Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Obesity Surgery
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 6/2019

22.03.2019 | Review Article

Mid-long-term Revisional Surgery After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

verfasst von: Bingsheng Guan, Tsz Hong Chong, Juzheng Peng, Yanya Chen, Cunchuan Wang, Jingge Yang

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study aimed to make a meta-analysis regarding mid-long-term outcomes (≥ 3-year follow-up) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), focusing on incidence, reasons, and results of revisional surgery. PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched and 32 studies were included. The overall revision rate was 10.4%, but for patients with ≥ 10-year follow-up, the rate was 22.6%. European studies had a higher revision rate (14.4%) than other studies. The most common reason for revision was failure in weight loss, and the most frequent revisional procedure was gastric bypass. Revisional surgery was favorable for weight reduction and comorbidity resolution. In conclusion, revision rate is not rare after SG, especially when looking at long-term follow-up. Bariatric surgeons and patients need to fully understand and deal with the need for revision after SG.
Literatur
1.
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery and endoluminal procedures: IFSO worldwide survey 2014. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2279–89.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Ricci C, Gaeta M, Rausa E, et al. Long-term effects of bariatric surgery on type II diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia: a meta-analysis and meta-regression study with 5-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):397–405.PubMed
3.
Rosenthal RJ. International sleeve gastrectomy expert panel consensus statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of > 12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):8–19.
4.
English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):259–63.PubMed
5.
De Angelis F, Avallone M, Albanese A, et al. Re-sleeve gastrectomy 4 years later: is it still an effective revisional option? Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3714–6.PubMed
6.
Boru CE, Greco F, Giustacchini P, et al. Short-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy conversion to R-Y gastric bypass: multi-center retrospective study. Langenbeck Arch Surg. 2018;403(4):473–9.
7.
Boza C, Daroch D, Barros D, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(6):1129–33.PubMed
8.
Diamantis T, Apostolou KG, Alexandrou A, et al. Review of long-term weight loss results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(1):177–83.PubMed
9.
Juodeikis Z, Brimas G. Long-term results after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(4):693–9.PubMed
10.
Clapp B, Wynn M, Martyn C, et al. Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(6):741–7.PubMed
11.
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2008;283(15):2000.
12.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336–41.PubMed
13.
Chen J, Wang X, Bai W, et al. Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(4):674–80.PubMed
14.
Richardson WS, Polashenski WA, Robbins BW. Could our pretest probabilities become evidence based? A prospective survey of hospital practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(3):203–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Ruiz-Tovar J, Carbajo MA, Jimenez JM, et al. Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(2):401–10.PubMed
16.
Altieri MS, Yang J, Nie L, et al. Rate of revisions or conversion after bariatric surgery over 10 years in the state of New York. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(4):500–7.PubMed
17.
Peterli R, Wolnerhanssen BK, Peters T, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Chang D, Lee W, Chen J, et al. Thirteen-year experience of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: surgical risk, weight loss, and revision procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(10):2991–7.PubMed
19.
Castagneto Gissey L, Casella Mariolo JR, Genco A, et al. 10-year follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: outcomes in a monocentric series. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(10):1480–7.PubMed
20.
Kowalewski PK, Olszewski R, Walędziak MS, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—a single-center, retrospective study. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):130–4.PubMed
21.
Felsenreich DM, Ladinig LM, Beckerhinn P, et al. Update: 10 years of sleeve gastrectomy—the first 103 patients. Obes Surg. 2018;28(11):3586–94.PubMed
22.
Flølo TN, Andersen JR, Kolotkin RL, et al. Five-year outcomes after vertical sleeve gastrectomy for severe obesity: a prospective cohort study. Obes Surg. 2017;27(8):1944–51.PubMed
23.
Noel P, Nedelcu M, Eddbali I, et al. What are the long-term results 8 years after sleeve gastrectomy? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(7):1110–5.
24.
Mandeville Y, Van Looveren R, Vancoillie P, et al. Moderating the enthusiasm of sleeve gastrectomy: up to fifty percent of reflux symptoms after ten years in a consecutive series of one hundred laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies. Obes Surg. 2017;27(7):1797–803.PubMed
25.
Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes—5-year outcomes. New Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.PubMed
26.
Gadiot RP Biter LU, van Mil S, Zengerink HF, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: 5 to 8-year results. Obes Surg. 2017;27(1):59–63.PubMed
27.
Garofalo F, Denis R, Pescarus R, et al. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients over 65 years old: a retrospective analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;13(1):1–6.PubMed
28.
Lessing Y, Pencovich N, Lahat G, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for diabetics—5-year outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(10):1658–63.PubMed
29.
Yilmaz H, Ece I, Sahin M. Revisional surgery after failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: retrospective analysis of causes, results, and technical considerations. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2855–60.PubMed
30.
Arman GA, Himpens J, Dhaenens J, et al. Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(10):1778–86.PubMed
31.
Seki Y, Kasama K, Hashimoto K. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese Japanese patients. Obes Surg. 2016;26(1):138–45.PubMed
32.
Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Hasani A, et al. Five-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: effects on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and co-morbidities. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(5):960–8.PubMed
33.
Dakour Aridi H, Alami R, Tamim H, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a Lebanese center experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(9):1689–96.PubMed
34.
Casella G, Soricelli E, Giannotti D, et al. Long-term results after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in a large monocentric series. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(4):757–62.PubMed
35.
Dogan K, Gadiot RP, Aarts EO, et al. Effectiveness and safety of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding in morbidly obese patients: a multicenter, retrospective, matched cohort study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(7):1110–8.PubMed
36.
Lee W, Pok E, Almulaifi A, et al. Medium-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a matched comparison with gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1431–8.PubMed
37.
Abd Ellatif ME, Abdallah E, Askar W, et al. Long term predictors of success after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Int J Surg. 2014;12(5):504–8.PubMed
38.
Prevot F, Verhaeghe P, Pequignot A, et al. Two lessons from a 5-year follow-up study of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: persistent, relevant weight loss and a short surgical learning curve. Surgery. 2014;155(2):292–9.PubMed
39.
Sieber P, Gass M, Kern B, et al. Five-year results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(2):243–9.PubMed
40.
Rawlins L, Rawlins MP, Brown CC, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes of a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;9(1):21–5.PubMed
41.
Catheline JM, Fysekidis M, Bachner I, et al. Five-year results of sleeve gastrectomy. J Visc Surg. 2013;150(5):307–12.PubMed
42.
Abbatini F, Capoccia D, Casella G, et al. Long-term remission of type 2 diabetes in morbidly obese patients after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(4):498–502.PubMed
43.
Sarela AI, Dexter SPL, O'Kane M, et al. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 8–9-year results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(6):679–84.PubMed
44.
Bohdjalian A, Langer FB, Shakeri-Leidenmühler S, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy as sole and definitive bariatric procedure: 5-year results for weight loss and ghrelin. Obes Surg. 2010;20(5):535–40.PubMed
45.
Himpens J, Dobbeleir J, Peeters G. Long-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity. Ann Surg. 2010;252(2):319–24.PubMed
46.
Shen XJ, Zhang X, Bi JW, et al. Long-term complications requiring reoperations after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):956–64.PubMed
47.
Shimon O, Keidar A, Orgad R, et al. Long-term effectiveness of laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure. Obes Surg. 2018;28(6):1724–30.PubMed
48.
Quezada N, Hernández J, Pérez G, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: experience in 50 patients after 1 to 3 years of follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(8):1611–5.PubMed
49.
Oor JE, Roks DJ, Unlu C, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2016;211(1):250–67.PubMed
50.
Braghetto I, Csendes A, Korn O, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(3):148–53.PubMed
51.
Daes J, Jimenez ME, Said N, et al. Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms after standardized laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2014;24(4):536–40.PubMed
52.
Malinka T, Zerkowski J, Katharina I, et al. Three-year outcomes of revisional laparoscopic gastric bypass after failed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a case-matched analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2324–30.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Mid-long-term Revisional Surgery After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
verfasst von
Bingsheng Guan
Tsz Hong Chong
Juzheng Peng
Yanya Chen
Cunchuan Wang
Jingge Yang
Publikationsdatum
22.03.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03842-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Obesity Surgery 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Original Contributions

Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Bone Mineral Density: Observational Study of 110 Patients Followed up in a Specialized Center for the Treatment of Obesity in France

Correction

Correction to: Outcomes After Laparoscopic Conversion of Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB) to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) or Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch (SADS)

Letter to the Editor

Esophageal Stricture Due to a Self-Expandable Metal Stent (SEMS) Placement for Post Sleeve Gastrectomy Leak: a Case Report

Letter to the Editor

Response to Letter to the Editor: Left Gastric Artery Embolization for Weight Loss—a Dead-End Procedure

Correction

Correction to: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Change in Ghrelin Levels After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Original Contributions

Absolute and Relative Changes in Ultra-processed Food Consumption and Dietary Antioxidants in Severely Obese Adults 3 Months After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.