;314(17):1818–1830.CrossRef Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Haas JS, Chan AT, Giovannucci EL. Trends in prescription drug use among adults in the united states from 1999-2012. JAMA 2015;314(17):1818–1830.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003;348(16):1556–1564.CrossRef Gandhi TK, Weingart SN, Borus J, et al. Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003;348(16):1556–1564.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Taché SV, Sönnichsen A, Ashcroft DM. Prevalence of adverse drug events in ambulatory care: a systematic review. Ann Pharmacother 2011;45(7–8):977–989.CrossRef Taché SV, Sönnichsen A, Ashcroft DM. Prevalence of adverse drug events in ambulatory care: a systematic review. Ann Pharmacother 2011;45(7–8):977–989.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Budnitz DS, Shehab N, Kegler SR, Richards CL. Medication use leading to emergency department visits for adverse drug events in older adults. Ann Intern Med 2007;147(11):755–765.CrossRef Budnitz DS, Shehab N, Kegler SR, Richards CL. Medication use leading to emergency department visits for adverse drug events in older adults. Ann Intern Med 2007;147(11):755–765.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med 2011;365(21):2002–2012.CrossRef Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med 2011;365(21):2002–2012.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Rose KO, Weidle NJ, Budnitz DS. US emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events, 2013-2014. JAMA 2016;316(20):2115–2125.CrossRef Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, Geller AI, Rose KO, Weidle NJ, Budnitz DS. US emergency department visits for outpatient adverse drug events, 2013-2014. JAMA 2016;316(20):2115–2125.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrato EH. The Case for Funding Our National Drug Safety Surveillance System. In: LWW; 2017. Morrato EH. The Case for Funding Our National Drug Safety Surveillance System. In: LWW; 2017.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Classen DC, Resar R, Griffin F, et al. ‘Global trigger tool’shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Aff 2011;30(4):581–589.CrossRef Classen DC, Resar R, Griffin F, et al. ‘Global trigger tool’shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Aff 2011;30(4):581–589.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW, Valim C, Mandl KD. Adverse drug events in the outpatient setting: an 11-year national analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19(9):901–910.CrossRef Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW, Valim C, Mandl KD. Adverse drug events in the outpatient setting: an 11-year national analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19(9):901–910.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Weingart SN, et al. Comparing patient-reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not? Ann Intern Med 2008;149(2):100–108.CrossRef Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Weingart SN, et al. Comparing patient-reported hospital adverse events with medical record review: do patients know something that hospitals do not? Ann Intern Med 2008;149(2):100–108.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Berner ES, Ray MN, Panjamapirom A, et al. Exploration of an automated approach for receiving patient feedback after outpatient acute care visits. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(8):1105–1112.CrossRef Berner ES, Ray MN, Panjamapirom A, et al. Exploration of an automated approach for receiving patient feedback after outpatient acute care visits. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(8):1105–1112.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Berner ES, Burkhardt JH, Panjamapirom A, Ray MN. Cost implications of human and automated follow-up in ambulatory care. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(11 Spec No. 17):SP531–540. Berner ES, Burkhardt JH, Panjamapirom A, Ray MN. Cost implications of human and automated follow-up in ambulatory care. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(11 Spec No. 17):SP531–540.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Willig JH, Krawitz M, Panjamapirom A, et al. Closing the feedback loop: an interactive voice response system to provide follow-up and feedback in primary care settings. J Med Syst 2013;37(2):9905.CrossRef Willig JH, Krawitz M, Panjamapirom A, et al. Closing the feedback loop: an interactive voice response system to provide follow-up and feedback in primary care settings. J Med Syst 2013;37(2):9905.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Auger C, Forster AJ, Oake N, Tamblyn R. Usability of a computerised drug monitoring programme to detect adverse drug events and non-compliance in outpatient ambulatory care. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22(4):306–316.CrossRef Auger C, Forster AJ, Oake N, Tamblyn R. Usability of a computerised drug monitoring programme to detect adverse drug events and non-compliance in outpatient ambulatory care. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22(4):306–316.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Houser SH, Ray MN, Maisiak R, et al. Telephone follow-up in primary care: can interactive voice response calls work? Stud Health Technol Inform 2013;192:112–116.PubMedPubMedCentral Houser SH, Ray MN, Maisiak R, et al. Telephone follow-up in primary care: can interactive voice response calls work? Stud Health Technol Inform 2013;192:112–116.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas JS, Iyer A, Orav EJ, Schiff GD, Bates DW. Participation in an ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19(9):961–969.CrossRef Haas JS, Iyer A, Orav EJ, Schiff GD, Bates DW. Participation in an ambulatory e-pharmacovigilance system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19(9):961–969.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas JS, Amato M, Marinacci L, Orav EJ, Schiff GD, Bates DW. Do package inserts reflect symptoms experienced in practice?: assessment using an automated phone pharmacovigilance system with varenicline and zolpidem in a primary care setting. Drug Saf 2012;35(8):623–628.CrossRef Haas JS, Amato M, Marinacci L, Orav EJ, Schiff GD, Bates DW. Do package inserts reflect symptoms experienced in practice?: assessment using an automated phone pharmacovigilance system with varenicline and zolpidem in a primary care setting. Drug Saf 2012;35(8):623–628.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahida S, Seoane E, Klinger E, et al. Cost of reporting possible adverse Drug reactions in medical Outpatients using a Telephonic interactive Voice response system. Value Health 2015;18(3):A257.CrossRef Mahida S, Seoane E, Klinger E, et al. Cost of reporting possible adverse Drug reactions in medical Outpatients using a Telephonic interactive Voice response system. Value Health 2015;18(3):A257.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rehan HS, Chopra D, Kakkar AK. Physician’s guide to pharmacovigilance: Terminology and causality assessment. Eur J Intern Med 2009;20(1):3–8.CrossRef Rehan HS, Chopra D, Kakkar AK. Physician’s guide to pharmacovigilance: Terminology and causality assessment. Eur J Intern Med 2009;20(1):3–8.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Farcas A, Bojita M. Adverse drug reactions in clinical practice: a causality assessment of a case of drug-induced pancreatitis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2009;18(3):353–358.PubMed Farcas A, Bojita M. Adverse drug reactions in clinical practice: a causality assessment of a case of drug-induced pancreatitis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2009;18(3):353–358.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bates DW, Evans RS, Murff H, Stetson PD, Pizziferri L, Hripcsak G. Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10(2):115–128.CrossRef Bates DW, Evans RS, Murff H, Stetson PD, Pizziferri L, Hripcsak G. Detecting adverse events using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10(2):115–128.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Forster AJ, Erlanger TE, Jennings A, et al. Effectiveness of a computerized drug-monitoring program to detect and prevent adverse drug events and medication non-adherence in outpatient ambulatory care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015;16(1):1.CrossRef Forster AJ, Erlanger TE, Jennings A, et al. Effectiveness of a computerized drug-monitoring program to detect and prevent adverse drug events and medication non-adherence in outpatient ambulatory care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015;16(1):1.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Forster AJ, Auger C. Using information technology to improve the monitoring of outpatient prescribing. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(5):382–384.CrossRef Forster AJ, Auger C. Using information technology to improve the monitoring of outpatient prescribing. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173(5):382–384.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Falconi M, Johnston S, Hogg W. A scoping review to explore the suitability of interactive voice response to conduct automated performance measurement of the patient’s experience in primary care. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2016;17(3):209–225.CrossRef Falconi M, Johnston S, Hogg W. A scoping review to explore the suitability of interactive voice response to conduct automated performance measurement of the patient’s experience in primary care. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2016;17(3):209–225.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Boulos MNK, Wheeler S, Tavares C, Jones R. How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online 2011;10(1):1.CrossRef Boulos MNK, Wheeler S, Tavares C, Jones R. How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online 2011;10(1):1.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Link MW, Murphy J, Schober MF, et al. Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys: report of the AAPOR task force on emerging technologies in public opinion research. Deerfield: AAPOR 2014. Link MW, Murphy J, Schober MF, et al. Mobile technologies for conducting, augmenting and potentially replacing surveys: report of the AAPOR task force on emerging technologies in public opinion research. Deerfield: AAPOR 2014.
Metadaten
Titel
Screening for Adverse Drug Events: a Randomized Trial of Automated Calls Coupled with Phone-Based Pharmacist Counseling
verfasst von
Gordon D. Schiff, MD
Elissa Klinger, SM
Alejandra Salazar, PharmD
Jeffrey Medoff, BA
Mary G. Amato, PharmD
E. John Orav, PhD
Shimon Shaykevich, MS
Enrique V. Seoane, PharmD
Lake Walsh, BA
Theresa E. Fuller, BA, BS
Patricia C. Dykes, RN, PhD, MA
David W. Bates, MD, MSc
Jennifer S. Haas, MD, MSPH
Publikationsdatum
05.10.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4672-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Healing Arts: Materia Medica

“I Was Never Loved Enough”

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.