This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
Professor Kellie’s report was largely consistent with the evidence of PMH. He rejected the position of Oshin’s parents concerning administering palliative care only and alternative therapies see CAHS v Kiszko & Anor [2016] FCWA 34, [18]–[22].
Re J (A Minor) (wardship: medical treatment) [1991] Fam 33, 46 (Lord Donaldson), cited in The NHS Trust v A (A Child) Ors [2007] EWCH 1696 (Fam), recently applied in Re JM (A Child) [2015] EWCH 2832 (Fam).
The NHS Trust v A (A Child) & Ors [2007] EWHC 1696 (Fam); Re JM (A Child) [2015] EWHC 2832 (Fam); Re Norma [1992] NZFLR 445.
Re Norma [1992] NZFLR 445, 451 cited by Thackray CJ at [57].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richards, B., Okninski, M.E. Regulating “Quack” Medicine and Decision-Making For Children Re-visited. Bioethical Inquiry 13, 467–471 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9746-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9746-9