Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports 12/2016

01.12.2016 | Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction (H Goldman and G Badlani, Section Editors)

Failure of Expectations in Vaginal Surgery: Lack of Appropriate Consent, Goals and Expectations of Surgery

verfasst von: Debjyoti Karmakar, Peter L. Dwyer

Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and Background

Vaginal surgery for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence (USI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using a synthetic polypropylene mesh is going through a time of unprecedented turmoil and debate. This review focuses on vaginal surgery for vaginal prolapse and looks at the current scientific literature on issues surrounding surgery including consent and expectations.

Safety and Effectiveness of Surgical Options

Synthetic mesh has been used both abdominally and vaginally to improve the effectiveness of POP surgery. The relatively high incidence of mesh complications particularly with vaginal surgery has lead to repeat surgery, disappointment and litigation in some women. The benefits and risks of the various POP procedures are reviewed including native tissue repair, uterine conservation and obliterative vaginal surgery.

Conclusion

Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and their doctors have many treatment options. The benefits and risks should be discussed as part of shared decision making.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Morgan JE. A sling operation, using Marlex polypropylene mesh, for treatment of recurrent stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970;106(3):369–77.CrossRefPubMed Morgan JE. A sling operation, using Marlex polypropylene mesh, for treatment of recurrent stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970;106(3):369–77.CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ulmsten U, Petros P. Surgery for female urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;4(3):456–62.CrossRefPubMed Ulmsten U, Petros P. Surgery for female urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;4(3):456–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones KA, Shepherd JP, Oliphant SS, et al. Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979-2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:501–e1.PubMedPubMedCentral Jones KA, Shepherd JP, Oliphant SS, et al. Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979-2006. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:501–e1.PubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, de Tayrac R, Dietz V, Guldberg R, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):755.e1–755.e27. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.017.CrossRef Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, de Tayrac R, Dietz V, Guldberg R, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):755.e1–755.e27. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2015.​02.​017.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(7):789–98.CrossRefPubMed Abed H, Rahn DD, Lowenstein L, Balk EM, Clemons JL, Rogers RG, et al. Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(7):789–98.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rardin CR, Washington BB. New considerations in the use of vaginal mesh for prolapse repair. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:360–4. PubMed: 19423069.CrossRefPubMed Rardin CR, Washington BB. New considerations in the use of vaginal mesh for prolapse repair. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009;16:360–4. PubMed: 19423069.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat ••Davila GW, Baessler K, Cosson M, Cardozo L. Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:S7–S14. This document provides guidance from the IUGA regarding patient individualisation and expertise in the use of vaginal graft. The guidance aims to reduce morbidity from graft use and safeguard clinicians and patients alike from adverse outcomes.CrossRefPubMed ••Davila GW, Baessler K, Cosson M, Cardozo L. Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:S7–S14. This document provides guidance from the IUGA regarding patient individualisation and expertise in the use of vaginal graft. The guidance aims to reduce morbidity from graft use and safeguard clinicians and patients alike from adverse outcomes.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat ••Ow LL, Lim YN, Dwyer PL, Karmakar D, Murray C, Thomas E, et al. Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes? Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Sep;27(9):1313–20. This series of native tissue and mesh vaginal repairs provides a realistic picture of the advantages and risks of surgery for POP over a 10-year period. ••Ow LL, Lim YN, Dwyer PL, Karmakar D, Murray C, Thomas E, et al. Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes? Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Sep;27(9):1313–20. This series of native tissue and mesh vaginal repairs provides a realistic picture of the advantages and risks of surgery for POP over a 10-year period.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):242–50.CrossRefPubMed Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(2 Pt 1):242–50.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Achtari C, Hiscock R, O’Reilly BA, Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL. Risk factors for mesh erosion after transvaginal surgery using polypropylene (Atrium) or composite polypropylene/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(5):389–94.CrossRefPubMed Achtari C, Hiscock R, O’Reilly BA, Schierlitz L, Dwyer PL. Risk factors for mesh erosion after transvaginal surgery using polypropylene (Atrium) or composite polypropylene/polyglactin 910 (Vypro II) mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005;16(5):389–94.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Brill AI. The hoopla over mesh: what it means for practice. Obstetrics and Gynecology News. 2012;14–15. Brill AI. The hoopla over mesh: what it means for practice. Obstetrics and Gynecology News. 2012;14–15.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Araco F, Gravante G, Sorge R, Overton J, De Vita D, Primicerio M, Dati S, Araco P, Piccione E.The influence of BMI, smoking, and age on vaginal erosions after synthetic mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapses. A multicenter study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(7):772–80. doi:10.1080/00016340903002840. Araco F, Gravante G, Sorge R, Overton J, De Vita D, Primicerio M, Dati S, Araco P, Piccione E.The influence of BMI, smoking, and age on vaginal erosions after synthetic mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapses. A multicenter study.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(7):772–80. doi:10.​1080/​0001634090300284​0.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P, HaDuc E, Lucot JP, Cosson M. Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17:315. Collinet P, Belot F, Debodinance P, HaDuc E, Lucot JP, Cosson M. Transvaginal mesh technique for pelvic organ prolapse repair: mesh exposure management and risk factors. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17:315.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, Kluivers KB, Milani AL. Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(3):629–36. Withagen MI, Vierhout ME, Hendriks JC, Kluivers KB, Milani AL. Risk factors for exposure, pain, and dyspareunia after tension-free vaginal mesh procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(3):629–36.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Caquant F, Collinet P, Debodinance P, et al. Safety of transvaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(4):449–56. PubMed: 18937698.CrossRefPubMed Caquant F, Collinet P, Debodinance P, et al. Safety of transvaginal mesh procedure: retrospective study of 684 patients. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008;34(4):449–56. PubMed: 18937698.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat ••Kuhlmann-Capek MJ, Kilic GS, Shah AB, Diken ZM, Snyder RR, Phelps III JY. Enmeshed in controversy: use of vaginal mesh in the current medicolegal environment. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(5):241–3. This article evaluates the current medicolegal situation and controversies surrounding vaginal mesh. It is a good guide for readers to understand the basis of medicolegal claims with vaginal mesh and is a useful reference in the context of the review.CrossRefPubMed ••Kuhlmann-Capek MJ, Kilic GS, Shah AB, Diken ZM, Snyder RR, Phelps III JY. Enmeshed in controversy: use of vaginal mesh in the current medicolegal environment. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21(5):241–3. This article evaluates the current medicolegal situation and controversies surrounding vaginal mesh. It is a good guide for readers to understand the basis of medicolegal claims with vaginal mesh and is a useful reference in the context of the review.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dwyer PL. Choice of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: vaginal or abdominal, native tissue or synthetic grafts, open abdominal versus laparoscopic or robotic. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(9):1151–2.CrossRefPubMed Dwyer PL. Choice of pelvic organ prolapse surgery: vaginal or abdominal, native tissue or synthetic grafts, open abdominal versus laparoscopic or robotic. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(9):1151–2.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz JN, Losina E, Barrett J, et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(11):1622–9.CrossRefPubMed Katz JN, Losina E, Barrett J, et al. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(11):1622–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber AM, Walters MD. Burch procedure compared with sling for stress urinary incontinence: a decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(6):867–73.PubMed Weber AM, Walters MD. Burch procedure compared with sling for stress urinary incontinence: a decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(6):867–73.PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bandarian M, Ghanbari Z, Asgari A. Comparison of transobturator tape (TOT) vs Burch method in treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(6):518–20.CrossRefPubMed Bandarian M, Ghanbari Z, Asgari A. Comparison of transobturator tape (TOT) vs Burch method in treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(6):518–20.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Zebede S, Smith AL, Plowright LN, et al. Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis in a large group of elderly women. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2 Pt 1):279–84.CrossRefPubMed Zebede S, Smith AL, Plowright LN, et al. Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis in a large group of elderly women. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(2 Pt 1):279–84.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyson MD, Wolter CE. A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(2):151–5. doi:10.1002/nau.22522. ​Tyson MD, Wolter CE. A comparison of 30-day surgical outcomes for minimally invasive and open sacrocolpopexy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(2):151–5. doi:10.​1002/​nau.​22522.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P, et al. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):377–84. ​Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, Frappell J, Bombieri L, Moran P, et al. A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):377–84. 
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR. Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG. 2005;112(8):1134–8. ​Higgs PJ, Chua HL, Smith AR. Long term review of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. BJOG. 2005;112(8):1134–8.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Teleman P, Laurikainen E, Kinne I, Pogosean R, Jakobsson U, Rudnicki M. Relationship between the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(2):195–200. doi:10.1007/s00192-014-2434-6. ​Teleman P, Laurikainen E, Kinne I, Pogosean R, Jakobsson U, Rudnicki M. Relationship between the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q), the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) before and after anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(2):195–200. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-014-2434-6.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Rachedi LS, Lesavre M, Pourcelot AG, Fournet S, Capmas P, Fernandez HJ. [Assessment patient’s sexuality after prolapse repair using the Elevate™ kit]. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016;45(7):661–72. [Article in French]. Rachedi LS, Lesavre M, Pourcelot AG, Fournet S, Capmas P, Fernandez HJ. [Assessment patient’s sexuality after prolapse repair using the Elevate™ kit]. Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016;45(7):661–72. [Article in French].
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Jirschele K, Seitz M, Zhou Y, Rosenblatt P, Culligan P, Sand P. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):743–8.CrossRefPubMed Jirschele K, Seitz M, Zhou Y, Rosenblatt P, Culligan P, Sand P. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(5):743–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Feiner B, Maher C. Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:325–30.CrossRefPubMed Feiner B, Maher C. Vaginal mesh contraction: definition, clinical presentation, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:325–30.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber AM, Walter MD, Piedmonte MR. Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1610–15. Weber AM, Walter MD, Piedmonte MR. Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:1610–15.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Agnew G, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Lim Y, Edwards G, Lee JK. Functional outcomes following surgical management of pain, exposure or extrusion following a suburethral tape insertion for urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(2):235–9. Agnew G, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, Lim Y, Edwards G, Lee JK. Functional outcomes following surgical management of pain, exposure or extrusion following a suburethral tape insertion for urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(2):235–9.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng S-C, Chen G-D. Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women aged 70 years and over. Taiwanese J Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;55(1):68–71. Ng S-C, Chen G-D. Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women aged 70 years and over. Taiwanese J Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;55(1):68–71.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat • Moen M, Noone M, Vassallo B. Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):857–62. This reference highlights the importance of surgeon experience and role of surgical volume in setting realistic expectations in patients and improving patient reported outcomes. • Moen M, Noone M, Vassallo B. Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):857–62. This reference highlights the importance of surgeon experience and role of surgical volume in setting realistic expectations in patients and improving patient reported outcomes.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellington DR, Richter HE. The role of vaginal mesh procedures in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in view of complication risk. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:356960. doi:10.1155/2013/356960 Ellington DR, Richter HE. The role of vaginal mesh procedures in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in view of complication risk. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;2013:356960. doi:10.​1155/​2013/​356960
Metadaten
Titel
Failure of Expectations in Vaginal Surgery: Lack of Appropriate Consent, Goals and Expectations of Surgery
verfasst von
Debjyoti Karmakar
Peter L. Dwyer
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Urology Reports / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-016-0642-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

Current Urology Reports 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms & Voiding Dysfunction (H Goldman and G Badlani, Section Editors)

Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.