Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 6/2015

01.06.2015 | Original Contributions

Technique Evolution, Learning Curve, and Outcomes of 200 Robot-Assisted Gastric Bypass Procedures: a 5-Year Experience

verfasst von: Vivek Bindal, Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia, Mario Masrur, Enrique F. Elli

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We evaluate our 5-year experience, evolution of technique, and clinical outcomes with robot-assisted RYGB.

Methods

Two hundred consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted RYGB at our center were included. Among them, 118 patients underwent a hybrid robot-assisted laparoscopic RYGB (LRRYGB), and 82 patients underwent a totally robotic RYGB (TRRYGB). Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, operative parameters, conversions, morbidity, mortality, and excess weight loss were analyzed.

Results

Most of the patients (88 %) were female with a mean age of 41.9 years and mean BMI of 46.6 kg/m2. The outcomes of patients who underwent LRRYGB (n = 118) were compared to those who underwent TRRYGB (n = 82). The mean operative time in TRRYGB group was 170.9 ± 51.4 min which was significantly lower than LRRYGB group (216 ± 54.1 min). The mean operative time for the last 100 patients was significantly lower than that for the first 100 patients. The excess weight loss (EWL) was 58.3 % at 6 months, 67.7 % at 1 year, 71.6 % at 2 years, and 65 % at 3 years. There were three conversions to open, three reoperations and four readmissions. There were no anastomotic leak, major bleed, gastrojejunostomy stricture, or mortality seen in our series.

Conclusions

Use of robot assistance to perform RYGB is safe and may reduce the associated complications, namely, anastomotic leak, gastrojejunostomy (GJ) stricture, and hemorrhage. Excess weight loss at 2 years after RRYGB is comparable to laparoscopic RYGB.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Favretti F. The world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg. 1999;9:206–9.CrossRefPubMed Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Favretti F. The world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg. 1999;9:206–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson EB, Sudan R. The evolution of robotic bariatric surgery. World J Surg. 2013;37:2756–60.CrossRefPubMed Wilson EB, Sudan R. The evolution of robotic bariatric surgery. World J Surg. 2013;37:2756–60.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin WS, The Academic Robotics Group. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1521–4.CrossRefPubMed Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S, Melvin WS, The Academic Robotics Group. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1521–4.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bindal V, Bhatia P, Kalhan S, Khetan M, John S, Ali A, et al. Robot-assisted excision of a large retroperitoneal schwannoma. JSLS. 2014;18(1):150–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Bindal V, Bhatia P, Kalhan S, Khetan M, John S, Ali A, et al. Robot-assisted excision of a large retroperitoneal schwannoma. JSLS. 2014;18(1):150–4.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Bruyns J, Germay O, Leman G, et al. Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(9):918–23.CrossRefPubMed Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, Bruyns J, Germay O, Leman G, et al. Evaluation of telesurgical (robotic) NISSEN fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(9):918–23.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakadi IE, Melot C, Closset J, DeMoor V, Betroune K, Feron P, et al. Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication clinical results and cost minimization. World J Surg. 2006;30(6):1050–4.CrossRefPubMed Nakadi IE, Melot C, Closset J, DeMoor V, Betroune K, Feron P, et al. Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication clinical results and cost minimization. World J Surg. 2006;30(6):1050–4.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1145–79.CrossRefPubMed Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S. Laparoscopic surgery for morbid obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 2001;81(5):1145–79.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.CrossRefPubMed Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, Hagen ME, Chassot G, Koutny-Fong P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1116–21.CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, Hagen ME, Chassot G, Koutny-Fong P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1116–21.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubbard VS, Hall WH. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Obes Surg. 1991;1(3):257–65.CrossRefPubMed Hubbard VS, Hall WH. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Obes Surg. 1991;1(3):257–65.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayloo SM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Shah G, Giulianotti PC. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes? World J Surg. 2011;35:637–42.CrossRefPubMed Ayloo SM, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Shah G, Giulianotti PC. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass: is there a difference in outcomes? World J Surg. 2011;35:637–42.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fourman MM, Saber AA. Robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:483–8.CrossRefPubMed Fourman MM, Saber AA. Robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:483–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, Gourash W. The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(3):212–5.CrossRefPubMed Schauer P, Ikramuddin S, Hamad G, Gourash W. The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(3):212–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng JY, Lourié DJ. 100 robotic-assisted laparoscopic gastric bypasses at a community hospital. Am Surg. 2008;10:1022–5. Deng JY, Lourié DJ. 100 robotic-assisted laparoscopic gastric bypasses at a community hospital. Am Surg. 2008;10:1022–5.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, Albrecht WC, Scarborough TK, Wilson EB. Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robot assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg. 2006;192:746–9.CrossRefPubMed Yu SC, Clapp BL, Lee MJ, Albrecht WC, Scarborough TK, Wilson EB. Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robot assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg. 2006;192:746–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Myers SR, McGuirl J, Wang J. Robot assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short term outcomes. Obes Surg. 2013;23:467–73.CrossRefPubMed Myers SR, McGuirl J, Wang J. Robot assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short term outcomes. Obes Surg. 2013;23:467–73.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, Wilson T, Toder M, Wilson E. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: update from 2 high-volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):284–8.CrossRefPubMed Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, Wilson T, Toder M, Wilson E. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: update from 2 high-volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):284–8.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):52–61.CrossRefPubMed Hagen ME, Pugin F, Chassot G, Huber O, Buchs N, Iranmanesh P, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):52–61.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, Klein C, Wilson EB. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):265–70.CrossRefPubMed Snyder BE, Wilson T, Leong BY, Klein C, Wilson EB. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):265–70.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, Kinross J, Ziprin P. Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7(4):393–400.CrossRefPubMed Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Venkat-Ramen V, Kinross J, Ziprin P. Robotic vs. laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in morbidly obese patients: systematic review and pooled analysis. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7(4):393–400.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlin AM, Zeni TM, English WJ, Hawasli AA, Genaw JA, Krause KR, et al. The comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):791–7.CrossRefPubMed Carlin AM, Zeni TM, English WJ, Hawasli AA, Genaw JA, Krause KR, et al. The comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):791–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Courcoulas AP, Christian NJ, Belle SH, Berk PD, Flum DR, Garcia L, et al. Weight change and health outcomes at 3 years after bariatric surgery among individuals with severe obesity. JAMA. 2013;310(22):2416–25.PubMedCentralPubMed Courcoulas AP, Christian NJ, Belle SH, Berk PD, Flum DR, Garcia L, et al. Weight change and health outcomes at 3 years after bariatric surgery among individuals with severe obesity. JAMA. 2013;310(22):2416–25.PubMedCentralPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Curet MJ, Curet M, Soloman H, Lui G, Morton JM. Comparison of hospital charges between robotic, laparoscopic stapled, and laparoscopic handsewn Roux-en-Ygastric bypass. J Robot Surg. 2009;3(2):75–8.CrossRef Curet MJ, Curet M, Soloman H, Lui G, Morton JM. Comparison of hospital charges between robotic, laparoscopic stapled, and laparoscopic handsewn Roux-en-Ygastric bypass. J Robot Surg. 2009;3(2):75–8.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Gypen B, Van Tu T, Vaneerdeweg W. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1690–6.CrossRefPubMed Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Gypen B, Van Tu T, Vaneerdeweg W. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1690–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):597–603.CrossRefPubMed Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, Rocchietto S, Allieta R, Morino M. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):597–603.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Technique Evolution, Learning Curve, and Outcomes of 200 Robot-Assisted Gastric Bypass Procedures: a 5-Year Experience
verfasst von
Vivek Bindal
Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia
Mario Masrur
Enrique F. Elli
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2015
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-014-1502-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2015

Obesity Surgery 6/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.