Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Diabetes Reports
Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports 6/2018

01.06.2018 | Obesity (J McCaffery, Section Editor)

Social Media and Obesity in Adults: a Review of Recent Research and Future Directions

verfasst von: Molly E. Waring, Danielle E. Jake-Schoffman, Marta M. Holovatska, Claudia Mejia, Jamasia C. Williams, Sherry L. Pagoto

Erschienen in: Current Diabetes Reports | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Social media is widely used and has potential to connect adults with obesity with information and social support for weight loss and to deliver lifestyle interventions. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent observational and intervention research on social media and obesity.

Recent Findings

Online patient communities for weight loss abound but may include misinformation. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that social media-delivered lifestyle interventions modestly impact weight, yet how social media was used and participant engagement varies widely.

Summary

The rapidly changing social media landscape poses challenges for patients, clinicians, and researchers. Research is needed on how patients can establish supportive communities for weight loss and the role of clinicians in these communities. Emerging research on meaningful engagement in, and the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of, social media-delivered lifestyle interventions should provide insights into how to leverage social media to address the obesity epidemic.
Literatur
1.
Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2015-2016. NCHS Data Brief 2017;(288):1–8.
2.
3.
Guh DP, Zhang W, Bansback N, Amarsi Z, Birmingham CL, Anis AH. The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, Ard JD, Comuzzie AG, Donato KA, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S102–38.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Renehan AG, Roberts DL, Dive C. Obesity and cancer: pathophysiological and biological mechanisms. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2008;114(1):71–83.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Tsai AG, Williamson DF, Glick HA. Direct medical cost of overweight and obesity in the USA: a quantitative systematic review. Obes Rev. 2011;12(1):50–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Dee A, Kearns K, O’Neill C, Sharp L, Staines A, O’Dwyer V, et al. The direct and indirect costs of both overweight and obesity: a systematic review. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
DPP Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393–403.CrossRef
9.
Wing RR. Long-term effects of a lifestyle intervention on weight and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: four-year results of the Look AHEAD trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(17):1566–75.PubMed
10.
Oster G, Thompson D, Edelsberg J, Bird AP, Colditz GA. Lifetime health and economic benefits of weight loss among obese persons. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(10):1536–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zhao Y, Zhang J. Consumer health information seeking in social media: a literature review. Health Inf Libr J. 2017;34(4):268–83.CrossRef
12.
13.
Madden KM. The seasonal periodicity of healthy contemplations about exercise and weight loss: ecological correlational study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017;3(4):e92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Attai DJ, Cowher MS, Al-Hamadani M, Schoger JM, Staley AC, Landercasper J. Twitter social media is an effective tool for breast cancer patient education and support: patient-reported outcomes by survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(7):e188.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Myneni S, Fujimoto K, Cobb N, Cohen T. Content-driven analysis of an online community for smoking cessation: integration of qualitative techniques, automated text analysis, and affiliation networks. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(6):1206–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Rus HM, Cameron LD. Health communication in social media: message features predicting user engagement on diabetes-related Facebook pages. Ann Behav Med. 2016;50(5):678–89.CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
So J, Prestin A, Lee L, Wang Y, Yen J, Chou WY. What do people like to “share” about obesity? A content analysis of frequent retweets about obesity on Twitter. Health Commun. 2016;31(2):193–206.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Lydecker JA, Cotter EW, Palmberg AA, Simpson C, Kwitowski M, White K, et al. Does this tweet make me look fat? A content analysis of weight stigma on Twitter. Eat Weight Disord. 2016;21(2):229–35.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Pagoto S, Schneider KL, Evans M, Waring ME, Appelhans B, Busch AM, et al. Tweeting it off: characteristics of adults who tweet about a weight loss attempt. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(6):1032–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Pappa GL, Cunha TO, Bicalho PV, Ribeiro A, Couto Silva AP, Meira W Jr, et al. Factors associated with weight change in online weight management communities: a case study in the LoseIt Reddit community. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Hwang KO, Ning J, Trickey AW, Sciamanna CN. Website usage and weight loss in a free commercial online weight loss program: retrospective cohort study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(1):e11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
32.
Evans M, Faghri PD, Pagoto SL, Schneider KL, Waring ME, Whited MC, et al. The weight loss blogosphere: an online survey of weight loss bloggers. Translat Behav Med: Pract Policy Res. 2016;6(3):403–9.CrossRef
33.
May CN, Waring ME, Rodrigues S, Oleski JL, Olendzki E, Evans M, et al. Weight loss support seeking on Twitter: the impact of weight on follow back rates and interactions. Transl Behav Med.
34.
Scanfeld D, Scanfeld V, Larson EL. Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(3):182–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Park S, Oh HK, Park G, Suh B, Bae WK, Kim JW, et al. The source and credibility of colorectal cancer information on Twitter. Medicine. 2016;95(7):e2775.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Lazard AJ, Saffer AJ, Wilcox GB, Chung AD, Mackert MS, Bernhardt JM. E-cigarette social media messages: a text mining analysis of marketing and consumer conversations on Twitter. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016;2(2):e171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Syed-Abdul S, Fernandez-Luque L, Jian WS, Li YC, Crain S, Hsu MH, et al. Misleading health-related information promoted through video-based social media: anorexia on YouTube. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Park M, Sun Y, McLaughlin ML. Social media propagation of content promoting risky health behavior. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017;20(5):278–85.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Modave F, Shokar NK, Penaranda E, Nguyen N. Analysis of the accuracy of weight loss information search engine results on the internet. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(10):1971–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Cardel MI, Chavez S, Bian J, Penaranda E, Miller DR, Huo T, et al. Accuracy of weight loss information in Spanish search engine results on the internet. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2016;24(11):2422–34.CrossRef
41.
Wilkinson JL, Strickling K, Payne HE, Jensen KC, West JH. Evaluation of diet-related infographics on Pinterest for use of behavior change theories: a content analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016;4(4):e133.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Basch CH, Fung IC, Menafro A, Mo C, Yin J. An exploratory assessment of weight loss videos on YouTube. Public Health. 2017;151:31–8.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Mogul DB, Nagy PG, Bridges JFP. Building stronger online communities through the creation of Facebook-integrated health applications. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(10):933–4.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Breland JY, Quintiliani LM, Schneider KL, May CN, Pagoto S. Social media as a tool to increase the impact of public health research. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(12):1890–1.CrossRefPubMed
45.
46.
Alpert JM, Womble FE. Just what the doctor tweeted: physicians’ challenges and rewards of using twitter. Health Commun. 2016;31(7):824–32.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Hart M, Stetten N, Islam S, Pizarro K. Twitter and public health (part 2): qualitative analysis of how individual health professionals outside organizations use microblogging to promote and disseminate health-related information. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017;3(4):e54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Zimmermann M, Jucks R. How experts’ use of medical technical jargon in different types of online health forums affects perceived information credibility: randomized experiment with laypersons. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(1):e30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Tan SS, Goonawardene N. Internet health information seeking and the patient-physician relationship: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Farnan JM, Snyder Sulmasy L, Worster BK, Chaudhry HJ, Rhyne JA, Arora VM. Online medical professionalism: patient and public relationships: policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(8):620–7.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Helm J, Jones RM. Practice paper of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: social media and the dietetics practitioner: opportunities, challenges, and best practices. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016;116(11):1825–35.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Abbass MAA, Keshava HB, Delaney CP. The bigger picture: picking the right soap box-is it possible to connect with different audience targets (practitioners and patients) from the same platform? Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(4):281–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
• Pagoto S, Waring ME, May CN, Ding EY, Kunz WH, Hayes R, et al. Adapting behavioral interventions for social media delivery. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e24. How to adapt behavioral interventions for social media delivery, including an overview of the characteristics, strengths, and limitations of popular commercial social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
55.
Ciao AC, Latner JD, Durso LE. Treatment seeking and barriers to weight loss treatments of different intensity levels among obese and overweight individuals. Eat Weight Disord. 2012;17(1):e9–16.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Mailey E, Huberty J, Dinkel D, McAuley E. Physical activity barriers and facilitators among working mothers and fathers. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):657.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
57.
58.
Fisher W, Piazza C, Roane H. Handbook of applied behavior analysis. New York: Guildford Press; 2011.
59.
Chang T, Chopra V, Zhang C, Woolford SJ. The role of social media in online weight management: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11):e262.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Maher CA, Lewis LK, Ferrar K, Marshall S, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Laranjo L, Arguel A, Neves AL, Gallagher AM, Kaplan R, Mortimer N, et al. The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015;22(1):243–56.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Ashrafian H, Toma T, Harling L, Kerr K, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Social networking strategies that aim to reduce obesity have achieved significant although modest results. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(9):1641–7.CrossRef
63.
Willis EA, Szabo-Reed AN, Ptomey LT, Steger FL, Honas JJ, Washburn RA, et al. Do weight management interventions delivered by online social networks effectively improve body weight, body composition, and chronic disease risk factors? A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2016;
64.
• An R, Ji M, Zhang S. Effectiveness of social media-based interventions on weight-related behaviors and body weight status: review and meta-analysis. Am J Health Behav. 2017;41(6):670–82. Systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes 22 social media-delivered interventions for weight or weight-related behaviors. CrossRefPubMed
65.
Pagoto S, Waring M, Olendzki E, Oleski J, May C, Evans M. The feasibility of incentivizing participation in an online social network weight loss program. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences [peer-reviewed manuscript]. 2017.
66.
Waring ME, Moore Simas TA, Oleski J, Xiao RS, Mulcahy JA, May CN, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of delivering a postpartum weight loss intervention via Facebook: a pilot study. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018;50(1):70–4.e1.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Willis EA, Szabo-Reed AN, Ptomey LT, Steger FL, Honas JJ, Al-Hihi EM, et al. Distance learning strategies for weight management utilizing social media: a comparison of phone conference call versus social media platform. Rationale and design for a randomized study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;47:282–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
68.
Pagoto SL, Waring ME, Schneider KL, Oleski JL, Olendzki E, Hayes RB, et al. Twitter-delivered behavioral weight loss interventions: a pilot series. JMIR Res Proc. 2015;4(4):e123.CrossRef
69.
Wang ML, Waring ME, Jake-Schoffman DE, Oleski JL, Michaels Z, Goetz JM, et al. Clinic versus online social network-delivered lifestyle interventions: protocol for the get social noninferiority randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protocols. 2017;6(12):e243.CrossRef
70.
71.
Turner-McGrievy G, Tate D. Weight loss social support in 140 characters or less: use of an online social network in a remotely-delivered weight loss intervention. Transl Behav Med: Pract Policy Res. 2013;3(3):287–94.CrossRef
72.
Hales S, Davidson C, Turner-McGrievy G. Varying social media post types differentially impacts engagement in a behavioral weight loss intervention. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4(4):355–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Pagoto S, Waring M, Olendzki E, Oleski J, May C, Evans M. The feasibility of incentivizing participation in an online social network weight loss program. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences [peer-reviewed manuscript]. 2017;http://​hdl.​handle.​net/​10125/​41615
74.
Cavallo DN, Sisneros JA, Ronay AA, Robbins CL, Jilcott Pitts SB, Keyserling TC, et al. Assessing the feasibility of a web-based weight loss intervention for low-income women of reproductive age: a pilot study. JMIR Res Protocols. 2016;5(1):e30.CrossRef
75.
Napolitano MA, Hayes S, Bennett GG, Ives AK, Foster GD. Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2013;21(1):25–31.CrossRef
76.
Turner-McGrievy G, Tate D. Tweets, apps, and pods: results of the 6-month mobile pounds off digitally (Mobile POD) randomized weight-loss intervention among adults. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
77.
West DS, Monroe CM, Turner-McGrievy G, Sundstrom B, Larsen C, Magradey K, et al. A technology-mediated behavioral weight gain prevention intervention for college students: controlled, quasi-experimental study. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(6):e133.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
78.
Herring SJ, Cruice JF, Bennett GG, Rose MZ, Davey A, Foster GD. Preventing excessive gestational weight gain among African American women: a randomized clinical trial. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md). 2016;24(1):30–6.CrossRef
79.
• Pagoto S, Waring ME, Jake-Schoffman DE, Goetz J, Michaels Z, Oleski J, et al. What type of engagement predictors success in a Facebook weight loss group? Proceedings of the 51th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences [peer-reviewed manuscript]. 2018:3304-12. https://​scholarspace.​manoa.​hawaii.​edu/​handle/​10125/​50307. What types of participant posts are associated with greater weight loss in a lifestyle intervention delivered via a secret Facebook group.
80.
Aschbrenner KA, Naslund JA, Shevenell M, Kinney E, Bartels SJ. A pilot study of a peer-group lifestyle intervention enhanced with mHealth technology and social media for adults with serious mental illness. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016;204(6):483–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
81.
Aschbrenner KA, Naslund JA, Shevenell M, Mueser KT, Bartels SJ. Feasibility of behavioral weight loss treatment enhanced with peer support and mobile health technology for individuals with serious mental illness. Psychiatric Q. 2016;87(3):401–15.CrossRef
82.
Chung AE, Skinner AC, Hasty SE, Perrin EM. Tweeting to health: a novel mHealth intervention using Fitbits and Twitter to foster healthy lifestyles. Clin Pediatr. 2016;
83.
Herring SJ, Cruice JF, Bennett GG, Davey A, Foster GD. Using technology to promote postpartum weight loss in urban, low-income mothers: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(6):610–5.
84.
Rus HM, Cameron LD. Health communication in social media: message features predicting user engagement on diabetes-related Facebook pages. Ann Behav Med. 2016;50(5):678–689.
85.
Thrul J, Klein AB, Ramo DE. Smoking cessation intervention on Facebook: which content generates the best engagement? J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(11):e244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
86.
Merchant G, Weibel N, Patrick K, Fowler JH, Norman GJ, Gupta A, et al. Click “like” to change your behavior: a mixed methods study of college students’ exposure to and engagement with Facebook content designed for weight loss. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
87.
Veale HJ, Sacks-Davis R, Weaver ER, Pedrana AE, Stoove MA, Hellard ME. The use of social networking platforms for sexual health promotion: identifying key strategies for successful user engagement. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
88.
Cavallo D, Tate D, Ward D, DeVellis R, Thayer L, Ammerman A. Social support for physical activity—role of Facebook with and without structured intervention. Transl Behav Med. 2014;4(4):346–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
89.
Archer E, Groessl EJ, Sui X, McClain AC, Wilcox S, Hand GA, et al. An economic analysis of traditional and technology-based approaches to weight loss. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(2):176–82.CrossRefPubMed
90.
Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H, Reed SD, Augustovski F, Jonsson B, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II—an ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health. 2015;18(2):161–72.CrossRefPubMed
91.
92.
93.
Riley WT, Glasgow RE, Etheredge L, Abernethy AP. Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clin Transl Med. 2013;2(1):10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
94.
95.
96.
97.
Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a tool for health research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(1):e1–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
98.
Henderson M, Johnson NF, Auld G. Silences of ethical practice: dilemmas for researchers using social media. Educ Res Eval. 2013;19(6):546–60.CrossRef
99.
• Hunter RF, Gough A, O’Kane N, McKeown G, Fitzpatrick A, Walker T, et al. Ethical issues in social media research for public health. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(3):343–8. Key ethical issues in social media research and discusses potential strategies for addressing these concerns. CrossRefPubMed
100.
Moreno MA, Goniu N, Moreno PS, Diekema D. Ethics of social media research: common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(9):708–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
101.
102.
103.
Torous J, Nebeker C. Navigating ethics in the digital age: introducing Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE), a tool for researchers and institutional review boards. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(2):e38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Social Media and Obesity in Adults: a Review of Recent Research and Future Directions
verfasst von
Molly E. Waring
Danielle E. Jake-Schoffman
Marta M. Holovatska
Claudia Mejia
Jamasia C. Williams
Sherry L. Pagoto
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Diabetes Reports / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1534-4827
Elektronische ISSN: 1539-0829
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-1001-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Current Diabetes Reports 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Diabetes Epidemiology (E Selvin and K Foti, Section Editors)

Sex Differences in the Burden and Complications of Diabetes

Pediatric Type 2 and Monogenic Diabetes (PS Zeitler and O Pinhas-Hamiel, Section Editors)

Type 2 Diabetes in Youth: New Lessons from the SEARCH Study

Other Forms of Diabetes and Its Complications (JJ Nolan and H Thabit, Section Editors)

Diabetes in South Asians: Phenotype, Clinical Presentation, and Natural History

Pediatric Type 2 and Monogenic Diabetes (PS Zeitler and O Pinhas-Hamiel, Section Editors)

Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes in Japan: Similarities and Differences from Type 2 Diabetes in Other Pediatric Populations

Obesity (J McCaffery, Section Editor)

Causes of Emotional Eating and Matched Treatment of Obesity

Pediatric Type 2 and Monogenic Diabetes (PS Zeitler and O Pinhas-Hamiel, Section Editors)

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, the Metabolic Syndrome, and Its Components in Adult Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Nachrichten

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Prävention und Rehabilitation in der Kardiologie | Nachrichten

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger
weitere anzeigen

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise