Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 5/2011

01.05.2011 | Clinical Research

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for High-Risk Patients: Weight Loss and Comorbidity Improvement—Short-Term Results

verfasst von: Conor J. Magee, Jonathan Barry, Mayilone Arumugasamy, Shafiq Javed, Robert Macadam, David D. Kerrigan

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The obesity surgery mortality risk score (OS-MRS) is a five-point scoring system stratifying the risk of post-operative mortality. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 60 may also carry an increased risk of peri-operative complications. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as an initial procedure could reduce weight and associated comorbidity allowing a safer, definitive second procedure. We investigated weight loss and risk reduction in patients having LSG as part of a planned two-stage definitive bariatric procedure.

Methods

Patients with a high OS-MRS (4–5), males with BMI > 60 or females with BMI > 65, who underwent LSG were identified from a prospective database. Data were analysed by means of the Mann–Whitney U and Chi-squared test.

Results

Sixty-eight patients underwent LSG. LSG reduced median BMI at 12 months (68 versus 54, P < 0.001) and the OS-MRS (3 versus 2, P = 0.005). An increase in patients considered low risk (OS-MRS, 0–1) was seen following LSG (35% versus 14%, P = 0.006). The proportion of patients with BMI < 50 increased from 0% to 30% (P < 0.001). Improvement or resolution of diabetes and hypertension was seen in 23% and 25% of cases, respectively.

Conclusions

LSG achieves good weight loss, reduces the OS-MRS and improves obesity-related comorbidity in high-risk surgical patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A, et al. Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes Lond. 2007;31:1248–61.PubMedCrossRef Karlsson J, Taft C, Ryden A, et al. Ten-year trends in health-related quality of life after surgical and conventional treatment for severe obesity: the SOS intervention study. Int J Obes Lond. 2007;31:1248–61.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dresel A, Kuhn JA, McCarty TM. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese and super morbidly obese patients. Am J Surg. 2004;187:230–2. discussion 232.PubMedCrossRef Dresel A, Kuhn JA, McCarty TM. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese and super morbidly obese patients. Am J Surg. 2004;187:230–2. discussion 232.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez AZ Jr, Demaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for death following gastric bypass for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2004;239:698–702. discussion 702-693.PubMedCrossRef Fernandez AZ Jr, Demaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for death following gastric bypass for treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2004;239:698–702. discussion 702-693.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23. discussion 524.PubMedCrossRef Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23. discussion 524.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat DeMaria EJ, Murr M, Byrne TK, et al. Validation of the obesity surgery mortality risk score in a multicenter study proves it stratifies mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2007;246:578–82. discussion 583-574.PubMedCrossRef DeMaria EJ, Murr M, Byrne TK, et al. Validation of the obesity surgery mortality risk score in a multicenter study proves it stratifies mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2007;246:578–82. discussion 583-574.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, Brehant O, et al. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study in 135 patients with morbid obesity. Surgery. 2009;145:106–13.PubMedCrossRef Fuks D, Verhaeghe P, Brehant O, et al. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective study in 135 patients with morbid obesity. Surgery. 2009;145:106–13.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Almogy G, Crookes PF, Anthone GJ. Longitudinal gastrectomy as a treatment for the high-risk super-obese patient. Obes Surg. 2004;14:492–7.PubMedCrossRef Almogy G, Crookes PF, Anthone GJ. Longitudinal gastrectomy as a treatment for the high-risk super-obese patient. Obes Surg. 2004;14:492–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Langer FB, Reza Hoda MA, Bohdjalian A, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding: effects on plasma ghrelin levels. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1024–9.PubMedCrossRef Langer FB, Reza Hoda MA, Bohdjalian A, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding: effects on plasma ghrelin levels. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1024–9.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Milone L, Strong V, Gagner M. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is superior to endoscopic intragastric balloon as a first stage procedure for super-obese patients (BMI > or =50). Obes Surg. 2005;15:612–7.PubMedCrossRef Milone L, Strong V, Gagner M. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is superior to endoscopic intragastric balloon as a first stage procedure for super-obese patients (BMI > or =50). Obes Surg. 2005;15:612–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1030–3.PubMedCrossRef Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1030–3.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Baltasar A, Serra C, Perez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1124–8.PubMedCrossRef Baltasar A, Serra C, Perez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1124–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tichansky DS, DeMaria EJ, Fernandez AZ, et al. Postoperative complications are not increased in super-super obese patients who undergo laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:939–41.PubMedCrossRef Tichansky DS, DeMaria EJ, Fernandez AZ, et al. Postoperative complications are not increased in super-super obese patients who undergo laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:939–41.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Abeles D, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME, et al. Primary laparoscopic gastric bypass can be performed safely in patients with BMI > or = 60. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:236–40.PubMedCrossRef Abeles D, Kim JJ, Tarnoff ME, et al. Primary laparoscopic gastric bypass can be performed safely in patients with BMI > or = 60. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:236–40.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat DeMaria EJ, Portenier D, Wolfe L. Obesity surgery mortality risk score: proposal for a clinically useful score to predict mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:134–40.PubMedCrossRef DeMaria EJ, Portenier D, Wolfe L. Obesity surgery mortality risk score: proposal for a clinically useful score to predict mortality risk in patients undergoing gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:134–40.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen R, Uzzan B, Bihan H, et al. Ghrelin levels and sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obesity. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1501–2.PubMedCrossRef Cohen R, Uzzan B, Bihan H, et al. Ghrelin levels and sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obesity. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1501–2.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for High-Risk Patients: Weight Loss and Comorbidity Improvement—Short-Term Results
verfasst von
Conor J. Magee
Jonathan Barry
Mayilone Arumugasamy
Shafiq Javed
Robert Macadam
David D. Kerrigan
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0226-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Obesity Surgery 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.