Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 10/2012

01.10.2012 | Clinical Research

Satisfaction and Quality-of-Life Issues in Body Contouring Surgery Patients: a Qualitative Study

verfasst von: Anne F. Klassen, Stefan J. Cano, Amie Scott, Jessica Johnson, Andrea L. Pusic

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Body contouring, which encompasses a range of surgical procedures on different areas of the body, is one of the most rapidly growing areas of plastic surgery. Little is known about outcomes from the perspective of post-weight loss body contouring patients. The aim of our qualitative study was to identify the health and aesthetic concerns of such patients through in-depth patient interviews.

Methods

Forty-three bariatric surgery post-weight loss body contouring patients were recruited between September 2009 and January 2011 from the offices of five plastic surgeons located in the USA and Canada. Interviews were used to explore the impact that obesity, weight loss, and body contouring surgery had on all aspects of the patient’s life. Interviews were transcribed and data analysis involved coding and the use of the constant comparison method to develop categories and themes. Interviewing continued until no new themes emerged.

Results

Patients described a range of important health and aesthetic concerns related to body contouring surgery following massive weight loss, including the following: appearance-related concerns, physical health concerns, sexual health concerns, psychological health concerns, and social health concerns. Body contouring surgery played an instrumental role in the completion of the entire weight loss process for patients.

Conclusions

The removal of excess skin leads to improvements in a patient’s appearance and enhanced physical, psychological, and social health and well-being. In order to appropriately measure the impact of body contouring procedures from the patient’s perspective, a well-developed psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome instrument is needed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Heddens CJ. Body contouring after massive weight loss. Plast Surg Nurs. 2004;24:107–15.PubMed Heddens CJ. Body contouring after massive weight loss. Plast Surg Nurs. 2004;24:107–15.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Pecori L, Serra Cervetti GG, Marinari GM, et al. Attitudes of morbidly obese patients to weight loss and body image following bariatric surgery and body contouring. Obes Surg. 2007;17:68–73.PubMedCrossRef Pecori L, Serra Cervetti GG, Marinari GM, et al. Attitudes of morbidly obese patients to weight loss and body image following bariatric surgery and body contouring. Obes Surg. 2007;17:68–73.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Song AY, Rubin JP, Thomas V, et al. Body image and quality of life in post massive weight loss body contouring patients. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:1626–36.CrossRef Song AY, Rubin JP, Thomas V, et al. Body image and quality of life in post massive weight loss body contouring patients. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:1626–36.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarwer DB, Fabricatore AN. Psychiatric Considerations of the Massive Weight Loss Patient. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35:10.CrossRef Sarwer DB, Fabricatore AN. Psychiatric Considerations of the Massive Weight Loss Patient. Clin Plast Surg. 2008;35:10.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hensel JM, Lehman Jr JA, Tantri MP, et al. An outcomes analysis and satisfaction survey of 199 consecutive abdominoplasties. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46:357–63.PubMedCrossRef Hensel JM, Lehman Jr JA, Tantri MP, et al. An outcomes analysis and satisfaction survey of 199 consecutive abdominoplasties. Ann Plast Surg. 2001;46:357–63.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurwitz DJ, Agha-Mohammadi S. Postbariatric surgery breast reshaping: the spiral flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:481–6.PubMedCrossRef Hurwitz DJ, Agha-Mohammadi S. Postbariatric surgery breast reshaping: the spiral flap. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56:481–6.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurwitz DJ, Holland SW. The L brachioplasty: An innovative approach to correct excess tissue of the upper arm, axilla, and lateral chest. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:403–11.PubMedCrossRef Hurwitz DJ, Holland SW. The L brachioplasty: An innovative approach to correct excess tissue of the upper arm, axilla, and lateral chest. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:403–11.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Migliori F, Rosati C, D'Alessandro G, et al. Body contouring after biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1638–44.PubMedCrossRef Migliori F, Rosati C, D'Alessandro G, et al. Body contouring after biliopancreatic diversion. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1638–44.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van Huizum MA, Roche NA, Hofer SO. Circular belt lipectomy: a retrospective follow-up study on perioperative complications and cosmetic outcome. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:459–64.PubMedCrossRef van Huizum MA, Roche NA, Hofer SO. Circular belt lipectomy: a retrospective follow-up study on perioperative complications and cosmetic outcome. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;54:459–64.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Young SC, Freiberg A. A critical look at abdominal lipectomy following morbid obesity surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991;15:81–4.PubMedCrossRef Young SC, Freiberg A. A critical look at abdominal lipectomy following morbid obesity surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991;15:81–4.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Yousif NJ, Lifchez SD, Nguyen HH. Transverse rectus sheath plication in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:778–84.PubMedCrossRef Yousif NJ, Lifchez SD, Nguyen HH. Transverse rectus sheath plication in abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:778–84.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cano S, Klassen A, Pusic A. The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:98e–106e.PubMedCrossRef Cano S, Klassen A, Pusic A. The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:98e–106e.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Reavey P, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, et al. Measuring quality of life and patient satisfaction after body contouring: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;7:807–13.CrossRef Reavey P, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, et al. Measuring quality of life and patient satisfaction after body contouring: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;7:807–13.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Augustin M, Zschocke I, Sommer B, et al. Sociodemographic profile and satisfaction with treatment of patients undergoing liposuction in tumescent anesthesia. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:4. Augustin M, Zschocke I, Sommer B, et al. Sociodemographic profile and satisfaction with treatment of patients undergoing liposuction in tumescent anesthesia. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:4.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris DL, Carr AT. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54:216–22.PubMedCrossRef Harris DL, Carr AT. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS59): a new psychometric scale for the evaluation of patients with disfigurements and aesthetic problems of appearance. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54:216–22.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Carr T, Harris D, James C. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59): A new scale to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol. 2000;5:201–15.CrossRef Carr T, Harris D, James C. The Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59): A new scale to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol. 2000;5:201–15.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. The DAS 24: A short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:14.CrossRef Carr T, Moss T, Harris D. The DAS 24: A short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10:14.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sigurdson L, Kirkland SA, Mykhalovskiy E. Validation of a questionnaire for measuring morbidity in breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1108–14.PubMedCrossRef Sigurdson L, Kirkland SA, Mykhalovskiy E. Validation of a questionnaire for measuring morbidity in breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:1108–14.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Striplin D, et al. The health burden of breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1591–9.PubMedCrossRef Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Striplin D, et al. The health burden of breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1591–9.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–53.PubMedCrossRef Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: The BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–53.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. The BREAST-Q: Further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:293–302. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. The BREAST-Q: Further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:293–302.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193–205.CrossRef Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193–205.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lasch KE, Marquis P, Vigneuz M, et al. PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as crucial foundation. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:1087–96.PubMedCrossRef Lasch KE, Marquis P, Vigneuz M, et al. PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as crucial foundation. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:1087–96.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Qualitative Solutions Research International. NVivo 8 [Software]. Australia: QSR International; 2008. Qualitative Solutions Research International. NVivo 8 [Software]. Australia: QSR International; 2008.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1–190, 215–357, iii‐iv. Review. Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13:1–190, 215–357, iii‐iv. Review.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Beek ESJ, te Riele W, Specken TF, et al. The impact of reconstructive procedures following bariatric surgery on patient well-being and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2010;20:36–41.PubMedCrossRef van der Beek ESJ, te Riele W, Specken TF, et al. The impact of reconstructive procedures following bariatric surgery on patient well-being and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2010;20:36–41.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Duval K, Marceau P, Perusse L, et al. An overview of obesity-specific quality of life questionnaires. Obes Rev. 2006;7:347–60.PubMedCrossRef Duval K, Marceau P, Perusse L, et al. An overview of obesity-specific quality of life questionnaires. Obes Rev. 2006;7:347–60.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott AM, Pusic AL, Cano SJ, et al. The BODY-Q: A new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for body contouring patients. Qual Life Res. 2012;20:74–75. Scott AM, Pusic AL, Cano SJ, et al. The BODY-Q: A new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for body contouring patients. Qual Life Res. 2012;20:74–75.
Metadaten
Titel
Satisfaction and Quality-of-Life Issues in Body Contouring Surgery Patients: a Qualitative Study
verfasst von
Anne F. Klassen
Stefan J. Cano
Amie Scott
Jessica Johnson
Andrea L. Pusic
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0640-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2012

Obesity Surgery 10/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.