Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 6/2016

14.10.2015 | Original Contributions

The Results of 100 Robotic Versus 100 Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedures: a Single High Volume Centre Experience

verfasst von: R. M. Smeenk, G. van ‘t Hof, E. Elsten, P. G. B. M. Feskens

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The introduction of robotics in bariatric surgery is a novel development since the beginning of this century. The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcome of the robotic gastric bypass with the laparoscopic counterpart.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted to compare the results of 100 fully robotic gastric bypasses (RGB) and 100 laparoscopic gastric bypasses (LGB) performed by a single surgeon. Surgical outcome was analysed by evaluating operation room time and surgical time, morbidity and mortality, and length of hospital stay.

Results

In the RGB and LGB group, respectively, 92 and 80 % of operated patients were female (p = 0.024). Mean age was 39 (range 20–62, SD 10.21) and 42 years (range 18–65, SD 11.87), respectively (p = 0.158). Mean BMI was 40 (range 35–47, SD 2.66) and 42 (range 35–56, SD 4.75), respectively (p < 0.05). Mean surgical time was 67 (range 39–210, SD 22.46) and 31 min (range 18–62, SD 9.12), respectively (p < 0.05). Mean operation room time was 117 (range 80–257, SD 30.13) and 66 min (range 38–101, SD 12.68), respectively (p < 0.05). The surgery-related 30-day morbidity rate was 5 % in both groups. Major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo class 3–4) was 3 and 1 %, respectively (p = 0.62). There was no mortality. Median hospital stay was two postoperative days in both groups. A learning curve developed after 25 procedures.

Conclusions

The RGB is a feasible procedure. Although more time is needed, a standardized technique results in fair operation times in the hands of an experienced surgeon.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason E, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47:1345–54.PubMed Mason E, Ito C. Gastric bypass in obesity. Surg Clin North Am. 1967;47:1345–54.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wittgrove A, Clark G, Tremblay L. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4:353–7.CrossRefPubMed Wittgrove A, Clark G, Tremblay L. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4:353–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Horgan S, Vanuno D. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11(6):415–9.CrossRefPubMed Horgan S, Vanuno D. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11(6):415–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Talamini M, Chapman S, Horgan S, et al. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Academic Robotics Group. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(10):1521–4.CrossRefPubMed Talamini M, Chapman S, Horgan S, et al. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Academic Robotics Group. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(10):1521–4.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fourman M, Saber A. Robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(4):483–8.CrossRefPubMed Fourman M, Saber A. Robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(4):483–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat NIH Consensus Development Conference Panel for bariatric surgery, Bethesda, March 1991 NIH Consensus Development Conference Panel for bariatric surgery, Bethesda, March 1991
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fried I, Yumuk V, Oppert J, et al. Interdisciplinary European guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Facts. 2013;6(5):449–68.CrossRefPubMed Fried I, Yumuk V, Oppert J, et al. Interdisciplinary European guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Facts. 2013;6(5):449–68.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos A, Silva A, Ramos M, et al. Simplified gastric bypass: 13 years of experience and 12,000 patients operated. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27 Suppl 1:2–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ramos A, Silva A, Ramos M, et al. Simplified gastric bypass: 13 years of experience and 12,000 patients operated. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2014;27 Suppl 1:2–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat DeMaria E, Sugerman H, Kellum J, et al. Results of 281 consecutive total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2002;235(5):640–5. discussion 645-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeMaria E, Sugerman H, Kellum J, et al. Results of 281 consecutive total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2002;235(5):640–5. discussion 645-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterli R, Borbély Y, Kern B, et al. Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2013;258(5):690–4. discussion 695.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peterli R, Borbély Y, Kern B, et al. Early results of the Swiss Multicentre Bypass or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS): a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2013;258(5):690–4. discussion 695.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dillemans B, Sakran N, Van Cauwenberge S, et al. Standardization of the fully stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity reduces early immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality: a single center study on 2606 patients. Obes Surg. 2009;19(10):1355–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dillemans B, Sakran N, Van Cauwenberge S, et al. Standardization of the fully stapled laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity reduces early immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality: a single center study on 2606 patients. Obes Surg. 2009;19(10):1355–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dogan K, Kraaij L, Aarts E, et al. Fast-track bariatric surgery improves perioperative care and logistics compared to conventional care. Obes Surg. 2015;25(1):28–35.CrossRefPubMed Dogan K, Kraaij L, Aarts E, et al. Fast-track bariatric surgery improves perioperative care and logistics compared to conventional care. Obes Surg. 2015;25(1):28–35.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Myers SR, McGuirl J, Wang J. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short-term outcomes. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):467–73.CrossRefPubMed Myers SR, McGuirl J, Wang J. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short-term outcomes. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):467–73.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Park C, Lam E, Walsh T, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery? Surg Endosc. 2011;25(10):3312–21.CrossRefPubMed Park C, Lam E, Walsh T, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery? Surg Endosc. 2011;25(10):3312–21.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagen M, Inan I, Pugin F, et al. The da Vinci surgical system in digestive surgery. Rev Med Suisse. 2007;3(117):1622–6.PubMed Hagen M, Inan I, Pugin F, et al. The da Vinci surgical system in digestive surgery. Rev Med Suisse. 2007;3(117):1622–6.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Benizri E, Renaud M, Reibel N, et al. Perioperative outcomes after totally robotic gastric bypass: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. Am J Surg. 2013;206(2):145–51.CrossRefPubMed Benizri E, Renaud M, Reibel N, et al. Perioperative outcomes after totally robotic gastric bypass: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study. Am J Surg. 2013;206(2):145–51.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs N, Morel P, Azagury D, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(12):2031–9.CrossRefPubMed Buchs N, Morel P, Azagury D, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(12):2031–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu S, Clapp B, Lee M, et al. Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):746–9.CrossRefPubMed Yu S, Clapp B, Lee M, et al. Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses. Am J Surg. 2006;192(6):746–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayloo S, Addeo P, Shah G, et al. Robot-assisted hybrid laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: surgical technique and early outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(10):847–50.CrossRefPubMed Ayloo S, Addeo P, Shah G, et al. Robot-assisted hybrid laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: surgical technique and early outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(10):847–50.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Artuso D, Wayne M, Grossi R. Use of robotics during laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. JSLS. 2005;9(3):266–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Artuso D, Wayne M, Grossi R. Use of robotics during laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity. JSLS. 2005;9(3):266–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohr C, Nadzam G, Alami R, et al. Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass: results from 75 patients. Obes Surg. 2006;16(6):690–6.CrossRefPubMed Mohr C, Nadzam G, Alami R, et al. Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass: results from 75 patients. Obes Surg. 2006;16(6):690–6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hagen M, Pugin F, Chassot G, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):52–61.CrossRefPubMed Hagen M, Pugin F, Chassot G, et al. Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2012;22(1):52–61.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1690–6.CrossRefPubMed Hubens G, Balliu L, Ruppert M, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure performed with the da Vinci robot system: is it worth it? Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1690–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey J, Hayden J, Davis P, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in obese adults ages 18 to 65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(2):414–26.CrossRefPubMed Bailey J, Hayden J, Davis P, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in obese adults ages 18 to 65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(2):414–26.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanchez B, Mohr C, Morton J, et al. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1(6):549–54.CrossRefPubMed Sanchez B, Mohr C, Morton J, et al. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1(6):549–54.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, et al. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):597–603.CrossRefPubMed Scozzari G, Rebecchi F, Millo P, et al. Robot-assisted gastrojejunal anastomosis does not improve the results of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):597–603.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder B, Wilson T, Leong B, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):265–70.CrossRefPubMed Snyder B, Wilson T, Leong B, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: minimizing morbidity and mortality. Obes Surg. 2010;20(3):265–70.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(12):2031–9. doi:10.1007/s11695-014-1335-6.CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Morel P, Azagury DE, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons and long-term follow-up learned from a large prospective monocentric study. Obes Surg. 2014;24(12):2031–9. doi:10.​1007/​s11695-014-1335-6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: update from 2 high-volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):284–8.CrossRefPubMed Tieu K, Allison N, Snyder B, et al. Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: update from 2 high-volume centers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):284–8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Moser F, Horgan S. Robotically assisted bariatric surgery. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4A Suppl):38S–44.CrossRefPubMed Moser F, Horgan S. Robotically assisted bariatric surgery. Am J Surg. 2004;188(4A Suppl):38S–44.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Deng J, Lourié D. 100 robotic-assisted laparoscopic gastric bypasses at a community hospital. Am Surg. 2008;74(10):1022–5.PubMed Deng J, Lourié D. 100 robotic-assisted laparoscopic gastric bypasses at a community hospital. Am Surg. 2008;74(10):1022–5.PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Bindal V, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Masrur M, Elli EF. Technique evolution, learning curve, and outcomes of 200 robot-assisted gastric bypass procedures: a 5-year experience.Obes Surg. 2014;14. Bindal V, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Masrur M, Elli EF. Technique evolution, learning curve, and outcomes of 200 robot-assisted gastric bypass procedures: a 5-year experience.Obes Surg. 2014;14.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Bindal V, Bhatia P, Dudeja U, et al. Review of contemporary role of robotics in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):1–8.CrossRef Bindal V, Bhatia P, Dudeja U, et al. Review of contemporary role of robotics in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):1–8.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Toro J, Lin E, Patel A. Review of robotics in foregut and bariatric surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11(1):16–21.CrossRef Toro J, Lin E, Patel A. Review of robotics in foregut and bariatric surgery. J Minim Access Surg. 2015;11(1):16–21.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs N, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):1116–21.CrossRefPubMed Buchs N, Pugin F, Bucher P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):1116–21.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Renaud M, Reibel N, Zarnegar R, et al. Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1753–60.CrossRefPubMed Renaud M, Reibel N, Zarnegar R, et al. Multifactorial analysis of the learning curve for totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2013;23(11):1753–60.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawson E, Curet M, Sanchez B, et al. Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project. Robot Surg. 2007;1(1):61–7.CrossRef Lawson E, Curet M, Sanchez B, et al. Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project. Robot Surg. 2007;1(1):61–7.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Results of 100 Robotic Versus 100 Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedures: a Single High Volume Centre Experience
verfasst von
R. M. Smeenk
G. van ‘t Hof
E. Elsten
P. G. B. M. Feskens
Publikationsdatum
14.10.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1933-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Obesity Surgery 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.