Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 2/2017

28.07.2016 | Original Contributions

MILEPOST Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: 12-Month Weight Loss and Satiety Outcomes After pose SM vs. Medical Therapy

verfasst von: Karl Miller, R. Turró, J. W. Greve, C. M. Bakker, J. N. Buchwald, J. C. Espinós

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Pose SM is an endolumenal weight-loss intervention in which suture anchors are placed endoscopically in the gastric fundus/distal gastric body. Observational studies of pose have shown safe, effective weight loss. Twelve-month results of a randomized controlled trial comparing weight loss and satiety after pose vs. conventional medical therapy are reported.

Methods

Subjects with classes I–II obesity were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to pose or diet/exercise guidance only (control). Pose subjects received gastric fundus and distal body suture-anchor plications with diet/exercise counseling. Total body (%TBWL) and excess weight loss (%EWL) were assessed at 6 and 12 months. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to analyze 12-month %TBWL. Satiety changes were assessed at 6 and 12 months.

Results

From November 2013 to July 2014, 44 subjects were randomized (34, 77.3 % female; mean age, 38.3 ± 10.7 years; body mass index, 36.5 ± 3.4 kg/m2) to pose (n = 34) or control (n = 10) groups in three centers. Mean pose procedure time was 51.8 ± 14.5 min; pose subjects received a mean 8.8 ± 1.3 fundal and 4.2 ± 0.7 distal body plications. Twelve-month TBWL: pose, 13.0 % (EWL, 45.0 %), n = 30 vs. control group, 5.3 % (18.1 %), n = 9; significant mean difference, 7.7 % (95 % CI 2.2, 13.2; p < 0.01). Pose subjects showed significant reductions in satiety parameters (p < 0.001); controls experienced reduced caloric intake and satiety volume (p < 0.05). No serious device- or procedure-related adverse events occurred.

Conclusions

In a randomized controlled trial at 12 months, pose-treated subjects had significantly greater weight loss than those treated with diet/exercise guidance alone. At 6 and 12 months, pose subjects showed significant reduction in satiety parameters.
Study registration: clinicaltrials.gov identifier # NCT01843231
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH. The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH. The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Aguilar-Valles A, Inoue W, Rummel C, Luheshi GN. Obesity, adipokines, and neuroinflammation. Neuropharmacology. 2015;96(Pt A):124–34 .ReviewCrossRefPubMed Aguilar-Valles A, Inoue W, Rummel C, Luheshi GN. Obesity, adipokines, and neuroinflammation. Neuropharmacology. 2015;96(Pt A):124–34 .ReviewCrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cremieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA, Ghosh A, Yang HE, Buessing M. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(9):589–96.PubMed Cremieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA, Ghosh A, Yang HE, Buessing M. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008;14(9):589–96.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dee A, Kearns K, O'Neill C, Sharp L, Staines A, O'Dwyer V, et al. The direct and indirect costs of both overweight and obesity: a systematic review. BMC Res Notes 2014;7:242. Review. Dee A, Kearns K, O'Neill C, Sharp L, Staines A, O'Dwyer V, et al. The direct and indirect costs of both overweight and obesity: a systematic review. BMC Res Notes 2014;7:242. Review.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1032–40.CrossRefPubMed O’Brien PE, McPhail T, Chaston TB, et al. Systematic review of medium-term weight loss after bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1032–40.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1567–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribaric G, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Diabetes and weight in comparative studies of bariatric surgery vs conventional medical therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2014;24(3):437–55.CrossRefPubMed Ribaric G, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW. Diabetes and weight in comparative studies of bariatric surgery vs conventional medical therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2014;24(3):437–55.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Sledge I. Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2007;142(4):621–32.CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Sledge I. Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2007;142(4):621–32.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Morton JM, Wolfe BM, Schirmer B, Ali M, Traverso LW. The SAGES bariatric surgery outcome inititiave. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1429–38.CrossRefPubMed Nguyen NT, Morton JM, Wolfe BM, Schirmer B, Ali M, Traverso LW. The SAGES bariatric surgery outcome inititiave. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1429–38.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Afonso BB, Rosenthal R, Li KM, Zapatier J, Szomstein S. Perceived barriers to bariatric surgery among morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):16–21.CrossRefPubMed Afonso BB, Rosenthal R, Li KM, Zapatier J, Szomstein S. Perceived barriers to bariatric surgery among morbidly obese patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):16–21.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregory DM, Temple Newhook J, Twells LK. Patients’ perceptions of waiting for bariatric surgery: a qualitative study. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gregory DM, Temple Newhook J, Twells LK. Patients’ perceptions of waiting for bariatric surgery: a qualitative study. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Padwal R, Chang H-J, Klarenbach S, Sharma A, Majumdar S. Characteristics of the population eligible for and receiving publicly funded bariatric surgery in Canada. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Padwal R, Chang H-J, Klarenbach S, Sharma A, Majumdar S. Characteristics of the population eligible for and receiving publicly funded bariatric surgery in Canada. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11:54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahony D. Bariatric surgery attrition secondary to psychological barriers. Clin Obes. 2013;3(1–2):32–8.CrossRefPubMed Mahony D. Bariatric surgery attrition secondary to psychological barriers. Clin Obes. 2013;3(1–2):32–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin M, Beekley A, Kjorstad R, Sebesta J. Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: a national population-based analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):8–15.CrossRefPubMed Martin M, Beekley A, Kjorstad R, Sebesta J. Socioeconomic disparities in eligibility and access to bariatric surgery: a national population-based analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010;6(1):8–15.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma R, Eid G, Ali M, Saber A, Pryor AD. ASMBS emerging technologies and procedures committee. Emerging technologies and procedures: results of an online survey and real-time poll. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(1):161–8.CrossRefPubMed Verma R, Eid G, Ali M, Saber A, Pryor AD. ASMBS emerging technologies and procedures committee. Emerging technologies and procedures: results of an online survey and real-time poll. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(1):161–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Espinós JC, Turró R, Mata A, Cruz M, da Costa M, Villa V, et al. Early experience with the incisionless operating platform™ (IOP) for the treatment of obesity: the primary obesity surgery endolumenal (pose) procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23(9):1375–83.CrossRefPubMed Espinós JC, Turró R, Mata A, Cruz M, da Costa M, Villa V, et al. Early experience with the incisionless operating platform™ (IOP) for the treatment of obesity: the primary obesity surgery endolumenal (pose) procedure. Obes Surg. 2013;23(9):1375–83.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat López-Nava G, Bautistia-Castaño I, Jiminez A, de Grado T, Fernandez-Corbelle JP. The primary obesity surgery endolumenal (pose) procedure: one-year patient weight loss and safety outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):861–5.CrossRefPubMed López-Nava G, Bautistia-Castaño I, Jiminez A, de Grado T, Fernandez-Corbelle JP. The primary obesity surgery endolumenal (pose) procedure: one-year patient weight loss and safety outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):861–5.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Espinós JC, Turró R, Moragas G, Bronstone A, Buchwald JN, Mearin F, et al. Gastrointestinal physiological changes and their relationship to weight loss following the pose procedure. Obes Surg. 2015. Espinós JC, Turró R, Moragas G, Bronstone A, Buchwald JN, Mearin F, et al. Gastrointestinal physiological changes and their relationship to weight loss following the pose procedure. Obes Surg. 2015.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat USGI Medical. Protocol: a randomized controlled multicenter study of an incisionless operating platform for primary obesity vs. diet-exercise alone: The MILEPOST study. 2014. USGI Medical. Protocol: a randomized controlled multicenter study of an incisionless operating platform for primary obesity vs. diet-exercise alone: The MILEPOST study. 2014.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Puigvehi M, Gras-Miralles B, Torra S, Alsina S, et al. Comparison of ad-libitum energy intake and the neuro-endocrine postprandial response as measured during a buffet-type meal and a standardized nutrient drink test. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:S-56. Puigvehi M, Gras-Miralles B, Torra S, Alsina S, et al. Comparison of ad-libitum energy intake and the neuro-endocrine postprandial response as measured during a buffet-type meal and a standardized nutrient drink test. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:S-56.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer-Gerspach AC, Wölnerhanssen B, Beglinger B, Nessenius F, Napitupulu M, Schulte FH, et al. Gastric and intestinal satiation in obese and normal weight healthy people. Physiol Behav. 2014;129:265–71.CrossRefPubMed Meyer-Gerspach AC, Wölnerhanssen B, Beglinger B, Nessenius F, Napitupulu M, Schulte FH, et al. Gastric and intestinal satiation in obese and normal weight healthy people. Physiol Behav. 2014;129:265–71.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Torra S, Ilzarbe L, Malagelada JR, Negre M, Mestre-Fusco A, Aguade-Bruix S, et al. Meal size can be decreased in obese subjects through pharmacological acceleration of gastric emptying (the OBERYTH trial). Int J Obes. 2011;35(6):829–37.CrossRef Torra S, Ilzarbe L, Malagelada JR, Negre M, Mestre-Fusco A, Aguade-Bruix S, et al. Meal size can be decreased in obese subjects through pharmacological acceleration of gastric emptying (the OBERYTH trial). Int J Obes. 2011;35(6):829–37.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat USGI Medical. Randomized controlled multicenter study of an incisionless operating platform for primary obesity vs. diet-exercise alone: the MILEPOST study. TPR41936 Rev F, 2014. USGI Medical. Randomized controlled multicenter study of an incisionless operating platform for primary obesity vs. diet-exercise alone: the MILEPOST study. TPR41936 Rev F, 2014.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjöström L. Review of the key results from the Swedish obese subjects (SOS) trial—a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–34.CrossRefPubMed Sjöström L. Review of the key results from the Swedish obese subjects (SOS) trial—a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–34.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Heo YS, Park JM, Kim YJ, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional therapy in obese Korea patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012;83(6):335–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heo YS, Park JM, Kim YJ, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional therapy in obese Korea patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012;83(6):335–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Shauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Navaneethan SD. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(21):2002–13.CrossRef Shauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Navaneethan SD. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(21):2002–13.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Leccesi L, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1577–85.CrossRefPubMed Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, Guidone C, Iaconelli A, Leccesi L, et al. Bariatric surgery versus conventional medical therapy for type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(17):1577–85.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Maggard-Gibbons M, Maglione M, Livhits M, Ewing B, Maher HR, Hu K, et al. Bariatric surgery for weight loss and glycemic control in nonmorbidly obese adults with diabetes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2250–61.CrossRefPubMed Maggard-Gibbons M, Maglione M, Livhits M, Ewing B, Maher HR, Hu K, et al. Bariatric surgery for weight loss and glycemic control in nonmorbidly obese adults with diabetes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2250–61.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD003641 .Review Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, Frampton GK. Surgery for weight loss in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8:CD003641 .Review
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, Birch D, Karmali S, Manns B, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized medical versus surgical treatment of type 2 diabetes: the search for level 1 evidence. Obes Rev. 2011;12:602–21.CrossRefPubMed Padwal R, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, Birch D, Karmali S, Manns B, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized medical versus surgical treatment of type 2 diabetes: the search for level 1 evidence. Obes Rev. 2011;12:602–21.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen MD, Pories WJ, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen MD, Pories WJ, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson PW, Kannel WB, Silbershatz H, D'Agostino RB. Clustering of metabolic factors and coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(10):1104–9.CrossRefPubMed Wilson PW, Kannel WB, Silbershatz H, D'Agostino RB. Clustering of metabolic factors and coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(10):1104–9.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Korner J, Inabnet W, Conwell IM, et al. Differential effects of gastric bypass and banding on circulating gut hormone and leptin levels. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:1553–61.CrossRef Korner J, Inabnet W, Conwell IM, et al. Differential effects of gastric bypass and banding on circulating gut hormone and leptin levels. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006;14:1553–61.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings DE, Overduin J, Foster-Schubert KE. Gastric bypass for obesity: mechanisms of weight loss and diabetes resolution. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):2608–15.CrossRefPubMed Cummings DE, Overduin J, Foster-Schubert KE. Gastric bypass for obesity: mechanisms of weight loss and diabetes resolution. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):2608–15.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
MILEPOST Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: 12-Month Weight Loss and Satiety Outcomes After pose SM vs. Medical Therapy
verfasst von
Karl Miller
R. Turró
J. W. Greve
C. M. Bakker
J. N. Buchwald
J. C. Espinós
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2295-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

Obesity Surgery 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.