Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1/2018

01.03.2018 | Original Research

Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges

verfasst von: Natacha Salomé Lima

Erschienen in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

In the last few decades, assisted reproduction has introduced new challenges to the way people conceive and build their families. While the numbers of donor-conceived (DC) individuals have increased worldwide, there are still many controversies concerning access to donor information. Is there a fundamental moral right to know one’s genetic background? What does identity in DC families mean? Is there any relationship between identity formation and disclosure of genetic origins? These questions are addressed by analysing core regulatory discourse (ethical recommendations and codes of practice). This analysis shows that the notion of narrative identity is suitable for defining and answering these questions. This review analyses the meaning of resemblance in DC families and the way donors are selected following affinity-ties and discusses disclosure strategies and agreements. As a preliminary conclusion, it could be said that, in the field of third-party reproduction, knowing about the donor conception significantly contributes towards the development of a narrative identity and also serves as a moral basis for the child’s right to know.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Adlan, A.A., and H.A. ten Have. 2012. The dilemma of revealing sensitive information on paternity status in Arabian social and cultural contexts. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(4): 403–409.CrossRefPubMed Adlan, A.A., and H.A. ten Have. 2012. The dilemma of revealing sensitive information on paternity status in Arabian social and cultural contexts. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(4): 403–409.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat ASRM. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2013. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 100(1): 45–49.CrossRef ASRM. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2013. Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 100(1): 45–49.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Becker, G., A. Butler, and R.D. Nachtigall. 2005. Resemblance talk: A challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the USA. Social Science & Medicine, 61(6): 300–1309.CrossRef Becker, G., A. Butler, and R.D. Nachtigall. 2005. Resemblance talk: A challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the USA. Social Science & Medicine, 61(6): 300–1309.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Blake, L., P. Casey, J. Readings, V. Jadva, and S. Golombok. 2010. “Daddy ran out of tadpoles”: How parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understand. Human Reproduction 25(10): 2527–2534.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Blake, L., P. Casey, J. Readings, V. Jadva, and S. Golombok. 2010. “Daddy ran out of tadpoles”: How parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understand. Human Reproduction 25(10): 2527–2534.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Brewaeys, A. 1996. Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology 17(1): 1–13.CrossRef Brewaeys, A. 1996. Donor insemination, the impact on family and child development. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology 17(1): 1–13.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Council of Europe. 1997. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Treaty Series—No. 164. Oviedo, 4.IV Council of Europe. 1997. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. European Treaty Series—No. 164. Oviedo, 4.IV
Zurück zum Zitat Daniels, K.R., and K. Taylor. 1993. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2): 155–170.CrossRefPubMed Daniels, K.R., and K. Taylor. 1993. Secrecy and openness in donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences 12(2): 155–170.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat DeGrazia, D. 2005. Human identity and bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef DeGrazia, D. 2005. Human identity and bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat De Melo-Martín, I. 2014. The ethics of anonymous gamete donation: Is there a right to know one's genetic origins? Hastings Center Report 44(2): 28–35.CrossRefPubMed De Melo-Martín, I. 2014. The ethics of anonymous gamete donation: Is there a right to know one's genetic origins? Hastings Center Report 44(2): 28–35.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman, T. 2015. Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: An overview of the psychosocial evidence. Monash Bioethics Review 33(1): 45–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Freeman, T. 2015. Gamete donation, information sharing and the best interests of the child: An overview of the psychosocial evidence. Monash Bioethics Review 33(1): 45–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Golombok, S., J. Readings, and L. Blake, et al. 2011. Children conceived by gamete donation: Psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7. Journal of Family Psychology 25(2): 230. Golombok, S., J. Readings, and L. Blake, et al. 2011. Children conceived by gamete donation: Psychological adjustment and mother-child relationships at age 7. Journal of Family Psychology 25(2): 230.
Zurück zum Zitat Golombok, S., L. Blake, P. Casey, G. Roman, and V. Jadva. 2013. Children born through reproductive donation: A longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 54(6): 653–660.CrossRefPubMed Golombok, S., L. Blake, P. Casey, G. Roman, and V. Jadva. 2013. Children born through reproductive donation: A longitudinal study of psychological adjustment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 54(6): 653–660.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Greenfeld, D.A., 2002. Changing attitudes towards third-party reproductive techniques. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 14(3): 289–292.CrossRefPubMed Greenfeld, D.A., 2002. Changing attitudes towards third-party reproductive techniques. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 14(3): 289–292.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Grunwald, A., 2014. The hermeneutic side of responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(3): 274–291.CrossRef Grunwald, A., 2014. The hermeneutic side of responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1(3): 274–291.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hershberger, P., S.C. Klock, and R.B. Barnes. 2007. Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study. Fertility and Sterility 87(2): 288–296.CrossRefPubMed Hershberger, P., S.C. Klock, and R.B. Barnes. 2007. Disclosure decisions among pregnant women who received donor oocytes: a phenomenological study. Fertility and Sterility 87(2): 288–296.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Jadva, V., T. Freeman, W. Kramer, and S. Golombok. 2009. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: Comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction 24(8): 1909–1919.CrossRefPubMed Jadva, V., T. Freeman, W. Kramer, and S. Golombok. 2009. The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: Comparisons by age of disclosure and family type. Human Reproduction 24(8): 1909–1919.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kirkman, M., 2003a. Egg and embryo donation and the meaning of motherhood. Women & Health 38(2): 1–18.CrossRef Kirkman, M., 2003a. Egg and embryo donation and the meaning of motherhood. Women & Health 38(2): 1–18.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat _____. 2003b. Parents’ contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception. Social Science & Medicine 57(11): 2229–2242. _____. 2003b. Parents’ contributions to the narrative identity of offspring of donor-assisted conception. Social Science & Medicine 57(11): 2229–2242.
Zurück zum Zitat _____. 2002. What's the plot? Applying narrative theory to research in psychology. Australian Psychologist 37(1): 30–38. _____. 2002. What's the plot? Applying narrative theory to research in psychology. Australian Psychologist 37(1): 30–38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovacs, G.T., S. Wise, and S. Finch. 2015. Keeping a child’s donor sperm conception secret is not linked to family and child functioning during middle childhood: An Australian comparative study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 55(4): 390–396.CrossRefPubMed Kovacs, G.T., S. Wise, and S. Finch. 2015. Keeping a child’s donor sperm conception secret is not linked to family and child functioning during middle childhood: An Australian comparative study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 55(4): 390–396.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lalos, A., C. Gottlieb, and O. Lalos. 2007. Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: A study of parental thinking. Human Reproduction 22(6): 1759–1768.CrossRefPubMed Lalos, A., C. Gottlieb, and O. Lalos. 2007. Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: A study of parental thinking. Human Reproduction 22(6): 1759–1768.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mac Dougall, K., G. Becker, J.E. Scheib, and R.D. Nachtigall. 2007. Strategies for disclosure: How parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes. Fertility and sterility 87(3): 524–533.CrossRefPubMed Mac Dougall, K., G. Becker, J.E. Scheib, and R.D. Nachtigall. 2007. Strategies for disclosure: How parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametes. Fertility and sterility 87(3): 524–533.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Malek, J. 2006. Identity, harm, and the ethics of reproductive technology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31(1): 83–95.CrossRefPubMed Malek, J. 2006. Identity, harm, and the ethics of reproductive technology. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31(1): 83–95.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mamo, L. 2005. Biomedicalizing kinship: Sperm banks and the creation of affinity-ties. Science as Culture 14(3): 237–264.CrossRefPubMed Mamo, L. 2005. Biomedicalizing kinship: Sperm banks and the creation of affinity-ties. Science as Culture 14(3): 237–264.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McAdams, D.P., and K.C. McLean. 2013. Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22(3): 233–238.CrossRef McAdams, D.P., and K.C. McLean. 2013. Narrative identity. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22(3): 233–238.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nachtigall, R.D., G. Becker, S.S. Quiroga, and J.M. Tschann. 1998. The disclosure decision: Concerns and issues of parents of children conceived through donor insemination. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 178(6): 1165–1170.CrossRefPubMed Nachtigall, R.D., G. Becker, S.S. Quiroga, and J.M. Tschann. 1998. The disclosure decision: Concerns and issues of parents of children conceived through donor insemination. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 178(6): 1165–1170.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2013. Donor conception: Ethical aspects of information sharing. London. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2013. Donor conception: Ethical aspects of information sharing. London.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings, G. 2014. Donación anónima y no anónima: Pros y contras [Anonymous and non-anonymous donation: Pros and cons]. In Reproduccion humana asistida: Aspectos juridicos, soicales y psicológicos, edited by G. Baccino, 301–319. Tirant Humanidades. Pennings, G. 2014. Donación anónima y no anónima: Pros y contras [Anonymous and non-anonymous donation: Pros and cons]. In Reproduccion humana asistida: Aspectos juridicos, soicales y psicológicos, edited by G. Baccino, 301–319. Tirant Humanidades.
Zurück zum Zitat _____. 1997. The “double track” policy for donor anonymity. Human Reproduction 12(12): 2839–2844. _____. 1997. The “double track” policy for donor anonymity. Human Reproduction 12(12): 2839–2844.
Zurück zum Zitat Raes, I., A. Ravelingien, and G. Pennings 2016. Donor conception disclosure: Directive or non-Directive counselling? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(3): 369–379.CrossRefPubMed Raes, I., A. Ravelingien, and G. Pennings 2016. Donor conception disclosure: Directive or non-Directive counselling? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13(3): 369–379.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Ravelingien, A., V. Provoost, and G. Pennings. 2015. Open-identity sperm donation: How does offering donor-identifying information relate to donor-conceived offspring’s wishes and needs? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12(3): 503–509.CrossRefPubMed Ravelingien, A., V. Provoost, and G. Pennings. 2015. Open-identity sperm donation: How does offering donor-identifying information relate to donor-conceived offspring’s wishes and needs? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12(3): 503–509.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Ravelingien, A., and G. Pennings. 2013. The right to know your genetic parents: From open-identity gamete donation to routine paternity testing. The American Journal of Bioethics 13(5): 33–41.CrossRefPubMed Ravelingien, A., and G. Pennings. 2013. The right to know your genetic parents: From open-identity gamete donation to routine paternity testing. The American Journal of Bioethics 13(5): 33–41.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Readings, J., L. Blake, P. Casey, V. Jadva, and S. Golombok, 2011. Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: Decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 22(5): 485–495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Readings, J., L. Blake, P. Casey, V. Jadva, and S. Golombok, 2011. Secrecy, disclosure and everything in-between: Decisions of parents of children conceived by donor insemination, egg donation and surrogacy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 22(5): 485–495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Rodino, I.S., P.J. Burton, and K.A. Sanders, 2011. Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: An Australian perspective. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 22(3): 303–311.CrossRefPubMed Rodino, I.S., P.J. Burton, and K.A. Sanders, 2011. Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: An Australian perspective. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 22(3): 303–311.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Schaffer, J.A., and R. Diamond. 1993. Infertility: Private pain and secret stigma. In Secrets in Families and Family Therapy, edited by E. Imber-Black, 106–120. New York: W.W. Norton. Schaffer, J.A., and R. Diamond. 1993. Infertility: Private pain and secret stigma. In Secrets in Families and Family Therapy, edited by E. Imber-Black, 106–120. New York: W.W. Norton.
Zurück zum Zitat Shehab, D., J. Duff, L.A. Pasch, et al. 2008. How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: Contexts, influences, and couple dynamics. Fertility and Sterility 89(1): 179–187.CrossRefPubMed Shehab, D., J. Duff, L.A. Pasch, et al. 2008. How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: Contexts, influences, and couple dynamics. Fertility and Sterility 89(1): 179–187.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Strathern, M. 2003. Still giving nature a helping hand? Surrogacy: A debate about technology and society. In Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives, edited by R.Cook, S.D Sclater, and F. Kaganas, 281–296. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Strathern, M. 2003. Still giving nature a helping hand? Surrogacy: A debate about technology and society. In Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives, edited by R.Cook, S.D Sclater, and F. Kaganas, 281–296. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Zurück zum Zitat Swierstra, T., 2015. Identifying the normative challenges posed by technology’s “soft”impacts. Etikk i praksis-Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 9(1): 5–20.CrossRef Swierstra, T., 2015. Identifying the normative challenges posed by technology’s “soft”impacts. Etikk i praksis-Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 9(1): 5–20.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2015. Code of practice, 8th ed. London. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2015. Code of practice, 8th ed. London.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner, A.J., and A. Coyle. 2000. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction 15(9): 2041–2051.CrossRefPubMed Turner, A.J., and A. Coyle. 2000. What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction 15(9): 2041–2051.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat UNESCO. 2005. Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Records of the General Conference. October, 2005. UNESCO. 2005. Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights. Records of the General Conference. October, 2005.
Zurück zum Zitat United Nations. 1989. Convention on the rights of the child. Treaty Series, 1577, 3. United Nations. 1989. Convention on the rights of the child. Treaty Series, 1577, 3.
Zurück zum Zitat Warnock, M. 1986. A question of life. The Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology. Oxford: B Blackwell. Warnock, M. 1986. A question of life. The Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology. Oxford: B Blackwell.
Metadaten
Titel
Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges
verfasst von
Natacha Salomé Lima
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2018
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Elektronische ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-017-9823-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe