Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Erschienen in: Current Pain and Headache Reports 2/2012

01.04.2012 | Psychiatric Management of Pain (MR Clark, Section Editor)

The Patient-Provider Relationship in Chronic Pain

verfasst von: Kevin E. Vowles, Miles Thompson

Erschienen in: Current Pain and Headache Reports | Ausgabe 2/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The relationship between patient and provider has long been the subject of study within the psychotherapy literature, with the available data suggesting a modest, but reliable, association between the strength of this relationship and treatment outcome. Conversely, there has been little work focused on the patient–provider relationship in chronic pain settings despite the complexities and difficulties that are often involved in this area. This review provides a brief, broad overview of the literature on the patient–provider relationship and identifies key aspects that are specifically relevant to chronic pain settings. In addition to reviewing the literature in this area, a series of recommendations for future clinical and academic work are offered.
Literatur
1.
• Norcross JC, Lambert MJ. Psychotherapy relationships that work II. Psychother 2011;48:4–8. This is the introduction to a special issue on the patient–provider relationship in psychotherapy. The article provides an overview of the area and, in addition to the rest of the articles within the issue, specifies aspects of the relationship that are reliably related to outcomes. CrossRef
2.
Mumford E, Schlesinger HJ, Glass GV. The effect of psychological intervention on recovery from surgery and heart attacks: an analysis of the literature. Am J Public Health. 1982;72:141–51.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Jamison RN. Nonspecific treatment effects in pain medicine. Pain Clinical Updates. 2011;9:1–7.
4.
Safran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, et al. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Family Practice. 1998;47:213–20.
5.
Makoul G. Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement. Acad Med. 2001;76:390–3.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Wasan AD, Wootton J, Jamison RN. Dealing with difficult patients in your pain practice. Region Anesth Pain Med. 2005;30:184–92.
7.
Burns JW, Higdon LJ, Mullen JT, Lansky D, Wei JM. Relationships among patient hostility, anger expression, depression, and the working alliance in a work hardening program. Ann Beh Med. 1999;21:77–82.CrossRef
8.
Rogers CR. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. J Consult Psychol. 1957;21:95–103.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Horvath AO, Symonds BD. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: a meta-analysis. J Couns Psychol. 1991;38:149–39.CrossRef
10.
Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review. J Consulting Clin Psych. 2000;68:438–50.CrossRef
11.
Horvath AO, Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Symonds D. Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychother. 2011;48:9–16.CrossRef
12.
13.
Burlingame GM, McClendon DT, Alonso J. Cohesion in group therapy. Psychother. 2011;48:34–42.CrossRef
14.
Elliott R, Bohart AC, Watson JC, Greenberg LS. Empathy. Psychother. 2011;48:43–9.CrossRef
15.
16.
Kolden GG, Klein MH, Wang C-C, Austin SB. Congruence/genuineness. Psychother. 2011;48:65–71.CrossRef
17.
Grencavage LM, Norcross JC. Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1990;21:372–8.CrossRef
18.
Myers S. Empathic listening: reports on the experience of being heard. J Humanist Psychol. 2000;40:148–73.CrossRef
19.
Lewis M, Morley S, van der Windt DAWM, et al. Measuring practitioner/therapist effects in randomised trials of low back pain and neck pain interventions in primary care settings. Eur J Pain. 2010;14:1033–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Williams ACDC, Potts HWW. Group membership and staff turnover affect outcomes in group CBT for persistent pain. Pain. 2010;148:481–6.PubMedCrossRef
21.
De Ruddere L, Goubert L, Prkachin KM, et al. When you dislike patients, pain is taken less seriously. Pain. 2011;152:2342–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Gulbrandsen P, Madsen HB, Benth JS, Laerum E. Health care providers communicate less well with patients with chronic low back pain: a study of encounters at a back pain clinic in Denmark. Pain. 2010;150:458–61.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Tryon GS, Winograd G. Goal consensus and collaboration. Psychother. 2011;48:50–7.CrossRef
24.
Frantsve LME, Kerns RD. Patient-provider interactions in the management of chronic pain: current findings within the context of shared medical decision making. Pain Med. 2007;8:25–35.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Hirsh AT, Atchison JW, Berger JJ, et al. Patient satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain: predictors and relationship to compliance. Clin J Pain. 2005;21:302–10.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Smith MY, Winkel G, Egert J, Diaz-Wionczek M, DuHamel KN. Patient-physician communication in the context of persistent pain: validation of a modified version of the Patients’ Perceived Involvement in Care Scale. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2006;32:71–81.CrossRef
27.
Thorne FM, Morley S. Prospective judgments of acceptable outcomes for pain, interference and activity: patient-determined outcome criteria. Pain. 2009;144:262–9.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Robinson ME, Brown JL, George SZ, et al. Multidimensional success criteria and expectations for treatment of chronic pain: the patient perspective. Pain Med. 2005;6:336–45.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Dobkin PL, Sita A, Sewitch MJ. Predictors of adherence to treatment in women with fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain;22:286–94.
30.
Baker SC, Gallois C, Driedger SM, Santesso N. Communication accommodation and managing musculoskeletal disorders: doctors’ and patients’ perspectives. Health Commun. 2011;26:379–88.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Benner DE. Who can help me? A chronic pain patient’s view of multidisciplinary treatment. In: Schatman M, Campbell M, editors. Chronic pain management: guidelines for multidisciplinary program development. New York: Informa; 2007. p. 117–28.
32.
Vowles KE, Robinson ME. Progressing towards acceptable treatment outcomes. Pain. 2009;144:228–9.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Norcross JC, Wampold BE. Evidence-based therapy relationships: research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychother. 2011;48:98–102.CrossRef
34.
Leila NM, Pirkko H, Eeva P, Eija K, Reino P. Training medical students to manage a chronic pain patient: both knowledge and communication skills are needed. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:167–70.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Baldwin SA, Wampold BE, Imel ZE. Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. J Cons Consulting Psych. 2007;75:842–52.CrossRef
36.
Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. New York: Guilford; 2002.
37.
Vong SK, Cheing GL, Chan F, So EM, Chan CC. Motivational enhancement therapy in addition to physical therapy improves motivational factors and treatment outcomes in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2011;92:176–83.CrossRef
38.
Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Revicki D, et al. Identifying important outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: an IMMPACT survey of people with pain. Pain. 2008;137:276–85.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Beale M, Cella M, Williams ACDC. Comparing patients’ and clinician-researchers’ outcome choice for psychological treatment of chronic pain. Pain. 2011;152:2283–6.PubMedCrossRef
40.
•• Morley S. Efficacy and effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic pain: progress and some challenges. Pain 2011;152:S99–S106. This is a review and commentary on the progressive developments within cognitive and behavioral approaches to chronic pain. It also identifies areas in need of further work and challenges to be addressed. PubMedCrossRef
41.
Thompson M, McCracken LM. Acceptance and related processes in adjustment to chronic pain. Curr Pain Headache R. 2011;15:144–51.CrossRef
42.
Vowles KE, McCracken LM, O’Brien JZ. Acceptance and values-based action in chronic pain: a three-year follow-up analysis of treatment effectiveness and process. Beh Res Ther. 2011;49:748–55.CrossRef
43.
Hayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson KG. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford; 1999.
44.
Kohlenberg RJ, Tsai M. Functional analytic psychotherapy: creating intense and curative therapeutic relationships. New York: Springer; 2007.
45.
Linehan M. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford; 1993.
46.
• Hayes SC, Villatte M, Levin M, Hildebrandt M. Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annu Rev Clin Psych 2011;7:141–68. This is a comprehensive review of the emerging contextual approaches that includes both a conceptual overview and empirical review. CrossRef
47.
Pierson H, Hayes S. Using acceptance and commitment therapy to empower the therapeutic relationship. In: Gilbert P, Leahy RL, editors. The therapeutic relationship in the cognitive behavioral psychotherapies. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2007. p. 205–28.
48.
Lambert MJ, Shimokawa K. Collecting client feedback. Psychother. 2011;48:72–9.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Patient-Provider Relationship in Chronic Pain
verfasst von
Kevin E. Vowles
Miles Thompson
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2012
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Pain and Headache Reports / Ausgabe 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1531-3433
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3081
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-012-0244-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2012

Current Pain and Headache Reports 2/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Psychiatric Management of Pain (MR Clark, Section Editor)

Health Economics of Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain: Does it Support or Invalidate the Outcomes Research of These Programs?

Psychiatric Management of Pain (MR Clark, Section Editor)

Operant Learning Theory in Pain and Chronic Pain Rehabilitation

Psychiatric Management of Pain (MR Clark, Section Editor)

Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome: What Specialized Rehabilitation Services Do Patients Require?

Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias (M Matharu, Section Editor)

Interictal Pain in Primary Headache Syndromes

Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias (M Matharu, Section Editor)

Traumatic Head Injury in Cluster Headache: Cause or Effect?

Psychiatric Management of Pain (MR Clark, Section Editor)

Focused Review of Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs for Chronic Pain Management

Neu im Fachgebiet AINS

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen | Nachrichten

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung
weitere anzeigen

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

hier abonnieren