Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2017

30.12.2016 | Original Article

Hepatobilio-pancreatic robotic surgery: initial experience from a single center institute

verfasst von: Yolanda Quijano, Emilio Vicente, Benedetto Ielpo, Hipolito Duran, Eduardo Diaz, Isabel Fabra, Luis Malave, Valentina Ferri, Carlos Plaza, Jan Lammel Lindemann, Vito D’Andrea, Riccardo Caruso

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The use of robotic surgery in the hepatobilio-pancreatic (HBP) field is still limited. Our aim is to present our early experience of robotic liver resection. A retrospective review of robotic pancreatic and liver resection was performed at Sanchinarro University hospital from October 2010 to April 2016. Since the beginning of the robotic program in our center, 22 hepatic procedures and 45 pancreatic robotic procedures have been performed. Of the 21 patients subjected to liver resection, 13 (65%) were for malignancy. There were two left hepatectomies, one right hepatectomy, one associated liver partition and portal vein ligation staged procedure (both steps by robotic approach), three bisegmentectomies and three segmentectomies, eight wedge resections, and three pericystectomies. The mean operating time was 282 min. The overall conversion rate and postoperative complication rate were 4.7 and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 13.4 days (range 4–64 days). Of the 45 patients subjected to pancreatic resection, 22 were male and 23 female. The average age of all patients was 62 years (range 31–82 years). The mean operating room (OR) time was 370 min (120–780 min). Among the procedures performed were 15 pancreatico-duodenectomies, 19 distal pancreatectomies, and 11 enucleations. All procedures in the HBP area were R0. Our early experience shows that robotic surgery is a safe and feasible procedure in the HBP area. The complication and mortality rates are comparable to those of open surgery, but with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, Frawley WH, Rege RV, Jones DB (2001) Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182(2):137–142CrossRefPubMed Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST, Frawley WH, Rege RV, Jones DB (2001) Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182(2):137–142CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith CD, Farrel TM, McNatt SS, Metreveli RE (2001) Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg 181:547–550CrossRefPubMed Smith CD, Farrel TM, McNatt SS, Metreveli RE (2001) Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills. Am J Surg 181:547–550CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement. Ann Surg 250:825–830CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection 2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection 2,804 patients. Ann Surg 250:831–841CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Mostaedi R, Milosevic Z, Han HS, Khatri VP (2012) Laparoscopic liver resection: current role and limitations. World J Gastrointest Oncol 4:187–192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mostaedi R, Milosevic Z, Han HS, Khatri VP (2012) Laparoscopic liver resection: current role and limitations. World J Gastrointest Oncol 4:187–192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC (2003) Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 13:33–36CrossRef Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Ellison EC (2003) Robotic resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 13:33–36CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK (2011) Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):471–480CrossRefPubMed Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK (2011) Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18(4):471–480CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6, 336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6, 336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Post hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB 13(8):528–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Post hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB 13(8):528–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Geller DA (2010) Laparoscopic liver resection. current update. Surg Clin N Am 90:749–760CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Geller DA (2010) Laparoscopic liver resection. current update. Surg Clin N Am 90:749–760CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ito K, Ito H, Are C et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a matched pair case control study. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2276–2283CrossRefPubMed Ito K, Ito H, Are C et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a matched pair case control study. J Gastrointest Surg 13(12):2276–2283CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F et al (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford) 12(8):583–586CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259:549–555CrossRefPubMed Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259:549–555CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H et al (2013) Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 27(3):732–739CrossRefPubMed Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H et al (2013) Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 27(3):732–739CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28:2973–2979CrossRefPubMed Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28:2973–2979CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchs NC, Oldani G, Orci LA et al (2014) Current status of robotic liver resection: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 14(2):237–246CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Oldani G, Orci LA et al (2014) Current status of robotic liver resection: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 14(2):237–246CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342CrossRefPubMed Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253(2):342CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8(5):408–410CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreatico-duodenectomy feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23CrossRefPubMed Kendrick ML, Cusati D (2010) Total laparoscopic pancreatico-duodenectomy feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg 145(1):19–23CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Briggs CD, Mann CD, Irving GRB et al (2009) Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. J Gastrointestinal Surg 13(6):1129–1137CrossRef Briggs CD, Mann CD, Irving GRB et al (2009) Systematic review of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. J Gastrointestinal Surg 13(6):1129–1137CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, Ferri V, Quijano Y, Diaz E, Fabra I, Oliva C, Olivares S, Vicente E (2014) Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int J Med Robot Comput Assisted Surg 10(3):280–285CrossRef Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, Ferri V, Quijano Y, Diaz E, Fabra I, Oliva C, Olivares S, Vicente E (2014) Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int J Med Robot Comput Assisted Surg 10(3):280–285CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257(1):128–132CrossRefPubMed Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257(1):128–132CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ielpo B, Caruso R, Prestera A, De Luca GM, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Olivares S, Quijano Y, Vicente E (2015) Arterial pseudoaneurysms following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: a single center experience. JOP 16(1):8–9 Ielpo B, Caruso R, Prestera A, De Luca GM, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Olivares S, Quijano Y, Vicente E (2015) Arterial pseudoaneurysms following hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: a single center experience. JOP 16(1):8–9
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Vicente E, Quijano Y, Ielpo B (2014) Arterial resection for pancreatic cancer: a modern surgeon should change its behavior according to the new therapeutic options. G Chir 35(1–2):5–14PubMedCentral Vicente E, Quijano Y, Ielpo B (2014) Arterial resection for pancreatic cancer: a modern surgeon should change its behavior according to the new therapeutic options. G Chir 35(1–2):5–14PubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Ayloo SM, Bianco FM (2011) Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Pancreas 40(8):1264–1270CrossRefPubMed Giulianotti PC, Addeo P, Buchs NC, Ayloo SM, Bianco FM (2011) Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Pancreas 40(8):1264–1270CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 258(4):554–559PubMedPubMedCentral Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ (2013) 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg 258(4):554–559PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Hepatobilio-pancreatic robotic surgery: initial experience from a single center institute
verfasst von
Yolanda Quijano
Emilio Vicente
Benedetto Ielpo
Hipolito Duran
Eduardo Diaz
Isabel Fabra
Luis Malave
Valentina Ferri
Carlos Plaza
Jan Lammel Lindemann
Vito D’Andrea
Riccardo Caruso
Publikationsdatum
30.12.2016
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0663-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.