Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2014

01.01.2014 | Symposium: 2013 Knee Society Proceedings

The Effect of Geometric Variations in Posterior-stabilized Knee Designs on Motion Characteristics Measured in a Knee Loading Machine

verfasst von: Peter S. Walker, PhD, Michael T. Lowry, BS, Anoop Kumar, MS

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 1/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In different posterior-stabilized (PS) total knees, there are considerable variations in condylar surface radii and cam-post geometry. To what extent these variations affect kinematics is not known. Furthermore, there are no clearly defined ideal kinematics for a total knee.

Questions/purposes

The purposes of this study were to determine (1) what the kinematic differences are caused by geometrical variations between PS total knee designs in use today; and (2) what design characteristics will produce kinematics that closely resemble that of the normal anatomic knee.

Methods

Four current PS designs with different geometries and one experimental asymmetric PS design, with a relatively conforming medial side, were tested in a purpose-built machine. The machine applied combinations of compressive, shear, and torque forces at a sequence of flexion angles to represent a range of everyday activities, consistent with the ASTM standard test for measuring constraint. The femorotibial contact points, the neutral path of motion, and the AP and internal-external laxities were used as the kinematic indicators.

Results

The PS designs showed major differences in motion characteristics among themselves and with motion data from anatomic knees determined in a previous study. Abnormalities in the current designs included symmetric mediolateral motion, susceptibility to excessive AP medial laxity, and reduced laxity in high flexion. The asymmetric-guided motion design alleviated some but not all of the abnormalities.

Conclusions

Current PS designs showed kinematic abnormalities to a greater or lesser extent. An asymmetric design may provide a path to achieving a closer match to anatomic kinematics.

Clinical Relevance

One criterion for the evaluation of PS total knees is how closely the kinematics of the prosthesis resemble that of the anatomic knee, because this is likely to affect the quality of function.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat ASTM Standard F1223-08. Determination of Total Knee Replacement Constraint. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International; 2008. ASTM Standard F1223-08. Determination of Total Knee Replacement Constraint. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International; 2008.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:35–57. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Haas BD, Stiehl JB. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:35–57.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat DesJardins JD, Banks SA, Benson LC, Pace T, LaBerge M. A direct comparison of patient and force-controlled simulator total knee replacement kinematics. J Biomech. 2007;40:3458–3466.PubMedCrossRef DesJardins JD, Banks SA, Benson LC, Pace T, LaBerge M. A direct comparison of patient and force-controlled simulator total knee replacement kinematics. J Biomech. 2007;40:3458–3466.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Lima DD, Poole C, Chadha H, Hermida JC, Mahar A, Colwell CW Jr. Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:213–220.PubMedCrossRef D’Lima DD, Poole C, Chadha H, Hermida JC, Mahar A, Colwell CW Jr. Quadriceps moment arm and quadriceps forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:213–220.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Eckhoff D, Hogan C, DiMatteo L, Robinson M, Bach J. Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:238–244.PubMed Eckhoff D, Hogan C, DiMatteo L, Robinson M, Bach J. Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:238–244.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzpatrick CK, Clary CW, Rullkoetter PJ. The role of patient, surgical, and implant design variation in total knee replacement performance. J Biomech. 2012;45:2092–2102.PubMedCrossRef Fitzpatrick CK, Clary CW, Rullkoetter PJ. The role of patient, surgical, and implant design variation in total knee replacement performance. J Biomech. 2012;45:2092–2102.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Galloway F, Worsley P, Stokes M, Nair P, Taylor M. Development of a statistical model of knee kinetics for applications in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech. 2012;45:191–195.PubMedCrossRef Galloway F, Worsley P, Stokes M, Nair P, Taylor M. Development of a statistical model of knee kinetics for applications in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech. 2012;45:191–195.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Haider H. Tribological assessment of UHMWPE in the knee. In: Kurtz SM, ed. UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook—Ultra-high molecular Weight Polyethylene in Total Joint Replacement and Medical Devices. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier Publishing; 2012. Haider H. Tribological assessment of UHMWPE in the knee. In: Kurtz SM, ed. UHMWPE Biomaterials Handbook—Ultra-high molecular Weight Polyethylene in Total Joint Replacement and Medical Devices. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier Publishing; 2012.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Haider H, Walker PS. Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement. J Biomech. 2005;38:341–348.PubMedCrossRef Haider H, Walker PS. Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement. J Biomech. 2005;38:341–348.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Haider H, Walker PS, DesJardins J, Blunn G. Effects of patient and surgical alignment variables on kinematics in TKR simulation under force-control. JAI. 2006;3:3–14. Haider H, Walker PS, DesJardins J, Blunn G. Effects of patient and surgical alignment variables on kinematics in TKR simulation under force-control. JAI. 2006;3:3–14.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Halloran JP, Clary CW, Maletsky LP, Taylor M, Petrella AJ, Rullkoetter PJ. Verification of predicted knee replacement kinematics during simulated gait in the Kansas knee simulator. J Biomech Eng. 2010;132:081010.PubMedCrossRef Halloran JP, Clary CW, Maletsky LP, Taylor M, Petrella AJ, Rullkoetter PJ. Verification of predicted knee replacement kinematics during simulated gait in the Kansas knee simulator. J Biomech Eng. 2010;132:081010.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hein CS, Postak PD, Plaxton NA, Greenwald AS. Classification of mobile-bearing knee designs: mobility and constraint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;2:32–37. Hein CS, Postak PD, Plaxton NA, Greenwald AS. Classification of mobile-bearing knee designs: mobility and constraint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;2:32–37.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinlein B, Kutzner I, Graichen F, Bender A, Rohlmann A, Halder AM, Beier A, Bergmann G. ESB clinical biomechanics award 2008: complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6–10 months. Clin Biomech. 2009;24:315–326.CrossRef Heinlein B, Kutzner I, Graichen F, Bender A, Rohlmann A, Halder AM, Beier A, Bergmann G. ESB clinical biomechanics award 2008: complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6–10 months. Clin Biomech. 2009;24:315–326.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler O, Durselen L, Banks S, Mannel H, Marin F. Sagittal curvature of total knee replacements predicts in vivo kinematics. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:52–58.CrossRef Kessler O, Durselen L, Banks S, Mannel H, Marin F. Sagittal curvature of total knee replacements predicts in vivo kinematics. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:52–58.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Li G, Most E, Sultan PG, Schule S, Zayontz S, Park SE, Rubash HE. Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1721–1729.PubMed Li G, Most E, Sultan PG, Schule S, Zayontz S, Park SE, Rubash HE. Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1721–1729.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Li G, Papannagari R, Most E, Park SE, Johnson T, Tanamal L, Rubash HE. Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:536–541.PubMedCrossRef Li G, Papannagari R, Most E, Park SE, Johnson T, Tanamal L, Rubash HE. Anterior tibial post impingement in a posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:536–541.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin KJ, Huang CH, Liu YL, Chen WC, Chang TW, Yang CT, Lai YS, Cheng CK. Influence of post-cam design of posterior stabilized knee prosthesis on tibiofemoral motion during high knee flexion. Clin Biomech. 2011;26:847–852.CrossRef Lin KJ, Huang CH, Liu YL, Chen WC, Chang TW, Yang CT, Lai YS, Cheng CK. Influence of post-cam design of posterior stabilized knee prosthesis on tibiofemoral motion during high knee flexion. Clin Biomech. 2011;26:847–852.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Luger E, Sathasivam S, Walker PS. Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements. Knee. 1997;4:7–14.CrossRef Luger E, Sathasivam S, Walker PS. Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements. Knee. 1997;4:7–14.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mihalko WM, Conner DJ, Benner R, Williams JL. How does TKA kinematics vary with transverse plane alignment changes in a contemporary implant? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:186–192.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mihalko WM, Conner DJ, Benner R, Williams JL. How does TKA kinematics vary with transverse plane alignment changes in a contemporary implant? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:186–192.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Moran MF, Bhimji S, Racanello J, Piazza SJ. Computational assessment of constraint in total knee replacement. J Biomech. 2008;41:2013–2020.PubMedCrossRef Moran MF, Bhimji S, Racanello J, Piazza SJ. Computational assessment of constraint in total knee replacement. J Biomech. 2008;41:2013–2020.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Most E, Axe J, Rubash H, Li G. Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. J Biomech. 2004;37:1743–1748.PubMedCrossRef Most E, Axe J, Rubash H, Li G. Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. J Biomech. 2004;37:1743–1748.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ngai V, Wimmer MA. Kinematic evaluation of cruciate-retaining total knee replacement patients during level walking: a comparison with the displacement-controlled ISO standard. J Biomech. 2009;42:2363–2368.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ngai V, Wimmer MA. Kinematic evaluation of cruciate-retaining total knee replacement patients during level walking: a comparison with the displacement-controlled ISO standard. J Biomech. 2009;42:2363–2368.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pritchett JW. Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or the medial pivot total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:224–228.PubMedCrossRef Pritchett JW. Patients prefer a bicruciate-retaining or the medial pivot total knee prosthesis. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:224–228.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton LG, Werner FW, Haider H, Hamblin T, Clabeaux JJ. In vitro response of the natural cadaver knee to the loading profiles specified in a standard for knee implant wear testing. J Biomech. 2010;43:2203–2207.PubMedCrossRef Sutton LG, Werner FW, Haider H, Hamblin T, Clabeaux JJ. In vitro response of the natural cadaver knee to the loading profiles specified in a standard for knee implant wear testing. J Biomech. 2010;43:2203–2207.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajan KM, Harry RE, Johnson T, Li G. Can in vitro systems capture the characteristic differences between the flexion-extension kinematics of the healthy and TKA knee? Med Eng Phys. 2009;31:899–906.PubMedCrossRef Varadarajan KM, Harry RE, Johnson T, Li G. Can in vitro systems capture the characteristic differences between the flexion-extension kinematics of the healthy and TKA knee? Med Eng Phys. 2009;31:899–906.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Victor J, Labey L, Wong P, Innocenti B, Bellemans J. The influence of muscle load on tibiofemoral knee kinematics. J Orthop Res. 2009;28:419–428. Victor J, Labey L, Wong P, Innocenti B, Bellemans J. The influence of muscle load on tibiofemoral knee kinematics. J Orthop Res. 2009;28:419–428.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker PS, Glauber SM, Haoting W. Laboratory evaluation method for the functional performance of total knee replacements. JAI. 2012 Apr 1 [Epub ahead of print]. Walker PS, Glauber SM, Haoting W. Laboratory evaluation method for the functional performance of total knee replacements. JAI. 2012 Apr 1 [Epub ahead of print].
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker PS, Haider H. Standard testing methods for mobile bearing knees. JAI. 2011 Nov 8 [Epub ahead of print]. Walker PS, Haider H. Standard testing methods for mobile bearing knees. JAI. 2011 Nov 8 [Epub ahead of print].
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker PS, Heller Y, Cleary DJ, Yildirim G. Preclinical evaluation method for total knees designed to restore normal knee mechanics. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:152–160.PubMedCrossRef Walker PS, Heller Y, Cleary DJ, Yildirim G. Preclinical evaluation method for total knees designed to restore normal knee mechanics. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:152–160.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker PS, Heller Y, Yildirim I, Immerman I. Reference axes for comparing the motion of knee replacements with the anatomic knee. Knee. 2011;18:312–316.PubMedCrossRef Walker PS, Heller Y, Yildirim I, Immerman I. Reference axes for comparing the motion of knee replacements with the anatomic knee. Knee. 2011;18:312–316.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker PS, Sussman-Fort JM, Yildirim G, Boyer J. Design features of total knees for achieving normal knee motion characteristics. J Arthroplasty. 2008;24:475–483.PubMedCrossRef Walker PS, Sussman-Fort JM, Yildirim G, Boyer J. Design features of total knees for achieving normal knee motion characteristics. J Arthroplasty. 2008;24:475–483.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Willing R, Kim IY. Design optimization of a total knee replacement for improved constraint and flexion kinematics. J Biomech. 2011;44:1014–1020.PubMedCrossRef Willing R, Kim IY. Design optimization of a total knee replacement for improved constraint and flexion kinematics. J Biomech. 2011;44:1014–1020.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Yildirim G, Walker PS, Boyer J. Total knees designed for normal kinematics evaluated in an up-and-down crouching machine. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:1022–1027.PubMedCrossRef Yildirim G, Walker PS, Boyer J. Total knees designed for normal kinematics evaluated in an up-and-down crouching machine. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:1022–1027.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Effect of Geometric Variations in Posterior-stabilized Knee Designs on Motion Characteristics Measured in a Knee Loading Machine
verfasst von
Peter S. Walker, PhD
Michael T. Lowry, BS
Anoop Kumar, MS
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 1/2014
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3088-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2014

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.