nach oben

Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Erschienen in:

01.02.2016 | Review

Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence

verfasst von: Dori L. Klemanski, Kristine K. Browning, Jennifer Kue

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this systematic review was to describe and examine the current use of treatment summaries and survivorship care plans (TSs/SCPs) for cancer survivors, as well as to summarize and critically assess relevant literature regarding their preferences and usefulness. There is a knowledge gap regarding the preferences of stakeholders as to what is useful on a treatment summary or survivorship care plan.

Methods

A systematic review of eligible manuscripts was conducted using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies were identified via PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and the Cochrane Library from 2005 through 2013. Eligible studies were critically appraised with qualitative and quantitative appraisal tools.

Results

There were 29 studies included in this review; 19 were quantitative. Survivors and primary care physicians preferred a printable format delivered 0 to 6 months posttreatment and highlighting signs and symptoms of recurrence, late, and long-term effects, and recommendations for healthy living. Oncology providers supported the concept of treatment summary and survivorship care plan but reported significant barriers to their provision. No studies incorporated caregiver perspectives of treatment summary and survivorship care plan.

Conclusion

This systematic review did not reveal conclusive evidence regarding the needs of survivors or providers regarding treatment summaries and survivorship care plans. A lack of rigorous studies contributed to this.

Implications for cancer survivors

Treatment summaries and survivorship care plans are useful for cancer survivors; however, future rigorous studies should be conducted to identify and prioritize the preferences of survivors regarding these.

Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, editors. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005.

American Cancer Society. Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Facts & Figures 2014-2015. Atlanta.

ASCO Survivorship Care Plan Template In: Cancer survivorship. American Society of Clinical Oncology. http://www.asco.org/practice-research/cancer-survivorship. Accessed December 16, 2014.

Survivorship Care Plan Builder. Journey Forward. 2014. http://www.journeyforward.org/professionals/survivorship-care-plan-builder. Accessed December 16, 2014.

LIVESTRONG™ Care Plan powered by Penn Medicine’s OncoLink. 2014. http://www.livestrongcareplan.org/. Accessed December 16, 2014.

The Prescription for Living Plan. The American Cancer Society, Oncology Nursing Society, the National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship, American Journal of Nursing, and the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing. 2014. http://www.nursingcenter.com/lnc/static?pageid=721732. Accessed December 16, 2014.

What’s Next? Life after Cancer Treatment. In: Cancer survivorship care plan. The Minnesota Cancer Alliance. http://mncanceralliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/SurvivorCarePlan3202012_Final.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2014.

Survivorship Toolkit. Society of Gynecologic Oncology. 2014. https://www.sgo.org/clinical-practice/management/survivorship-toolkit/. Accessed December 16, 2014.

Cancer Program Standards 2012, version 1.2.1: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care Manual. American College of Surgeons. 2014. https://www.facs.org/quality%20programs/cancer/coc/standards. Accessed May 13, 2014.

10.

Birken SA, Mayer DK, Weiner BJ. Survivorship care plans: prevalence and barriers to use. J Canc Educ. 2013. doi:10.1007/s13187-013-0469-x.

11.

Forsythe LP, Parry C, Alfano CM, Kent EE, Leach CR, Haggstrom DA, et al. Use of survivorship care plans in the United States: associations with survivorship care. J Natl Cancer I. 2013. doi:10.1093/jnci/djt258.

12.

Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Risendal B, Jones A, Panzer S, Ganz PA, et al. Survivorship care planning after the institute of medicine recommendations: how are we faring? J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5:358–70.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Merport A, Lemon SC, Nyambose J, Prout MN. The use of cancer treatment summaries and care plans among Massachusetts physicians. Support Care Cancer. 2012. doi:10.1007/s00520-012-1458-z.

14.

Blanch-Hartigan D, Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, Tenbroeck S, Nekhlyudov L, Ganz PA, et al. Provision and discussion of survivorship care plans among cancer survivors: results of a nationally representative survey of oncologists and primary care physicians. J Clin Oncol. 2014. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.51.7540.

15.

Accreditation Committee Clarifications for Standard 3.3 Survivorship Care Plan. In: The CoC source. American College of Surgeons. 2014. https://www.facs.org/publications/newsletters/coc-source/special-source/standard33. Accessed December 16, 2014.

16.

Mayer DK, Birken SA, Check DK, Chen RC. Summing it up: an integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006-2013). Cancer. 2014. doi:10.1002/cncr.28884.

17.

Brennan ME, Gormally JF, Butow P, Boyle FM, Spillane AJ. Survivorship care plans in cancer: a systematic review of care plan outcomes. Brit J Cancer. 2014. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.505.

18.

Oeffinger KC, Hudson MM, Mertens AC, Smith SM, Mitby PA, Eshelman-Kent DA, et al. Increasing rates of breast cancer and cardiac surveillance among high-risk survivors of childhood Hodgkin Lymphoma following a mailed, one-page survivorship care plan. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;56:818–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

19.

Palmer SC, Jacobs LA, DeMichele A, Risendal B, Jones AF, Stricker CT. Metrics to evaluate treatment summaries and survivorship care plans: a scorecard. Support Care Cancer. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-2107-x.

20.

Shalom MM, Hahn EE, Casillas J, Ganz PA. Do survivorship care plans make a difference? a primary care provider perspective. J Oncol Pract. 2011. doi:10.1200/JOP.2010.000208.PubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Dulko D, Pace CM, Dittus KL, Sprague BL, Pollack LA, Hawkins NA, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer survivorship care plans. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013. doi:10.1188/13.ONF.575-580.PubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Hewitt ME, Bamundo A, Day R, Harvey C. Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians. J Clin Oncol. 2007. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0826.PubMed

23.

Jefford M, Lotfi-Jam K, Baravelli C, Grogan S, Rogers M, Krishnasamy M, et al. Development and pilot testing of a nurse-led posttreatment support package for bowel cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs. 2011. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181f22f02.PubMed

24.

Salz T, McCabe MS, Onstad EE, Baxi SS, Deming RL, Franco RA, et al. Survivorship care plans: is there buy-in from community oncology providers? Cancer. 2014. doi:10.1002/cncr.28472.PubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Birken SA, Deal AM, Mayer DK, Weiner BJ. Determinants of survivorship care plan use in US cancer programs. J Cancer Educ. 2014. doi:10.1007/s13187-014-0645-7.

26.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535.

27.

Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology: a power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–9.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Quality Assessment Tool For Quantitative Studies. Effective Public Health Practice Project. 1998. http://www.ephpp.ca/index.html. Accessed May 13, 2014.

29.

Quality Assessment Tool For Quantitative Studies Dictionary. Effective Public Health Practice Project. 2009. http://www.ephpp.ca/PDF/QADictionary_dec2009.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2014.

30.

Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.

31.

Brothers BM, Easley A, Salani R, Andersen BL. Do survivorship care plans impact patients’ evaluations of care? a randomized evaluation with gynecologic oncology patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129:554–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

32.

Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, Maunsell E, Coyle D, Folkes A, et al. Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.36.837.PubMed

33.

Hershman DL, Greenlee H, Awad D, Kalinsky K, Maurer M, Kranwinkel G, et al. Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2486-1.

34.

Baravelli C, Krishnasamy M, Pezaro C, Schofield P, Lotfi-Jam K, Rogers M, et al. The views of bowel cancer survivorship and health care professionals regarding survivorship care plans and post treatment follow-up. J Cancer Surviv. 2009. doi:10.1007/s11764-009-0086-1.PubMed

35.

Blinder VS, Norris VW, Peacock NW, Griggs JJ, Harrington DP, Moore A, et al. Patient perspectives on breast cancer treatment plan and summary documents in community oncology care. Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1002/cncr.27856.PubMedCentral

36.

Brennan ME, Butow P, Spillane J, Boyle FM. Survivorship care after breast cancer: follow-up practices of Australian health professionals and attitudes to a survivorship care plan. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01286.x.PubMed

37.

Burg MA, Lopez EDS, Dailey A, Keller ME, Prendergast B. The potential of survivorship care plans in primary care follow-up of minority breast cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2009. doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1012-y.PubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Faul LA, Rivers B, Shibata D, Townsend I, Carbrera P, Quinn GP, et al. Survivorship care planning in colorectal cancer: feedback from survivors & providers. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2012; doi: 0.1080/07347332.2011.651260.

39.

Haq R, Heus L, Baker NA, Dastur D, Leung FH, Leung E, et al. Designing a multifaceted survivorship care plan to meet the information and communication needs of breast cancer patients and their family physicians: results of a qualitative pilot study. BMC Med Inform Decis. 2013. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-76.

40.

Hill-Kayser CE, Vachani CC, Hampshire MK, Di Lullo G, Jacobs LA, Metz JM. Impact of internet-based cancer survivorship care plans on health care and lifestyle behaviors. Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1002/cncr.28286.PubMed

41.

Kent EE, Arora NK, Rowland JH, Bellizzi KM, Forsythe LP, Hamilton AS, et al. Health information needs and health-related quality of life in a diverse population of long–term cancer survivors. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;89:345–52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Marbach TJ, Griffie J. Patient preference concerning treatment plans, survivorship care plans, education, and support services. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011;38:335–42.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Mayer DK, Gerstel A, Leak AN, Smith SK. Patient and provider preference for survivorship care plans. J Oncol Pract. 2012. doi:10.1200/JOP.2011.000401.

44.

Partridge AH, Norris VW, Blinder VS, Cutter BA, Halpern MT, Malin J, et al. Implementing a breast cancer registry and treatment plan/summary program in clinical practices: a pilot program. Cancer. 2012. doi:10.1002/cncr.27625.PubMedCentral

45.

Salz T, Oeffinger KC, Lewis PR, Williams RL, Rhyne RL, Yeazel MW. Primary care providers’ needs and preferences for information about colorectal cancer survivorship care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012; doi: 0.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120083

46.

Sima JL, Perkins SM, Haggstrom DA. Primary care physician perceptions of adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013. doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000000061.

47.

Singh-Carlson S, Nguyen SKA, Wong F. Perceptions of survivorship care among south Asian female breast cancer survivors. Curr Oncol. 2013;20:80–9.

48.

Singh-Carlson S, Wong F, Martin L, Nguyen SKA. Breast cancer survivorship and South Asian women: understanding about the follow-up care plan and perspective and preferences for information post treatment. Curr Oncol. 2013;20:63–79.

49.

Smith SL, Singh-Carlson S, Downie L, Payeur N, Wai ES. Survivors of breast cancer: patient perspectives on survivorship care planning. J Cancer Surviv. 2011. doi:10.1007/s11764-011-0185-7.

50.

Smith SL, Wai ES, Alexander C, Singh-Carlson S. Caring for survivors of breast cancer: perspective of the primary care physician. Curr Oncol. 2011;18:e218–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

51.

Sprague BL, Dittus KL, Pace CM, Dulko D, Pollack LA, Hawkins NA, et al. Patient satisfaction with breast and colorectal cancer survivorship care plans. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17:266–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

52.

Watson EK, Sugden EM, Rose PW. Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey. J Cancer Surviv. 2010. doi:10.1007/s11764-010-0117-y.PubMed

53.

Wiljer D, Urowitz S, Jones J, Kornblum A, Secord S, Catton P. Exploring the use of survivorship consult in providing survivorship care. Support Care Cancer. 2013. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1760-4.

54.

Reviewers’ Manual, Appendix III. Joanna Briggs Institute. 2014. http://joannabriggs.org/assets/ docs/sumari/ReviewersManual-2014.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2014.

55.

Pluye P, Gagnon MP, Griffiths F, Johnson-Lafleur J. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in mixed studies reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:529–46.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Jagosh J, et al. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:47–53.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Hannes K, Lockwood C, Pearson A. A comparative analysis of three online appraisal instruments’ ability to assess validity in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2010. doi:10.1177/1049732310378656.PubMed

58.

Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, Miller T, Smith J, Young B, et al. Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. Health Serv Res Policy. 2007. doi:10.1258/135581907779497486.

59.

SUMARI: The Joanna Briggs Institute system for the unified management, assessment and review of information. Joanna Briggs Institute. 2007. http://www.joannabriggs.org/sumari.html. Accessed May 13, 2014.

60.

Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, TREND The Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:361–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

61.

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.CrossRef

62.

Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–4.PubMedCrossRef

63.

CONSORT Statement. 2010. http://www.consort-statement.org/downloads/consort-statement. Accessed April 8, 2014.

64.

Armstrong R, Waters E, Doyle J. Chapter 21: reviews in health promotion and public health. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1, The Cochrane Collaboration. 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed April 8, 2104.

65.

De Padova S, Rosti G, Scarpi E, Salvioni R, Amadori D, De Giorgi U. Expectations of survivors, caregivers and healthcare providers for testicular cancer survivorship and quality of life. Tumori. 2011;97:367–73.PubMed

66.

Given BA, Sherwood P, Given CW. Support for caregivers of cancer patients: transition after active treatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0611.PubMed

67.

Dolce MC. The internet as a source of health information: experiences of cancer survivors and caregivers with healthcare providers. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011. doi:10.1188/11.ONF.353-359.PubMed

Titel: Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence
verfasst von: Dori L. Klemanski
Kristine K. Browning
Jennifer Kue
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Elektronische ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-015-0452-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Springer Medizin

Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Implications for cancer survivors

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Update Onkologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Implications for cancer survivors

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Assessing the prevalence of compromised bone health among overweight and obese African-American breast cancer survivors: a case–control study

Educational attainment among long-term survivors of cancer in childhood and adolescence: a Norwegian population-based cohort study

Cultural considerations for South Asian women with breast cancer

Satisfaction with information and unmet information needs in men and women with cancer

Surveillance and beliefs about follow-up care among long-term breast cancer survivors: a comparison of primary care and oncology providers

Physical inactivity and risk of poor quality of life among elderly cancer survivors compared to women without cancer: the Iowa Women’s Health Study

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Adjuvante Brustkrebstherapie: Doppelt hält besser

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

Einladung zum PSA-Screening senkt die Krebssterblichkeit

Update Onkologie