Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Obesity Surgery
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 10/2012

01.10.2012 | Review

Predictors of Attrition in Bariatric Aftercare: A Systematic Review of the Literature

verfasst von: Irina Moroshko, Leah Brennan, Paul O’Brien

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 10/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Bariatric surgery results in greater weight loss and maintenance than non-surgical interventions in obese patients. Inadequate adherence to aftercare is associated with poor weight loss and maintenance, poorer control of obesity-related comorbidities, and the development of post-operative complications. This study aims to identify factors influencing failure to attend follow-up visits in the adult post-bariatric surgery patients. A systematic review was undertaken to identify factors associated with attrition from bariatric aftercare in adult (18–65 years) obese (BMI > 30) patients. Eight studies published before May 2011 and addressing factors associated with bariatric aftercare attendance were identified. Few consistent findings were evident. Greater pre-surgical weight and greater travel distance to the follow-up centre were more commonly associated with attrition. Conclusions were limited by the very small number of studies, the different types of bariatric surgery studied and the variety of methodologies employed and variables considered. There is a need for research identifying the modifiable attrition risk factors that can be targeted to improve surgical aftercare attendance. This has the potential to facilitate long-term weight loss and maintanence as well as to reduce post-operative complications and costs; thus improving both the effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery.
Literatur
1.
Toussi R, Fujioka K, Coleman KJ. Pre- and postsurgery behavioral compliance, patient health, and postbariatric surgical weight loss. Obesity. 2009;17(5):996–1002.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Garb J, et al. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2009;19(10):1447–55.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Favretti F, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in 1,791 consecutive obese patients: 12-year results. Obes Surg. 2007;17(2):168–75.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Wheeler E, et al. Adherence to outpatient program postoperative appointments after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4(4):515–20.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Poole NAA. Compliance with surgical aftercare following bariatric surgery for morbid obesity: a retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2005;15(2):261–5.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Sivagnanam P, Rhodes M. The importance of follow-up and distance from centre in weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(10):2432–8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Denino WF, et al. Travel distance as factor in follow-up visit compliance in postlaparoscopic adjustable gastric banding population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(6):597–600.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Pontiroli AE, et al. Post-surgery adherence to scheduled visits and compliance, more than personality disorders, predict outcome of bariatric restrictive surgery in morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17(11):1492–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Pessina A, Andreoli M, Vassallo C. Adaptability and compliance of the obese patient to restrictive gastric surgery in the short term. Obes Surg. 2001;11(4):459–63.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Pories WJ, et al. Who would have thought it? An operation proves to be the most effective therapy for adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1995;222(3):339–52.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Lara MD, et al. Travel distance, age, and sex as factors in follow-up visit compliance in the post-gastric bypass population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2004;1(1):17–21.CrossRef
12.
Himpens J, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Arch Surg. 2011;146(7):802–7.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Sugerman HJ, et al. Bariatric surgery for severely obese adolescents. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7(1):102–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Padwal R, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review of the clinical and economic evidence. Obes Rev. 2011;12:602–621.
15.
Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, Borrelli V. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(2):127–32.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Karamanakos SN, et al. Weight loss, appetite suppression, and changes in fasting and postprandial ghrelin and peptide-YY levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, double blind study. Ann Surg. 2008;247(3):401–7.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Peterli R, et al. Improvement in glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery: comparison of laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):234–41.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Nguyen NT, et al. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity: outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2009;250(4):631–9.PubMed
19.
Grant AM, et al. Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: UK collaborative randomised trial. BMJ 2008;337:a2664.
20.
Astrup A, et al. Effects of liraglutide in the treatment of obesity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Lancet. 2009;374(9701):1606–16.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Fabricatore A, et al. Attrition from randomized controlled trials of pharmacological weight loss agents: a systematic review and analysis. Obes Rev. 2009;10(3):333–41.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Teixeira PJJ. Pretreatment predictors of attrition and successful weight management in women. Int J Obes. 2004;28(9):1124–33.CrossRef
23.
Harris MB, et al. Correlates of success and retention in a multifaceted, long-term behavior modification program for obese adolescent girls. Addict Behav. 1980;5(1):25–34.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg (London, England). 2010;8(5):336–41.
25.
Shen R, et al. Impact of patient follow-up on weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2004;14(4):514–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Pekarik G, et al. Variables related to continuance in a behavioral weight loss program. Addict Behav. 1984;9(4):413–6.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Bennett JM, Jones SE. Dropping out of treatment for obesity. J Psychosom Res. 1986;30(5):567–73.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Chang M-W, Brown R, Nitzke S. Participant recruitment and retention in a pilot program to prevent weight gain in low-income overweight and obese mothers. BMC Publ Health. 2009;9:424.CrossRef
29.
Sitton SC, Miller HG. The effect of pretreatment eating patterns on the completion of a very low calorie diet. Int J Eat Disord. 1991;10(3):369–72.CrossRef
30.
Examination of pretreatment predictors of attrition in a VLCD and behavior therapy weight-loss program. Addict Behav. 1993;18(4): 431–435.
31.
Mitchell C, Stuart BS. Effect of self-efficacy on dropout from obesity treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1984;52(6):1100–1.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Davis MJ, Addis ME. Predictors of attrition from behavioral medicine treatments. Ann Behav Med. 1999;21(4):339–49.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Huisman S, et al. Low goal ownership predicts drop-out from a weight intervention study in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Behav Med. 2010;17(3):176–81.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Becker MH, Maiman LA. Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Medical Care. 1975;13(1):10–24.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Wadden TA, Letizia KA. Predictors of attrition and weight loss in patients treated by moderate and severe caloric restriction treatment of the seriously obese patient. New York, NY: Guilford Press; US; 1992. p. 383–410.
36.
Martin CK, et al. Weight loss and retention in a commercial weight-loss program and the effect of corporate partnership. Int J Obes. 2010;34(4):742–50.CrossRef
37.
Kong W, et al. Predictors of success to weight-loss intervention program in individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;90(2):147–53.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Moroshko I, Brennan L, O'Brien P. Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2011;12(11):912–34.
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of Attrition in Bariatric Aftercare: A Systematic Review of the Literature
verfasst von
Irina Moroshko
Leah Brennan
Paul O’Brien
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0691-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2012

Obesity Surgery 10/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Clinical Research

Improvement of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) After Bariatric Surgery—Who Fails in the Early Postoperative Course?

Clinical Research

Impact of Weight-Loss Surgery and Diabetes Status on Serum ALT Levels

Clinical Research

Deep and Superficial Fat Ratio in Dietary and Surgically Induced Weight Loss Patients

Clinical Research

Gastric Plication for Morbid Obesity: a Systematic Review

Clinical Research

Comorbidities Remission After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity is Sustained in a Long-Term Follow-up and Correlates with Weight Regain

Clinical Research

Cholecystolithiasis after Gastric Bypass: A Clinical, Biochemical, and Ultrasonographic 3-year Follow-up Study

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | Infektiologie | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

10.04.2024 | Postoperative Schmerztherapie | Nachrichten

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente

10.04.2024 | Narbenhernie | Nachrichten

Deutlich weniger Narbenhernien mit der Small-Bites-Technik
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.