Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports 4/2016

01.04.2016 | Minimally Invasive Surgery (T Guzzo, Section Editor)

Minimally Invasive (“Mini”) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Classification, Indications, and Outcomes

verfasst von: Sasha C. Druskin, Justin B. Ziemba

Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Minimally invasive endoscopic procedures are often employed for the surgical removal of kidney stones. Traditionally, large stones are removed by (standard) percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SPCNL). Although effective for the clearance of large stone burdens, SPCNL is associated with significant morbidity. Therefore, in an effort to reduce this morbidity, while preserving efficacy, mini-PCNL (MPCNL) with a smaller tract size (<20 French) was developed. Several studies suggest that MPCNL has a comparable stone-free rate to SPCNL. However, the question of lower morbidity with MPCNL remains unanswered. In this review, we describe the equipment, indications, and efficacy of MPCNL with particular attention to its value over traditional minimally invasive stone removal techniques.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Scales Jr CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Urologic diseases in America P. prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scales Jr CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS. Urologic diseases in America P. prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62:160–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ordon M, Urbach D, Mamdani M, Saskin R, RJ DAH, Pace KT. The surgical management of kidney stone disease: a population based time series analysis. J Urol. 2014;192:1450–6.CrossRefPubMed Ordon M, Urbach D, Mamdani M, Saskin R, RJ DAH, Pace KT. The surgical management of kidney stone disease: a population based time series analysis. J Urol. 2014;192:1450–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173:1991–2000.CrossRefPubMed Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173:1991–2000.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K. EAU Guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2015. Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K. EAU Guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2015.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25:11–7.CrossRefPubMed de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25:11–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NP, et al. Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol. 2011;25:933–9.CrossRefPubMed Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NP, et al. Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol. 2011;25:933–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 1998;16:371–4.CrossRefPubMed Jackman SV, Docimo SG, Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. The “mini-perc” technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 1998;16:371–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.•
Zurück zum Zitat Wright AE, Somani BK, Rukin NJ. Proposition for new terminologies in PCNL: what does ‘ultra-mini-micro’ actually mean? Urolithiasis. 2014;42:539–40. This article comprehensively describes the hardware available for the currently available minimally-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy systems. CrossRefPubMed Wright AE, Somani BK, Rukin NJ. Proposition for new terminologies in PCNL: what does ‘ultra-mini-micro’ actually mean? Urolithiasis. 2014;42:539–40. This article comprehensively describes the hardware available for the currently available minimally-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy systems. CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc. World J Urol. 2015;33(2):235–40.CrossRefPubMed Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc. World J Urol. 2015;33(2):235–40.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X, Yang S, Xia Y, Ruan Y. Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol. 2010;24:1579–82.CrossRefPubMed Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X, Yang S, Xia Y, Ruan Y. Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol. 2010;24:1579–82.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C, Kurien A, Sabnis R, Desai M. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int. 2011;108(6):896–9. discussion899–900.PubMed Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C, Kurien A, Sabnis R, Desai M. Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int. 2011;108(6):896–9. discussion899–900.PubMed
13.••
Zurück zum Zitat Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol. 2010;24(7):1075–9. This article is a contemporary meta-analysis comparing standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of stone free rate, operative characteristics, complications, and patient reported outcomes. It should be considered the highest-level of available evidence demonstrating that standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy have equivalent stone free rate. CrossRefPubMed Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol. 2010;24(7):1075–9. This article is a contemporary meta-analysis comparing standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in terms of stone free rate, operative characteristics, complications, and patient reported outcomes. It should be considered the highest-level of available evidence demonstrating that standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy have equivalent stone free rate. CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, Lei M, Yuan J, Wan SP. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):563–70.CrossRefPubMed Zhu W, Liu Y, Liu L, Lei M, Yuan J, Wan SP. Minimally invasive versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(6):563–70.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Matlaga BR, Hodges SJ, Shah OD, Passmore L, Hart LJ, Assimos DG. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: predictors of length of stay. J Urol. 2004;172:1351–4.CrossRefPubMed Matlaga BR, Hodges SJ, Shah OD, Passmore L, Hart LJ, Assimos DG. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: predictors of length of stay. J Urol. 2004;172:1351–4.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(3):241–6.CrossRefPubMed Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L, Guneri C, Unsal A, Biri H. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis. 2013;41(3):241–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M. Treating renal calculi 1–2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study. BJU Int. 2012;110((8 Pt B)):E346–9.CrossRefPubMed Sabnis RB, Jagtap J, Mishra S, Desai M. Treating renal calculi 1–2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study. BJU Int. 2012;110((8 Pt B)):E346–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JW, Park J, Lee SB, Son H, Cho SY, Jeong H. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones larger than 10 mm: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urology. 2015;86:873–7.CrossRefPubMed Lee JW, Park J, Lee SB, Son H, Cho SY, Jeong H. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones larger than 10 mm: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urology. 2015;86:873–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Herrmann TR, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol. 2013;31(6):1555–61.CrossRefPubMed Kruck S, Anastasiadis AG, Herrmann TR, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy. World J Urol. 2013;31(6):1555–61.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiremit MC, Guven S, Sarica K, et al. Contemporary management of medium-sized (10–20 mm) renal stones: a retrospective multicenter observational study. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):838–43.CrossRefPubMed Kiremit MC, Guven S, Sarica K, et al. Contemporary management of medium-sized (10–20 mm) renal stones: a retrospective multicenter observational study. J Endourol. 2015;29(7):838–43.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar Jha S, Kumar R, Singh H. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol. 2015;193(1):160–4.CrossRefPubMed Kumar A, Kumar N, Vasudeva P, Kumar Jha S, Kumar R, Singh H. A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience. J Urol. 2015;193(1):160–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Minimally Invasive (“Mini”) Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Classification, Indications, and Outcomes
verfasst von
Sasha C. Druskin
Justin B. Ziemba
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Urology Reports / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-016-0591-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Current Urology Reports 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Female Urology (K Kobashi, Section Editor)

Mesh Excision: Is Total Mesh Excision Necessary?

Female Urology (K Kobashi, Section Editor)

Female Bladder Outlet Obstruction

Female Urology (K Kobashi, Section Editor)

Management of the Recurrent Male Urethral Stricture

Female Urology (K Kobashi, Section Editor)

Female Sexual Dysfunction: Is It a Treatable Disease?

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.