Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology 6/2020

01.06.2020 | Skin Cancer (T Ito, Section Editor)

Current Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastasis

verfasst von: Anupam Rishi, MD, Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu, MD, ScM

Erschienen in: Current Treatment Options in Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Opinion statement

With greater understanding of underlying biology and development of effective BRAF-targeted therapy and immunotherapy, along with remarkable advances in local treatment such as stereotactic radiosurgery, melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) is witnessing continually improving outcome, with 1-year overall survival rate approaching 85%. Given disease complexity and myriad treatment options, all patients with MBM should ideally be evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting to allow an individualized treatment approach based on prognostic groups, molecular classification, number and size of brain metastasis, and performance status. With improving outcome, pendulum has now swayed to focus more on effective treatment modalities with minimal neurological toxicity while maintaining quality of life. Surgery is usually considered in symptomatic and large MBMs, while stereotactic radiosurgery considered in 1–4 lesions, and now also being explored for up to 15 brain metastases for improved local control. The role of whole brain radiotherapy is diminishing given its neurocognitive toxicities and is reserved for patients with diffuse brain involvement. Cytotoxic chemotherapy has largely been ineffective without evidence for survival benefit. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become the cornerstone of management for melanoma brain metastasis with durable intracranial tumor control and excellent toxicity profile. For patients with asymptomatic MBMs, ipilimumab and nivolumab have shown intracranial response near 60% and provides comparable clinical benefit in MBMs as for extracranial metastases. For patients with driver BRAF mutation, BRAFi-/MEKi-targeted agents are proven to be effective in MBM with high rate intracranial responses (44–59%). However, the durability of intracranial responses induced by BRAFi/MEKi seems to be shorter than that of extracranial disease. Emerging data support novel combination of systemic therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, which appears to be safe and effective; however, potential benefits and risks should be evaluated prospectively. Promising ongoing trials will further expand therapeutic evidence in MBM, and patients should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials.
Literatur
20.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Sperduto PW, Jiang W, Brown PD, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Wattson DA, et al. Estimating survival in melanoma patients with brain metastases: an update of the graded prognostic assessment for melanoma using molecular markers (Melanoma-molGPA). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(4):812–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2454 The study updated the DS-GPA specific for MBMs by including molecular markers in a large (n=823) and more contemporary (2006–2015) patient cohort. Melanoma-molGPA scores of 4.0 and 0.0 were associated with the best and worst prognoses. There were 5 significant prognostic factors for survival (age, KPS, extracranial metastases, number of brain metastases, and BRAF status), whereas only KPS and number of brain metastases were included in the original Melanoma-GPA.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral •• Sperduto PW, Jiang W, Brown PD, Braunstein S, Sneed P, Wattson DA, et al. Estimating survival in melanoma patients with brain metastases: an update of the graded prognostic assessment for melanoma using molecular markers (Melanoma-molGPA). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(4):812–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2017.​06.​2454 The study updated the DS-GPA specific for MBMs by including molecular markers in a large (n=823) and more contemporary (2006–2015) patient cohort. Melanoma-molGPA scores of 4.0 and 0.0 were associated with the best and worst prognoses. There were 5 significant prognostic factors for survival (age, KPS, extracranial metastases, number of brain metastases, and BRAF status), whereas only KPS and number of brain metastases were included in the original Melanoma-GPA.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat • Fischer GM, Jalali A, Kircher DA, Lee WC, McQuade JL, Haydu LE, et al. Molecular profiling reveals unique immune and metabolic features of melanoma brain metastases. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(5):628–45. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1489 Comprehensive molecular profiling on MBMs and patient-matched extracranial metastases showed unique MBM biology as compared with patient-matched extracranial metastases.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral • Fischer GM, Jalali A, Kircher DA, Lee WC, McQuade JL, Haydu LE, et al. Molecular profiling reveals unique immune and metabolic features of melanoma brain metastases. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(5):628–45. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1158/​2159-8290.​CD-18-1489 Comprehensive molecular profiling on MBMs and patient-matched extracranial metastases showed unique MBM biology as compared with patient-matched extracranial metastases.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Memantine hydrochloride and whole-brain radiotherapy with or without hippocampal avoidance in reducing neurocognitive decline in patients with brain metastases. https://clinicaltrialsgov/ct2/show/NCT02360215. Memantine hydrochloride and whole-brain radiotherapy with or without hippocampal avoidance in reducing neurocognitive decline in patients with brain metastases. https://​clinicaltrialsgo​v/​ct2/​show/​NCT02360215.​
37.
Zurück zum Zitat • Brown PD, Gondi V, Pugh S, Tome WA, Wefel JS, Armstrong TS et al. Hippocampal Avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy plus memantine for patients with brain metastases: phase III trial NRG oncology CC001. J Clin Oncol. 2020;JCO1902767. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02767 Phase III trial of WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) plus memantine with or without hippocampal avoidance, showed better preservation of neurocognitive function and patient-reported symptoms, with hippocampal avoidance, while achieving similar intracranial control and survival.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral • Brown PD, Gondi V, Pugh S, Tome WA, Wefel JS, Armstrong TS et al. Hippocampal Avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy plus memantine for patients with brain metastases: phase III trial NRG oncology CC001. J Clin Oncol. 2020;JCO1902767. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​19.​02767 Phase III trial of WBRT (30 Gy in 10 fractions) plus memantine with or without hippocampal avoidance, showed better preservation of neurocognitive function and patient-reported symptoms, with hippocampal avoidance, while achieving similar intracranial control and survival.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Muacevic A, Wowra B, Siefert A, Tonn JC, Steiger HJ, Kreth FW. Microsurgery plus whole brain irradiation versus Gamma Knife surgery alone for treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomized controlled multicentre phase III trial. J Neuro-Oncol. 2008;87(3):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-007-9510-4.CrossRef Muacevic A, Wowra B, Siefert A, Tonn JC, Steiger HJ, Kreth FW. Microsurgery plus whole brain irradiation versus Gamma Knife surgery alone for treatment of single metastases to the brain: a randomized controlled multicentre phase III trial. J Neuro-Oncol. 2008;87(3):299–307. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11060-007-9510-4.CrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Rades D, Bohlen G, Pluemer A, Veninga T, Hanssens P, Dunst J, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery alone versus resection plus whole-brain radiotherapy for 1 or 2 brain metastases in recursive partitioning analysis class 1 and 2 patients. Cancer. 2007;109(12):2515–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22729.PubMedCrossRef Rades D, Bohlen G, Pluemer A, Veninga T, Hanssens P, Dunst J, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery alone versus resection plus whole-brain radiotherapy for 1 or 2 brain metastases in recursive partitioning analysis class 1 and 2 patients. Cancer. 2007;109(12):2515–21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​22729.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Brown PD, Jaeckle K, Ballman KV, Farace E, Cerhan JH, Anderson SK, et al. Effect of radiosurgery alone vs radiosurgery with whole brain radiation therapy on cognitive function in patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(4):401–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.9839 The landmark Alliance trial showed lesser cognitive deterioration with SRS alone as compared with WBRT, with similar overall survival. This study abloshed the practice of combined SRS + WBRT, and WBRT is now mostly reserved for diffuse MBMs.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral •• Brown PD, Jaeckle K, Ballman KV, Farace E, Cerhan JH, Anderson SK, et al. Effect of radiosurgery alone vs radiosurgery with whole brain radiation therapy on cognitive function in patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316(4):401–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1001/​jama.​2016.​9839 The landmark Alliance trial showed lesser cognitive deterioration with SRS alone as compared with WBRT, with similar overall survival. This study abloshed the practice of combined SRS + WBRT, and WBRT is now mostly reserved for diffuse MBMs.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Burton S, Amankulor N, Engh J, Flickinger J. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for large brain metastases. https://clinicaltrialsgov/ct2/show/NCT02054689. 2019. Burton S, Amankulor N, Engh J, Flickinger J. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for large brain metastases. https://​clinicaltrialsgo​v/​ct2/​show/​NCT02054689.​ 2019.
55.
Zurück zum Zitat ClinicalTrials.gov. Single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery compared with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery in treating patients with resected metastatic brain disease. https://clinicaltrialsgov/ct2/show/NCT04114981.(12 Jan 2020, date last accessed). ClinicalTrials.gov. Single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery compared with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery in treating patients with resected metastatic brain disease. https://​clinicaltrialsgo​v/​ct2/​show/​NCT04114981.​(12 Jan 2020, date last accessed).
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Serrone L, Zeuli M, Sega FM, Cognetti F. Dacarbazine-based chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: thirty-year experience overview. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2000;19(1):21–34.PubMed Serrone L, Zeuli M, Sega FM, Cognetti F. Dacarbazine-based chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: thirty-year experience overview. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2000;19(1):21–34.PubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiernik PH, Einzig AI. Taxol in malignant melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1993;15:185–7. Wiernik PH, Einzig AI. Taxol in malignant melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1993;15:185–7.
72.
Zurück zum Zitat •• Davies MA, Saiag P, Robert C, Grob JJ, Flaherty KT, Arance A, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma brain metastases (COMBI-MB): a multicentre, multicohort, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(7):863–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30429-1 COMBI-MB is a phase II clinical trial, which showed intracranial response rates between 44% and 59% with dabrafenib and trametinib. The study established this combination for MBMs, and along with COMBI-AD study (NCT01682083) led to FDA approval of this combination.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral •• Davies MA, Saiag P, Robert C, Grob JJ, Flaherty KT, Arance A, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma brain metastases (COMBI-MB): a multicentre, multicohort, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(7):863–73. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(17)30429-1 COMBI-MB is a phase II clinical trial, which showed intracranial response rates between 44% and 59% with dabrafenib and trametinib. The study established this combination for MBMs, and along with COMBI-AD study (NCT01682083) led to FDA approval of this combination.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Giacomo AM, Ascierto PA, Queirolo P, Pilla L, Ridolfi R, Santinami M, et al. Three-year follow-up of advanced melanoma patients who received ipilimumab plus fotemustine in the Italian Network for Tumor Biotherapy (NIBIT)-M1 phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(4):798–803. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdu577.CrossRefPubMed Di Giacomo AM, Ascierto PA, Queirolo P, Pilla L, Ridolfi R, Santinami M, et al. Three-year follow-up of advanced melanoma patients who received ipilimumab plus fotemustine in the Italian Network for Tumor Biotherapy (NIBIT)-M1 phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(4):798–803. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdu577.CrossRefPubMed
86.
Zurück zum Zitat ClinicalTrials.gov. A study of fotemustine (FTM) vs FTM and ipilimumab (IPI) or IPI and nivolumab in melanoma brain metastasis (NIBITM2). https://clinicaltrialsgov/ct2/show/NCT02460068. (12 Dec 2019, date last accessed). ClinicalTrials.gov. A study of fotemustine (FTM) vs FTM and ipilimumab (IPI) or IPI and nivolumab in melanoma brain metastasis (NIBITM2). https://​clinicaltrialsgo​v/​ct2/​show/​NCT02460068.​ (12 Dec 2019, date last accessed).
88.
Zurück zum Zitat • Goldberg SB, Gettinger SN, Mahajan A, Chiang AC, Herbst RS, Sznol M, et al. Pembrolizumab for patients with melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer and untreated brain metastases: early analysis of a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):976–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30053-5 This phase II study was initial and seminal evidence to show durable response rate of 22–26% with pembrolizumab in untreated MBMs with an acceptable safety profile. Important to note in this study, brain metastasis and systemic responses were concordant.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral • Goldberg SB, Gettinger SN, Mahajan A, Chiang AC, Herbst RS, Sznol M, et al. Pembrolizumab for patients with melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer and untreated brain metastases: early analysis of a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):976–83. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(16)30053-5 This phase II study was initial and seminal evidence to show durable response rate of 22–26% with pembrolizumab in untreated MBMs with an acceptable safety profile. Important to note in this study, brain metastasis and systemic responses were concordant.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
89.
Zurück zum Zitat • Tawbi HA, Forsyth PA, Algazi A, Hamid O, Hodi FS, Moschos SJ, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in melanoma metastatic to the brain. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(8):722–30. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1805453 Landmark phase II study CheckMate 204 investigated combination of nivolumab + ipilimumab in asymptomatic non-irradiated MBM, which showed intracranial response of 57%, including 26% complete response rates, which was concordant with extracranial activity. Although relatively small non-randomized study, reported data is pertinent to clinical practice with given the high intracranial and extracranial response rate, rapid time to response, and manageable side-effect profile.PubMedCrossRef • Tawbi HA, Forsyth PA, Algazi A, Hamid O, Hodi FS, Moschos SJ, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in melanoma metastatic to the brain. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(8):722–30. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1805453 Landmark phase II study CheckMate 204 investigated combination of nivolumab + ipilimumab in asymptomatic non-irradiated MBM, which showed intracranial response of 57%, including 26% complete response rates, which was concordant with extracranial activity. Although relatively small non-randomized study, reported data is pertinent to clinical practice with given the high intracranial and extracranial response rate, rapid time to response, and manageable side-effect profile.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Current Treatment of Melanoma Brain Metastasis
verfasst von
Anupam Rishi, MD
Hsiang-Hsuan Michael Yu, MD, ScM
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Treatment Options in Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1527-2729
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6277
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00733-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Current Treatment Options in Oncology 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Neuroendocrine Cancers (JR Strosberg, Section Editor)

Hereditary Syndromes in Neuroendocrine Tumors

Leukemia (PH Wiernik, Section Editor)

Biology and Treatment of Hairy Cell Leukemia

Neuroendocrine Cancers (JR Strosberg, Section Editor)

Surgical Principles in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.